<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="no"?>
<?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>
<?rfc strict="no" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-cdni-redirection-19" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="Request Routing Redirection">Request Routing Redirection
    interface for CDN Interconnection</title>

    <author fullname="Ben Niven-Jenkins" initials="B." role="editor"
            surname="Niven-Jenkins">
      <organization>Nokia</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>3 Ely Road</street>

          <city>Milton</city>

          <region>Cambridge</region>

          <code>CB24 6DD</code>

          <country>UK</country>
        </postal>

        <email>ben.niven-jenkins@nokia.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Ray van Brandenburg" initials="R." role="editor"
            surname="van Brandenburg">
      <organization>TNO</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Anna van Buerenplein 1</street>

          <city>The Hague</city>

          <region/>

          <code>2595DA</code>

          <country>the Netherlands</country>
        </postal>

        <phone>+31-88-866-7000</phone>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="" month="" year=""/>

    <abstract>
      <t>The Request Routing Interface comprises (1) the asynchronous
      advertisement of footprint and capabilities by a downstream Content
      Delivery Network (CDN) that allows an upstream CDN to decide whether to
      redirect particular user requests to that downstream CDN; and (2) the
      synchronous operation of an upstream CDN requesting whether a downstream
      CDN is prepared to accept a user request and of a downstream CDN
      responding with how to actually redirect the user request. This document
      describes an interface for the latter part, i.e., the CDNI Request
      Routing Redirection interface.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction" toc="default">
      <t>A Content Delivery Network (CDN) is a system built on an existing IP
      network which is used for large scale content delivery, via prefetching
      or dynamically caching content on its distributed surrogates (caching
      servers). <xref target="RFC6707"/> describes the problem area of
      interconnecting CDNs.</t>

      <t>The CDNI Request Routing interface outlined in <xref
      target="RFC7336"/> comprises of:</t>

      <t><list style="numbers">
          <t>The asynchronous advertisement of footprint and capabilities by a
          downstream CDN (dCDN) that allows an upstream CDN (uCDN) to decide
          whether to redirect particular user requests to that dCDN.</t>

          <t>The synchronous operation of a uCDN requesting whether a dCDN is
          prepared to accept a user request and of a dCDN responding with how
          to actually redirect the user request.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>This document describes an interface for the latter part, i.e., the
      CDNI Request Routing Redirection interface (RI).</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
      target="RFC2119"/>.</t>

      <t>This document reuses the terminology defined in <xref
      target="RFC6707"/>.</t>

      <t>The following additional terms are introduced by this document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="Application Level Redirection:">The act of using an
          application specific redirection mechanism for the request routing
          process of a CDN. The Redirection Target (RT) is the result of the
          routing decision of a CDN at the time it receives a content request
          via an application specific protocol response. Examples of an
          application level redirection are HTTP 302 Redirection and RTMP 302
          Redirection.</t>

          <t hangText="DNS Redirection:">The act of using DNS name resolution
          for the request routing process of a CDN. In DNS Redirection, the
          DNS name server of the CDN makes the routing decision based on a
          local policy and selects one or more Redirection Targets (RTs) and
          redirects the user agent to the RT(s) by returning the details of
          the RT(s) in response to the DNS query request from the user agent's
          DNS resolver.</t>

          <t hangText="HTTP Redirection:">The act of using an HTTP redirection
          response for the request routing process of a CDN. The Redirection
          Target (RT) is the result of the routing decision of a CDN at the
          time it receives a content request via HTTP. HTTP Redirection is a
          particular case of Application Level Redirection.</t>

          <t hangText="Redirection Target (RT):">A Redirection Target is the
          endpoint to which the user agent is redirected. In CDNI, a RT may
          point to a number of different components, some examples include a
          surrogate in the same CDN as the request router, a request router in
          a dCDN or a surrogate in a dCDN, etc.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="Interface function and operation overview">
      <t>The main function of the CDNI Redirection interface (RI) is to allow
      the request routing systems in interconnected CDNs to communicate to
      facilitate the redirection of User Agent requests between interconnected
      CDNs.</t>

      <t>The detailed requirements for the Redirection interface and their
      relative priorities are described in section 5 of <xref
      target="RFC7337"/>.</t>

      <t>The User Agent will make a request to a request router in the uCDN
      using one of either DNS or HTTP. The RI is used between the uCDN and one
      or more dCDNs. The dCDN's RI response may contain a Redirection Target
      with a type that is compatible with the protocol used between User Agent
      and uCDN request router. The dCDN has control over the Redirection
      Target it provides. Depending on the returned Redirection Target, the
      User Agent's request may be redirected to:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The final Surrogate, which may be in the dCDN that returned the
          RI response to the uCDN, or another CDN (if the dCDN delegates the
          delivery to another CDN); or</t>

          <t>A request router (in the dCDN or another CDN), which may use a
          different redirection protocol (DNS or HTTP) than the one included
          in the RI request.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>The Redirection interface operates between the request routing
      systems of a pair of interconnected CDNs. To enable communication over
      the Redirection interface, the uCDN needs to know the URI (end point) in
      the dCDN to send CDNI request routing queries.</t>

      <t>The Redirection interface URI may be statically pre-configured,
      dynamically discovered via the CDNI Control interface, or discovered via
      other means. However, such discovery mechanisms are not specified in
      this document, as they are considered out of the scope of the
      Redirection interface specification.</t>

      <t>The Redirection interface is only relevant in the case of Recursive
      Request Redirection, as Iterative Request Redirection does not invoke
      any interaction over the Redirection interface between interconnected
      CDNs. Therefore, the scope of this document is limited to Recursive
      Request Redirection.</t>

      <t>In the case of Recursive Request Redirection, in order to perform
      redirection of a request received from a User Agent, the uCDN queries
      the dCDN so that the dCDN can select and provide a Redirection Target.
      In cases where a uCDN has a choice of dCDNs it is up to the uCDN to
      decide (for example, via configured policies) which dCDN(s) to query and
      in which order to query them. A number of strategies are possible
      including selecting a preferred dCDN based on local policy, possibly
      falling back to querying an alternative dCDN(s) if the first dCDN does
      not return a Redirection Target or otherwise rejects the uCDN's RI
      request. A more complex strategy could be to query multiple dCDNs in
      parallel before selecting one and using the Redirection Target provided
      by that dCDN.</t>

