<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc2595 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2595.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc5226 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5226.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc5246 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5246.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc7242 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7242.xml'>
]>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<rfc ipr="trust200902" 
     category="std"
     docName="draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-00"
     obsoletes="RFC7242">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="DTN TCPCLv4">
      Delay-Tolerant Networking TCP Convergence Layer Protocol Version 4
    </title>
    <author initials="B." surname="Sipos" fullname="Brian Sipos">
      <organization abbrev="RKF Engineering">
        RKF Engineering Solutions, LLC
      </organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>1229 19th Street NW</street>
          <city>Wasington</city>
          <region>DC</region>
          <code>20036</code>
          <country>US</country>
        </postal>
        <email>BSipos@rkf-eng.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="M." surname="Demmer" fullname="Michael Demmer">
      <organization abbrev="UC Berkeley">
        University of California, Berkeley
      </organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Computer Science Division</street>
          <street>445 Soda Hall</street>
          <city>Berkeley</city>
          <region>CA</region>
          <code>94720-1776</code>
          <country>US</country>
        </postal>
        <email>demmer@cs.berkeley.edu</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="J." surname="Ott" fullname="Joerg Ott">
      <organization>
        Aalto University
      </organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Department of Communications and Networking</street>
          <street>PO Box 13000</street>
          <city>Aalto</city>
          <code>02015</code>
          <country>Finland</country>
        </postal>
        <email>jo@netlab.tkk.fi</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="S." surname="Perreault" fullname="Simon Perreault">
      <organization>
      </organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street></street>
          <city>Quebec</city>
          <region>QC</region>
          <country>Canada</country>
        </postal>
        <email>simon@per.reau.lt</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2016" month="October" day="19"/>
    <area>Transport</area>
    <workgroup>Delay Tolerant Networking</workgroup>

