<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2464 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2464.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3315 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3315.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3610 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3610.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3633 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3633.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3972 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3972.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4193 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4193.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4861 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4861.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4862 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4862.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4903 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4903.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4941 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4941.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4944 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4944.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5535 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5535.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6282 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6282.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4291 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4291.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6775 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6775.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC7136 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7136.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC7217 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7217.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC7668 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7668.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-6lo-backbone-router SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-6lo-backbone-router.xml">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- used by XSLT processors -->
<!-- OPTIONS, known as processing instructions (PIs) go here. -->
<!-- For a complete list and description of PIs,
     please see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/README.html. -->
<!-- Below are generally applicable PIs that most I-Ds might want to use. -->
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<!-- give errors regarding ID-nits and DTD validation -->
<!-- control the table of contents (ToC): -->
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<!-- generate a ToC -->
<?rfc tocdepth="2"?>
<!-- the number of levels of subsections in ToC. default: 3 -->
<!-- control references: -->
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<!-- use symbolic references tags, i.e, [RFC2119] instead of [1] -->
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<!-- sort the reference entries alphabetically -->
<!-- control vertical white space: 
     (using these PIs as follows is recommended by the RFC Editor) -->
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<!-- do not start each main section on a new page -->
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<!-- keep one blank line between list items -->
<!-- end of popular PIs -->
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-07" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="IPv6 over DECT ULE">Transmission of IPv6 Packets over DECT
    Ultra Low Energy</title>

    <author fullname="Peter B. Mariager" initials="P.M." surname="Mariager">
      <organization abbrev="RTX A/S">RTX A/S</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Stroemmen 6</street>

          <code>DK-9400 Noerresundby</code>

          <country>Denmark</country>
        </postal>

        <email>pm@rtx.dk</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Jens Toftgaard Petersen" initials="J.T.P." role="editor"
            surname="Petersen">
      <organization abbrev="RTX A/S">RTX A/S</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Stroemmen 6</street>

          <code>DK-9400 Noerresundby</code>

          <country>Denmark</country>
        </postal>

        <email>jtp@rtx.dk</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Zach Shelby" initials="Z.S." surname="Shelby">
      <organization abbrev="ARM">ARM</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>150 Rose Orchard</street>

          <code>San Jose, CA 95134</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>zach.shelby@arm.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Marco van de Logt" initials="M.L." surname="Van de Logt">
      <organization abbrev="Gigaset Communications GmbH">Gigaset
      Communications GmbH</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Frankenstrasse 2</street>

          <code>D-46395 Bocholt</code>

          <country>Germany</country>
        </postal>

        <email>marco.van-de-logt@gigaset.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Dominique Barthel" initials="D" surname="Barthel">
      <organization>Orange Labs</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>28 chemin du Vieux Chene</street>

          <code>38243 Meylan</code>

          <country>France</country>
        </postal>

        <email>dominique.barthel@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2016"/>

    <!-- <area/> -->

    <workgroup>6Lo Working Group</workgroup>

    <!-- <keyword/> -->

    <!-- <keyword/> -->

    <!-- <keyword/> -->

    <!-- <keyword/> -->

    <abstract>
      <t>DECT Ultra Low Energy is a low power air interface technology that is
      defined by the DECT Forum and specified by ETSI.</t>

      <t>The DECT air interface technology has been used world-wide in
      communication devices for more than 20 years, primarily carrying voice
      for cordless telephony but has also been deployed for data centric
      services.</t>

      <t>The DECT Ultra Low Energy is a recent addition to the DECT interface
      primarily intended for low-bandwidth, low-power applications such as
      sensor devices, smart meters, home automation etc. As the DECT Ultra Low
      Energy interface inherits many of the capabilities from DECT, it
      benefits from long range, interference free operation, world wide
      reserved frequency band, low silicon prices and maturity. There is an
      added value in the ability to communicate with IPv6 over DECT ULE such
      as for Internet of Things applications.</t>