      <t>The uCDN-&gt;User Agent redirection protocols addressed in this draft
      are: DNS redirection and HTTP redirection. Other types of application
      level redirection will not be discussed further in this document.
      However, the Redirection interface is designed to be extensible and
      could be extended to support additional application level redirection
      protocols.</t>

      <t>For both DNS &amp; HTTP redirection, either HTTP or HTTPS could be
      used to connect to the Redirection Target. When HTTPS is used to connect
      to the uCDN, if the uCDN uses DNS redirection to identify the RT to the
      User Agent, then the new target domain name may not match the domain in
      the URL dereferenced to reach the uCDN; without operational precautions,
      and in the absence of DNSSEC, this can make a legitimate redirection
      look like a DNS-based attack to a User Agent and trigger security
      warnings. When DNS-based redirection with HTTPS is used, this
      specification assumes that any RT can complete the necessary TLS
      handshake with the User Agent. Any operational mechanisms this requires,
      e.g., private key distribution to surrogates and request routers in
      dCDNs, are outside the scope of this document. </t>

      <t>This document also defines an RI loop prevention and detection
      mechanism as part of the Redirection interface.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="HTTP based interface for the Redirection Interface">
      <t>This document defines a simple interface for the Redirection
      interface based on HTTP <xref target="RFC7230"/>, where the attributes
      of a User Agent's requests are encapsulated along with any other data
      that can aid the dCDN in processing the requests. The RI response
      encapsulates the attributes of the RT(s) that the uCDN should return to
      the User Agent (if it decides to utilize the dCDN for delivery) along
      with the policy for how the response can be reused. The examples of RI
      requests and responses below do not contain a complete set of HTTP
      headers for brevity; only the pertinent HTTP headers are shown.</t>

      <t>The RI between the uCDN and dCDN uses the same HTTP interface to
      encapsulate the attributes of both DNS and HTTP requests received from
      User Agents, although the contents of the RI requests/responses contain
      data specific to either DNS or HTTP redirection.</t>

      <t>This approach has been chosen because it enables CDN operators to
      only have to deploy a single interface for the RI between their CDNs,
      regardless of the User Agent redirection method. In this way, from an
      operational point of view there is only one interface to monitor,
      manage, develop troubleshooting tools for, etc.</t>

      <t>In addition, having a single RI where the attributes of the User
      Agent's DNS or HTTP request are encapsulated along with the other data
      required for the dCDN to make a request routing decision, avoids having
      to try to encapsulate or proxy DNS/HTTP/RTMP/etc requests and find ways
      to somehow embed the additional CDNI Request Routing Redirection
      interface properties/data within those End User DNS/HTTP/RTMP/etc
      requests.</t>

      <t>Finally, the RI is easily extendable to support other User Agent
      request redirection methods (e.g., RTMP 302 redirection) by defining
      additional protocol specific keys for RI requests and responses along
      with a specification how to process them.</t>

      <t>The generic Recursive Request Redirection message flow between
      Request Routing systems in a pair of interconnected CDNs is as
      follows:</t>

      <t/>

      <figure anchor="generic-message-flow"
              title="Generic Recursive Request Redirection message flow">
        <artwork><![CDATA[User Agent                CDN B RR                  CDN A RR
    |UA Request (DNS or HTTP) |                         |
    |-------------------------------------------------->| (1)
    |                         |                         |
    |                         |HTTP POST to CDN B's RI  |
    |                         |URI encapsulating UA     |
    |                         |request attributes       |
    |                         |<------------------------| (2)
    |                         |                         |
    |                         |HTTP Response with body  |
    |                         |containing RT attributes |
    |                         |of the protocol specific |
    |                         |response to return to UA |
    |                         |------------------------>| (3)
    |                         |                         |
    |           Protocol specific response (redirection)|
    |<--------------------------------------------------| (4)
    |                         |                         |]]></artwork>
      </figure>

      <t/>

      <t><list style="numbers">
          <t>The User Agent sends its (DNS or HTTP) request to CDN A. The
          Request Routing System of CDN A processes the request and, through
          local policy, recognizes that the request is best served by another
          CDN, specifically CDN B (or that CDN B may be one of a number of
          candidate dCDNs it could use).</t>

          <t>The Request Routing System of CDN A sends an HTTP POST to CDN B's
          RI URI containing the attributes of the User Agent's request.</t>

          <t>The Request Routing System of CDN B processes the RI request and
          assuming the request is well formed, responds with an HTTP "200"
          response with a message body containing the RT(s) to return to the
          User Agent as well as parameters that indicate the properties of the
          response (cacheability and scope).</t>

          <t>The Request Routing System of CDN A sends a protocol specific
          response (containing the returned attributes) to the User Agent, so
          that the User Agent's request will be redirected to the RT(s)
          returned by CDN B.</t>
        </list></t>

      <section title="Information passed in RI requests &amp; responses">
        <t>The information passed in RI requests splits into two basic
        categories:</t>

        <t>
          <list style="numbers">
            <t>The attributes of the User Agent's request to the uCDN.</t>

            <t>Properties/parameters that the uCDN can use to control the
            dCDN&rsquo;s response or that can help the dCDN make its
            decision.</t>
          </list>
        </t>

        <t>Generally, dCDNs can provide better routing decisions given additional information about the content request, e.g., the URI of the requested content or the User Agent's IP address or subnet. The set of information required to base a routing decision on can be highly dependent on the type of content delivered. A uCDN SHOULD only include information that is absolutely necessary for delivering that type of content. Cookies in particular are particularly sensitive from a security/privacy point of view and in general SHOULD NOT be conveyed in the RI Requests to the dCDN. The set of information necessary to be conveyed for a particular type of request is expected to be conveyed out of band between the uCDN and dCDN. See <xref target="privacy"/> for more detail on the privacy aspects of using RI Requests to convey information about UA requests.</t>

