<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!-- This template is for creating an Internet Draft using xml2rfc,
    which is available here: http://xml.resource.org. -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!-- One method to get references from the online citation libraries.
    There has to be one entity for each item to be referenced. 
    An alternate method (rfc include) is described in the references. -->

<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3610 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3610.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3633 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3633.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4291 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4291.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4861 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4861.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4862 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4862.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4944 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4944.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6282 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6282.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4193 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4193.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4541 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4541.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6775 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6775.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids.xml">



]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!-- used by XSLT processors -->
<!-- For a complete list and description of processing instructions (PIs), 
    please see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/README.html. -->
<!-- Below are generally applicable Processing Instructions (PIs) that most I-Ds might want to use.
    (Here they are set differently than their defaults in xml2rfc v1.32) -->
<?rfc strict="no" ?>
<!-- give errors regarding ID-nits and DTD validation -->
<!-- control the table of contents (ToC) -->
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<!-- generate a ToC -->
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<!-- the number of levels of subsections in ToC. default: 3 -->
<!-- control references -->
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<!-- use symbolic references tags, i.e, [RFC2119] instead of [1] -->
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<!-- sort the reference entries alphabetically -->
<!-- control vertical white space 
    (using these PIs as follows is recommended by the RFC Editor) -->
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<!-- do not start each main section on a new page -->
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<!-- keep one blank line between list items -->
<!-- end of list of popular I-D processing instructions -->
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-6lo-btle-05" ipr="trust200902">
 <!-- category values: std, bcp, info, exp, and historic
    ipr values: trust200902, noModificationTrust200902, noDerivativesTrust200902,
       or pre5378Trust200902
    you can add the attributes updates="NNNN" and obsoletes="NNNN" 
    they will automatically be output with "(if approved)" -->

 <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->

 <front>
   <!-- The abbreviated title is used in the page header - it is only necessary if the 
        full title is longer than 39 characters -->

  <title abbrev="IPv6 over Bluetooth LE">Transmission of IPv6 Packets over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy</title>

  <author fullname="Johanna Nieminen" initials="J.N" surname="Nieminen">
     <organization abbrev="Nokia">Nokia</organization>
    <address>
      <email>johannamaria.nieminen@gmail.com</email>
    </address>
  </author>
 
  <author initials='T.S' surname="Savolainen" fullname='Teemu Savolainen'>
   <organization abbrev="Nokia">Nokia</organization>
   <address>
     <postal>
       <street>Visiokatu 3</street>
       <city>Tampere</city>
       <code>33720</code>
       <country>Finland</country>
     </postal>
     <email>teemu.savolainen@nokia.com</email>
   </address>
  </author>

  <author initials='M.I.' surname="Isomaki" fullname='Markus Isomaki'>
    <organization abbrev="Nokia">Nokia</organization>
    <address>
      <postal>
	<street>Otaniementie 19</street>
        <city>Espoo</city>
        <code>02150</code>
	<country>Finland</country>
      </postal>
      <email>markus.isomaki@nokia.com</email>
    </address>
  </author>

  <author initials='B.P.' surname="Patil" fullname='Basavaraj Patil'>
    <organization abbrev="AT&amp;T">AT&amp;T</organization>
      <address>
         <postal>
            <street>1410 E. Renner Road</street>
            <city>Richardson</city>
            <region>TX</region>
            <code>75082</code>
            <country>USA</country>
         </postal>
         <email>basavaraj.patil@att.com</email>
      </address>
      </author>


  <author initials='Z.S.' surname="Shelby" fullname='Zach Shelby'>
    <organization abbrev="Arm">Arm</organization>
    <address>
      <postal>
	<street>Hallituskatu 13-17D</street>
        <city>Oulu</city>
        <code>90100</code>
	<country>Finland</country>
      </postal>
      <email>zach.shelby@arm.com</email>
    </address>
  </author>

  <author initials='C.G.' surname="Gomez" fullname='Carles Gomez'>
    <organization abbrev="Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya/i2CAT">Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya/i2CAT</organization>
    <address>
      <postal>
	<street>C/Esteve Terradas, 7</street>
        <code>08860</code>
	<city>Castelldefels</city>
	<country>Spain</country>
      </postal>
      <email>carlesgo@entel.upc.edu</email>
    </address>
  </author>


   <date year="2015" />

   <area>Internet</area>

   <workgroup>6Lo Working Group</workgroup>

   <keyword>Bluetooth Low Energy</keyword>
   <keyword>6lowpan</keyword>
   <keyword>IPv6</keyword>
   <keyword>Low power</keyword>