    <abstract>
      <t>
This document describes a revised protocol for the TCP-based convergence
layer for Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN).
The protocol revision is based on implementation issues in the original
<xref target="RFC7242"/> and updates to the Bundle Protocol contents,
encodings, and convergence layer requirements in <xref target="I-D.ietf-dtn-bpbis"/>.
The majority of this specification is unchanged from TCPCL version 3.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="sec-1" title="Introduction">
      <t>
   This document describes the TCP-based convergence-layer protocol for
   Delay-Tolerant Networking.  Delay-Tolerant Networking is an end-to-
   end architecture providing communications in and/or through highly
   stressed environments, including those with intermittent
   connectivity, long and/or variable delays, and high bit error rates.
   More detailed descriptions of the rationale and capabilities of these
   networks can be found in &quot;Delay-Tolerant Network Architecture&quot;
   <xref target="RFC4838"/>.
</t><t>
   An important goal of the DTN architecture is to accommodate a wide
   range of networking technologies and environments.  The protocol used
   for DTN communications is the revsided Bundle Protocol (BP)
   <xref target="I-D.ietf-dtn-bpbis"/>, an
   application-layer protocol that is used to construct a store-and-
   forward overlay network.  As described in the Bundle Protocol
   specification <xref target="I-D.ietf-dtn-bpbis"/>,
   it requires the services of a &quot;convergence-
   layer adapter&quot; (CLA) to send and receive bundles using the service of
   some &quot;native&quot; link, network, or Internet protocol.  This document
   describes one such convergence-layer adapter that uses the well-known
   Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).  This convergence layer is
   referred to as TCPCL.
</t><t>
   The locations of the TCPCL and the BP in the Internet model protocol
   stack are shown in Figure 1.  In particular, when BP is using TCP as
   its bearer with TCPCL as its convergence layer, both BP and TCPCL
   reside at the application layer of the Internet model.
 </t>
<figure anchor="fig-tcpcl-ip-stack"
     title="The Locations of the Bundle Protocol and the TCP Convergence-Layer Protocol above the Internet Protocol Stack">
<artwork>
      +-------------------------+
      |     DTN Application     | -\
      +-------------------------|   |
      |  Bundle Protocol (BP)   |   -&gt; Application Layer
      +-------------------------+   |
      | TCP Conv. Layer (TCPCL) | -/
      +-------------------------+
      |     TLS (optional)      | ---&gt; Presentation Layer
      +-------------------------+
      |          TCP            | ---&gt; Transport Layer
      +-------------------------+
      |           IP            | ---&gt; Network Layer
      +-------------------------+
      |   Link-Layer Protocol   | ---&gt; Link Layer
      +-------------------------+
      |    Physical Medium      | ---&gt; Physical Layer
      +-------------------------+
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>
   This document describes the format of the protocol data units passed
   between entities participating in TCPCL communications.  This
   document does not address:
 </t>
 <t>
 <list style="symbols">
   <t>
     The format of protocol data units of the Bundle Protocol, as those
     are defined elsewhere in <xref target="RFC5050"/> and
     <xref target="I-D.ietf-dtn-bpbis"/>.
     This includes the concept of bundle fragmentation or bundle encapsulation.
     The TCPCL transfers bundles as opaque data blocks.
   </t><t>
     Mechanisms for locating or identifying other bundle nodes within
     an internet.
   </t>
 </list>
 </t>
</section>
<section title="Requirements Language">
<t>
   The key words &quot;MUST&quot;, &quot;MUST NOT&quot;, &quot;REQUIRED&quot;, &quot;SHALL&quot;, &quot;SHALL NOT&quot;,
   &quot;SHOULD&quot;, &quot;SHOULD NOT&quot;, &quot;RECOMMENDED&quot;, &quot;MAY&quot;, and &quot;OPTIONAL&quot; in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-2.1" title="Definitions Specific to the TCPCL Protocol">
<t>
   This section contains definitions that are interpreted to be specific
   to the operation of the TCPCL protocol, as described below.
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="TCP Connection:">
  A TCP connection refers to a transport connection
  using TCP as the transport protocol.
</t><t hangText="TCPCL Session:">
  A TCPCL session (as opposed to a TCP connection)
  is a TCPCL communication relationship between two
  bundle nodes. The lifetime of a TCPCL session is bound to
  the lifetime of an underlying TCP connection. Therefore, a
  TCPCL session is initiated when a bundle node initiates a TCP
  connection to be established for the purposes of bundle
  communication. A TCPCL session is terminated when the TCP
  connection ends, due either to one or both nodes actively
  terminating the TCP connection or due to network errors causing
  a failure of the TCP connection. For the remainder of this
  document, the term &quot;session&quot; without the prefix &quot;TCPCL&quot;
  refer to a TCPCL session.
</t><t hangText="Session parameters:">
  The session parameters are a set of
  values used to affect the operation of the TCPCL for a given
  session. The manner in which these parameters are conveyed
  to the bundle node and thereby to the TCPCL is implementation
  dependent. However, the mechanism by which two bundle nodes
  exchange and negotiate the values to be used for a given session
  is described in <xref target="sec-contact-negotiate"/>.
</t><t hangText="Transmission:">
  Transmission refers to the procedures and mechanisms
  (described below) for conveyance of a bundle from one node to
  another.
</t></list></t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-3" title="General Protocol Description">
<t>
   The service of this protocol is the transmission of DTN bundles over
   TCP.  This document specifies the encapsulation of bundles,
   procedures for TCP setup and teardown, and a set of messages and node
   requirements.  The general operation of the protocol is as follows.
</t><t>
   First, one node establishes a TCPCL session to the other by
   initiating a TCP connection.  After setup of the TCP connection is
   complete, an initial contact header is exchanged in both directions
   to set parameters of the TCPCL session and exchange a singleton
   endpoint identifier for each node (not the singleton Endpoint
   Identifier (EID) of any application running on the node) to denote
   the bundle-layer identity of each DTN node.  This is used to assist
   in routing and forwarding messages, e.g., to prevent loops.
</t><t>
   Once the TCPCL session is established and configured in this way,
   bundles can be transmitted in either direction.  Each bundle is
   transmitted in one or more logical segments of formatted bundle data.
   Each logical data segment consists of a DATA_SEGMENT message header,
   a count of the length of the segment, and finally the
   octet range of the bundle data.  The choice of the length to use for
   segments is an implementation matter.  The first segment for a bundle
   MUST set the 'start' flag, and the last one MUST set the 'end' flag
   in the DATA_SEGMENT message header.
</t><t>
   If multiple bundles are transmitted on a single TCPCL connection,
   they MUST be transmitted consecutively.  Interleaving data segments
   from different bundles is not allowed.  Bundle interleaving can be
   accomplished by fragmentation at the BP layer or by establishing multiple
   TCPCL sessions.
</t><t>
   A feature of this protocol is for the receiving node to send
   acknowledgments as bundle data segments arrive (ACK_SEGMENT).  The
   rationale behind these acknowledgments is to enable the sender node
   to determine how much of the bundle has been received, so that in
   case the session is interrupted, it can perform reactive
   fragmentation to avoid re-sending the already transmitted part of the
   bundle.
   For each data segment that is
   received, the receiving node sends an ACK_SEGMENT code followed by an
   count containing the cumulative length of the bundle that has been
   received.  The sending node MAY transmit multiple DATA_SEGMENT
   messages without necessarily waiting for the corresponding
   ACK_SEGMENT responses.  This enables pipelining of messages on a
   channel.  In addition, there is no explicit flow control on the TCPCL
   layer.
</t><t>
   Another feature is that a receiver MAY interrupt the
   transmission of a bundle at any point in time by replying with a
   REFUSE_BUNDLE message, which causes the sender to stop transmission
   of the current bundle, after completing transmission of a partially
   sent data segment.  Note: This enables a cross-layer optimization in
   that it allows a receiver that detects that it already has received a
   certain bundle to interrupt transmission as early as possible and
   thus save transmission capacity for other bundles.
</t><t>
   For sessions that are idle, a KEEPALIVE message is
   sent at a negotiated interval.  This is used to convey liveness
   information.
</t><t>
   Finally, before sessions close, a SHUTDOWN message is sent to the
   session peer.  After sending a SHUTDOWN message, the sender of this
   message MAY send further acknowledgments (ACK_SEGMENT or
   REFUSE_BUNDLE) but no further data messages (DATA_SEGMENT).  A
   SHUTDOWN message MAY also be used to refuse a session setup by a
   peer.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-3.1" title="Bidirectional Use of TCPCL Sessions">
<t>
   There are specific messages for sending and receiving operations (in
   addition to session setup/teardown).  TCPCL is symmetric, i.e.,
   both sides can start sending data segments in a session, and one
   side's bundle transfer does not have to complete before the other
   side can start sending data segments on its own.  Hence, the protocol
   allows for a bi-directional mode of communication.
</t><t>
   Note that in the case of concurrent bidirectional transmission,
   acknowledgment segments MAY be interleaved with data segments.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-3.2" title="Example Message Exchange">
<t>
   The following figure visually depicts the protocol exchange for a
   simple session, showing the session establishment and the
   transmission of a single bundle split into three data segments (of
   lengths L1, L2, and L3) from Node A to Node B.
</t><t>
   Note that the sending node MAY transmit multiple DATA_SEGMENT
   messages without necessarily waiting for the corresponding
   ACK_SEGMENT responses.  This enables pipelining of messages on a
   channel.  Although this example only demonstrates a single bundle
   transmission, it is also possible to pipeline multiple DATA_SEGMENT
   messages for different bundles without necessarily waiting for
   ACK_SEGMENT messages to be returned for each one.  However,
   interleaving data segments from different bundles is not allowed.
</t><t>
   No errors or rejections are shown in this example.
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-contact-example"
    title="A Simple Visual Example of the Flow of Protocol Messages on a Single TCP Session between Two Nodes (A and B)">
<artwork>
              Node A                              Node B
              ======                              ======
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |     Contact Header      | -&gt;   &lt;- |     Contact Header      |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    
    +-------------------------+
    |   DATA_SEGMENT (start)  | -&gt;
    |     Transfer ID [I1]    | -&gt;
    |       Length [L1]       | -&gt;
    |  Bundle Data 0..(L1-1)  | -&gt;
    +-------------------------+
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |     DATA_SEGMENT        | -&gt;   &lt;- |       ACK_SEGMENT       |
    |     Transfer ID [I1]    | -&gt;   &lt;- |     Transfer ID [I1]    |
    |       Length   [L2]     | -&gt;   &lt;- |        Length   [L1]    |
    |Bundle Data L1..(L1+L2-1)| -&gt;      +-------------------------+
    +-------------------------+
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |    DATA_SEGMENT (end)   | -&gt;   &lt;- |       ACK_SEGMENT       |
    |     Transfer ID [I1]    | -&gt;   &lt;- |     Transfer ID [I1]    |
    |        Length   [L3]    | -&gt;   &lt;- |      Length   [L1+L2]   |
    |Bundle Data              | -&gt;      +-------------------------+
    |    (L1+L2)..(L1+L2+L3-1)|
    +-------------------------+
                                        +-------------------------+
                                     &lt;- |       ACK_SEGMENT       |
                                     &lt;- |     Transfer ID [I1]    |
                                     &lt;- |     Length   [L1+L2+L3] |
                                        +-------------------------+

