<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!-- This template is for creating an Internet Draft using xml2rfc,
     which is available here: http://xml.resource.org. -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!-- One method to get references from the online citation libraries.
     There has to be one entity for each item to be referenced. 
     An alternate method (rfc include) is described in the references. -->

<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4271 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4271.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4272 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4272.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5492 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5492.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC8174 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis.xml">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!-- used by XSLT processors -->
<!-- For a complete list and description of processing instructions (PIs), 
     please see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/README.html. -->
<!-- Below are generally applicable Processing Instructions (PIs) that most I-Ds might want to use.
     (Here they are set differently than their defaults in xml2rfc v1.32) -->
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<!-- give errors regarding ID-nits and DTD validation -->
<!-- control the table of contents (ToC) -->
<?rfc toc="no"?>
<!-- generate a ToC -->
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<!-- the number of levels of subsections in ToC. default: 3 -->
<!-- control references -->
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<!-- use symbolic references tags, i.e, [RFC2119] instead of [1] -->
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<!-- sort the reference entries alphabetically -->
<!-- control vertical white space 
     (using these PIs as follows is recommended by the RFC Editor) -->
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<!-- do not start each main section on a new page -->
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<!-- keep one blank line between list items -->
<!-- end of list of popular I-D processing instructions -->
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11" ipr="trust200902"
 updates="4271">
  <!-- category values: std, bcp, info, exp, and historic
     ipr values: full3667, noModification3667, noDerivatives3667
     you can add the attributes updates="NNNN" and obsoletes="NNNN" 
     they will automatically be output with "(if approved)" -->

  <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->

  <front>
    <!-- The abbreviated title is used in the page header - it is only necessary if the 
         full title is longer than 39 characters -->

    <title abbrev="Extended Optional Parameters Length">Extended
      Optional Parameters Length for BGP OPEN Message</title>

    <!-- add 'role="editor"' below for the editors if appropriate -->

    <!-- Another author who claims to be an editor -->

    <author fullname="Enke Chen" initials="E.C." 
            surname="Chen">
      <organization>Palo Alto Networks</organization>

      <address>
        <email>enchen@paloaltonetworks.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="John Scudder" initials="J.S." 
            surname="Scudder">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>

      <address>
        <email>jgs@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date/>

    <!-- If the month and year are both specified and are the current ones, xml2rfc will fill 
         in the current day for you. If only the current year is specified, xml2rfc will fill 
	 in the current day and month for you. If the year is not the current one, it is 
	 necessary to specify at least a month (xml2rfc assumes day="1" if not specified for the 
	 purpose of calculating the expiry date).  With drafts it is normally sufficient to 
	 specify just the year. -->

    <!-- Meta-data Declarations -->

    <area>General</area>

    <workgroup>Internet Engineering Task Force</workgroup>

    <!-- WG name at the upperleft corner of the doc,
         IETF is fine for individual submissions.  
	 If this element is not present, the default is "Network Working Group",
         which is used by the RFC Editor as a nod to the history of the IETF. -->

    <keyword>IDR</keyword>
    <keyword>BGP</keyword>

    <!-- Keywords will be incorporated into HTML output
         files in a meta tag but they have no effect on text or nroff
         output. If you submit your draft to the RFC Editor, the
         keywords will be used for the search engine. -->

    <abstract>
      <t>
The Optional Parameters in the BGP OPEN message as defined in the base
BGP specification are limited to 255 octets due to a one-octet length
field.  BGP Capabilities are carried in this field and may foreseeably
exceed 255 octets in the future, leading to concern about this
limitation.
      </t>
      <t>
This document updates RFC 4271 by extending, in a
backward-compatible manner, the length of the Optional Parameters in the
BGP OPEN. The Parameter Length field of individual Optional Parameters
is also extended.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>
The Optional Parameters Length field in the BGP OPEN message is defined
in <xref target="RFC4271">the base BGP specification</xref> as one
octet, thus limiting the Optional Parameters field in the OPEN message
to 255 octets.  Since BGP Capabilities <xref target="RFC5492"></xref> are
carried in the Optional Parameters field, and new BGP capabilities
continue to be introduced, the limitation is a concern for BGP
development.
      </t>
      <t>
This document updates <xref target="RFC4271"/> by extending, in a
backward-compatible manner, the length of the Optional Parameters in BGP
OPEN. This is done by using Optional Parameter Type 255 as a
distinguished value, that indicates an extended Optional Parameters
Length field follows.  In this case the Parameter Length field of the
individual Optional Parameters in the BGP OPEN message is also extended.
      </t>