   <abstract>
      <t>
         Bluetooth Smart is the brand name for the Bluetooth low energy feature in the Bluetooth specification 
         defined by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group. The standard Bluetooth radio has been
         widely implemented and available in mobile phones, notebook
         computers, audio headsets and many other devices. The low power
         version of Bluetooth is a specification that enables the use of
         this air interface with devices such as sensors, smart meters,
         appliances, etc. The low power variant of Bluetooth is
         standardized since the revision 4.0 of the Bluetooth specifications, although
         version 4.1 or newer is required for IPv6. 
         This document describes how IPv6
         is transported over Bluetooth low energy using 6LoWPAN techniques.
     </t>
   </abstract>
 </front>

<middle>
  <section title="Introduction">
     <t>
        Bluetooth low energy (LE) is a radio technology targeted for
        devices that operate with coin cell batteries or minimalistic power
        sources, which means that low power consumption is essential. Bluetooth 
	LE is an especially attractive technology for
        Internet of Things applications, such as health monitors,
        environmental sensing, proximity applications and many others.
     </t>

     <t>
        Considering the potential for the exponential growth in the number of sensors and
        Internet connected devices and things, IPv6 is
        an ideal protocol due to the large address space it provides. In
        addition, IPv6 provides tools for stateless address autoconfiguration, which is
        particularly suitable for sensor network applications and nodes
        which have very limited processing power or lack a full-fledged
        operating system.   
     </t>

     <t>
        RFC 4944 <xref target="RFC4944"/> specifies the transmission of IPv6 over
        IEEE 802.15.4. The Bluetooth LE link in many respects
        has similar characteristics to that of IEEE 802.15.4. Many of
        the mechanisms defined in the RFC 4944 can be
        applied to the transmission of IPv6 on Bluetooth LE
        links. This document specifies the details of IPv6 transmission
        over Bluetooth LE links. 
     </t>

     <section title="Terminology and Requirements Language">    
        <t>
           The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
           "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   	   document are to be interpreted as described 
	   in <xref target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.
        </t>

        <t>
	   The terms 6LN, 6LR and 6LBR are defined as in <xref target="RFC6775"/>, 
           with an addition that Bluetooth LE central and Bluetooth LE peripheral (see <xref target="llroles"/>) 
	   can both be either 6LN or 6LBR.
        </t>
     </section>
</section>     

<section title="Bluetooth Low Energy">
     <t>
        Bluetooth LE is designed for transferring small amounts of
        data infrequently at modest data rates at a very low cost per
        bit. Bluetooth Special Interest Group (Bluetooth SIG) has 
        introduced two trademarks, Bluetooth Smart for single-mode devices 
        (a device that only supports Bluetooth LE) and Bluetooth Smart Ready 
        for dual-mode devices (devices that support both Bluetooth and Bluetooth LE). 
	In the rest of the 
        document, the term Bluetooth LE refers to both types of devices.
     </t>

     <t>
        Bluetooth LE was introduced in Bluetooth 4.0 and further enhanced in Bluetooth 4.1 <xref target="BTCorev4.1"/>. 
        Bluetooth SIG has also published Internet Protocol Support Profile (IPSP) <xref target="IPSP"/>, which includes
        Internet Protocol Support Service (IPSS). The IPSP enables 
        discovery of IP-enabled devices and establishment of link-layer 
        connection for transporting IPv6 packets.       
        IPv6 over Bluetooth LE is dependent on both Bluetooth 4.1 and IPSP 1.0 or newer.
     </t>
 
     <t>
        Devices such as mobile phones, notebooks, tablets and other handheld computing
        devices which will include Bluetooth 4.1 chipsets will also
        have the low-energy functionality of Bluetooth. Bluetooth LE will also be
        included in many different types of accessories that collaborate with
        mobile devices such as phones, tablets and notebook computers. An
        example of a use case for a Bluetooth LE accessory is a heart rate monitor
        that sends data via the mobile phone to a server on the Internet.
     </t>

     <section title="Bluetooth LE stack">
        <t>
           The lower layer of the Bluetooth LE stack consists of the Physical (PHY) and
           the Link Layer (LL). The Physical Layer transmits and receives the actual
           packets. The Link Layer is responsible for providing medium access, 
           connection establishment, error control and flow control. The upper layer consists of the Logical Link Control and
           Adaptation Protocol (L2CAP), Attribute Protocol (ATT), Generic Attribute Profile (GATT) and
           Generic Access Profile (GAP) as shown in <xref target="fig_BTLEStack"/>. The device internal
           Host Controller Interface (HCI) separates the lower layers, often implemented in
           the Bluetooth controller, from higher layers, often implemented in the host stack.
           GATT and Bluetooth LE
           profiles together enable the creation of applications in a
           standardized way without using IP. L2CAP provides multiplexing
           capability by multiplexing the data channels from the above layers.
           L2CAP also provides fragmentation and reassembly for large data
           packets.