      <t>This document describes how IPv6 is transported over DECT ULE using
      6LoWPAN techniques.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>DECT (Digital Enhanced Cordless
      Telecommunications) is a standard series [EN300.175-part1-7] specified
      by ETSI and CAT-iq (Cordless Advanced Technology - internet and quality)
      is a set of product certification and interoperability profiles [CAT-iq]
      defined by DECT Forum. DECT Ultra Low Energy (DECT ULE or just ULE) is an air interface
      technology building on the key fundamentals of traditional DECT / CAT-iq
      but with specific changes to significantly reduce the power consumption
      at the expense of data throughput. DECT ULE devices with requirements on power
      consumption as specified by ETSI in [TS102.939-1] and [TS102.939-2],
      will operate on special power optimized silicon, but can connect to a
      DECT Gateway supporting traditional DECT / CAT-iq for cordless telephony
      and data as well as the ULE extensions. DECT terminology operates with
      two major role definitions: The Portable Part (PP) is the power
      constrained device, while the Fixed Part (FP) is the Gateway or base
      station. This FP may be connected to the Internet. An example of a use
      case for DECT ULE is a home security sensor transmitting small amounts
      of data (few bytes) at periodic intervals through the FP, but is able to
      wake up upon an external event (burglar) and communicate with the FP.
      Another example incorporating both DECT ULE as well as traditional
      CAT-iq telephony is an elderly pendant (broche) which can transmit
      periodic status messages to a care provider using very little battery,
      but in the event of urgency, the elderly person can establish a voice
      connection through the pendant to an alarm service. It is expected that
      DECT ULE will be integrated into many residential gateways, as many of
      these already implements DECT CAT-iq for cordless telephony. DECT ULE
      can be added as a software option for the FP. It is desirable to
      consider IPv6 for DECT ULE devices due to the large address space and
      well-known infrastructure. This document describes how IPv6 is used on
      DECT ULE links to optimize power while maintaining the many benefits of
      IPv6 transmission. [RFC4944], [RFC6282] and [RFC6775] specify the
      transmission of IPv6 over IEEE 802.15.4. DECT ULE has many
      characteristics similar to those of IEEE 802.15.4, but also differences.
      A subset of mechanisms defined for transmission of IPv6 over IEEE
      802.15.4 can be applied to the transmission of IPv6 on DECT ULE
      links.</t>

      <t>This document specifies how to map IPv6 over DECT ULE inspired by
      [RFC4944], [RFC6282], [RFC6775] and [RFC7668].</t>

      <section title="Requirements Notation">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
        target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Terms Used">
        <t><figure>
            <artwork>
6CO:     6LoWPAN Context Option [RFC6775]
6BBR:    6loWPAN Backbone Router
6LBR:    6LoWPAN Border Router as defined in [RFC6775]. The DECT Fixed 
         Part is having this role
6LN:     6LoWPAN Node as defined in [RFC6775]. The DECT Portable part 
         is having this role
6LoWPAN: IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network
AES128:  Advanced Encryption Standard with key size of 128 bits
API:     Application Programming Interface
ARO:     Address Registration Option [RFC6775]
CAT-iq:  Cordless Advanced Technology - internet and quality
CID:     Context Identifier [RFC6775]
DAC:     Destination Address Compression
DAD:     Duplicate Address Detection [RFC4862]
DAM:     Destination Address Mode
DHCPv6:  Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 [RFC3315]
DLC:     Data Link Control
DSAA2:   DECT Standard Authentication Algorithm #2
DSC:     DECT Standard Cipher
DSC2:    DECT Standard Cipher #2
FDMA:    Frequency Division Multiplex
FP:      DECT Fixed Part, the gateway
GAP:     Generic Access Profile
IID:     Interface Identifier
IPEI:    International Portable Equipment Identity; (DECT identity)
MAC-48:  48 bit global unique MAC address managed by IEEE
MAC:     Media Access Control
MTU:     Maximum Transmission Unit
NBMA:    Non-broadcast multi-access
ND:      Neighbor Discovery [RFC4861] [RFC6775]
PDU:     Protocol Data Unit
PHY:     Physical Layer
PMID:    Portable MAC Identity; (DECT identity)
PP:      DECT Portable Part, typically the sensor node (6LN)
PVC:     Permanent Virtual Circuit
RFPI:    Radio Fixed Part Identity; (DECT identity)
SAC:     Source Address Compression
SAM:     Source Address Mode
TDD:     Time Division Duplex
TDMA:    Time Division Multiplex
TPUI:    Temporary Portable User Identity; (DECT identity)
UAK:     User Authentication Key, DECT master security key
ULA:     Unique Local Address [RFC4193]
</artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="DECT Ultra Low Energy">
      <t>DECT ULE is a low power air interface technology that is designed to
      support both circuit switched for service, such as voice communication,
      and for packet mode data services at modest data rate. This draft is
      only addressing the packet mode data service of DECT ULE.</t>

      <section title="The DECT ULE Protocol Stack">
        <t>The DECT ULE protocol stack consists of the PHY layer operating at
        frequencies in the 1880 - 1920 MHz frequency band depending on the
        region and uses a symbol rate of 1.152 Mbps. Radio bearers are
        allocated by use of FDMA/TDMA/TDD techniques.</t>

        <t>In its generic network topology, DECT is defined as a cellular
        network technology. However, the most common configuration is a star
        network with a single FP defining the network with a number of PP
        attached. The MAC layer supports both traditional DECT circuit mode 
		operation as this is used for services like discovery, pairing, 
		security features etc, and it supports new ULE packet mode operation. 
		The circuit mode features have been reused from DECT.
		</t>

