<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd"[
<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2629 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2629.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6374 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6374.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-bier-architecture SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-bier-architecture-03.xml">

]>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>

<rfc category="info" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-02">

<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<front>
	<title abbrev='OAM Requirements for BIER'>Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) Requirements for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Layer</title>

	<author initials='G.' surname="Mirsky" fullname='Greg Mirsky'>
		<organization>Ericsson</organization>
		<address>
			<email>gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='E.' surname="Nordmark" fullname='Erik Nordmark'>
		<organization>Arista Networks</organization>
		<address>
			<email>nordmark@acm.org</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='C.' surname="Pignataro" fullname='Carlos Pignataro'>
		<organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
		<address>
			<email>cpignata@cisco.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='N.' surname="Kumar" fullname='Nagendra Kumar'>
		<organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
		<address>
			<email>naikumar@cisco.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>
	
	<author initials='S.' surname="Aldrin" fullname='Sam Aldrin'>
		<organization>Google</organization>
		<address>
			<email>aldrin.ietf@gmail.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='L.' surname="Zheng" fullname='Lianshu Zheng'>
		<organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
		<address>
			<email>vero.zheng@huawei.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>
	
	<author initials='M.' surname="Chen" fullname='Mach Chen'>
		<organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
		<address>
			<email>mach.chen@huawei.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='N.' surname="Akiya" fullname='Nobo Akiya'>
		<organization>Big Switch Networks</organization>
		<address>
			<email>nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>

	<author initials='S' surname="Pallagatti" fullname='Santosh Pallagatti'>
		<organization></organization>
		<address>
			<email>santosh.palagatti@gmail.com</email>
		</address> 
	</author>


    <date day="22" month="September" year="2016" />

    <area>Routing</area>

    <workgroup>BIER  Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
   
   <keyword>BIER</keyword>
   
   <keyword>OAM</keyword>
	
	<abstract>
	<t>
	   This document describes a list of functional requirement toward Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM)
	   toolset in Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) layer of a network.
	 </t>
	</abstract>
</front>

<middle>
  <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
        <t>
   <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-architecture"/> introduces and explains Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)
   architecture and how it supports forwarding of multicast data packets.
       </t>
       <t>
   This document lists the OAM requirements for BIER layer of multicast domain. 
   The list can further be used to for gap analysis of available OAM tools to identify
   possible enhancements of existing or whether new OAM tools are required to
   support proactive and on-demand path monitoring and service validation.
          </t>
         
     <section title="Conventions used in this document">
         <section title="Terminology">
<t>
Term "BIER OAM" used in this document interchangeably with longer version
"set of OAM protocols, methods and tools for BIER layer".
</t>
            <t>BFR:       Bit-Forwarding Router            </t>
            <t>BFER:    Bit-Forwarding Egress Router</t>
            <t>BIER:     Bit Index Explicit Replication</t>
            <t>OAM:      Operations, Administration and Maintenance</t>
 
         </section>    
         
        <section title="Requirements Language">
             <t>
	  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
                "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and 
	  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in 
	  <xref target="RFC2119"></xref>.
             </t>
          </section>

      </section>
     </section>

  <section anchor="req-list" title="Requirements">
  <t>
  This section lists requirements for OAM of BIER layer:
  <list style="numbers">
  <t>
  The listed requirements MUST be supported with any type of transport layer over which BIER layer can be realized.
  </t>
  <t>
  It MUST be possible to initialize BIER OAM session from any Bit-Forwarding Router (BFR) of the given BIER domain.
  </t>
  <t>
  It SHOULD be possible to initialize BIER OAM session from a centralized controller.
  </t>
  <t>
  BIER OAM MUST support proactive and on-demand OAM monitoring and measurement methods.
  </t>
  <t>
  BIER OAM MUST support unidirectional OAM methods, both continuity check and performance measurement.
  </t>
 <t>
  BIER OAM packets MUST be in-band, i.e. follow exactly the same path as data plane traffic, in forward direction,
  i.e. from ingress toward egress end point(s) of the OAM test session.
  </t>
    <t>
  BIER OAM MUST support bi-directional OAM methods. Such OAM methods MAY combine in-band monitoring or
  measurement in forward direction and out-of-band notification in the reverse direction, i.e. from egress to ingress
  end point of the OAM test session.
  </t>
<!-- <t>
  BIER OAM MUST support continuity check method.
  </t>
 -->
 <t>
BIER OAM MUST support proactive monitoring of BFER availability by a BFR in the given BIER
domain, e.g. p2mp BFD active tail support.
</t>
<t>
BIER OAM MUST support Path Maximum Transmission Unit discovery.
</t>
<t>
BIER OAM MUST support Reverse Defect Indication (RDI) notification of the source of continuity
checking BFR by Bit-Forwarding Egress Routers (BFERs), e.g. by using Diag in p2mp BFD
with active tail support.
</t>
 <t>
  BIER OAM MUST support active and passive performance measurement methods.
  </t>
<t>
BIER OAM MUST support unidirectional performance measurement methods to calculate throughput, loss, delay 
and delay variation metrics. <xref target="RFC6374"/> provides great details into performance
measurement and performance metrics.
</t>
<t>
BIER OAM MUST support defect notification mechanism, like Alarm Indication Signal. Any BFR in the given BIER domain
MAY originate a defect notification addressed to any subset of BFRs within the domain.
</t>
<t>
BIER OAM MUST support methods to enable survivability of a BIER layer. These recovery methods MAY use
protection switching and restoration.
</t>
  </list> 			
  </t>

</section>

  <section anchor="iana-considerations" title="IANA Considerations">
  <t>
  This document does not propose any IANA consideration. This section may be removed.
  </t>
  </section>
 
   <section anchor="security-considerations" title="Security Considerations">
   <t>
   This document list the OAM requirement for BIER-enabled domain
   and does not raise any security concerns or issues in addition to ones common to networking.
   </t>
   </section> 
   
   <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgement">
   <t>
   TBD
   </t>
   </section>
  
  </middle>
  
    <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
     
     &RFC2119;
     
     &I-D.ietf-bier-architecture;
     
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
    
    &RFC6374;
    
    </references>

 </back>
 </rfc>   
    