        <t>In order for the dCDN to determine whether it is capable of
        delivering any requested content, it requires CDNI metadata related to
        the content the User Agent is requesting. That metadata will describe
        the content and any policies associated with it. It is expected that
        the RI request contains sufficient information for the Request Router
        in the dCDN to be able to retrieve the required CDNI Metadata via the
        CDNI Metadata interface.</t>

        <t>The information passed in RI responses splits into two basic
        categories:</t>

        <t><list style="numbers">
            <t>The attributes of the RT to return to the User Agent in the DNS
            response or HTTP response.</t>

            <t>Parameters/policies that indicate the properties of the
            response, such as, whether it is cacheable, the scope of the
            response, etc.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>In addition to details of how to redirect the User Agent, the dCDN
        may wish to return additional policy information to the uCDN to it
        with future RI requests. For example, the dCDN may wish to return a
        policy that expresses &ldquo;this response can be reused without
        requiring an RI request for 60 seconds provided the User Agent's IP
        address is in the range 198.51.100.0 - 198.51.100.255&rdquo;.</t>

        <t>These additional policies split into two basic categories:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Cacheability information signaled via the HTTP response headers
            of the RI response (to reduce the number of subsequent RI requests
            the uCDN needs to make).</t>

            <t>The scope of a cacheable response signaled in the HTTP response
            body of the RI response, for example, whether the response applies
            to a wider range of IP addresses than what was included in the RI
            request.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The cacheability of the response is indicated using the standard
        HTTP Cache-Control mechanisms.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="JSON encoding of RI requests &amp; responses">
        <t>The body of RI requests and responses is a JSON object <xref
        target="RFC7159"/> that MUST conform to <xref target="RFC7493"/>
        containing a dictionary of key:value pairs. Senders MUST encode all
        (top level object and sub-object) keys specified in this document in
        lowercase. Receivers MUST ignore any keys that are unknown or
        invalid.</t>

        <t>The following top level keys are defined along with whether they
        are applicable to RI requests, RI responses or both:</t>

        <texttable title="Top-Level keys in RI requests/responses">
          <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Request/Response</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

          <c>dns</c>

          <c>Both</c>

          <c>The attributes of the UA's DNS request or the attributes of the
          RT(s) to return in a DNS response.</c>

          <c>http</c>

          <c>Both</c>

          <c>The attributes of the UA's HTTP request or the attributes of the
          RT to return in a HTTP response.</c>

          <c>scope</c>

          <c>Response</c>

          <c>The scope of the response (if it is cacheable). For example,
          whether the response applies to a wider range of IP addresses than
          what was included in the RI request.</c>

          <c>error</c>

          <c>Response</c>

          <c>Additional details if the response is an error response.</c>

          <c>cdn-path</c>

          <c>Both</c>

          <c>A List of Strings. Contains a list of the CDN Provider IDs of
          previous CDNs that have participated in the request routing for the
          associated User Agent request. On RI requests it contains the list
          of previous CDNs that this RI request has passed through. On RI
          responses it contains the list of CDNs that were involved in
          obtaining the final redirection included in the RI response.</c>

          <c>max-hops</c>

          <c>Request</c>

          <c>Integer specifying the maximum number of hops (CDN Provider IDs)
          this request is allowed to be propagated along. This allows the uCDN
          to coarsely constrain the latency of the request routing chain.</c>
        </texttable>

        <t>A single request or response MUST contain only one of the dns or
        http keys. Requests MUST contain a cdn-path key and responses MAY
        contain a cdn-path key. If the max-hops key is not present then there
        is no limit on the number of CDN hops that the RI request can be
        propagated along. If the first uCDN does not wish the RI request to be
        propagated beyond the dCDN it is making the request to, then the uCDN
        MUST set max-hops to 1.</t>

        <t>The cdn-path MAY be reflected back in RI responses, although doing
        so could expose information to the uCDN that a dCDN may not wish to
        expose (for example, the existence of business relationships between a
        dCDN and other CDNs).</t>

        <t>If the cdn-path is reflected back in the RI response it MUST
        contain the value of cdn-path received in the associated RI request
        with the final dCDN's CDN Provider ID appended. Transit CDNs MAY
        remove the cdn-path from RI responses but MUST NOT modify the cdn-path
        in other ways.</t>

        <t>The presence of an error key within a response that also contains
        either a dns or http key does not automatically indicate that the RI
        request was unsuccessful as the error key MAY be used for
        communicating additional (e.g., debugging) information. When a
        response contains an error key as well as either a dns or http key,
        the error-code SHOULD be 1xx (e.g., 100). See <xref target="error"/>
        for more details of encoding error information in RI responses.</t>

        <t>All implementations that support IPv4 addresses MUST support the
        encoding specified by the &rsquo;IPv4address&rsquo; rule in Section
        3.2.2 of <xref target="RFC3986"/>. Likewise, implementations that
        support IPv6 addresses MUST support all IPv6 address formats specified
        in <xref target="RFC4291"/>. Server implementations SHOULD use IPv6
        address formats specified in <xref target="RFC5952"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="MIME Media Types used by the RI interface">
        <t>RI requests MUST use a MIME Media Type of application/cdni as
        specified in <xref target="RFC7736"/>, with the Payload Type (ptype)
        parameter set to 'redirection-request'.</t>

        <t>RI responses MUST use a MIME Media Type of application/cdni as
        specified in <xref target="RFC7736"/>, with the Payload Type (ptype)
        parameter set to 'redirection-response'.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="DNS redirection">
        <t>The following sections provide detailed descriptions of the
        information that should be passed in RI requests and responses for DNS
        redirection.</t>

        <section anchor="dns-redirection-request"
                 title="DNS Redirection requests">
          <t>For DNS based redirection the uCDN needs to pass the following
          information to the dCDN in the RI request:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>The IP address of the DNS resolver that made the DNS request
              to the uCDN.</t>

              <t>The type of DNS query made (usually either A or AAAA).</t>

              <t>The class of DNS query made (usually IN).</t>

              <t>The fully qualified domain name for which DNS redirection is
              being requested.</t>