     <figure title="Bluetooth LE Protocol Stack"
                anchor="fig_BTLEStack">
        <artwork><![CDATA[            

     +-------------------------------------------------+
     |              Applications                       |
     +---------------------------------------+---------+
     |        Generic Attribute Profile      | Generic |        
     +--------------------+------------------+ Access  |
     | Attribute Protocol | Security Manager | Profile |
     +--------------------+------------------+---------+
     |  Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol   |
- - -+-----------------------+-------------------------+- - - HCI
     |      Link Layer       |    Direct Test Mode     |      
     +-------------------------------------------------+
     |             Physical Layer                      |
     +-------------------------------------------------+

        ]]></artwork></figure>
         </t>
      </section>     

      <section title="Link layer roles and topology" anchor="llroles">
         <t>
            Bluetooth LE defines two GAP roles of relevance herein: the Bluetooth LE central role and the Bluetooth LE peripheral
            role. A device in the central role, which is called central from now on, has traditionally
            been able to manage multiple simultaneous connections with a number of devices in
            the peripheral role, called peripherals from now on. A peripheral is commonly connected to a
            single central, but since Bluetooth 4.1 can also connect to multiple centrals. 
            In this document for IPv6 networking purposes the Bluetooth LE network (i.e. a Bluetooth LE piconet) follows
            a star topology shown in the <xref target="fig_BTLETopo"/>, where the router typically
            implements the Bluetooth LE central role and nodes implement the Bluetooth LE peripheral role. In the future
            mesh networking may be defined for IPv6 over Bluetooth LE.
      
     <figure title="Bluetooth LE Star Topology"
                anchor="fig_BTLETopo">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
               Node --.      .-- Node
                       \    /
             Node ---- Router ---- Node
                       /    \
               Node --'      '-- Node
	]]></artwork></figure>
        </t>

     <t>
        In Bluetooth LE a central is assumed to be less constrained than a peripheral. Hence,
        in the primary deployment scenario central and peripheral will act as 6LoWPAN 
        Border Router (6LBR) and a 6LoWPAN Node (6LN), respectively.
     </t>

     <t>
        In Bluetooth LE, direct communication only takes place between a central and a
        peripheral. Hence, in a Bluetooth LE network using IPv6, a radio hop is equivalent
        to an IPv6 link and vice versa.
     </t>
   </section>

   <section title="Bluetooth LE device addressing" anchor="deviceaddressing">
     <t>
        Every Bluetooth LE device is identified by a 48-bit device address. The
        Bluetooth specification describes the device address of a Bluetooth LE device
        as:"Devices are identified using a device address. Device addresses may
        be either a public device address or a random device address." <xref target="BTCorev4.1"/>.
        The public device addresses are based on the IEEE 802-2001 standard <xref target="IEEE802-2001"/>.  
        The random device addresses are generated as defined in the Bluetooth specification. These random 
        device addresses have a very small chance of being in conflict, as Bluetooth LE does not
        support random device address collision avoidance or detection. 
     </t>
   </section>

   <section title="Bluetooth LE packets sizes and MTU" anchor="btlemtu">
     <t>
        Optimal MTU defined for L2CAP fixed channels over Bluetooth LE is 27 bytes including the L2CAP header 
        of four bytes. Default MTU for Bluetooth LE is hence defined to be 27 bytes. Therefore, excluding L2CAP 
        header of four bytes, protocol data unit (PDU) size of 23 bytes is available for upper layers.
        In order to be able to transmit IPv6 packets of 1280 bytes or larger, link layer fragmentation 
        and reassembly solution is provided by the L2CAP layer. The IPSP defines means for negotiating up 
        a link-layer connection that provides MTU of 1280 bytes or higher for the IPv6 layer <xref target="IPSP"/>. 
	The link-layer MTU is negotiated separately for each direction. Implementations that require single  
        link-layer MTU value SHALL use the smallest of the possibly different MTU values.
     </t>
   </section>    
</section>