        <t>The DECT ULE device can switch to the ULE mode of operation,
        utilizing the new ULE MAC layer features. The DECT ULE Data Link
        Control (DLC) provides multiplexing as well as segmentation and
        re-assembly for larger packets from layers above. The DECT ULE layer
        also implements per-message authentication and encryption. The DLC
        layer ensures packet integrity and preserves packet order, but
        delivery is based on best effort.</t>

        <t>The current DECT ULE MAC layer standard supports low bandwidth data
        broadcast. However, this document is not considering usage of the DECT
        ULE MAC layer broadcast service for IPv6 over DECT ULE.</t>

        <t>In general, communication sessions can be initiated from both FP
        and PP side. Depending on power down modes employed in the PP, latency
        may occur when initiating sessions from FP side. MAC layer
        communication can take place using either connection oriented packet
        transfer with low overhead for short sessions or take place using
        connection oriented bearers including media reservation. The MAC layer
        autonomously selects the radio spectrum positions that are available
        within the band and can rearrange these to avoid interference. The MAC
        layer has built-in retransmission procedures in order to improve
        transmission reliability.</t>

        <t>The DECT ULE device will typically incorporate an Application
        Programmers Interface (API) as well as common elements known as
        Generic Access Profile (GAP) for enrolling into the network. The DECT
        ULE stack establishes a permanent virtual circuit (PVC) for the
        application layers and provides support for a range of different
        application protocols. The used application protocol is negotiated
        between the PP and FP when the PVC communication service is
        established. This draft defines 6LoWPAN as one of the possible
        protocols to negotiate.</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork>


    +----------------------------------------+ 
    |          Application Layers            | 
    +----------------------------------------+ 
    | Generic Access     |     ULE Profile   |
    |       Profile      |                   |
    +----------------------------------------+ 
    | DECT/Service API   | ULE Data API      | 
    +--------------------+-------------------+ 
    | LLME  | NWK (MM,CC)|                   | 
    +--------------------+-------------------+ 
    | DECT DLC           | DECT ULE DLC      | 
    +--------------------+-------------------+ 
    |                MAC Layer               | 
    +--------------------+-------------------+ 
    |                PHY Layer               | 
    +--------------------+-------------------+ 
          (C-plane)             (U-plane)

    Figure 1: DECT ULE Protocol Stack 
</artwork>
          </figure>Figure 1 above shows the DECT ULE Stack divided into the
        Control-plane and User-data path, to left and to the right,
        respectively. The shown entities in the Stack are the (PHY) Physical
        Layer, (MAC) Media Access Control Layer, (DLC) Data Link Control
        Layer, (NWK) Network Layer with subcomponents: (LLME) Lower Layer
        Management Entity, (MM) Mobility Management and (CC) Call Control.
        Above there are the typically (API) Application Programmers Interface
        and application profile specific layers.</t>

        <t/>
      </section>

      <section title="Link Layer Roles and Topology">
        <t>A FP is assumed to be less constrained than a PP. Hence, in the
        primary scenario FP and PP will act as 6LBR and a 6LN, respectively.
        This document only addresses this primary scenario and all other scenarios are out of scope.</t>

        <t>In DECT ULE, at link layer the communication only takes place
        between a FP and a PP. A FP is able to handle multiple simultaneous
        connections with a number of PP. Hence, in a DECT ULE network using
        IPv6, a radio hop is equivalent to an IPv6 link and vice versa (see Section 3.3).
        <figure>
            <artwork>

    [DECT ULE PP]-----\                 /-----[DECT ULE PP]
                       \               /
    [DECT ULE PP]-------+[DECT ULE FP]+-------[DECT ULE PP]
                       /               \
    [DECT ULE PP]-----/                 \-----[DECT ULE PP]


    Figure 2: DECT ULE star topology


</artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>A significant difference between IEEE 802.15.4 and DECT ULE is that
        the former supports both star and mesh topology (and requires a
        routing protocol), whereas DECT ULE in it's primary configuration does
        not support the formation of multihop networks at the link layer. In
        consequence, the mesh header defined in [RFC4944] for mesh under
        routing are not used in DECT ULE networks.</t>

        <t>DECT ULE repeaters are considered to operate in the DECT protocol 
		domain and are outside the scope of this document.</t>

        <t/>
      </section>

      <section title="Addressing Model">
        <t>Each DECT PP is assigned an IPEI during manufacturing. This
        identity has the size of 40 bits and is globally unique within DECT addressing space 
		and can be used to constitute the MAC address used to derive the IID for
        link-local address.</t>