    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |       SHUTDOWN          | -&gt;   &lt;- |         SHUTDOWN        |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
</section>
</section>
<section title="Session Establishment">
<t>
   For bundle transmissions to occur using the TCPCL, a TCPCL session
   MUST first be established between communicating nodes.  It is up to
   the implementation to decide how and when session setup is
   triggered.  For example, some sessions MAY be opened proactively
   and maintained for as long as is possible given the network
   conditions, while other sessions MAY be opened only when there is
   a bundle that is queued for transmission and the routing algorithm
   selects a certain next-hop node.
</t><t>
   To establish a TCPCL session, a node MUST first establish a TCP
   connection with the intended peer node, typically by using the
   services provided by the operating system.  Port number 4556 has been
   assigned by IANA as the well-known port number for the TCP
   convergence layer.  Other port numbers MAY be used per local
   configuration.  Determining a peer's port number (if different from
   the well-known TCPCL port) is up to the implementation.
</t><t>
   If the node is unable to establish a TCP connection for any reason,
   then it is an implementation matter to determine how to handle the
   connection failure.  A node MAY decide to re-attempt to establish the
   connection.  If it does so, it MUST NOT overwhelm its target with
   repeated connection attempts.  Therefore, the node MUST retry the
   connection setup only after some delay (a 1-second minimum is
   RECOMMENDED), and it SHOULD use a (binary) exponential backoff
   mechanism to increase this delay in case of repeated failures.  In
   case a SHUTDOWN message specifying a reconnection delay is received,
   that delay is used as the initial delay.  The default initial delay
   SHOULD be at least 1 second but SHOULD be configurable since it will
   be application and network type dependent.
</t><t>
   The node MAY declare failure after one or more connection attempts
   and MAY attempt to find an alternate route for bundle data.  Such
   decisions are up to the higher layer (i.e., the BP).
</t><t>
   Once a TCP connection is established, each node MUST immediately
   transmit a contact header over the TCP connection.  The format of the
   contact header is described in <xref target="sec-contact-header"/>.
</t><t>
   Upon receipt of the contact header, both nodes perform the validation
   and negotiation procedures defined in <xref target="sec-contact-negotiate"/>
</t><t>
   After receiving the contact header from the other node, either node
   MAY also refuse the session by sending a SHUTDOWN message.  If
   session setup is refused, a reason MUST be included in the
   SHUTDOWN message.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-contact-header" title="Contact Header">
<t>
   Once a TCP connection is established, both parties exchange a contact
   header.  This section describes the format of the contact header and
   the meaning of its fields.
</t><t>
   The format for the Contact Header is as follows:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-contact-header"
     title="Contact Header Format">
<artwork align="center">
                     1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|                          magic='dtn!'                         |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|     Version   |   Flags       |      Keepalive Interval       |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|                          Segment MRU...                       |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|                          contd.                               |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|                         Transfer MRU...                       |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|                          contd.                               |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|          EID Length           |             EID Data...       |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
|     contd.                                                    |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>
   The fields of the contact header are:
</t><t>
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="magic:">
    A four-octet field that always contains the octet sequence 0x64
    0x74 0x6e 0x21, i.e., the text string &quot;dtn!&quot; in US-ASCII
    (and UTF-8).
</t><t hangText="Version:">
    A one-octet field value containing the value 4 (current
    version of the protocol).
</t><t hangText="Flags:">
    A one-octet field of single-bit flags, interpreted according to the 
    descriptions in <xref target="tab-session-flags"/>.
</t><t hangText="Keepalive Interval:">
    A 16-bit unsigned integer indicating the longest allowable interval 
    in seconds between KEEPALIVE messages received in this session.
</t><t hangText="Segment MRU:">
    A 64-bit unsigned integer indicating the largest allowable single-segment
    data payload size to be received in this session.
    Any DATA_SEGMENT sent to this peer SHALL have a data payload no longer 
    than the peer's Segment MRU.
    The two endpoints of a single session MAY have different Segment MRUs, and
    no relation between the two is required.
</t><t hangText="Transfer MRU:">
    A 64-bit unsigned integer indicating the largest allowable total-bundle
    data size to be received in this session.
    Any bundle transfer sent to this peer SHALL have a Total bundle data 
    payload no longer than the peer's Transfer MRU.
    This value can be used to perform proactive bundle fragmentation.
    The two endpoints of a single session MAY have different Transfer MRUs, and
    no relation between the two is required.
</t><t hangText="EID Length and EID Data:">
    Together these fields represent a variable-length text string.
    The EID Length is a 16-bit unsigned integer indicating the number of 
    octets of EID Data to follow.
    A zero EID Length is a special case which
    indicates the lack of EID rather than a truly empty EID.
    A non-zero-length EID Data contains the UTF-8 encoded EID of some
    singleton endpoint in which the sending node is a member, in the canonical
    format of &lt;scheme name&gt;:&lt;scheme-specific part&gt;.
</t>
</list>
</t>
<texttable anchor="tab-session-flags" title="Contact Header Flags">
  <ttcol>Type</ttcol><ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Description</ttcol>
  <c>CAN_TLS</c><c>0x01</c><c>If bit is set, indicates that the sending peer is capable of TLS security.</c>
</texttable>

