<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<!--rfc category="info" ipr="full3978"-->
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-02" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>

    <title abbrev="WebSocket SDP Attribute"> 
Session Description Protocol (SDP) WebSocket Connection URI Attribute</title>

   <author initials="Ram Mohan" surname="Ravindranath" fullname="Ram Mohan Ravindranath">
			<organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
			<address>
				<postal>
					<street>Cessna Business Park,</street>
					<street>Kadabeesanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli,</street>
					<street>Sarjapur-Marathahalli Outer Ring Road</street>
					<city>Bangalore</city>
					<region>Karnataka</region>
					<code>560103</code>
					<country>India</country>
				</postal>
				<email>rmohanr@cisco.com</email>
			</address>
		    </author>
		    
    <author fullname="Gonzalo Salgueiro" initials="G.S."
            surname="Salgueiro">
      <organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
       <address>
        <postal>
          <street>7200-12 Kit Creek Road</street>
          <city>Research Triangle Park</city>
          <region>NC</region>
          <code>27709</code>
          <country>US</country>
        </postal>
        <email>gsalguei@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2016"/>

    <area>Real-time Applications and Infrastructre (RAI)</area>

    <workgroup>BFCPBIS Working Group</workgroup>

    <abstract>
      <t>The WebSocket protocol enables bidirectional real-time communication
      between clients and servers in web-based applications. This document specifies extensions to Session
      Description Protocol (SDP) for application protocols using WebSocket as a transport.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
  
    <section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">
      <t>The WebSocket protocol <xref target="RFC6455"/> enables
      bidirectional message exchange between clients and servers on top of a
      persistent TCP connection (optionally secured with Transport Layer Security (TLS) <xref
      target="RFC5246"/>). The initial protocol handshake makes use of
      Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) <xref target="RFC7235"/> semantics, allowing the WebSocket
      protocol to reuse existing HTTP infrastructure.</t>

      <t>Modern web browsers include a WebSocket client stack
      compliant with the WebSocket API <xref target="WS-API"/> as
      specified by the W3C. It is expected that other client
      applications (e.g., those running on personal computers, mobile devices, etc.) will also make a WebSocket client stack
      available. Several specifications have been written that define how different
      applications can use a WebSocket subprotocol as a reliable transport mechanism. </t>
      
     <t>For example, <xref target="RFC7118"/> defines WebSocket subprotocol as a reliable 
     transport mechanism between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)<xref target="RFC3261"/>
      entities to enable use of SIP in web-oriented deployments. Additionally, 
      <xref target="I-D.pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket"/> defines a new WebSocket sub-protocol 
      as a reliable transport mechanism between Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) clients 
      and relays.  <xref target="RFC7395"/> defines a WebSocket subprotocol for the 
      Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP).  Similarly,  
      <xref target="I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket"/> defines a WebSocket sub-protocol as a 
      reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) 
     <xref target="I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis"/> entities to enable usage of BFCP in new 
     scenarios. </t>
        
      <t>As defined in Section 3 of <xref target="RFC2818"/>, when 
      using Secure WebSockets the Canonical Name (CNAME) of the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) <xref target="RFC6101"/> certificate MUST 
      match the WebSocket connection URI host. While it is 
      possible to generate self-signed certificates with Internet Providers (IPs) as CNAME, 
      in most cases it is not viable for certificates signed by well known authorities. Thus, 
      there is a need to indicate the connection URI for the WebSocket Client. For applications 
      that use Session Description Protocol (SDP) <xref target="RFC4566"/> to negotiate, the 
      connection URI can be indicated by means of an SDP attribute. This specification defines 
      new SDP attributes to indicate the connection URI for the WebSocket client. Applications 
      that use SDP for negotiation and WebSocket as a transport protocol can use this specification 
      to advertise the WebSocket client connection URI.</t>
      
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
      NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described
      in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>

    </section>


<section anchor="sdp_con"  title="SDP Considerations">
    
      <section anchor="gen" title="General">
        <t>Applications that use the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism <xref target="RFC3264"/> for 
        negotiating media and also use WebSocket as a transport protocol MAY indicate 
        the connection URI for the WebSocket Client via a new SDP a=  media-level attribute 
       defined in <xref target="attribute1"/>. </t>
       <t>Applications that use SDP for negotiation and also use secure WebSocket as a 
      transport protocol TLS MAY indicate the connection URI for the WebSocket Client
       via a new SDP a= media-level attribute defined in <xref target="attribute2"/>.</t>
      </section>  
      <section anchor="attribute1"  title="ws-uri SDP Attribute">
      <t>This section defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'ws-uri' which
can appear in any of the media sections.</t>

   <t>Name : ws-uri</t>
   <t>Value: ws-uri (defined in Section 3 of  <xref target="RFC6455"/>)</t>
   <t>Usage Level: media</t>
   <t>Mux Category: NOT RECOMMENDED</t>
   <t>Charset Dependent: no</t>

   <t> Example:</t>
     <t>  
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[      
       a=ws-uri:ws://example.com/chat ]]></artwork>
      </figure></t>
   