<section title="Specification of IPv6 over Bluetooth Low Energy">
     <t>
        Before any IP-layer communications can take place over Bluetooth LE, Bluetooth LE
        enabled nodes such as 6LNs and 6LBRs have to find each other and establish a suitable link-layer 
        connection. The discovery and Bluetooth LE connection setup procedures are documented by Bluetooth SIG
        in the IPSP specification <xref target="IPSP"/>. In the rare case of Bluetooth LE random device
        address conflict, the 6LBR can detect multiple 6LNs with the same Bluetooth LE device address.
        The 6LBR MUST have at most one connection for a given Bluetooth LE device address at
        any given moment. This will avoid addressing conflicts within a Bluetooth LE network.
	The IPSP depends on Bluetooth version 4.1, and hence both Bluetooth version 4.1, or newer, and 
	IPSP version 1.0, or newer, are required for IPv6 communications.
     </t>

     <t>
	Bluetooth LE technology sets strict requirements for low power consumption
        and thus limits the allowed protocol overhead. 6LoWPAN standards
        <xref target="RFC6775"/>, and <xref target="RFC6282"/> provide useful
        functionality for reducing overhead which can be applied to
        Bluetooth LE. This functionality comprises of link-local IPv6 addresses and
        stateless IPv6 address autoconfiguration (see <xref target="slaac"/>), Neighbor
        Discovery (see <xref target="neighbordiscovery"/>) and header compression (see <xref target="hcompression"/>).
     </t>

     <t>
        A significant difference between IEEE 802.15.4 and Bluetooth LE is that the
        former supports both star and mesh topology (and requires a routing protocol),
        whereas Bluetooth LE does not currently support the formation of
        multihop networks at the link layer. 
     </t>

   <section title="Protocol stack">
     <t>
        <xref target="fig_IPv6overLE"/> illustrates IPv6 over Bluetooth LE
        stack including the Internet Protocol Support Service. UDP and 
        TCP are provided as examples of transport protocols, 
        but the stack can be used by any other upper layer protocol capable of
        running atop of IPv6. The 6LoWPAN layer runs on top of Bluetooth LE L2CAP layer.
     </t>

     <t>
       <figure title="IPv6 over Bluetooth LE Stack"
               anchor="fig_IPv6overLE">
	 <artwork><![CDATA[
       +---------+  +----------------------------+
       |  IPSS   |  |       UDP/TCP/other        |
       +---------+  +----------------------------+
       |  GATT   |  |            IPv6            |
       +---------+  +----------------------------+
       |  ATT    |  |  6LoWPAN for Bluetooth LE  |
       +---------+--+----------------------------+
       |          Bluetooth LE L2CAP             |
  -  - +-----------------------------------------+- - - HCI
       |        Bluetooth LE Link Layer          |
       +-----------------------------------------+
       |         Bluetooth LE Physical           |
       +-----------------------------------------+
        ]]></artwork></figure>       	  
     </t>
     
   </section>
   <section title="Link model" anchor="linkmodel">
      <t>
         The concept of IPv6 link (layer 3) and the physical link (combination of
         PHY and MAC) needs to be clear and the relationship has to be well understood in
         order to specify the addressing scheme for transmitting IPv6 packets
         over the Bluetooth LE link. RFC 4861 <xref target="RFC4861"/> defines a link as "a communication
         facility or medium over which nodes can communicate at the link layer,
         i.e., the layer immediately below IPv6." 
      </t>

      <t>
         In the case of Bluetooth LE, 6LoWPAN layer is adapted to support
         transmission of IPv6 packets over Bluetooth LE. The IPSP defines all steps required
         for setting up the Bluetooth LE connection over which 6LoWPAN can function <xref target="IPSP"/>, including
         handling the link-layer fragmentation required on Bluetooth LE, as described in <xref target="btlemtu"/>.
      </t> 

      <t>
         While Bluetooth LE protocols, such as L2CAP, utilize little-endian byte orderering, IPv6 packets MUST be transmitted 
         in big endian order (network byte order).
      </t>

      <t>
         This specification requires IPv6 header compression format specified in RFC 6282 to be used <xref target="RFC6282"/>. 
         It is assumed that the IPv6 payload length can be inferred from the L2CAP
         header length and the IID value inferred from the link-layer address with help
         of Neighbor Cache, if elided from compressed packet header.
      </t>