</section>

<section anchor="sec-contact-negotiate"
    title="Validation and Parameter Negotiation">
<t>
   Upon reception of the contact header, each node follows the following
   procedures to ensure the validity of the TCPCL session and to
   negotiate values for the session parameters.
</t><t>
   If the magic string is not present or is not valid, the connection
   MUST be terminated.  The intent of the magic string is to provide
   some protection against an inadvertent TCP connection by a different
   protocol than the one described in this document.  To prevent a flood
   of repeated connections from a misconfigured application, a node MAY
   elect to hold an invalid connection open and idle for some time
   before closing it.
</t><t>
   If a node receives a contact header containing a version that is
   greater than the current version of the protocol that the node
   implements, then the node SHALL shutdown the session with a reason code
   of "Version mismatch".
   If a node receives a contact header with a
   version that is lower than the version of the protocol that the node
   implements, the node MAY either terminate the session (with a reason code
   of "Version mismatch"). Otherwise, the node MAY adapt its operation to 
   conform to the older version of the protocol.
   This decision is an implementation matter.
</t><t>
  A node calculates the parameters for a TCPCL session by
  negotiating the values from its own preferences (conveyed by the
  contact header it sent to the peer) with the preferences of the peer node
  (expressed in the contact header that it received from the peer).
  The negotatiated parameters defined by this specification are 
  described in the following paragraphs.
</t>
<t>
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="Session Keepalive:">
    Negotiation of the Session Keepalive parameter is performed by taking
    the minimum of this two contact headers' Keepalive Interval.
    If the negotiated Session Keepalve is zero (i.e. one or both contact 
    headers contains a zero Keepalive Interval), then the keepalive feature 
    (described in <xref target="sec-keepalive"/>) is disabled.
</t><t hangText="Enable TLS:">
    Negotiation of the Enable TLS parameter is performed by taking
    the logical AND of the two contact headers' CAN_TLS flags.
    If the negotiated Enable TLS value is true then TLS negotiation feature
    (described in <xref target="sec-session-security"/>) begins
    immediately following the contact header exchange.
</t>
</list>
</t>
<t>
   Once this process of parameter negotiation is completed, the protocol
   defines no additional mechanism to change the parameters of an
   established session; to effect such a change, the session MUST
   be terminated and a new session established.
</t>
</section>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-5" title="Established Session Operation">
<t>
   This section describes the protocol operation for the duration of an
   established session, including the mechanisms for transmitting
   bundles over the session.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-5.1" title="Message Type Codes">
<t>
   After the initial exchange of a contact header, all messages
   transmitted over the session are identified by a one-octet header
   with the following structure:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-header" title="Format of the One-Octet Message Header">
<artwork>
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| type  | flags |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
   type:  Indicates the type of the message as per <xref target="tab-msg-types"/> below.
</t><t>
   flags:  Optional flags defined based on message type.
</t><t>
   The types and values for the message type code are as follows.
</t>
<texttable anchor="tab-msg-types" title="TCPCL Message Types">
  <ttcol>Type</ttcol><ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Description</ttcol>
  <c>DATA_SEGMENT</c><c>0x1</c><c>Indicates the transmission of a segment of 
  bundle data, as described in <xref target="sec-DATA_SEGMENT"/>.</c>
  <c>ACK_SEGMENT</c><c>0x2</c><c>Acknowledges reception of a data segment, as 
  described in <xref target="sec-ACK_SEGMENT"/>.</c>
  <c>REFUSE_BUNDLE</c><c>0x3</c><c>Indicates that the transmission of the 
  current bundle SHALL be stopped, as described in <xref target="sec-REFUSE_BUNDLE"/>.</c>
  <c>KEEPALIVE</c><c>0x4</c><c>KEEPALIVE message for the session, 
  as described in <xref target="sec-keepalive"/>.</c>
  <c>SHUTDOWN</c><c>0x5</c><c>Indicates that one of the nodes participating in 
  the session wishes to cleanly terminate the session, 
  as described in <xref target="sec-6"/>.</c>
  <c>LENGTH</c><c>0x6</c><c>Contains the length (in octets) of the next bundle, as described in <xref target="sec-LENGTH"/>.</c>
</texttable>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-conn-upkeep" title="Upkeep and Status Messages">

<section anchor="sec-keepalive" title="Session Upkeep (KEEPALIVE)">
<t>
   The protocol includes a provision for transmission of KEEPALIVE
   messages over the TCPCL session to help determine if the underlying 
   TCP connection has been disrupted.
</t><t>
   As described in <xref target="sec-contact-header"/>, 
   one of the parameters in the contact
   header is the keepalive_interval.  Both sides populate this field
   with their requested intervals (in seconds) between KEEPALIVE
   messages.
</t><t>
   The format of a KEEPALIVE message is a one-octet message type code of
   KEEPALIVE (as described in Table 2) with no additional data.  Both
   sides SHOULD send a KEEPALIVE message whenever the negotiated
   interval has elapsed with no transmission of any message (KEEPALIVE
   or other).
</t><t>
   If no message (KEEPALIVE or other) has been received for at least
   twice the keepalive_interval, then either party MAY terminate the
   session by transmitting a one-octet SHUTDOWN message (as described in
   Table 2) and by closing the session.
</t><t>
   Note: The keepalive_interval SHOULD not be chosen too short as TCP
   retransmissions MAY occur in case of packet loss.  Those will have to
   be triggered by a timeout (TCP retransmission timeout (RTO)), which
   is dependent on the measured RTT for the TCP connection so that
   KEEPALIVE messages MAY experience noticeable latency.
</t>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-reject" title="Message Rejection (REJECT)">
<t>
    If a TCPCL endpoint receives a message which is uknown to it (possibly due
    to an unhandled protocol mismatch) or is inappropriate for the current 
    session state (e.g. a KEEPALIVE or LENGTH message received after
    feature negotation has disabled those features), there is a protocol-level
    message to signal this condition in the form of a REJECT reply.
</t><t>
    The format of a REJECT message follows:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-reject" title="Format of REJECT Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+-----------------------------+
|       Message Header        |
+-----------------------------+
|      Reason Code (U8)       |
+-----------------------------+
|   Rejected Message Header   |
+-----------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
    The Rejected Message Header is a copy of the Message Header to which the
    REJECT message is sent as a response.
    The REJECT Reason Code is an 8-bit unsigned integer and 
    indicates why the REJECT itself was sent.
    The specified values of the reason code are:
</t>
<texttable anchor="tab-reject-reasons" title="REJECT Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Name</ttcol><ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Description</ttcol>
  <c>Message Type Unknown</c><c>0x01</c><c>A message was received with
  a Message Type code unknown to the TCPCL endpoint.</c>
  <c>Message Unsupported</c><c>0x02</c><c>A message was received but
  the TCPCL endpoint cannot comply with the message contents.</c>
  <c>Message Unexpected</c><c>0x03</c><c>A message was received while the
  session is in a state in which the message is not expected.</c>
</texttable>
</section>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-session-security" title="Session Security">
<t>
  This version of the TCPCL supports establishing a session-level Transport
  Layer Security (TLS) session within an existing TCPCL session.
</t><t>
  When TLS is used within the TCPCL it affects the entire session.
  By convention, this protocol uses the endpoint which initiated the
  underlying TCP connection as the &quot;client&quot; role 
  of the TLS handshake request.
  Once a TLS session is established within TCPCL, there is no mechanism
  provided to end the TLS session and downgrade the session.
  If a non-TLS session is desired after a TLS session is started then
  the entire TCPCL session MUST be shutdown first.
</t>
<t>
  After negotiating an Enable TLS parameter of true, and before any other
  TCPCL messages are sent within the session, the session endpoints SHALL 
  begin a TLS handshake in accordance with <xref target="RFC5246"/>.
  The parameters within each TLS negotation are implementation dependent but
  any TCPCL endpoint SHOULD follow all recommended best practices of
  <xref target="RFC7525"/>.
</t>
      <section title="TLS Handshake Result">
        <t>
If a TLS handshake cannot negotiate a TLS session, both endpoints of the TCPCL
session SHALL cause a TCPCL shutdown with reason "TLS negotiation failed".

