Internet Engineering Task Force T. Hansen Internet-Draft AT&T Laboratories Updates: RFC 3458 (if approved) June 23, 2004 Expires: December 22, 2004 Video-Message Message-Context draft-hansen-lemonade-msgctxt-videomsg-01.txt Status of this Memo By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on December 22, 2004. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. Abstract The Message-Context header defined in RFC 3458 [1] describes the context of a message (for example: fax-message or voice-message). This specification extends the Message-Context header with one additional context value: "video-message". A receiving user agent (UA) may use this information as a hint to optimally present the message. Note Hansen Expires December 22, 2004 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Video-Message Message-Context June 2004 This document is being discussed in the LEMONADE and VPIM working group mailing lists, lemonade@ietf.org and vpim@ietf.org. 1. Introduction Email messages can be used to convey many different forms of messages, and the user will interact with different types in different ways. As explained in RFC 3458 [1], the "message context" of the message conveys information about the way the user expects to interact with the message, such as which icon to display. RFC 3458 then registers the message contexts for a "voice-message", "fax-message", "pager-message", "multimedia-message", "text-message" and "none". 1.1 Changes from version 00 The description of RFC 3458 in the Introduction was shortened. 2. Video Message One form of email is a message that consists mostly of a video stream. Examples of services that send video email are those connected to cell phones that capture video streams, and video email services that use webcams attached to a PC. These email messages currently consist of two flavors, both of which can be properly considered to be a video message: 1. those that embed the video stream internally within the message as a body part, and 2. those whose video stream is stored on a 3rd party's video server. However, none of the existing message contexts properly identify such video messages. This specification extends the Message-Context header with one additional context value: video-message. 3. IANA Considerations 3.1 Message-Context As specified in RFC 3458 [1], this document registers "video-message" in the "Internet Message Context Types" repository. Message-Context class name: video-message Hansen Expires December 22, 2004 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Video-Message Message-Context June 2004 Sumary of the message class: Indicates a message whose primary content is a video mail message. The primary content is video data. The context is usually a message recorded using a video camera, or a message whose primary purpose is to contain an external reference to a message recorded using a video camera. Person & email address to contact for further information: Tony Hansen, tony+msgctxt@maillennium.att.com. 4. Security Considerations The intention for this header is to be an indicator of message context only. As such, it is only a hint and requires no behavior on the part of a message user agent. 5 Normative References [1] Burger, E., Candell, E., Eliot, C. and G. Klyne, "Message Context for Internet Mail", RFC 3458, January 2003. Author's Address Tony Hansen AT&T Laboratories 200 Laurel Ave. Middletown, NJ 07748 USA EMail: tony+msgctxt@maillennium.att.com Hansen Expires December 22, 2004 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Video-Message Message-Context June 2004 Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Disclaimer of Validity This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. Acknowledgment Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Hansen Expires December 22, 2004 [Page 4]