      <t>
         Bluetooth LE connections used to build a star topology are
         point-to-point in nature, as Bluetooth broadcast features are not used for IPv6 over
         Bluetooth LE. 6LN-to-6LN communications, e.g. using link-local addresses,
         need to be bridged by the 6LBR.  The 6LBR ensures address collisions
         do not occur (see <xref target="neighbordiscovery"/>).
      </t>

      <t>
         After the peripheral and central have connected at the Bluetooth LE level, 
         the link can be considered up and IPv6 address configuration and transmission can begin.
      </t>

   <section title="Stateless address autoconfiguration" anchor="slaac">
      <t>
         At network interface initialization, both 6LN and 6LBR SHALL generate and assign 
	 to the Bluetooth LE network interface IPv6 link-local addresses <xref target="RFC4862"/> based on the 48-bit 
	 Bluetooth device addresses (see <xref target="deviceaddressing"/>) 
	 that were used for establishing underlying Bluetooth LE connection. A 64-bit Interface Identifier (IID)
         is formed from 48-bit Bluetooth device address by inserting two octets, with
         hexadecimal values of 0xFF and 0xFE in the middle of the 48-bit Bluetooth device address as shown in
         <xref target="fig_bleIID"/>. In the Figure letter 'b' represents a bit from Bluetooth device address.

         <figure title="Formation of IID from Bluetooth device adddress"
	               anchor="fig_bleIID">
	 <artwork><![CDATA[

|0              1|1              3|3              4|4              6|
|0              5|6              1|2              7|8              3|
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb|bbbbbbbb11111111|11111110bbbbbbbb|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb|
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+ 

        ]]></artwork></figure>

         The IID is then appended with prefix fe80::/64, as 
         described in RFC 4291 <xref target="RFC4291"/> and as depicted in <xref target="fig_IPv6linklocal"/>. 
         The same link-local address SHALL be used for the lifetime of the Bluetooth LE L2CAP channel.
 	 (After Bluetooth LE logical link has been established, it is referenced with a Connection Handle in HCI. Thus 
         possibly changing device addresses do not impact data flows within existing L2CAP channel. Hence there is no need
         to change IPv6 link-local addresses even if devices change their random device addresses during 
	 L2CAP channel lifetime).

         <figure title="IPv6 link-local address in Bluetooth LE"
               anchor="fig_IPv6linklocal">
	 <artwork><![CDATA[

          10 bits        54 bits             64 bits
        +----------+-----------------+----------------------+
        |1111111010|       zeros     | Interface Identifier |
        +----------+-----------------+----------------------+

        ]]></artwork></figure>
      </t>
 
      <t>
	 A 6LN MUST join the all-nodes multicast address. 
         There is no need for 6LN to join the solicited-node 
	 multicast address, since 6LBR will know device addresses and hence link-local addresses of all connected 6LNs. The 6LBR will 
	 ensure no two devices with the same Bluetooth LE device address are connected at the same time. Effectively duplicate
	 address detection for link-local addresses is performed by the 6LBR's software responsible of discovery of IP-enabled Bluetooth 
	 LE nodes and of starting Bluetooth LE connection establishment procedures. This approach increases 
         complexity of 6LBR, but reduces power consumption on both 6LN and 6LBR at link establishment phase by reducing number of
	 mandatory packet transmissions.
      </t>

      <t>
         After link-local address configuration, 6LN sends Router Solicitation messages as described in [RFC4861] Section 6.3.7. 
      </t>

      <t>	
	 For non-link-local addresses a 64-bit IID MAY be formed by utilizing the 48-bit Bluetooth device address.  
	 Alternatively, a randomly generated IID (see <xref target="neighbordiscovery"/>) can be used instead, for example, 
	 as discussed in <xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids"/>. The non-link-local addresses 6LN generates must be registered with
         6LBR as described in <xref target="neighbordiscovery"/>.
       </t>

      <t>
 	 Only if the Bluetooth device address is known to be
         a public address the "Universal/Local" bit can be set to 1 <xref target="RFC4291"/>. 
      </t>

      <t>
         The tool for a 6LBR to obtain an IPv6 prefix for numbering the
         Bluetooth LE network is out of scope of this document, but can be, for example,
         accomplished via DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation <xref target="RFC3633"/> or by
         using Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (ULA) <xref target="RFC4193"/>.
         Due to the link model of the Bluetooth LE (see <xref target="llroles"/>)
         the 6LBR MUST set the "on-link" flag (L) to zero in the
         Prefix Information Option <xref target="RFC4861"/>. This will cause 6LNs 
         to always send packets to the 6LBR, including the case when
         the destination is another 6LN using the same prefix.
      </t>
   </section>