              <t>The IP address or prefix of the User Agent (if known to the
              uCDN).</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The information above is encoded as a set of key:value pairs
          within the dns dictionary as follows:</t>

          <texttable>
            <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

            <c>resolver-ip</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The IP address of the UA's DNS resolver.</c>

            <c>qtype</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The type of DNS query made by the UA's DNS resolvers in
            uppercase (A, AAAA, etc.).</c>

            <c>qclass</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The class of DNS query made in uppercase (IN, etc.).</c>

            <c>qname</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The fully qualified domain name being queried.</c>

            <c>c-subnet</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>The IP address (or prefix) of the UA in CIDR format.</c>

            <c>dns-only</c>

            <c>Boolean</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>If True then dCDN MUST only use DNS redirection and MUST
            include RTs to one or more surrogates in any successful RI
            response. CDNs MUST include the dns-only property set to True on
            any cascaded RI requests. Defaults to False.</c>
          </texttable>

          <t>An RI request for DNS-based redirection MUST include a dns
          dictionary. This dns dictionary MUST contain the following keys:
          resolver-ip, qtype, qclass, qname and the value of each MUST be the
          value of the appropriate part of the User Agent's DNS
          query/request. For internationalized domain names containing non-ASCII characters, the value of the qname field MUST be the ASCII-compatible encoded (ACE) representation (A-label) of the domain name.</t>

          <t>An example RI request (uCDN-&gt;dCDN) for DNS based
          redirection:</t>

          <t/>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[POST /dcdn/ri HTTP/1.1
Host: rr1.dcdn.example.net
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-request
Accept: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response

{
  "dns" : {
    "resolver-ip" : "192.0.2.1",
    "c-subnet" : "198.51.100.0/24",
    "qtype" : "A",
    "qclass" : "IN",
    "qname" : "www.example.com"
  },
  "cdn-path": ["AS64496:0"],
  "max-hops": 3
}
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="dns-redirection-response"
                 title="DNS Redirection responses">
          <t>For a successful DNS based redirection, the dCDN needs to return
          one of the following to the uCDN in the RI response:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>The IP address(es) of (or the CNAME of) RTs that are dCDN
              surrogates (if the dCDN is performing DNS based redirection
              directly to a surrogate); or</t>

              <t>The IP address(es) of (or the CNAME of) RTs that are Request
              Routers (if the dCDN will perform request redirection itself). A
              dCDN MUST NOT return a RT which is a Request Router if the
              dns-only key is set to True in the RI request.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The information above is encoded as a set of key:value pairs
          within the dns dictionary as follows:</t>

          <texttable>
            <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

            <c>rcode</c>

            <c>Integer</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>DNS response code (see <xref target="RFC6895"/>).</c>

            <c>name</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The fully qualified domain name the response relates to.</c>

            <c>a</c>

            <c>List of String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>Set of IPv4 Addresses of RT(s).</c>

            <c>aaaa</c>

            <c>List of String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>Set of IPv6 Addresses of RT(s).</c>

            <c>cname</c>

            <c>List of String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>Set of fully qualified domain names of RT(s).</c>

            <c>ttl</c>

            <c>Integer</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>TTL in seconds of DNS response. Default is 0.</c>
          </texttable>

          <t>A successful RI response for DNS-based redirection MUST include a
          dns dictionary and MAY include an error dictionary (see <xref
          target="error"/>). An unsuccessful RI response for DNS-based
          redirection MUST include an error dictionary. If a dns dictionary is
          included in the RI response, it MUST include the rcode and name keys
          and it MUST include at least one of the following keys: a, aaaa,
          cname. The dns dictionary MAY include both 'a' and 'aaaa' keys. If
          the dns dictionary contains a cname key it MUST NOT contain either
          an a or aaaa key. For internationalized domain names containing non-ASCII characters, the value of the cname field MUST be the ASCII-compatible encoded (ACE) representation (A-label) of the domain name.</t>

          <t>An example of a successful RI response (dCDN-&gt;uCDN) for DNS
          based redirection with both a and aaaa keys is listed below :</t>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response

{
  "dns" : {
    "rcode" : 0,
    "name" : "www.example.com",
    "a" : ["203.0.113.200", "203.0.113.201", "203.0.113.202"],
    "aaaa" : ["2001:DB8::C8", "2001:DB8::C9"],
    "ttl" : 60
  }
}
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t/>

          <t>A further example of a successful RI response (dCDN-&gt;uCDN) for
          DNS based redirection is listed below, in this case with a cname key
          containing the FQDN of the RT.</t>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response

{
  "dns" : {
    "rcode" : 0,
    "name" : "www.example.com",
    "cname" : ["rr1.dcdn.example"],
    "ttl" : 20
  }
}]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t/>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="HTTP Redirection">
        <t>The following sections provide detailed descriptions of the
        information that should be passed in RI requests and responses for
        HTTP redirection.</t>

        <t>The dictionary keys used in HTTP Redirection requests and responses
        use the following conventions for their prefixes:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>c- is prefixed to keys for information related to the Client
            (User Agent).</t>

            <t>cs- is prefixed to keys for information passed by the Client
            (User Agent) to the Server (uCDN).</t>

            <t>sc- is prefixed to keys for information to be passed by the
            Server (uCDN) to the Client (User Agent).</t>
          </list></t>

        <section anchor="http-redirection-request"
                 title="HTTP Redirection requests">
          <t>For HTTP-based redirection the uCDN needs to pass the following
          information to the dCDN in the RI request:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>The IP address of the User Agent.</t>

              <t>The URI requested by the User Agent.</t>

              <t>The HTTP method requested by the User Agent</t>

              <t>The HTTP version number requested by the User Agent.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The uCDN may also decide to pass the presence and value of
          particular HTTP headers included in the User Agent request to the
          dCDN.</t>

          <t>The information above is encoded as a set of key:value pairs
          within the http dictionary as follows:</t>

          <texttable>
            <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

            <c>c-ip</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The IP address of the UA.</c>

            <c>cs-uri</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The Effective Request URI <xref target="RFC7230"/> requested by
            the UA.</c>