        <t>During a DECT location registration procedure, the FP assigns a 20 bit TPUI to a PP. 
		The FP creates a unique mapping between the assigned TPUI and the IPEI of each PP.
		This TPUI is used for addressing (layer 2) in messages between FP and PP.
		Although the TPUI is temporary by definition, the same value is usually 
		repeatedly assigned to any given PP, hence it seems not suitable for construction of IID,
		see [I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations].</t>

        <t>Each DECT FP is assigned a RFPI during manufacturing. This identity
        has the size of 40 bits and is globally unique within DECT addressing space and can be
        used to constitute the MAC address used to derive the IID for
        link-local address.</t>

        <t>Optionally each DECT PP and DECT FP can be assigned a unique (IEEE)
        MAC-48 address additionally to the DECT identities to be used by the
        6LoWPAN. During the address registration of non-link-local addresses
        as specified by this document, the FP and PP can use such MAC-48 to
        construct the IID. 
		However, as these addresses are considered as being permanent, 
		such scheme is not recommended as per [I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations].</t>

        <t/>
      </section>

      <section title="MTU Considerations">
        <t>Ideally the DECT ULE FP and PP may generate data that fits into a
        single MAC Layer packets (38 octets) for periodically transferred
        information, depending on application. However, IP packets may be much
        larger. The DECT ULE DLC procedures natively support segmentation and
        reassembly and provide any MTU size below 65536 octets. The default MTU
        size defined in DECT ULE [TS102.939-1] is 500 octets. In order to
        support complete IPv6 packets, the DLC layer of DECT ULE shall per this
        specification be configured with a MTU size of 1280 octets, 
		hence [RFC4944] fragmentation/reassembly is not required.</t>

        <t>It is expected that the LOWPAN_IPHC packet will fulfil all the
        requirements for header compression without spending unnecessary
        overhead for mesh addressing.</t>

        <t>It is important to realize that the usage of larger packets will be
        at the expense of battery life, as a large packet inside the DECT ULE
        stack will be fragmented into several or many MAC layer packets, each
        consuming power to transmit / receive. 
		The increased MTU size does not change the MAC layer packet and PDU size.</t>

        <t/>
      </section>

      <section title="Additional Considerations">
        <t>The DECT ULE standard allows PP to be DECT-registered (bind) to multiple
        FP and roaming between them. These FP and their 6LBR functionalities can either operate individual or 
		connected through a Backbone Router as per [I-D.ietf-6lo-backbone-router].</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Specification of IPv6 over DECT ULE">
      <t>Before any IP-layer communications can take place over DECT ULE, DECT
      ULE enabled nodes such as 6LNs and 6LBRs have to find each other and
      establish a suitable link-layer connection. The obtain-access-rights
      registration and location registration procedures are documented by ETSI
      in the specifications [EN300.175-part1-7], [TS102.939-1] and
      [TS102.939-2].</t>

      <t>DECT ULE technology sets strict requirements for low power
      consumption and thus limits the allowed protocol overhead. 6LoWPAN
      standards [RFC4944], [RFC6775], and [RFC6282] provide useful
      functionality for reducing overhead which can be applied to DECT ULE.
      This functionality comprises link-local IPv6 addresses and stateless
      IPv6 address autoconfiguration, Neighbor Discovery and header
      compression.</t>

      <t>The ULE 6LoWPAN adaptation layer can run directly on this U-plane DLC
      layer. Figure 3 illustrates IPv6 over DECT ULE stack.</t>

      <t>As consequence of DECT ULE in it's primary configuration does not
      support the formation of multihop networks at the link layer, the mesh
      header defined in [RFC4944] for mesh under routing MUST NOT be used. In
      addition, a DECT ULE PP node MUST NOT play the role of a 6LoWPAN Router
      (6LR).</t>

      <section title="Protocol Stack">
        <t>In order to enable data transmission over DECT ULE, a
        Permanent Virtual Circuit (PVC) has to be configured and opened between FP and PP.
        This is done by setting up a DECT service call from PP to FP. In DECT protocol domain the PP
        SHALL specify the &lt;&lt;IWU-ATTRIBUTES&gt;&gt; in a service-change
        (other) message before sending a service-change (resume) message as
        defined in [TS102.939-1]. The &lt;&lt;IWU-ATTRIBTES&gt;&gt; SHALL
        define the ULE Application Protocol Identifier to 0x06 and the MTU
        size to 1280 octets or larger. The FP sends a
        service-change-accept (resume) that MUST contain a valid paging descriptor.
        The PP MUST be pageable. Following this, transmission of IPv6 packets can start.</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork>                  +-------------------+
                  |    UDP/TCP/other  |
                  +-------------------+
                  |       IPv6        |
                  +-------------------+
                  |6LoWPAN adapted to |
                  |    DECT ULE       |
                  +-------------------+
                  |  DECT ULE DLC     |
                  +-------------------+
                  |  DECT ULE MAC     |
                  +-------------------+
                  |  DECT ULE PHY     |
                  +-------------------+