   <section title="Neighbor discovery" anchor="neighbordiscovery">
      <t>
         'Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal 
         Area Networks (6LoWPANs)' <xref target="RFC6775"/> describes the neighbor 
         discovery approach as adapted for use in several 6LoWPAN topologies, 
         including the mesh topology. Bluetooth LE does not support mesh networks and 
         hence only those aspects that apply to a star topology are considered.
      </t>

      <t>
         The following aspects of the Neighbor Discovery optimizations 
         <xref target="RFC6775"/> are applicable to Bluetooth LE 6LNs:
      </t>

      <t>
	 1.  A Bluetooth LE 6LN SHOULD NOT register its IID for 
	 link-local address. A Bluetooth LE 6LN MUST register its IIDs for non-link-local addresses
   	 with the 6LBR by sending a Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message with
    	 the Address Registration Option (ARO) and process the Neighbor
     	 Advertisement (NA) accordingly.  The NS with the ARO option MUST be
    	 sent irrespective of the method used to generate the IID.  If the 6LN
    	 registers multiple IIDs per IPv6 prefix available on a link, the 6LBR
    	 will not be able to fully elide IID on downlink packets (6LBR has 
    	 to send IID bits inline).
      </t>

      <t> 
         2. For sending Router Solicitations and processing Router
         Advertisements the Bluetooth LE 6LNs MUST, respectively, follow Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of the
         <xref target="RFC6775"/>.
       </t>
   </section>

   <section title="Header compression" anchor="hcompression">
      <t>
         Header compression as defined in RFC 6282 <xref target="RFC6282"/>, which specifies the compression format for
         IPv6 datagrams on top of IEEE 802.15.4, is REQUIRED in this document as the basis for IPv6 header compression on top
         of Bluetooth LE. All headers MUST be compressed according to RFC 6282 <xref target="RFC6282"/> encoding formats. 
      </t>
  
      <t>
         The Bluetooth LE's star topology structure and ARO can be exploited in order to provide 
         a mechanism for IID compression. 
         The following text describes the principles of IPv6 address compression on top of Bluetooth LE.
      </t>

      <t>The ARO option requires use of EUI-64 identifier <xref target="RFC6775"/>. In the case of Bluetooth LE, the field SHALL be filled
         with the 48-bit device address used by the Bluetooth LE node converted into 64-bit Modified EUI-64 format <xref target="RFC4291"/>.
      </t>

      <t>
         To enable efficient header compression, the 6LBR MUST include 6LoWPAN Context Option (6CO) <xref target="RFC6775"/> 
         for all prefixes the 6LBR advertises in Router Advertisements for use in stateless address autoconfiguration.
      </t>

      <t>
	 When a 6LN is sending a packet to or through a 6LBR, it MUST fully elide the source address if it is a link-local address or a non-link-local address 
         6LN has registered with ARO to the 6LBR
         for the indicated prefix. That is, if SAC=0 and SAM=11 the 6LN MUST be using the link-local IPv6 address derived from Bluetooth LE device address, 
	 and if
         SAC=1 and SAM=11 the 6LN MUST have registered the source IPv6 address with the prefix related to compression context identified
         with Context Identifier Extension. The destination IPv6 address MUST be fully elided if the 
         destination address is the same address to which the 6LN has succesfully registered its source IPv6 address with ARO (set DAC=0, DAM=11). 
         The destination IPv6 address MUST be fully or partially elided if context has been set up for the destination address. For example,
         DAC=0 and DAM=01 when destination prefix is link-local, and DAC=1 and DAM=01 with Context Identifier Extension if compression context has 
         been configured for the used destination prefix.
      </t> 

      <t>
         When a 6LBR is transmitting packets to 6LN, it MUST fully elide the source IID if the source IPv6
         address is the one 6LN has used to register its address with ARO (set SAC=0, SAM=11), and it MUST elide the source prefix or address if a compression
         context related to the IPv6 source address has been set up. The 6LBR also MUST
         elide the destination IPv6 address registered by the 6LN with ARO and thus 6LN can determine it based on 
         indication of link-local prefix (DAC=0) or indication of other prefix (DAC=1 with Context Identifier Extension).
      </t>
   
