<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [

<!ENTITY RFC4861 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4861.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6275 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6275.xml">
]>

<?rfc toc="no" ?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc comments="yes" ?>
<?rfc inline="yes" ?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana-01"
     ipr="trust200902" updates="rfc4861">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="">IPv6 ND PIO Flags IANA considerations</title>

    <author fullname="Ole Trøan" initials="O" surname="Trøan">
      <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Philip Pedersens vei 1</street>
          <city>Lysaker</city>
          <code>1366</code>
          <country>Norway</country>
        </postal>
        <email>ot@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2018" />
    <area>Cisco</area>
    <workgroup></workgroup>

    <!--  SECTION 0:  Abstract                      -->

    <abstract>


    <t>The Prefix Information Option in the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
    Router Advertisement defines an 8-bit flag field with two flags
    defined and the remaining 6 bits reserved (Reserved1). RFC 6275
    has defined a new flag from this field without creating a IANA
    registry or updating RFC 4861. The purpose of this document is to
    request that IANA to create a new registry for the PIO flags to avoid
    potential conflict in the use of these flags. This document updates RFC 4861.</t>

    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <!-- SECTION 1: Introduction -->

    <section title="Introduction">
    <t>The Prefix Information Option in the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
    Router Advertisement defines an 8-bit flag field with two flags
    defined and the remaining 6 bits reserved (Reserved1). RFC 6275
    has defined a new flag from this field without creating a IANA
    registry or updating RFC 4861. The purpose of this document is to
    request that IANA to create a new registry for the PIO flags to avoid
    potential conflict in the use of these flags.</t>

    </section>

    <!--  SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION                   -->

    <section title="Current Prefix Information Option flags">

      <t>Currently, the NDP Prefix Information Option contains the
      following one-bit flags defined in published RFCs:</t>

      <figure align="center" anchor="pioflags">
        <preamble></preamble>

        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |L|A|R|Reserved1|
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
        ]]></artwork>
      </figure>

      <t><list>
	<t>L - On-link Flag <xref target="RFC4861"/></t>
	<t>A - Autonomous Address Configuration Flag <xref target="RFC4861"/></t>
	<t>R - Router Address Agent Flag <xref target="RFC6275"/></t>
	<t>Reserved1 - Reserved</t>
      </list></t>
    </section>




    <section title="Updates to RFC4861">
      <t>This document updates Section 4.6.2 "Prefix Information" of
      <xref target="RFC4861"/> to point to the new IANA registry that
      is created in this document.</t>

      <t>Specifically:

      The current list of flags in the Prefix Information Option can be
      found in [IANA-TBD].</t>

      <!-- WAS: <t>This document updates RFC4861 with the new IANA
      Considerations section specified below.</t>-->

    </section>

    <!--  SECTION 4:  IANA Considerations           -->

    <section title="IANA Considerations">

      <t>The IANA is requested to create a new registry for IPv6 ND
      Prefix Information Option flags. This should include the current
      flags in the PIO option. The format for the registry is:</t>

      <figure align="center" anchor="ianapio">
        <preamble></preamble>

        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[


   +---------------+---------------------------------+-----------+
   | RA Option Bit | Description                     | Reference |
   +---------------+---------------------------------+-----------+
   | 0             | L - On-link Flag                | [RFC4861] |
   | 1             | A - Autonomous Address          | [RFC4861] |
   |               |     Configuration Flag          |           |
   | 2             | R - Router Address Flag         | [RFC6275] |
   +---------------+---------------------------------+-----------+

        ]]></artwork>
      </figure>


      <t>The assignment of new flags in the PIO option header require
   standards action.</t>

   <t>The registry for these flags should be added to:
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters</t>

    </section>

  </middle>

  <back>
    <!--  SECTION 8.1:  Normative References		-->

    <references title="Normative References">
      &RFC4861;
    </references>

    <!--  SECTION 8.2:  Informative References		-->

    <references title="Informative References">
      &RFC6275;
    </references>

  </back>
</rfc>