                Figure 3: IPv6 over DECT ULE Stack

</artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="Link Model">
        <t>The general model is that IPv6 is layer 3 and DECT ULE MAC+DLC is
        layer 2. The DECT ULE implements already fragmentation and reassembly
        functionality, hence [RFC4944] fragmentation and reassembly function
        MUST NOT be used.</t>
		
		<t>After the FP and PPs have connected at the DECT ULE level,
        the link can be considered up and IPv6 address configuration and
        transmission can begin. The 6LBR ensures address collisions do not
        occur.</t>

        <t>Per this specification, the IPv6 header compression format
        specified in [RFC6282] MUST be used. The IPv6 payload length can be
        derived from the ULE DLC packet length and the possibly elided IPv6
        address can be reconstructed from the link-layer address, used at the
        time of DECT ULE connection establishment, from the ULE MAC packet
        address, compression context if any, and from address registration
        information (see Section 3.2.2).</t>

        <t>Due to the DECT ULE star topology (see Section 2.2), PP each
        have a separate link to the FP, and thus the PPs cannot directly
        hear one another and cannot talk to one another.
		As discussed in [RFC4903], conventional usage 
		of IPv6 anticipates IPv6 subnets spanning a single
		link at the link layer. In order avoid the complexity of implementing 
		separate subnet for each DECT ULE link, a Multi-Link Subnet model has been chosen, 
		specifically Non-broadcast multi-access (NBMA) at layer 2.  
		Because of this, link-local multicast communications can
		happen only within a single DECT ULE connection; thus, 6LN-to-6LN
		communications using link-local addresses are not possible. 6LNs
		connected to the same 6LBR have to communicate with each other by
		using the shared prefix used on the subnet. The 6LBR forwards packets sent
		by one 6LN to another.</t>

        <t/>

        <section title="Stateless Address Autoconfiguration">
          <t>At network interface initialization, both 6LN and 6LBR SHALL
          generate and assign to the DECT ULE network interface IPv6
          link-local addresses [RFC4862] based on the DECT device addresses
          (see Section 2.3) that were used for establishing the underlying
          DECT ULE connection.</t>

          <t>The DECT device addresses IPEI and RFPI MUST be used to derive
          the IPv6 link-local 64 bit Interface Identifiers (IID) for 6LN and
          6LBR, respectively.</t>

          <t>The rule for deriving IID from DECT device addresses is as
          follows: The DECT device addresses that are consisting of 40 bits
          each, MUST be expanded with leading zero bits to form 48 bit
          intermediate addresses. Most significant bit in this newly formed
          48-bit intermediate address is set to one for addresses derived from
          the RFPI and set to zero for addresses derived from the IPEI. From
          these intermediate 48 bit addresses are derived 64 bit IIDs
          similar to the guidance of [RFC4291]. 
		  However, because DECT and IEEE address spaces are different, 
		  this intermediate address cannot be considered as unique within IEEE address space.
		  In the derived IIDs the U/L
          bit (7th bit) will be zero, indicating that derived IID's are not
          globally unique, see [RFC7136]. For example from RFPI=11.22.33.44.55
          the derived IID is 80:11:22:ff:fe:33:44:55 and from
          IPEI=01.23.45.67.89 the derived IID is 00:01:23:ff:fe:45:67:89.</t>

		  <t>Globally uniqueness of IID in link-local addresses are not required as they 
		  should never be leaked outside the subnet domain.</t>
		  
          <t>As defined in [RFC4291], the IPv6 link-local address is formed by
          appending the IID, to the prefix FE80::/64, as shown in Figure
          4.</t>

          <t><figure>
              <artwork>

             10 bits       54 bits            64 bits
          +----------+-----------------+----------------------+
          |1111111010|       zeros     | Interface Identifier |
          +----------+-----------------+----------------------+

                Figure 4: IPv6 link-local address in DECT ULE

</artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t>A 6LN MUST join the all-nodes multicast address.</t>

          <t>After link-local address configuration, 6LN sends Router
          Solicitation messages as described in [RFC4861] Section 6.3.7 and 
		  [RFC6775] Section 5.3.</t>