            <c>cs-method</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The method part of the request-line as defined in <xref
            target="RFC7230">Section 3.1.1 of</xref>.</c>

            <c>cs-version</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The HTTP-version part of the request-line as defined in <xref
            target="RFC7230">Section 3.1.1 of</xref>.</c>

            <c>cs-(&lt;headername&gt;)</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>The field-value of the HTTP header field named
            &lt;HeaderName&gt; as a string, for example, cs-(cookie) would
            contain the value of the HTTP Cookie header from the UA
            request.</c>
          </texttable>

          <t>An RI request for HTTP-based redirection MUST include an http
          dictionary. This http dictionary MUST contain the following keys:
          c-ip, cs-method, cs-version and cs-uri and the value of each MUST be
          the value of the appropriate part of the User Agent's HTTP
          request.</t>

          <t>The http dictionary of an RI request MUST contain a maximum of
          one cs-(&lt;headername&gt;) key for each unique header field-name
          (HTTP header field). &lt;headername&gt; MUST be identical to the
          equivalent HTTP header field-name encoded in all lowercase.</t>

          <t>In the case where the User Agent request includes multiple HTTP
          header fields with the same field-name, it is RECOMMENDED that the
          uCDN combines these different HTTP headers into a single value
          according to <xref target="RFC7230">Section 3.2.2 of</xref>.
          However, because of the plurality of already defined HTTP header
          fields, and inconsistency of some of these header fields concerning
          the combination mechanism defined in RFC 7230, the uCDN MAY have to
          deviate from using the combination mechanism where appropriate. For
          example, it might only send the contents of the first occurrence of
          the HTTP Headers instead.</t>

          <t>An example RI request (uCDN-&gt;dCDN) for HTTP based
          redirection:</t>

          <t/>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[POST /dcdn/rrri HTTP/1.1
Host: rr1.dcdn.example.net
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-request
Accept: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response

{
  "http": {
    "c-ip": "198.51.100.1",
    "cs-uri": "http://www.example.com",
    "cs-version": "HTTP/1.1",
    "cs-method": "GET"
  },
  "cdn-path": ["AS64496:0"],
  "max-hops": 3
}
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>

        <section anchor="http-redirection-response"
                 title="HTTP Redirection responses">
          <t/>

          <t>For a successful HTTP based redirection, the dCDN needs to return
          one of the following to the uCDN in the RI response:<list
              style="symbols">
              <t>A URI pointing to an RT that is the selected dCDN
              surrogate(s) (if the dCDN is performing HTTP based redirection
              directly to a surrogate); or</t>

              <t>A URI pointing to an RT that is a Request Router (if the dCDN
              will perform request redirection itself).</t>
            </list></t>

          <t/>

          <t>The information above is encoded as a set of key:value pairs
          within the http dictionary as follows:</t>

          <texttable>
            <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

            <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

            <c>sc-status</c>

            <c>Integer</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The status-code part of the status-line as defined in <xref
            target="RFC7230">Section 3.1.2 of</xref> to return to the UA
            (usually set to 302).</c>

            <c>sc-version</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The HTTP-version part of the status-line as defined in <xref
            target="RFC7230">Section 3.1.2 of</xref> to return to the UA.</c>

            <c>sc-reason</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The reason-phrase part of the status-line as defined in <xref
            target="RFC7230">Section 3.1.2 of</xref> to return to the UA.</c>

            <c>cs-uri</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The URI requested by the UA/client.</c>

            <c>sc-(location)</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>Yes</c>

            <c>The contents of the Location header to return to the UA (i.e.,
            a URI pointing to the RT(s)).</c>

            <c>sc-(&lt;headername&gt;)</c>

            <c>String</c>

            <c>No</c>

            <c>The field-value of the HTTP header field named
            &lt;HeaderName&gt; to return to the UA. For example, sc-(expires)
            would contain the value of the HTTP Expires header.</c>
          </texttable>

          <t>Note: The sc-(location) key in the table above is an example of
          sc-(&lt;headername&gt;) that has been called out separately as its
          presence is mandatory in RI responses.</t>

          <t>A successful RI response for HTTP-based redirection MUST include
          an http dictionary and MAY include an error dictionary (see <xref
          target="error"/>). An unsuccessful RI response for HTTP-based
          redirection MUST include an error dictionary. If an http dictionary
          is included in the RI response, it MUST include at least the
          following keys: sc-status, sc-version, sc-reason, cs-uri and
          sc-(location).</t>

          <t>The http dictionary of an RI response MUST contain a maximum of
          one sc-(&lt;headername&gt;) key for each unique header field-name
          (HTTP header field). &lt;headername&gt; MUST be identical to the
          equivalent HTTP header field-name encoded in all lowercase.</t>

          <t>The uCDN MAY decide to not return, override or alter any or all
          of the HTTP headers defined by sc-(&lt;headername&gt;) keys before
          sending the HTTP response to the UA. It should be noted that in some
          cases, sending the HTTP Headers indicated by the dCDN transparently
          on to the UA might result in, for the uCDN, undesired behaviour. As
          an example, the dCDN might include sc-(cache-control),
          sc-(last-modified) and sc-(expires) keys in the http dictionary,
          through which the dCDN may try to influence the cacheability of the
          response by the UA. If the uCDN would pass these HTTP headers on to
          the UA, this could mean that further requests from the uCDN would go
          directly to the dCDN, bypassing the uCDN and any logging it may
          perform on incoming requests. The uCDN is therefore recommended to
          carefully consider which HTTP headers to pass on, and which to
          either override or not pass on at all.</t>

          <t>An example of a successful RI response (dCDN-&gt;uCDN) for HTTP
          based redirection:</t>

          <t/>

          <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response

{
  "http": {
    "sc-status": 302,
    "sc-version": "HTTP/1.1", 
    "sc-reason": "Found",
    "cs-uri": "http://www.example.com"
    "sc-(location)":
      "http://sur1.dcdn.example/ucdn/example.com",  
  }
}
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="Cacheability and scope of responses">
        <t>RI responses may be cacheable. As long as a cached RI response is
        not stale according to standard HTTP Cache-Control or other applicable
        mechanisms, it may be reused by the uCDN in response to User Agent
        requests without sending another RI request to the dCDN.</t>