      <section title="Requirements Language">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
        NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
        "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref
        target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
        they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="protocol_extensions" title="Protocol Extensions">
      <t>
This document reserves Optional Parameter Type code 255 as the "Extended
Length" type code.
      </t>
      <t>
In the event that the length of Optional Parameters in the BGP OPEN
message does not exceed 255, the encodings of <xref target="RFC4271">the
base BGP specification</xref> MUST be used without alteration. (However,
an implementation MUST accept an OPEN message that uses the encoding of
this specification even if the length of Optional Parameters is 255 or
less.)
      </t>
      <t>
However, if the length of Optional Parameters in the BGP OPEN message 
does exceed 255, the OPEN message MUST be encoded according to the 
procedure below.
	  </t>
      <figure title="Extended Encoding OPEN Format" anchor="open_fmt">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |    Version    |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |     My Autonomous System      |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |           Hold Time           |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                         BGP Identifier                        |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |Non-Ext OP Len.|Non-Ext OP Type|  Extended Opt. Parm. Length   |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                                                               |
       |             Optional Parameters (variable)                    |
       |                                                               |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
        ]]></artwork>
      </figure>
<!-->      <t>
If the length of Optional Parameters is greater than 255, the extended
encoding defined here MUST be used. The (non-extended) length field,
shown in the figure as "Non-Ext OP Len", MUST be set to 255. The
subsequent octet (which would be the first Optional Parameter Type in
the non-extended format, and shown in the figure as "Non-Ext OP Type")
MUST be set to 255 as well. The subsequent two octets ("Extended Opt.
Parm. Length") carry the actual length. In addition, the "Parameter
Length" field of each Optional Parameter is enlarged to two octets. 
Other than the larger sizes of the given fields, there is no change to
the BGP OPEN message defined in <xref target="RFC4271"/>.
	  </t>
      <t>
When receiving an OPEN, a BGP speaker determines the extended encoding
is in use if the Non-Extended Optional Parameter Type field is 255. In
this case, the BGP speaker MUST use the Extended Optional Parameters
Length field in lieu of the <xref target="RFC4271"/> encoding to
determine the length of Optional Parameters contained in the message.
      </t>
      <t>
Accordingly, when the length of Optional Parameters in the BGP OPEN
message is greater than 255, the OPEN message format is modified as
shown above, using the  first Optional Parameter Type field to indicate the
use of the extended format:
      </t>-->
      <t>
The Non-Extended Optional Parameters Length field (Non-Ext OP Len)
SHOULD be set to 255 on transmission and in any event MUST NOT be set to
0, and MUST be ignored on receipt once the use of the extended format is
determined positively by inspection of the Non-Extended Optional
Parameters Type (Non-Ext OP Type) field.
	  </t>
	  <t>
The subsequent one-octet field (that would be the first Optional
Parameter Type field in the non-extended format, and is called "Non-Ext
OP Type" in the figure above) MUST be set to 255 on transmission. On
receipt, a value of 255 for this field is the indication that the
extended format is in use.
      </t>
      <t>
In this extended encoding, the subsequent two-octet field, termed
the Extended Optional Parameters Length field, is an unsigned
integer indicating the total length of the Optional Parameters field
in octets.  If the value of this field is zero, no Optional
Parameters are present.
	  </t>
      <t>
Likewise, in that situation the Optional Parameters encoding is modified
to be the following:
      </t>
      <figure title="Extended Parameters Format" anchor="parm_fmt">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
    0                   1                   2
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |  Parm. Type   |        Parameter Length       |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    ~            Parameter Value (variable)         ~
    |                                               |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
        ]]></artwork>
      </figure>
      <t>
The rules for encoding Optional Parameters are unchanged with respect
to those given in <xref target="RFC4271"/> other than the extension
of the Parameter Length field to be a two-octet unsigned integer.
      </t>
      <t>
In parsing an OPEN message, if the one-octet "Optional Parameters
Length" field is non-zero, a BGP speaker MUST use the value of the octet
following the one-octet "Optional Parameters Length" field to determine
both the encoding of the Optional Parameters length and the size of the
"Parameter Length" field of individual Optional Parameters.  If the
value of this field is 255, then the encoding described above is used
for the Optional Parameters length. Otherwise the encoding defined in
<xref target="RFC4271"></xref> is used.
      </t>
<!-->
      <t>
This encoding is chosen for backward compatibility reasons - - a BGP
speaker which has not been upgraded to support this specification may
legitimately send Optional Parameters whose length equals exactly 255, 
thus the Optional Parameters Length field alone is insufficient as an 
indicator.  However, such a speaker would never legitimately send an
Optional Parameter whose type code is 255, since that value has been
reserved by this specification.
      </t>
      <t>
The choice to mandate that when the extended encoding is in use, the
(non-extended) Optional Parameters Length field must be 255 was made for
backward compatibility with implementations of earlier versions of this
specification. When the extended encoding is in use, the value 0 MUST
NOT be used in that field since the presence of that value could have
the effect of causing a message parser to never inspect the following
octet.
      </t>
-->
    </section>
    