          <t>For non-link-local addresses, 6LNs SHOULD NOT be configured to
          use IIDs derived from a MAC-48 device address or DECT device
          addresses. Alternative schemes such as Cryptographically Generated
          Addresses (CGAs) [RFC3972], privacy extensions [RFC4941], Hash-Based
          Addresses (HBAs) [RFC5535], DHCPv6 [RFC3315], or static,
          semantically opaque addresses [RFC7217] SHOULD be used by default.
		  See also [I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations] for guidance of needed entropy in IIDs.
		  When generated IID's are not globally unique, Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) [RFC4862] MUST be used.
          In situations where the devices address embedded in the IID are
          required to support deployment constraints, 6LN MAY form a 64-bit
          IID by utilizing the MAC-48 device address or DECT device addresses.
          The non-link-local addresses that a 6LN generates MUST be registered with
          6LBR as described in Section 3.2.2.</t>

          <t>The means for a 6LBR to obtain an IPv6 prefix for numbering the
          DECT ULE network is out of scope of this document, but can be, for
          example, accomplished via DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation [RFC3633] or by
          using Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (ULA) [RFC4193]. Due to
          the link model of the DECT ULE the 6LBR MUST set the "on-link" flag
          (L) to zero in the Prefix Information Option [RFC4861]. This will
          cause 6LNs to always send packets to the 6LBR, including the case
          when the destination is another 6LN using the same prefix.</t>

        </section>

        <section title="Neighbor Discovery">
          <t>'Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless
          Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)' [RFC6775] describes the neighbor
          discovery approach as adapted for use in several 6LoWPAN topologies,
          including the mesh topology. As DECT ULE is considered not to
          support mesh networks, hence only those aspects that apply to a star
          topology are considered.</t>

          <t>The following aspects of the Neighbor Discovery optimizations
          [RFC6775] are applicable to DECT ULE 6LNs:</t>

          <t>1. For sending Router Solicitations and processing Router
          Advertisements the DECT ULE 6LNs MUST, respectively, follow Sections
          5.3 and 5.4 of the [RFC6775].</t>

          <t>2. A DECT ULE 6LN MUST NOT register its link-local address. 
		  Because the IIDs used in link-local addresses are derived from DECT addresses, 
		  there will always exist a unique mapping between link-local and layer-2 addresses.</t>
		  
		  <t>3. A DECT ULE 6LN MUST register its non-link-local addresses with the
          6LBR by sending a Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message with the
          Address Registration Option (ARO) and process the Neighbor
          Advertisement (NA) accordingly. The NS with the ARO option MUST be
          sent irrespective of the method used to generate the IID.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Unicast and Multicast Address Mapping">
          <t>The DECT MAC layer broadcast service is considered inadequate for
          IP multicast.</t>

          <t>Hence traffic is always unicast between two DECT ULE nodes. Even
          in the case where a 6LBR is attached to multiple 6LNs, the 6LBR
          cannot do a multicast to all the connected 6LNs. If the 6LBR needs
          to send a multicast packet to all its 6LNs, it has to replicate the
          packet and unicast it on each link. However, this may not be
          energy-efficient and particular care should be taken if the FP is
          battery-powered. To further conserve power, the 6LBR MUST keep track
          of multicast listeners at DECT-ULE link level granularity and it
          MUST NOT forward multicast packets to 6LNs that have not registered
          for multicast groups the packets belong to. In the opposite
          direction, a 6LN can only transmit data to or through the 6LBR.
          Hence, when a 6LN needs to transmit an IPv6 multicast packet, the
          6LN will unicast the corresponding DECT ULE packet to the 6LBR. The
          6LBR will then forward the multicast packet to other 6LNs.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Header Compression">
          <t>Header compression as defined in [RFC6282], which specifies the
          compression format for IPv6 datagrams on top of IEEE 802.15.4, is
          REQUIRED in this document as the basis for IPv6 header compression
          on top of DECT ULE. All headers MUST be compressed according to
          [RFC6282] encoding formats. The DECT ULE's star topology structure,
          ARO and 6CO can be exploited in order to provide a mechanism for
          address compression. The following text describes the principles of
          IPv6 address compression on top of DECT ULE.</t>

          <section title="Link-local Header Compression">
            <t>In a link-local communication terminated at 6LN and 6LBR, both
            the IPv6 source and destination addresses MUST be elided, since
            the used IIDs map uniquely into the DECT link end point addresses.
            A 6LN or 6LBR that receives a PDU containing an IPv6 packet can
            infer the corresponding IPv6 source address. For the unicast type of
            communication considered in this paragraph, the following settings
            MUST be used in the IPv6 compressed header: CID=0, SAC=0, SAM=11,
            DAC=0, DAM=11.</t>
          </section>

          <section title="Non-link-local Header Compression">
            <t>To enable efficient header compression, the 6LBR MUST include
            6LoWPAN Context Option (6CO) [RFC6775] for all prefixes the 6LBR
            advertises in Router Advertisements for use in stateless address
            autoconfiguration.</t>