        <t>An RI response MUST NOT be reused unless the request from the User
        Agent would generate an identical RI request to the dCDN as the one
        that resulted in the cached RI response (except for the c-ip field
        provided that the User Agent's c-ip is covered by the scope in the
        original RI response, as elaborated upon below).</t>

        <t>Additionally, although RI requests only encode a single User Agent
        request to be redirected there may be cases where a dCDN wishes to
        indicate to the uCDN that the RI response can be reused for other User
        Agent requests without the uCDN having to make another request via the
        RI. For example, a dCDN may know that it will always select the same
        Surrogates for a given set of User Agent IP addresses and in order to
        reduce request volume across the RI or to remove the additional
        latency associated with an RI request, the dCDN may wish to indicate
        that set of User Agent IP addresses to the uCDN in the initial RI
        response. This is achieved by including an optional scope dictionary
        in the RI response.</t>

        <t>Scope is encoded as a set of key:value pairs within the scope
        dictionary as follows:</t>

        <texttable>
          <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

          <c>iprange</c>

          <c>List of String</c>

          <c>No</c>

          <c>A List of IP subnets in CIDR notation that this RI response can
          be reused for, provided the RI response is still considered
          fresh.</c>
        </texttable>

        <t>If a uCDN has multiple cached responses with overlapping scopes and
        a UA request comes in for which the User Agent's IP matches with the
        IP subnets in multiple of these cached responses, the uCDN SHOULD use
        the most recent cached response when determining the approriate RI
        response to use.</t>

        <t>The following is an example of a DNS redirection response from
        <xref target="dns-redirection-response"/> that is cacheable by the
        uCDN for 30 seconds and can be returned to any User Agent with an IPv4
        address in 198.51.100.0/24.</t>

        <t/>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response
Cache-Control: public, max-age=30

{
  "dns" : {
    "rcode" : 0,
    "name" : "www.example.com",
    "a" : ["203.0.113.200", "203.0.113.201"],
    "aaaa" : ["2001:DB8::C8", "2001:DB8::C9"],
    "ttl" : 60
  }
  "scope" : {
    "iprange" : ["198.51.100.0/24"]
  }
}
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>Example of HTTP redirection response from <xref
        target="http-redirection-response"/> that is cacheable by the uCDN for
        60 seconds and can be returned to any User Agent with an IPv4 address
        in 198.51.100.0/24.</t>

        <t>Note: The response to the UA is only valid for 30 seconds, whereas
        the uCDN can cache the RI response for 60 seconds.</t>

        <t/>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response
Cache-Control: public, max-age=60

{
  "http": {
    "sc-status": 302,
    "cs-uri": "http://www.example.com"
    "sc-(location)":
      "http://sur1.dcdn.example/ucdn/example.com",  
    "sc-(cache-control)" : "public, max-age=30"
  }
  "scope" : {
    "iprange" : ["198.51.100.0/24"]
  }
}
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>
      </section>

      <section anchor="error" title="Error responses">
        <t>From a uCDN perspective, there are two types of errors that can be
        the result of the transmission of an RI request to a dCDN:</t>

        <t><list style="numbers">
            <t>An HTTP protocol error signaled via an HTTP status code,
            indicating a problem with the reception or parsing of the RI
            request or the generation of the RI response by the dCDN, and</t>

            <t>An RI-level error specified in an RI response message</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>This section deals with the latter type. The former type is outside
        the scope of this document.</t>

        <t>There are numerous reasons for a dCDN to be unable to return an
        affirmative RI response to a uCDN. Reasons may include both dCDN
        internal issues such as capacity problems, as well as reasons outside
        the influence of the dCDN, such as a malformed RI request. To aid with
        diagnosing the cause of errors, RI responses SHOULD include an error
        dictionary to provide additional information to the uCDN as to the
        reason/cause of the error. The intention behind the error dictionary
        is to aid with either manual or automatic diagnosis of issues. The
        resolution of such issues is outside the scope of this document; this
        document does not specify any consequent actions a uCDN should take
        upon receiving a particular error code.</t>

        <t>Error information (if present) is encoded as a set of key:value
        pairs within a JSON-encoded error dictionary as follows:</t>

        <texttable>
          <ttcol>Key</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Value</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Mandatory</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

          <c>error-code</c>

          <c>Integer</c>

          <c>Yes</c>

          <c>A three-digit numeric code defined by the server to indicate the
          error(s) that occurred.</c>

          <c>reason</c>

          <c>String</c>

          <c>No</c>

          <c>A string providing further information related to the error.</c>
        </texttable>

        <t>The first digit of the error-code defines the class of error. There
        are 5 classes of error distinguished by the first digit of the
        error-code:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>1xx: Informational (no error): The response should not be
            considered an error by the uCDN, which may proceed by redirecting
            the UA according to the values in the RI response. The error code
            and accompanying description may be used for informational
            purposes, e.g., for logging.</t>

            <t>2xx: Reserved.</t>

            <t>3xx: Reserved.</t>

            <t>4xx: uCDN error: The dCDN can not or will not process the
            request due to something that is perceived to be a uCDN error, for
            example, the RI request could not be parsed succesfully by the
            dCDN. The last two-digits may be used to more specifically
            indicate the source of the problem.</t>

            <t>5xx: dCDN error: Indicates that the dCDN is aware that it has
            erred or is incapable of satisfying the RI request for some
            reason, for example, the dCDN was able to parse the RI request but
            encountered an error for some reason. Examples include the dCDN
            not being able to retrieve the associated metadata or the dCDN
            being out of capacity.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The following error codes are defined and maintained by IANA (see
        <xref target="iana_section"/>):</t>

        <t>Error codes with a "Reason" of "&lt;reason&gt;" do not have a
        defined value for their 'reason'-key. Depending on the error-code
        semantics, the value of this field may be determined dynamically.</t>