   <t>When the 'ws-uri' attribute is present in the media
      section of the SDP, the IP address in 'c= ' line 
      SHALL be ignored and the full URI SHALL be used instead to open
      the WebSocket connection. The port provided in the 'm= ' line SHALL be ignored too, 
      as the 'a=ws-uri' SHALL provide port number when needed.</t>
      

    </section>
    
    <section anchor="attribute2"  title="wss-uri SDP Attribute">
      <t>This section defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'wss-uri' which can appear in any of
      the media sections. </t>
      
      <t>Name : wss-uri</t>
   <t>Value: wss-uri (defined in Section 3 of  <xref target="RFC6455"/>)</t>
   <t>Usage Level: media</t>
   <t>Mux Category: NOT RECOMMENDED</t>
   <t>Charset Dependent: no</t>

   <t> Example:</t>
     <t>  
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[      
       a=wss-uri:ws://example.com/chat ]]></artwork>
      </figure></t>

      <t>When the 'wss-uri' attribute is present in the media
      section of the SDP, the IP address in 'c= ' line 
      SHALL be ignored and the full URI SHALL be used instead to open
      the secure WebSocket connection. The port provided in the 'm= ' line SHALL be ignored too, 
      as the 'a=wss-uri' SHALL provide port number when needed.</t>
    </section>
    
    <section anchor="muxConsid" title="ws-uri and wss-uri Multiplexing Considerations">
<t>       
Multiplexing characteristics of SDP attributes are described in <xref target="I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes"/>.  Various SDP attribute multiplexing categories are introduced there.
</t>

<t> <xref target="attribute1"/> and <xref target="attribute2"/> describes the multiplex category for the new attributes in
this document.</t>
<t>
There are no multiplexing rules specified for the ws-uri and wss-uri SDP media-level attributes.  Additionally, the specification of multiplexing rules for the ws-uri and wss-uri attributes is outside the scope of this document.
</t>
<t>While it is technically possible to bundle WebSocket, there are a variety of reasons that make it impractical and it is thus considered unlikely to be used in practice. Therefore, the ws-uri and wss-uri SDP media-level attributes defined in <xref target="attribute1"/> and <xref target="attribute2"/> for using WebSocket as a transport protocol are not likely to be used with SDP bundle and are consequently categorized as NOT RECOMMENDED for multiplexing.
</t> 
<t>
If future extensions define how to bundle WebSocket then multiplexing rules for the "a=ws-uri:" and "a=wss-uri:" attributes need to be defined as well, for instance in an extension of this SDP based WebSocket negotiation specification.
</t>
</section> 

</section>

<section anchor="sdpoaprocedure" title="SDP Offer/Answer Procedures">
      <section title="General">
        <t>An endpoint (i.e., both the offerer and the answerer) that wishes to negotiate WebSocket
          as transport protocol MUST indicate that it wishes to use WebSocket or secure WebSocket  
          in the "proto" field of the "m=" line. Furthermore, the server side, which could be either 
          the offerer or answerer, MUST add an "a=ws-uri" or "a=wss-uri" attribute in the media section 
          depending on whether it wishes to use WebSocket or secure WebSocket. 
          This new attribute MUST follow the syntax defined in <xref target="sdp_con"/>. The procedures in 
          this section apply to an "m=" line associated with any media stream that uses WebSocket 
          or secure WebSocket as transport.</t>
       </section>
       
       <section anchor="sec-gen-intial-offer" title="Generating the Initial Offer">
        <t>An SDP offerer in order to negotiate WebSocket as a transport MUST indicate the same in
        the "proto" field of the "m=" line. For example, to negotiate BFCP-over-WebSocket the "proto"
        value in the "m=" line MUST be TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is over TLS, else it MUST be 
        TCP/WS/BFCP.</t>
        <t>The offerer SHOULD assign the SDP "setup" attribute with a value of "active" (the 
          offerer will be the initiator of the outgoing TCP connection), unless the offerer 
          insists on being a receiver of an incoming connection, in which case the offerer 
          SHOULD use a value of "passive".  The offerer MUST NOT assign an SDP "setup" attribute 
          with a "holdconn" value.  If the offerer assigns the SDP "setup" attribute with a value
           of "passive", the offerer MUST be prepared to receive an incoming TCP connection on the
          IP and port tuple advertised in the "c=" line and audio/video ports of the BFCP media 
          stream before it receives the SDP answer.</t>

          <t>The following is an example of an "m=" line for a BFCP connection:
             <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
Offer (browser):
m=application 9 TCP/WSS/BFCP *
a=setup:active
a=connection:new
a=floorctrl:c-only
m=audio 55000 RTP/AVP 0
m=video 55002 RTP/AVP 31
]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>
        <t>In the above example, the client is intending to setup the TLS /TCP connection 
        and hence the port is set to a value of 9, which is the discard port. </t>
       </section>

        <section anchor="sec-gen-answer" title="Generating the Answer">
          <t>If the answerer accepts the offered WebSocket transport
   connection, in the associated SDP answer, the answerer MUST assign an
   SDP "setup" attribute with a value of either "active" or "passive",
   according to the procedures in <xref target="RFC4145"/>.  The answerer MUST NOT
   assign an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of "holdconn".</t>