    <section title="Errors">
      <t>
If a BGP speaker supporting this specification (a "new speaker") is
peering with one which does not (an "old speaker") no interoperability
issues arise unless the new speaker needs to encode Optional Parameters
whose length exceeds 255.  In that case, it will transmit an OPEN
message which the old speaker will interpret as containing an Optional
Parameter with type code 255.  Since by definition the old speaker will
not recognize that type code, the old speaker is expected to close
the connection with a NOTIFICATION with an Error Code of OPEN Message
Error and an Error Subcode of Unsupported Optional Parameters, according
to Section 6.2 of <xref target="RFC4271"></xref>.
      </t>
<!-->      <t>
Although the above is the most likely error to be sent, it is not
impossible that the old speaker might detect some other error first,
such as a length error, depending on the details of the implementation. 
In no case would the peering be expected to establish successfully; the
only question is which NOTIFICATION would be generated.
      </t>
      <t>
We note that in any case, such a peering could not succeed, since 
by definition the extended length encoding would not be used by the
new speaker unless the basic encoding was insufficient.
      </t>-->
      <t>
Although the Optional Parameter Type code 255 is used in this 
specification as the indication that the extended encoding is in
use, it is not a bonafide Optional Parameter Type in the usual sense,
and MUST NOT be used other than as described above. If encountered
as an actual Optional Parameter Type code, it MUST be treated as 
an unrecognized Optional Parameter and handled according to 
<xref target="RFC4271"/> Section 6.2.
	  </t> 
	  <t>
It is not considered an error to receive an OPEN message whose Extended
Optional Parameters Length value is less than or equal to 255. It is not
considered a fatal error to receive an OPEN message whose (non-extended)
Optional Parameters Length value is not 255, and whose first Optional
Parameter type code is 255 -- in this case the encoding of this
specification MUST be used for decoding the message. A warning MAY be
logged.
	  </t>
    </section>
    
    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>
IANA is requested to designate type code 255 in the BGP OPEN Optional
Parameter Types registry as the Extended Length type code.
      </t>
    </section>
    
    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>
This extension to BGP does not change the underlying security or
confidentiality issues
inherent in the existing BGP <xref target="RFC4272"/>.
      </t>
    </section>
    
    <section title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>
The authors would like to thank Yakov Rekhter and Srihari Sangli for
discussing various options to enlarge the Optional Parameters field. We
would also like to thank Matthew Bocci, Bruno Decraene, John Heasley,
Jakob Heitz, Pradosh Mohapatra, Keyur Patel and Hannes Gredler for their
valuable comments.
      </t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <!--  *****BACK MATTER ***** -->

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      &RFC2119;
      &RFC4271;
      &RFC8174;
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      &RFC5492;
      &RFC4272;
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