Unless the TLS parameters change between two sequential handshakes, the
subsequent handshake is likely to fail just as the earlier one.
        </t>
        <t>
After a TLS session is successfuly established, both TCPCL endpoints SHALL
re-exchange TCPCL Contact Header messages.
Any information cached from the prior Contact Header exchange SHALL be
discarded.
This re-exchange avoids man-in-the-middle attack in identical fashon to
<xref target="RFC2595"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
    <section title="Example TLS Initiation">
      <t>
A summary of a typical CAN_TLS usage is shown in the sequence below where
the client/requester role is represented by the prefix "C" and the
server/responder role is represented by the prefix "S".
Unordered or "simultaneous" actions are shown as "C/S".
      </t>
<figure anchor="fig-tls-example" title="A simple visual example of TCPCL TLS Establishment between two nodes">
<artwork>
              Node A                              Node B
              ======                              ======
    
    +-------------------------+         
    |  Open TCP Connnection   | -&gt;   
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
                                     &lt;- |   Accept Connection     |
                                        +-------------------------+
    
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |     Contact Header      | -&gt;   &lt;- |     Contact Header      |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |     TLS Negotiation     | -&gt;   &lt;- |     TLS Negotiation     |
    |       (as client)       |         |       (as server)       |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |     Contact Header      | -&gt;   &lt;- |     Contact Header      |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    
                    ... secured TCPCL messaging ...
    
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
    |       SHUTDOWN          | -&gt;   &lt;- |         SHUTDOWN        |
    +-------------------------+         +-------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
  </section>
</section>