   <t>If the answerer assigns an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of
   "active", the answerer MUST initiate the WebSocket connection handshake by
  acting as client on the negotiated media stream, towards the IP address and port 
  of the offerer using the procedures described in <xref target="RFC6455"/>.
   The answer MUST have an "a=ws-uri"  or "a=wss-uri" attribute depending on
    whether the application is run of WS or WSS. This
     attribute MUST follow the syntax defined in <xref target="sdp_con"/>. For
     BFCP application,  the "proto" value in the "m=" line MUST be TCP/WSS/BFCP 
     if WebSocket is run on TLS, else it MUST be TCP/WS/BFCP.</t>

    <t>The following example shows a case where the server responds with a BFCP media stream over
     a WebSocket connection running TLS. It shows an answer "m=" line for the BFCP connection.
      In this example since WebSockets is running over TLS, the server answers back with 
      "a=wss-uri" attribute in the media section of SDP indicating the connection URI:
      <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
Answer (server):
m=application 50000 TCP/WSS/BFCP *
a=setup:passive
a=connection:new
a=wss-uri:wss://bfcp-ws.example.com?token=3170449312
a=floorctrl:s-only
a=confid:4321
a=userid:1234
a=floorid:1 m-stream:10
a=floorid:2 m-stream:11
m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 0
a=label:10
m=video 50004 RTP/AVP 31
a=label:11
      ]]></artwork>
        </figure></t> 
        </section>

        <section anchor="sec-off-ans" title="Offerer Processing of the Answer">
          <t>When the offerer receives an SDP answer, if the offerer ends up being
           active it MUST initiate the WebSocket connection handshake by sending a GET 
           message on the negotiated media stream, towards the IP address and port of the answerer, as 
           per the procedures described in <xref target="RFC6455"/>.</t>    
        </section>

        <section anchor="mid-call" title="Modifying the Session">
          <t>Once an offer/answer exchange has been completed, either endpoint MAY
   send a new offer in order to modify the session.  The endpoints can
   reuse the existing WebSocket connection by adding "a=connection:existing" attribute in the 
   media section of SDP following the rules mentioned in <xref target="RFC4145"/> if the ws-uri 
   values and the transport parameters indicated by each endpoint are unchanged.
   Otherwise, following the rules for the initial offer/answer exchange,
   the endpoints can negotiate and create a new WebSocket connection on top of TLS/TCP or TCP.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="sec-offerless" title="Offerless INVITE Scenarios">
          <t>
            In some scenarios an endpoint (e.g., a browser) originating the call (UAC) can send
an offerless INVITE to the server. The server will generate an offer
in response to the INVITE. In such cases the server MUST send an offer with
setup attribute as "passive" so as to accept incoming connection and
MUST include "a=wss-uri" or "a=ws-uri" attribute in the media section
depending on whether the server wishes to use WebSocket or secure WebSocket.
The SDP offer sent by the server will look like the example in <xref target="sec-gen-answer"/>.
          </t>
         </section> 

     </section> 


    <section anchor="security_considerations"
             title="Security Considerations">
      <t>An attacker may attempt to add, modify, or remove 'a=ws-uri' or 'a=wss-uri' attribute
   from a session description.  This could result in an application
   behaving undesirably.  Consequently, it is strongly RECOMMENDED that
   integrity protection be applied to the SDP session descriptions.  For
   session descriptions carried in SIP <xref target="RFC3261"/>, S/MIME is the natural 
   choice to provide such end-to-end integrity protection.</t>

      <t> It is also RECOMMENDED that the application signaling traffic being transported 
      over a WebSocket communication session be protected by using a secure WebSocket
      connection (using TLS <xref target="RFC5246"/> over TCP).</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana_considerations" title="IANA Considerations">

<t>NOTE to RFC Editor: Please replace "XXXX" with the number of this RFC.</t>

  <t>This document requests that IANA to register the attributes defined
    in <xref target="attribute1"/> and  <xref target="attribute2"/> as new values for the SDP att-field under the
    Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters registry, with RFCXXXX
    as the reference.</t>

    
</section>

      <section anchor="acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
        <t>Thanks to Christer Holmberg for raising the need for a 
        BFCP-independent SDP attribute for WebSocket Connection URI.  
        </t>
        <t>The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Kyzivat, Suhas Nandakumar and Christer Holmberg for their invaluable suggestions and review comments.</t> 
      </section>

  </middle>


  <back>

    <references title="Normative References">
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6455"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4145"?>

    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7235"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2818"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3261"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3264"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4566"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5246"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6101"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7118"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7395"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.I-D.pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis"?>
         <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes"?>

    <reference anchor="WS-API">
        <front>
          <title>The WebSocket API</title>

          <author>
            <organization>W3C</organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="Ian Hickson" initials="I." role="editor"
                  surname="Hickson">
            <organization>Google, Inc.</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="May" year="2012"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