      <section title="Remote destination example">
         <t> 
            When a 6LN transmits an IPv6 packet to a remote destination
            using global Unicast IPv6 addresses, if a context is defined for the 6LN's global IPv6 address, 
	    the 6LN has to indicate this context in the corresponding source fields of the compressed IPv6 header as per 
            Section 3.1 of RFC 6282 <xref target="RFC6282"/>, and has to elide the full IPv6 source address previously registered with ARO. 
            For this, the 6LN MUST use the following settings in the IPv6 compressed header: 
            CID=1, SAC=1, SAM=11. In this case, the 6LBR can infer the elided IPv6 source address since 1) the 6LBR has previously
            assigned the prefix to the 6LNs; and 2) the 6LBR maintains a
            Neighbor Cache that relates the Device Address and the IID the device has registered with ARO. If a context is
            defined for the IPv6 destination address, the 6LN has to
            also indicate this context in the corresponding destination fields of the compressed IPv6 header, 
            and elide the prefix of or the full destination IPv6 address. For this, the 6LN MUST set the DAM field 
            of the compressed IPv6 header as DAM=01 (if the context covers a 64-bit prefix) 
            or as DAM=11 (if the context covers a full, 128-bit address). CID and DAC MUST be set to CID=1 and DAC=1. 
            Note that when a context is defined for the IPv6 destination address, 
            the 6LBR can infer the elided destination prefix by using the context.
         </t>
  
         <t> 
            When a 6LBR receives an IPv6 packet sent by a remote node
            outside the Bluetooth LE network, and the destination of the packet is a
            6LN, if a context is defined for the prefix of the 6LN's global IPv6 address, 
            the 6LBR has to indicate this context in the corresponding destination fields 
            of the compressed IPv6 header. The 6LBR has to elide the IPv6 destination
            address of the packet before forwarding it, if the IPv6 destination address is inferable by the 6LN. 
            For this, the 6LBR will set the DAM field of the IPv6 compressed header as DAM=11. CID and DAC 
            needs to be set to CID=1 and DAC=1. If a context is defined for the IPv6 source
            address, the 6LBR needs to indicate this context in the source fields of the compressed
            IPv6 header, and elide that prefix as well.
            For this, the 6LBR needs to set the SAM field of the IPv6 compressed header as 
            SAM=01 (if the context covers a 64-bit prefix) or SAM=11 (if the context 
            covers a full, 128-bit address). CID and SAC are to be set to CID=1 and SAC=1. 
         </t>
      </section>
   </section>

   <section title="Unicast and Multicast address mapping">
      <t> 
         The Bluetooth LE link layer does not support multicast. Hence traffic is
         always unicast between two Bluetooth LE nodes. Even in the case where a
         6LBR is attached to multiple 6LNs, the 6LBR
         cannot do a multicast to all the connected 6LNs. If the
         6LBR needs to send a multicast packet to all its 6LNs, it has to 
         replicate the packet and unicast it on each link.   
         However, this may not be energy-efficient and particular care must be 
         taken if the master is battery-powered. In the opposite
         direction, a 6LN always has to send packets to or through 6LBR. 
         Hence, when a 6LN needs to transmit an IPv6 multicast
         packet, the 6LN will unicast the corresponding Bluetooth LE packet to the
         6LBR. The 6LBR will then forward the multicast packet to other 6LNs.
         To avoid excess of unwanted multicast traffic being sent to 6LNs, the
         6LBR SHOULD implement MLD Snooping feature <xref target="RFC4541"/>.
      </t>
   </section>
</section>

   <section title="Internet connectivity scenarios">
      <t> 
         In a typical scenario, the Bluetooth LE network is connected to the Internet as shown in the <xref target="fig_BTLEInternet"/>.
      </t>
    
      <t>
   <figure title="Bluetooth LE network connected to the Internet"
                anchor="fig_BTLEInternet">
        <artwork><![CDATA[

                      6LN 
                       \              ____________     
                        \            /            \    
                6LN ---- 6LBR ----- |  Internet   |
                        /            \____________/
                       /
                      6LN 
                                        
               <-- Bluetooth LE -->             

        ]]></artwork></figure>
      </t>

      <t> 
         In some scenarios, the Bluetooth LE network may transiently or permanently
         be an isolated network as shown in the <xref target="fig_BTLENoInternet"/>.