<section title="Bundle Transfer">
<t>
All of the message in this section are directly associated with tranfering
a bundle between TCPCL endpoints.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-transfer-id" title="Bundle Transfer ID">
<t>
Each of the bundle transfer messages contains a Transfer ID number which is
used to correlate messages originating from sender and receiver of a bundle.
The Transfer ID provides a similar behaivior to a datagram sequence number.
A Transfer ID does not attempt to address uniqueness of the bundle data itself
and has no relation to concepts such as bundle fragmentation.
Transmitting the same bundle repeatedly, or fragments of the same bundle, or
any other combination will result in a unique Transfer ID for each 
transmission sequence.
</t><t>
Transfer IDs from each endpoint SHALL be unique within a single TCPCL session.
The initial Transfer ID from each endpoint SHALL have value zero.
Subsequent Transfer ID values SHALL be incremented from the prior Transfer ID
value by one.
Upon exhaustion of the entire 64-bit Transfer ID space, the sending endpoint
SHALL terminate the session with SHUTDOWN reason code "Resource Exhaustion".
</t><t>
For bidirectional bundle transfers, a TCPCL endpoint SHOULD NOT rely on any
relation between Transfer IDs originating from each side of the TCPCL session.
</t>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-LENGTH" title="Bundle Length (LENGTH)">
<t>
   The LENGTH message contains the total length, in octets, of the next
   bundle, formatted as a 64-bit unsigned integer.
   Its purpose is to allow nodes to preemptively refuse bundles that would 
   exceed their resources or to prepare storage on the receiving node for
   the upcoming bundle data.
   The Total Bundle Length field within a LENGTH message SHALL be used as
   informative data by the receiver. If, for whatever reason, the actual
   total legnth of bundle data received differs from the value indicated by the
   LENGTH message, the receiver SHOULD accept the full set of bundle data
   as valid.
</t><t>
   The format of the LENGTH message is as follows:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-LENGTH" title="Format of LENGTH Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+-----------------------------+
|       Message Header        |
+-----------------------------+
|      Transfer ID (U64)      |
+-----------------------------+
|  Total bundle length (U64)  |
+-----------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
   LENGTH messages SHALL be sent immediately before transmission of any
   DATA_SEGMENT messages.
   LENGTH messages MUST NOT be sent unless the next DATA_SEGMENT message 
   has the 'S' bit set to &quot;1&quot;
   (i.e., just before the start of a new bundle).
</t><t>
   A receiver MAY send a BUNDLE_REFUSE message as soon as it receives a
   LENGTH message without waiting for the next DATA_SEGMENT message.
   The sender MUST be prepared for this and MUST associate the refusal
   with the correct bundle via the Transfer ID fields.
</t><t>
   Upon reception of a LENGTH message
   not immediately before the start of a starting DATA_SEGMENT
   the reciever SHALL send a REJECT message with a Reason Code of
   "Message Unexpected".
</t>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-DATA_SEGMENT" title="Bundle Data Transmission (DATA_SEGMENT)">
<t>
   Each bundle is transmitted in one or more data segments.
   The format of a DATA_SEGMENT message follows in 
   <xref target="fig-msg-data-segment"/> and its use of header flags is 
   shown in <xref target="fig-flags-data-segment"/>.
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-data-segment" title="Format of DATA_SEGMENT Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+------------------------------+
|       Message Header         |
+------------------------------+
|      Transfer ID (U64)       |
+------------------------------+
|      Data length (U64)       |
+------------------------------+
| Data contents (octet string) |
+------------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<figure anchor="fig-flags-data-segment" title="Format of DATA_SEGMENT Header flags">
<artwork align="center">
 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|S|E|
+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>
   The type portion of the message header contains the value 0x1.
</t><t>
   The flags portion of the message header octet contains two optional
   values in the two low-order bits, denoted 'S' and 'E' above.  The 'S'
   bit MUST be set to one if it precedes the transmission of the first
   segment of a new bundle.  The 'E' bit MUST be set to one when
   transmitting the last segment of a bundle.
   In the case where an entire transfer is accomplished in a single segment,
   both the 'S' and 'E' bits MUST be set to one.
</t><t>
   Following the message header, the length field is a 64-bit unsigned integer
   containing the number of octets of bundle data that are transmitted in this
   segment.  Following this length is the actual data contents.
</t><t>
   Once a transmission of a bundle has commenced, the node MUST only
   send segments containing sequential portions of that bundle until it
   sends a segment with the 'E' bit set.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-ACK_SEGMENT" title="Bundle Acknowledgments (ACK_SEGMENT)">
<t>
   Although the TCP transport provides reliable transfer of data between
   transport peers, the typical BSD sockets interface provides no means
   to inform a sending application of when the receiving application has
   processed some amount of transmitted data.  Thus, after transmitting
   some data, a Bundle Protocol agent needs an additional mechanism to
   determine whether the receiving agent has successfully received the
   segment.
   To this end, the TCPCL protocol provides feedback messaging whereby a
   receiving node transmits acknowledgments of reception of data
   segments.
</t><t>
   The format of an ACK_SEGMENT message follows in 
   <xref target="fig-msg-ack-segment"/> and its use of header flags is 
   the same as for DATA_SEGMENT (shown in <xref target="fig-flags-data-segment"/>).
   The flags of an ACK_SEGMENT message SHALL be identical to the flags of the
   DATA_SEGMENT message for which it is a reply.
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-ack-segment" title="Format of ACK_SEGMENT Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+-----------------------------+
|       Message Header        |
+-----------------------------+
|      Transfer ID (U64)      |
+-----------------------------+
| Acknowledged length (U64)   |
+-----------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
   To transmit an acknowledgment, a node first transmits a message
   header with the ACK_SEGMENT type code and all flags set to zero, then
   transmits a 64-bit unsigned integer containing the cumulative length in 
   octets of the received segment(s) of the current bundle.
   The length MUST fall on a segment boundary.
   That is, only full segments can be acknowledged.
</t><t>
   For example, suppose the sending node transmits four segments of
   bundle data with lengths 100, 200, 500, and 1000, respectively.
   After receiving the first segment, the node sends an acknowledgment
   of length 100.  After the second segment is received, the node sends
   an acknowledgment of length 300.  The third and fourth
   acknowledgments are of length 800 and 1800, respectively.
</t><t>
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-REFUSE_BUNDLE" title="Bundle Refusal (REFUSE_BUNDLE)">
<t>
   As bundles can be large, the TCPCL supports an optional mechanisms by
   which a receiving node MAY indicate to the sender that it does not
   want to receive the corresponding bundle.
</t><t>
   To do so, upon receiving a LENGTH or DATA_SEGMENT message, the node MAY
   transmit a REFUSE_BUNDLE message.  As data segments and
   acknowledgments MAY cross on the wire, the bundle that is being
   refused SHALL be identified by the Transfer ID of the refusal.
</t><t>
   The format of the  message is as follows:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-refuse-bundle" title="Format of REFUSE_BUNDLE Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+-----------------------------+
|       Message Header        |
+-----------------------------+
|      Transfer ID (U64)       |
+-----------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<figure anchor="fig-flags-refuse-bundle" title="Format of REFUSE_BUNDLE Header flags">
<artwork align="center">
 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+
| RCode |
+-+-+-+-+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
   The RCode field, which stands for &quot;reason code&quot;, contains a value
   indicating why the bundle was refused.  The following table contains
   semantics for some values.  Other values MAY be registered with IANA,
   as defined in <xref target="sec-IANA"/>.
</t>
<texttable anchor="tab-rcode-values" title="REFUSE_BUNDLE Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Name</ttcol><ttcol>RCode</ttcol><ttcol>Semantics</ttcol>
  <c>Unknown</c><c>0x0</c><c>Reason for refusal is unknown or not specified.</c>
  <c>Completed</c><c>0x1</c><c>The receiver now has the complete bundle. The sender MAY now 
  consider the bundle as completely received.</c>
  <c>No Resources</c><c>0x2</c><c>The receiver's resources are exhausted. The sender SHOULD apply 
  reactive bundle fragmentation before retrying.</c>
  <c>Retransmit</c><c>0x3</c><c>The receiver has encountered a problem that requires the bundle 
  to be retransmitted in its entirety.</c>
</texttable>
<t>
   The receiver MUST, for each bundle preceding the one to be refused,
   have either acknowledged all DATA_SEGMENTs or refused the bundle.
   This allows the sender to identify the bundles accepted and refused
   by means of a simple FIFO list of segments and acknowledgments.
</t><t>
   The bundle refusal MAY be sent before the entire data segment is
   received.  If a sender receives a REFUSE_BUNDLE message, the sender
   MUST complete the transmission of any partially sent DATA_SEGMENT
   message (so that the receiver stays in sync).  The sender MUST NOT
   commence transmission of any further segments of the refused bundle
   subsequently.  Note, however, that this requirement does not ensure
   that a node will not receive another DATA_SEGMENT for the same bundle
   after transmitting a REFUSE_BUNDLE message since messages MAY cross
   on the wire; if this happens, subsequent segments of the bundle
   SHOULD also be refused with a REFUSE_BUNDLE message.
</t><t>
   Note: If a bundle transmission is aborted in this way, the receiver
   MAY not receive a segment with the 'E' flag set to '1' for the
   aborted bundle.  The beginning of the next bundle is identified by
   the 'S' bit set to '1', indicating the start of a new bundle.
</t>
</section>