        <texttable anchor="error_codes">
          <ttcol>Code</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Reason</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Description</ttcol>

          <c>100</c>

          <c>&lt;reason&gt; (see Description)</c>

          <c>Generic informational error-code meant for carrying a
          human-readable string</c>

          <c>400</c>

          <c>&lt;reason&gt; (see Description)</c>

          <c>Generic error-code for uCDN errors where the dCDN can not or will
          not process the request due to something that is perceived to be a
          uCDN error. The reason field may be used to provide more details
          about the source of the error.</c>

          <c>500</c>

          <c>&lt;reason&gt; (see Description)</c>

          <c>Generic error-code for dCDN errors where the dCDN is aware that
          it has erred or is incapable of satisfying the RI request for some
          reason. The reason field may be used to provide more details about
          the source of the error.</c>

          <c>501</c>

          <c>Unable to retrieve metadata</c>

          <c>The dCDN is unable to retrieve the metadata associated with the
          content requested by the UA. This may indicate a configuration error
          or the content requested by the UA not existing.</c>

          <c>502</c>

          <c>Loop detected</c>

          <c>The dCDN detected a redirection loop (see <xref
          target="loop_detection"/>).</c>

          <c>503</c>

          <c>Maximum hops exceeded</c>

          <c>The dCDN detected the maximum number of redirection hops
          exceeding max-hops (see <xref target="loop_detection"/>).</c>

          <c>504</c>

          <c>Out of capacity</c>

          <c>The dCDN does not currently have sufficient capacity to handle
          the UA request.</c>

          <c>505</c>

          <c>Delivery protocol not supported</c>

          <c>The dCDN does not support the (set of) delivery protocols
          indicated in the CDNI Metadata of the content requested content by
          the UA.</c>

          <c>506</c>

          <c>Redirection protocol not supported</c>

          <c>The dCDN does not support the requested redirection protocol.
          This error-code is also used when the RI request has the dns-only
          flag set to True and the dCDN is not support or is not prepared to
          return a RT of a surrogate directly.</c>
        </texttable>

        <t>The following is an example of an unsuccessful RI response
        (dCDN-&gt;uCDN) for a DNS based User Agent request:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response
Cache-Control: private, no-cache

{
  "error" : {
    "error-code" : 504,
    "description" : "Out of capacity"
  }
}
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The following is an example of a successful RI response
        (dCDN-&gt;uCDN) for a HTTP based User Agent request containing an
        error dictionary for informational purposes:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:38 GMT
Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=redirection-response
Cache-Control: private, no-cache

{
   "http": {
    "sc-status": 302,
    "sc-version": "HTTP/1.1", 
    "sc-reason": "Found",
    "cs-uri": "http://www.example.com"
    "sc-(location)":
      "http://sur1.dcdn.example/ucdn/example.com",
   },
   "error" : {
    "error-code" : 100,                                                
    "description" : 
      "This is a human-readable message meant for debugging purposes"
  }  
}
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section anchor="loop_detection" title="Loop detection &amp; prevention">
        <t>In order to prevent and detect RI request loops, each CDN MUST
        insert its CDN Provider ID into the cdn-path key of every RI request
        it originates or cascades. When receiving RI requests a dCDN MUST
        check the cdn-path and reject any RI requests which already contain
        the dCDN's Provider ID in the cdn-path. Transit CDNs MUST NOT
        propagate to any downstream CDNs if the number of CDN Provider IDs in
        cdn-path (before adding its own Provider ID) is equal to or greater
        than max-hops.</t>

        <t>The CDN Provider ID uniquely identifies each CDN provider during
        the course of request routing redirection. It consists of the
        characters AS followed by the CDN Provider's AS number, then a colon
        (':') and an additional qualifier that is used to guarantee uniqueness
        in case a particular AS has multiple independent CDNs deployed. For
        example, "AS64496:0".</t>

        <t>If a dCDN receives an RI request whose cdn-path already contains
        that dCDN's Provider ID the dCDN MUST send an RI error response which
        SHOULD include an error code of 502.</t>

        <t>If a dCDN receives an RI request where the number of CDN Provider
        IDs in cdn-path is greater than max-hops, the dCDN MUST send an RI
        error response which SHOULD include an error code of 503.</t>

        <t>It should be noted that the loop detection &amp; prevention
        mechanisms described above only cover preventing and detecting loops
        within the RI itself. Besides loops within the RI itself, there is
        also the possibility of loops in the data plane, for example, if the
        IP address(es) or URI(s) returned in RI responses do not resolve
        directly to a surrogate in the final dCDN there is the possibility
        that a User Agent may be continuously redirected through a loop of
        CDNs. The specification of solutions to address data plane request
        redirection loops between CDNs is outside of the scope of this
        document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>Information passed over the RI could be considered personal or
      sensitive, for example, RI requests contain parts of a User Agent's
      original request and RI responses reveal information about the dCDN's
      policy for which surrogates should serve which content/user
      locations.</t>

      <t>The RI interface also provides a mechanism whereby a uCDN could probe
      a dCDN and infer the dCDN's edge topology by making repeated RI requests
      for different content and/or UA IP addresses and correlating the
      responses from the dCDN. Additionally the ability for a dCDN to indicate
      that an RI response applies more widely than the original request (via
      the scope dictionary) may significantly reduce the number of RI requests
      required to probe and infer the dCDN's edge topology.</t>

      <t>The same information could be obtained in the absence of the RI
      interface, but it could be more difficult to gather as it would require
      a distributed set of machines with a range of different IP addresses
      each making requests directly to the dCDN. However, the RI facilitates
      easier collection of such information as it enables a single client to
      query the dCDN for a redirection/surrogate selection on behalf of any UA
      IP address.</t>

      <section anchor="authentication"
               title="Authentication, Authorization, Confidentiality, Integrity            Protection">
        <t>An implementation of the CDNI Redirection interface MUST support
        TLS transport as per <xref target="RFC2818"/> and <xref
        target="RFC7230"/>. The use of TLS for transport of the CDNI
        Redirection interface messages allows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The dCDN and uCDN to authenticate each other</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>and, once they have mutually authenticated each other, it
        allows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The dCDN and uCDN to authorize each other (to ensure they are
            transmitting/receiving CDNI Redirection messages to/from an
            authorized CDN);</t>