            <t>When a 6LN transmits an IPv6 packet to a destination using
            global Unicast IPv6 addresses, if a context is defined for the
            prefix of the 6LNs global IPv6 address, the 6LN MUST indicate this
            context in the corresponding source fields of the compressed IPv6
            header as per Section 3.1 of [RFC6282], and MUST fully elide the latest registered IPv6
            source address. For this, the 6LN MUST use the following settings
            in the IPv6 compressed header: CID=1, SAC=1, SAM=11. In this case,
            the 6LBR can infer the elided IPv6 source address since 1) the
            6LBR has previously assigned the prefix to the 6LNs; and 2) the
            6LBR maintains a Neighbor Cache that relates the Device Address
            and the IID of the corresponding PP. 
			If a context is defined for
            the IPv6 destination address, the 6LN MUST also indicate this
            context in the corresponding destination fields of the compressed
            IPv6 header, and MUST elide the prefix of the destination IPv6
            address. For this, the 6LN MUST set the DAM field of the
            compressed IPv6 header as CID=1, DAC=1 and DAM=01 or DAM=11. Note
            that when a context is defined for the IPv6 destination address,
            the 6LBR can infer the elided destination prefix by using the
            context.</t>

            <t>When a 6LBR receives a IPv6 packet having a global Unicast IPv6
            address, and the destination of the packet is a 6LN, if a context
            is defined for the prefix of the 6LN's global IPv6 address, the
            6LBR MUST indicate this context in the corresponding destination
            fields of the compressed IPv6 header, and MUST fully elide the IPv6
            destination address of the packet if the destination address is the 
			latest registered by the 6LN for the indicated context. 
            For this, the 6LBR MUST set the DAM field of the IPv6 compressed
            header as DAM=11. CID and DAC MUST be set to CID=1 and DAC=1. If a
            context is defined for the prefix of the IPv6 source address, the
            6LBR MUST indicate this context in the source fields of the
            compressed IPv6 header, and MUST elide that prefix as well. For
            this, the 6LBR MUST set the SAM field of the IPv6 compressed
            header as CID=1, SAC=1 and SAM=01 or SAM=11.</t>

            <t/>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="Subnets and Internet Connectivity Scenarios">
        <t>In the DECT ULE star topology (see Section 2.2), PP each
        have a separate link to the FP and the FP acts as an IPv6
        router rather than a link-layer switch. A Multi-Link Subnet model [RFC4903] has been chosen, 
		specifically Non-broadcast multi-access (NBMA) at layer 2
		as further illustrated in Figure 5. The 6LBR forwards packets sent
		by one 6LN to another.
		In a typical scenario, the DECT ULE network is connected to the
        Internet as shown in the Figure 5. In this scenario, the DECT ULE
        network is deployed as one subnet, using one /64 IPv6 prefix.  
		The 6LBR is acting as router and forwarding packets between 6LNs and to and
        from Internet. </t>
        <figure>
          <artwork>

                       6LN
                        \               ____________
                         \             /            \
                 6LN ---- 6LBR ------ |  Internet    |
                         /             \____________/
                        /
                       6LN

             &lt;--  One subnet --&gt;
             &lt;--   DECT ULE  --&gt;


           Figure 5: DECT ULE network connected to the Internet

</artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>In some scenarios, the DECT ULE network may transiently or
        permanently be an isolated network as shown in the Figure 6. In this
        case the whole DECT ULE network consists of a single subnet with
        multiple links, where 6LBR is routing packets between 6LNs.</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork>

                      6LN      6LN
                       \      /
                        \    /
                 6LN --- 6LBR --- 6LN
                        /    \
                       /      \
                      6LN      6LN

                 &lt;----  One subnet ----&gt;
                 &lt;------ DECT ULE -----&gt;


                   Figure 6: Isolated DECT ULE network

</artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>In the isolated network scenario, communications between 6LN and
        6LBR can use IPv6 link-local methodology, but for communications
        between different PP, the FP has to act as 6LBR, number the network
        with ULA prefix [RFC4193], and route packets between PP.</t>
        
        <t>In other more advanced systems scenarios with multiple FP and 6LBR, 
        each DECT ULE FP constitutes a wireless cell. The
        network can be configured as a Multi-Link Subnet, in which the can 6LN operate 
        within the same /64 subnet prefix in multiple cells as shown in the Figure 7.
        The FPs operation role in such scenario are rather like Backbone Routers (6BBR) than 6LBR, 
        as per [I-D.ietf-6lo-backbone-router].</t>
        <figure>
          <artwork>
                            ____________
                           /            \
                          |  Internet    |
                           \____________/
                                 |
                                 |
                                 |
                                 |
                     6BBR/       |        6BBR/
            6LN ---- 6LBR -------+------- 6LBR ---- 6LN
                    /  \                   /  \
                   /    \                 /    \
                  6LN   6LN              6LN   6LN