</section>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-6" title="Session Termination">
<t>
   This section describes the procedures for ending a TCPCL session.
</t>
<section anchor="sec-6.1" title="Shutdown Message (SHUTDOWN)">
<t>
   To cleanly shut down a session, a SHUTDOWN message MUST be
   transmitted by either node at any point following complete
   transmission of any other message.
   A node SHOULD acknowledge all received data segments
   before sending a SHUTDOWN message to end the session.
</t><t>
   The format of the SHUTDOWN message is as follows:
</t>
<figure anchor="fig-msg-SHUTDOWN" title="Format of SHUTDOWN Messages">
<artwork align="center">
+-----------------------------------+
|          Message Header           |
+-----------------------------------+
|     Reason Code (optional U8)     |
+-----------------------------------+
| Reconnection Delay (optional U16) |
+-----------------------------------+
</artwork></figure>
<figure anchor="fig-flags-SHUTDOWN" title="Format of SHUTDOWN Header flags">
<artwork align="center">
 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|R|D|
+-+-+-+-+
</artwork></figure>
<t>
   It is possible for a node to convey additional information regarding
   the reason for session termination.  To do so, the node MUST set
   the 'R' bit in the message header flags and transmit a one-octet
   reason code immediately following the message header.  The specified
   values of the reason code are:
</t>
<texttable anchor="tab-shutdown-reasons" title="SHUTDOWN Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Name</ttcol><ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Description</ttcol>
  <c>Idle timeout</c><c>0x00</c><c>The session is being closed due to idleness.</c>
  <c>Version mismatch</c><c>0x01</c><c>The node cannot conform to the specified TCPCL protocol version.</c>
  <c>Busy</c><c>0x02</c><c>The node is too busy to handle the current session.</c>
  <c>Contact Failure</c><c>0x03</c><c>The node cannot interpret or negotiate contact header option.</c>
  <c>TLS failure</c><c>0x04</c><c>The node failed to negotiate TLS session and cannot continue the session.</c>
  <c>Resource Exhaustion</c><c>0x05</c><c>The node has run into some resoure limit and cannot continue the session.</c>
</texttable>
<t>
   It is also possible to convey a requested reconnection delay to
   indicate how long the other node MUST wait before attempting
   session re-establishment.  To do so, the node sets the 'D' bit in
</t><t>
   the message header flags and then transmits an 16-bit unsigned integer
   specifying the
   requested delay, in seconds, following the message header (and
   optionally, the SHUTDOWN reason code).  The value 0 SHALL be
   interpreted as an infinite delay, i.e., that the connecting node MUST
   NOT re-establish the session.  In contrast, if the node does not
   wish to request a delay, it SHOULD omit the reconnection delay field
   (and set the 'D' bit to zero).
</t><t>
   A session shutdown MAY occur immediately after TCP connection
   establishment or reception of a contact header (and prior to any
   further data exchange).  This MAY, for example, be used to notify
   that the node is currently not able or willing to communicate.
   However, a node MUST always send the contact header to its peer
   before sending a SHUTDOWN message.
</t><t>
   If either node terminates a session prematurely in this manner, it
   SHOULD send a SHUTDOWN message and MUST indicate a reason code unless
   the incoming connection did not include the magic string.  If a node
   does not want its peer to reopen a connection immediately, it
   SHOULD set the 'D' bit in the flags and include a reconnection delay
   to indicate when the peer is allowed to attempt another session
   setup.
</t><t>
   If a session is to be terminated before another protocol message
   has completed, then the node MUST NOT transmit the SHUTDOWN message
   but still SHOULD close the TCP connection.  In particular, if the
   session is to be closed (for whatever reason) while a node is in
   the process of transmitting a bundle data segment, the receiving node
   is still expecting segment data and might erroneously interpret the
   SHUTDOWN message to be part of the data segment.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-6.2" title="Idle Session Shutdown">
<t>
   The protocol includes a provision for clean shutdown of idle
   sessions.  Determining the length of time to wait before closing
   idle sessions, if they are to be closed at all, is an
   implementation and configuration matter.
</t><t>
   If there is a configured time to close idle links and if no bundle
   data (other than KEEPALIVE messages) has been received for at least
   that amount of time, then either node MAY terminate the session by
   transmitting a SHUTDOWN message indicating the reason code of 'Idle
   timeout' (as described in Table 4).  After receiving a SHUTDOWN
   message in response, both sides MAY close the TCP connection.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-7" title="Security Considerations">
<t>
   One security consideration for this protocol relates to the fact that
   nodes present their endpoint identifier as part of the session
   header exchange.  It would be possible for a node to fake this value
   and present the identity of a singleton endpoint in which the node is
   not a member, essentially masquerading as another DTN node.  If this
   identifier is used outside of a TLS-secured session or 
   without further verification as a means to
   determine which bundles are transmitted over the session, then the
   node that has falsified its identity MAY be able to obtain bundles
   that it SHOULD not have.  Therefore, a node SHALL NOT use the
   endpoint identifier conveyed in the TCPCL session message to
   derive a peer node's identity unless it can corroborate it via other
   means.
</t><t>
   These concerns MAY be mitigated through the use of the Bundle
   Security Protocol <xref target="RFC6257"/>.  In particular, the Bundle
   Authentication Block defines mechanism for secure exchange of bundles
   between DTN nodes.  Thus, an implementation could delay trusting the
   presented endpoint identifier until the node can securely validate
   that its peer is in fact the only member of the given singleton
   endpoint.
</t><t>
   TCPCL can be used to provide point-to-point transport security, but does
   not provide security of data-at-rest and does not guarantee
   end-to-end bundle security.
   The mechanisms defined in <xref target="RFC6257"/> and 
   <xref target="I-D.ietf-dtn-bpsec"/> are to be used instead.
</t><t>
   Even when using TLS to secure the TCPCL session, the actual ciphersuite
   negotiated between the TLS peers MAY be insecure.
   TLS can be used to perform authentication without data confidentiality,
   for example.
   It is up to security policies within each TCPCL node to ensure that the 
   negotiated TLS ciphersuite meets transport security requirements.
   This is identical behavior to STARTTLS use in <xref target="RFC2595"/>.
</t><t>
   Another consideration for this protocol relates to denial-of-service
   attacks.  A node MAY send a large amount of data over a TCPCL
   session, requiring the receiving node to handle the data, attempt
   to stop the flood of data by sending a REFUSE_BUNDLE message, or
   forcibly terminate the session.  This burden could cause denial of
   service on other, well-behaving sessions.  There is also nothing
   to prevent a malicious node from continually establishing sessions
   and repeatedly trying to send copious amounts of bundle data.  A
   listening node MAY take countermeasures such as ignoring TCP SYN
   messages, closing TCP connections as soon as they are established,
   waiting before sending the contact header, sending a SHUTDOWN message
   quickly or with a delay, etc.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
<t>
  In this section, registration procedures are as defined in <xref target="RFC5226"/>
</t>
<section anchor="sec-8.1" title="Port Number">
<t>
  Port number 4556 has been previously assigned as the default port for the
  TCP convergence layer in <xref target="RFC7242"/>.
  This assignment is unchanged by protocol version 4.
</t>
<texttable>
  <ttcol>Parameter</ttcol><ttcol>Value</ttcol>
  <c>Service Name:</c><c>dtn-bundle</c>
  <c>Transport Protocol(s):</c><c>TCP</c>
  <c>Assignee:</c><c>Simon Perreault &lt;simon@per.reau.lt&gt;</c>
  <c>Contact:</c><c>Simon Perreault &lt;simon@per.reau.lt&gt;</c>
  <c>Description:</c><c>DTN Bundle TCP CL Protocol</c>
  <c>Reference:</c><c><xref target="RFC7242"/></c>
  <c>Port Number:</c><c>4556</c>
</texttable>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-8.2" title="Protocol Versions">
<t>
   IANA has created, under the &quot;Bundle Protocol&quot; registry, a sub-
   registry titled &quot;Bundle Protocol TCP Convergence-Layer Version
   Numbers&quot; and initialized it with the following table.
   The registration procedure is RFC Required.
</t>
<texttable>
  <ttcol>Value</ttcol><ttcol>Description</ttcol><ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
  <c>0</c><c>Reserved</c><c><xref target="RFC7242"/></c>
  <c>1</c><c>Reserved</c><c><xref target="RFC7242"/></c>
  <c>2</c><c>Reserved</c><c><xref target="RFC7242"/></c>
  <c>3</c><c>TCPCL</c><c><xref target="RFC7242"/></c>
  <c>4</c><c>TCPCLbis</c><c>This specification.</c>
  <c>5-255</c><c>Unassigned</c>
</texttable>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-iana-message-types" title="Message Types">
<t>
   IANA has created, under the &quot;Bundle Protocol&quot; registry, a sub-
   registry titled &quot;Bundle Protocol TCP Convergence-Layer Message Types&quot;
   and initialized it with the contents below.  The registration
   procedure is RFC Required.
</t>
<texttable title="Message Type Codes">
  <ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Message Type</ttcol>
  <c>0x0</c><c>Reserved</c>
  <c>0x1</c><c>DATA_SEGMENT</c>
  <c>0x2</c><c>ACK_SEGMENT</c>
  <c>0x3</c><c>REFUSE_BUNDLE</c>
  <c>0x4</c><c>KEEPALIVE</c>
  <c>0x5</c><c>SHUTDOWN</c>
  <c>0x6</c><c>LENGTH</c>
  <c>0x7</c><c>REJECT</c>
  <c>0x8</c><c>STARTTLS</c>
  <c>0x9--0xf</c><c>Unassigned</c>
</texttable>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-8.4" title="REFUSE_BUNDLE Reason Codes">
<t>
   IANA has created, under the &quot;Bundle Protocol&quot; registry, a sub-
   registry titled &quot;Bundle Protocol TCP Convergence-Layer REFUSE_BUNDLE
   Reason Codes&quot; and initialized it with the contents of Table 3.  The
   registration procedure is RFC Required.
</t>
<texttable title="REFUSE_BUNDLE Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Refusal Reason</ttcol>
  <c>0x0</c><c>Unknown</c>
  <c>0x1</c><c>Completed</c>
  <c>0x2</c><c>No Resources</c>
  <c>0x3</c><c>Retransmit</c>
  <c>0x4--0x7</c><c>Unassigned</c>
  <c>0x8--0xf</c><c>Reserved for future usage</c>
</texttable>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-iana-shutdown-codes" title="SHUTDOWN Reason Codes">
<t>
   IANA has created, under the &quot;Bundle Protocol&quot; registry, a sub-
   registry titled &quot;Bundle Protocol TCP Convergence-Layer SHUTDOWN
   Reason Codes&quot; and initialized it with the contents of Table 4.  The
   registration procedure is RFC Required.
</t>
<texttable title="SHUTDOWN Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Shutdown Reason</ttcol>
  <c>0x00</c><c>Idle timeout</c>
  <c>0x01</c><c>Version mismatch</c>
  <c>0x02</c><c>Busy</c>
  <c>0x03</c><c>Contact Failure</c>
  <c>0x04</c><c>TLS failure</c>
  <c>0x05--0xFF</c><c>Unassigned</c>
</texttable>
</section>