            <t>CDNI Redirection interface messages to be transmitted with
            confidentiality; and</t>

            <t>The integrity of the CDNI Redirection interface messages to be
            protected during the exchange.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>In an environment where any such protection is required, mutually
        authenticated encrypted transport MUST be used to ensure
        confidentiality of the redirection information, and to do so, TLS MUST
        be used (including authentication of the remote end) by the
        server-side (dCDN) and the client-side (uCDN) of the CDNI Redirection
        interface. </t>

        <t>When TLS is used, the general TLS usage guidance in <xref
        target="RFC7525"/> MUST be followed.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="privacy" title="Privacy">
        <t>Information passed over the RI ought to be considered personal and
        sensitive. In particular, parts of a User Agent's original request,
        most notably the UA's IP address and requested URI, are transmitted
        over the RI to the dCDN. The use of mutually authenticated TLS, as
        described in the previous section, prevents any other party than the
        authorized dCDN from gaining access to this information.</t>

        <t>Regardless of whether the uCDN and dCDN use the RI, a successfull
        redirect from a uCDN to a dCDN will make that dCDN aware of the UA's
        IP address. As such, the fact that this information is transmitted
        across the RI does not allow the dCDN to learn new information. On the
        other hand, if a uCDN uses the RI to check with multiple candidate
        dCDNs, those candidates that do not end up getting redirected to, do
        obtain information regarding End User IP addresses and requested URIs
        that they would not have, had the RI not been used.</t>

        <t>While it is technically possible to mask some information in the RI
        Request, such as the last bits of the UA IP address, it is important
        to note that this will reduce the effectivess of the RI in certain
        cases. CDN deployments need to strike a balance between end-user
        privacy and the features impacted by such masking. This balance is
        likely to vary from one deployment to another. As an example, when the
        UA and its DNS resolver is behind a Carrier-grade NAT, and the RI is
        used to find an appropriate delivery node behind the same NAT, the
        full IP address might be necessary. Another potential issue when using
        IP anonymization is that it is no longer possible to correlate an RI
        Request with a subsequent UA request.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana_section" title="IANA Considerations">
      <section title="CDNI Payload Type Parameter registrations">
        <t>The IANA is requested to register the following two new Payload
        Types in the CDNI Payload Type Parameter registry for use with the
        application/cdni MIME media type.</t>

        <t>[RFC Editor Note: Please replace the references to [RFCthis] below
        with this document's RFC number before publication.</t>

        <texttable>
          <ttcol>Payload Type</ttcol>

          <ttcol>Specification</ttcol>

          <c>redirection-request</c>

          <c>[RFCthis]</c>

          <c>redirection-response</c>

          <c>[RFCthis]</c>
        </texttable>

        <section title="CDNI RI Redirection Request Payload Type">
          <t>Purpose: The purpose of this payload type is to distinguish RI
          request messages.</t>

          <t>Interface: RI</t>

          <t>Encoding: see <xref target="dns-redirection-request"/> and <xref
          target="http-redirection-request"/></t>
        </section>

        <section title="CDNI RI Redirection Response Payload Type">
          <t>Purpose: The purpose of this payload type is to distinguish RI
          response messages.</t>

          <t>Interface: RI</t>

          <t>Encoding: see <xref target="dns-redirection-response"/> and <xref
          target="http-redirection-response"/></t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="RI Error response registry">
        <t>IANA is requested to create a new "CDNI RI Error response code"
        subregistry within the "Content Delivery Network Interconnection
        (CDNI) Parameters" registry. The "CDNI RI Error response code"
        namespace defines the valid values for the error-code key in RI error
        responses. The CDNI RI Error response code MUST be a three digit
        integer.</t>

        <t>Additions to the "RI Error response registry" will be made via
        "Specification Required" as defined in <xref target="RFC5226"/>.</t>

        <t>The Designated Expert will verify that new error code registrations
        do not duplicate existing error code definitions (in name or
        functionality), ensure that the new error code is in accordance with
        the error classes defined in section <xref target="error"/> of this
        document, prevent gratuitous additions to the namespace, and prevent
        any additions to the namespace that would impair the interoperability
        of CDNI implementations.</t>

        <t>New registrations are required to provide the following
        information:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>Code: A three-digit numeric error-code, in accordance with the
            error classes defined in section <xref target="error"/> of this
            document.</t>

            <t>Reason: A string that provides further information related to
            the error that will be included in the JSON error dictionary with
            the 'reason'-key. Depending on the error-code semantics, the value
            of this field may be determined dynamically. In that case, the
            registration should set this value to '&lt;reason&gt;' and define
            its semantics in the description field.</t>

            <t>Description: A brief description of the error code
            semantics.</t>

            <t>Specification: An optional reference to a specification that
            defines in the error code in more detail.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The entries in <xref target="error_codes"/> are registered by this
        document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Contributors">
      <t>[RFC Editor Note: Please move the contents of this section to the
      Authors' Addresses section prior to publication as an RFC.]</t>

      <t>The following persons have participated as co-authors to this
      document:</t>

      <t><list style="empty">
          <t>Wang Danhua, Huawei, Email: wangdanhua@huawei.com</t>

          <t>He Xiaoyan, Huawi, Email: hexiaoyan@huawei.com</t>

          <t>Ge Chen, China Telecom, Email: cheng@gsta.com</t>

          <t>Ni Wei, China Mobile, Email: niwei@chinamobile.com</t>

          <t>Yunfei Zhang, Email:hishigh@gmail.com</t>

          <t>Spencer Dawkins, Huawei, Email: spencer@wonderhamster.org</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>The authors would like to thank Taesang Choi, Francois le Faucheur,
      Matt Miller, Scott Wainner and Kevin J Ma for their valuable comments
      and input to this document.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.2119'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.3986'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.4291'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5952'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7230'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7159'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6895'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7493'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7525'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5226'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6707'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.2818'?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7337'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7336'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7736'?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