   <figure title="Isolated Bluetooth LE network"
                anchor="fig_BTLENoInternet">
        <artwork><![CDATA[

                     6LN      6LN         
                      \      /
                       \    /            
                6LN --- 6LBR --- 6LN
                       /    \ 
                      /      \    
                     6LN      6LN

               <--- Bluetooth LE --->             
        ]]></artwork></figure>             
      </t>

      <t>
         It is also possible to have point-to-point connection between two 6LNs, one of which 
         being central and another being peripheral. Similarly, it is possible to have 
         point-to-point connections between two 6LBRs, one of which being central and another
         being peripheral.
      </t>

      <t>
         At this point in time mesh networking with Bluetooth LE is not specified.
      </t>

    </section>
 </section>

<section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
   <t>
      There are no IANA considerations related to this document.
   </t>
</section>

<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
   <t>
      The transmission of IPv6 over Bluetooth LE links has similar
      requirements and concerns for security as for IEEE 802.15.4. 
      Bluetooth LE Link Layer security considerations are covered by the IPSP <xref target="IPSP"/>.
  </t>
  
  <t>
     Bluetooth LE Link Layer supports encryption and authentication by using the
     Counter with CBC-MAC (CCM) mechanism <xref target="RFC3610"/> and a 128-bit AES block cipher. Upper layer security
     mechanisms may exploit this functionality when it is available.
     (Note: CCM does not consume bytes from the maximum per-packet L2CAP
     data size, since the link layer data unit has a specific field for them when they are used.)
  </t>

  <t>
     Key management in Bluetooth LE is provided by the Security Manager Protocol 
     (SMP), as defined in [BTCorev4.1].
  </t>

  <t>
     The IPv6 link-local address configuration described in <xref target="slaac"/> strictly binds
     the privacy level of IPv6 link-local address to the privacy level device has selected
     for the Bluetooth LE. This means that a device using Bluetooth privacy features will retain
     the same level of privacy with generated IPv6 link-local addresses. Respectively, device not using
     privacy at Bluetooth level will not have privacy at IPv6 link-local address either. For
     non-link local addresses implementations have a choice to support <xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids"/>. 
  </t>
</section>

<section title="Additional contributors"> 
   <t>
      Kanji Kerai, Jari Mutikainen, David Canfeng-Chen and Minjun Xi from
      Nokia have contributed significantly to this document.
   </t>
</section>

<section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
   <t>
      The Bluetooth, Bluetooth Smart and Bluetooth Smart Ready marks are registred trademarks owned by Bluetooth SIG, Inc.
   </t>

   <t>
      Samita Chakrabarti, Erik Nordmark, Marcel De Kogel, Dave Thaler, and Brian Haberman have provided valuable feedback for this draft. 
   </t>

   <t>
      Authors would like to give special acknowledgements for Krishna Shingala, Frank Berntsen, and Bluetooth SIG's Internet Working Group
      for providing significant feedback and improvement proposals for this document.
   </t> 
</section> 

   
</middle>

 <back>
   <!-- References split into informative and normative -->

   <!-- There are 2 ways to insert reference entries from the citation libraries:
    1. define an ENTITY at the top, and use "ampersand character"RFC2629; here (as shown)
    2. simply use a PI "less than character"?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?> here
       (for I-Ds: include="reference.I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis.xml")

    Both are cited textually in the same manner: by using xref elements.
    If you use the PI option, xml2rfc will, by default, try to find included files in the same
    directory as the including file. You can also define the XML_LIBRARY environment variable
    with a value containing a set of directories to search.  These can be either in the local
    filing system or remote ones accessed by http (http://domain/dir/... ).-->

   <references title="Normative References">
     <reference anchor="BTCorev4.1">
        <front>
            <title>Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.1</title>
            <author>
            <organization>Bluetooth Special Interest Group</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2013" month="December" day="3"/>
        </front>
     </reference>

     <reference anchor="IPSP">
        <front>
            <title>Bluetooth Internet Protocol Support Profile Specification Version 1.0.0</title>
            <author>
            <organization>Bluetooth Special Interest Group</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2014" month="December" day="16"/>
        </front>
     </reference>
        
     <!--?rfc include="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"?-->
     &RFC2119;    
     &RFC4291;
     &RFC4541;
     &RFC4861;
     &RFC4862;
     &RFC6282;
     &RFC6775;
   </references>

   <references title="Informative References">
   <!--?rfc include="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"?-->
   &RFC3610;
   &RFC3633;
   &RFC4193;
   &RFC4944;
   &I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids;
   <reference anchor="IEEE802-2001">
      <front>
          <title>IEEE 802-2001 Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview and Architecture</title>
          <author>
               <organization>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)</organization>
          </author>
	  <date year="2002"/>
      </front>
    </reference>

   </references>

   <!-- Change Log
v00 2011-03-07  BPa  Initial version

     -->
 </back>
</rfc>