         &lt;------------------One subnet ------------------&gt;
         &lt;-- DECT ULE Cell --&gt;       &lt;-- DECT ULE Cell --&gt;


         Figure 7: Multiple DECT ULE cells in a single Multi-Link subnet
           
           
</artwork>
        </figure>
        
        
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>There are no IANA considerations related to this document.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The secure transmission of speech over DECT will be based on the
      DSAA2 and DSC/DSC2 specification developed by ETSI TC DECT and the ETSI
      SAGE Security expert group.</t>

      <t>DECT ULE communications are secured at the link-layer (DLC) by
      encryption and per-message authentication through CCM mode (Counter with
      CBC-MAC) similar to [RFC3610]. The underlying algorithm for providing
      encryption and authentication is AES128.</t>

      <t>The DECT ULE pairing procedure generates a master authentication key
      (UAK). During location registration procedure or when the permanent
      virtual circuit are established, the session security keys are
      generated. Session security keys may be renewed regularly. The generated
      security keys (UAK and session security keys) are individual for each
      FP-PP binding, hence all PP in a system have different security keys.
      DECT ULE PPs do not use any shared encryption key.</t>

      <t>From privacy point of view, the IPv6 link-local address configuration
      described in Section 3.2.1 only reveals information about the 6LN to the
      6LBR that the 6LBR already knows from the link-layer connection. For
      non-link-local IPv6 addresses, by default a 6LN SHOULD use a randomly
      generated IID, for example, as discussed in [I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids], 
      or use alternative schemes such as Cryptographically Generated
      Addresses (CGA) [RFC3972], privacy extensions [RFC4941], Hash-Based
      Addresses (HBA, [RFC5535]), or static, semantically opaque addresses
      [RFC7217].</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ETSI" title="ETSI Considerations">
      <t>ETSI is standardizing a list of known application layer protocols
      that can use the DECT ULE permanent virtual circuit packet data service.
      Each protocol is identified by a unique known identifier, which is
      exchanged in the service-change procedure as defined in [TS102.939-1].
      The IPv6/6LoWPAN as described in this document is considered as an
      application layer protocol on top of DECT ULE. In order to provide
      interoperability between 6LoWPAN / DECT ULE devices a common protocol
      identifier for 6LoWPAN is standardized by ETSI.</t>

      <t>The ETSI DECT ULE Application Protocol Identifier is specified to
      0x06 for 6LoWPAN [TS102.939-1].</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>We are grateful to the members of the IETF 6lo working group; this
      document borrows liberally from their work.</t>

      <t>Ralph Droms, Samita Chakrabarti, Kerry Lynn, Suresh Krishnan, Pascal Thubert
      and Tatuya Jinmei have provided valuable
      feedback for this draft.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      &RFC2119;

      &RFC3633;

      &RFC4193;

      &RFC4861;

      &RFC4862;

      &RFC4941;

      &RFC4944;

      &RFC6282;

      &RFC4291;

      &RFC6775;

      &RFC7136;

      <reference anchor="EN300.175-part1-7"
                 target="https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300100_300199/30017501/02.06.01_60/en_30017501v020601p.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT); Common
          Interface (CI);</title>

          <author>
            <organization abbrev="ETSI">ETSI</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="2015"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="TS102.939-1"
                 target="https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102900_102999/10293901/01.02.01_60/ts_10293901v010201p.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT); Ultra
          Low Energy (ULE); Machine to Machine Communications; Part 1: Home
          Automation Network (phase 1)</title>

          <author>
            <organization abbrev="ETSI">ETSI</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="2015"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="TS102.939-2"
                 target="https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102900_102999/10293902/01.01.01_60/ts_10293902v010101p.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT); Ultra
          Low Energy (ULE); Machine to Machine Communications; Part 2: Home
          Automation Network (phase 2)</title>

          <author>
            <organization abbrev="ETSI">ETSI</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="2015"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <reference anchor="CAT-iq"
                 target="http://www.dect.org/userfiles/Public/DF_CAT-iq%20Certification%20Overview.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Cordless Advanced Technology - internet and quality</title>

          <author>
            <organization abbrev="DECTforum">DECT Forum</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="January" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      &RFC3315;

      &RFC3610;

      &RFC3972;

      &RFC4903;
	  
      &RFC5535;

      &RFC7217;

      &RFC7668;
	  
	  &I-D.ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations;
	  
      &I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids;
	  
	  &I-D.ietf-6lo-backbone-router;

    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>