<section anchor="sec-iana-reject-codes" title="REJECT Reason Codes">
<t>EDITOR NOTE: sub-registry to-be-created upon publication of this specification.</t>
<t>
   IANA will create, under the &quot;Bundle Protocol&quot; registry, a sub-
   registry titled &quot;Bundle Protocol TCP Convergence-Layer REJECT
   Reason Codes&quot; and initialized it with the contents of Table 4.  The
   registration procedure is RFC Required.
</t>
<texttable title="REJECT Reason Codes">
  <ttcol>Code</ttcol><ttcol>Rejection Reason</ttcol>
  <c>0x00</c><c>reserved</c>
  <c>0x01</c><c>Message Type Unknown</c>
  <c>0x02</c><c>Message Unsupported</c>
  <c>0x03</c><c>Message Unexpected</c>
  <c>0x04-0xFF</c><c>Unassigned</c>
</texttable>
</section>

</section>

<section anchor="sec-9" title="Acknowledgments">
<t>
    This memo is based on comments on implementation of 
    <xref target="RFC7242"/> provided from Scott Burleigh.
</t>
</section>
</middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5050.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5226.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5246.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-dtn-bpbis.xml"?>
      <reference anchor="refs.IANA-BP">
        <front>
          <title>Bundle Protocol registry</title>
          <author><organization>IANA</organization></author>
          <date year="2016" month="May"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2595.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4838.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6257.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7242.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7525.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-dtn-bpsec.xml"?>
    </references>
    
    <section title="Significant changes from RFC7242">
    <t>
    The areas in which changes from <xref target="RFC7242"/> have
    been made to existing messages are:
    <list style="symbols">
      <t>Changed contact header content to limit number of negotated options.</t>
      <t>Added contact option to negotiate maximum segment size (per each direction).</t>
      <t>Added a bundle transfer identification number to all bundle-related messages (LENGTH, DATA_SEGMENT, ACK_SEGMENT, REFUSE_BUNDLE).</t>
      <t>Use flags in ACK_SEGMENT to mirror flags from DATA_SEGMENT.</t>
      <t>Removed all uses of SDNV fields and replaced with fixed-bit-length fields.</t>
    </list>
    </t>
    <t>
    The areas in which extensions from <xref target="RFC7242"/> have been
    made as new messages and codes are:
    <list style="symbols">
      <t>Added REJECT message to indicate an unknown or unhandled message was received.</t>
      <t>Added TLS session security mechanism.</t>
      <t>Added TLS failure SHUTDOWN reason code.</t>
    </list>
    </t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
