INTERNET-DRAFT Editor: Kurt D. Zeilenga Intended Category: Standard Track OpenLDAP Foundation Expires in six months 21 February 2005 Obsoletes: RFC 2251, RFC 2252, RFC 2256, RFC 3674 LDAP: Directory Information Models Status of this Memo This document is intended to be published as a Standard Track RFC. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this document will take place on the IETF LDAP Revision Working Group mailing list . Please send editorial comments directly to the editor . By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section 4 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). All Rights Reserved. Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document for more information. Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 1] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 Abstract The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services which act in accordance with X.500 data and service models. This document describes the X.500 Directory Information Models, as used in LDAP. Table of Contents Status of this Memo 1 Abstract 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Relationship to Other LDAP Specifications 1.2. Relationship to X.501 4 1.3. Conventions 1.4. Common ABNF Productions 2. Model of Directory User Information 6 2.1. The Directory Information Tree 7 2.2. Structure of an Entry 2.3. Naming of Entries 8 2.4. Object Classes 9 2.5. Attribute Descriptions 12 2.6. Alias Entries 16 3. Directory Administrative and Operational Information 17 3.1. Subtrees 3.2. Subentries 18 3.3. The 'objectClass' attribute 3.4. Operational attributes 19 4. Directory Schema 22 4.1. Schema Definitions 23 4.2. Subschema Subentries 32 4.3. 'extensibleObject' 35 4.4. Subschema Discovery 36 5. DSA (Server) Informational Model 5.1. Server-specific Data Requirements 37 6. Other Considerations 40 6.1. Preservation of User Information 41 6.2. Short Names 6.3. Cache and Shadowing 7. Implementation Guidelines 42 7.1. Server Guidelines 7.2. Client Guidelines 8. Security Considerations 43 9. IANA Considerations 10. Acknowledgments 44 11. Editor's Address 12. References Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 2] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 12.1. Normative References 45 12.2. Informative References Appendix A. Changes Intellectual Property Rights 51 Full Copyright 1. Introduction This document discusses the X.500 Directory Information Models [X.501], as used by the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [Roadmap]. The Directory is "a collection of open systems cooperating to provide directory services" [X.500]. The information held in the Directory is collectively known as the Directory Information Base (DIB). A Directory user, which may be a human or other entity, accesses the Directory through a client (or Directory User Agent (DUA)). The client, on behalf of the directory user, interacts with one or more servers (or Directory System Agents (DSA)). A server holds a fragment of the DIB. The DIB contains two classes of information: 1) user information (e.g., information provided and administrated by users). Section 2 describes the Model of User Information. 2) administrative and operational information (e.g., information used to administer and/or operate the directory). Section 3 describes the model of Directory Administrative and Operational Information. These two models, referred to as the generic Directory Information Models, describe how information is represented in the Directory. These generic models provide a framework for other information models. Section 4 discusses the subschema information model and subschema discovery. Section 5 discusses the DSA (Server) Informational Model. Other X.500 information models, such as access control distribution knowledge, and replication knowledge information models, may be adapted for use in LDAP. Specification of how these models apply to LDAP is left to future documents. 1.1. Relationship to Other LDAP Specifications This document is a integral part of the LDAP technical specification [Roadmap] which obsoletes the previously defined LDAP technical Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 3] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 specification, RFC 3377, in its entirety. This document obsoletes RFC 2251 sections 3.2 and 3.4, as well as portions of sections 4 and 6. Appendix A.1 summarizes changes to these sections. The remainder of RFC 2251 is obsoleted by the [Protocol], [AuthMeth], and [Roadmap] documents. This document obsoletes RFC 2252 sections 4, 5 and 7. Appendix A.2 summarizes changes to these sections. The remainder of RFC 2252 is obsoleted by [Syntaxes]. This document obsoletes RFC 2256 sections 5.1, 5.2, 7.1 and 7.2. Appendix A.3 summarizes changes to these sections. The remainder of RFC 2256 is obsoleted by [Schema] and [Syntaxes]. This document obsoletes RFC 3674 in its entirety. Appendix A.4 summarizes changes since RFC 3674. 1.2. Relationship to X.501 This document includes material, with and without adaptation, from [X.501] as necessary to describe this protocol. These adaptations (and any other differences herein) apply to this protocol, and only this protocol. 1.3. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. Schema definitions are provided using LDAP description formats (as defined in Section 4.1). Definitions provided here are formatted (line wrapped) for readability. Matching rules and LDAP syntaxes referenced in these definitions are specified in [Syntaxes]. 1.4. Common ABNF Productions A number of syntaxes in this document are described using Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC2234]. These syntaxes (as well as a number of syntaxes defined in other documents) rely on the following common productions: keystring = leadkeychar *keychar leadkeychar = ALPHA Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 4] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 keychar = ALPHA / DIGIT / HYPHEN number = DIGIT / ( LDIGIT 1*DIGIT ) ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; "A"-"Z" / "a"-"z" DIGIT = %x30 / LDIGIT ; "0"-"9" LDIGIT = %x31-39 ; "1"-"9" HEX = DIGIT / %x41-46 / %x61-66 ; "0"-"9" / "A"-"F" / "a"-"f" SP = 1*SPACE ; one or more " " WSP = 0*SPACE ; zero or more " " NULL = %x00 ; null (0) SPACE = %x20 ; space (" ") DQUOTE = %x22 ; quote (""") SHARP = %x23 ; octothorpe (or sharp sign) ("#") DOLLAR = %x24 ; dollar sign ("$") SQUOTE = %x27 ; single quote ("'") LPAREN = %x28 ; left paren ("(") RPAREN = %x29 ; right paren (")") PLUS = %x2B ; plus sign ("+") COMMA = %x2C ; comma (",") HYPHEN = %x2D ; hyphen ("-") DOT = %x2E ; period (".") SEMI = %x3B ; semicolon (";") LANGLE = %x3C ; left angle bracket ("<") EQUALS = %x3D ; equals sign ("=") RANGLE = %x3E ; right angle bracket (">") ESC = %x5C ; backslash ("\") USCORE = %x5F ; underscore ("_") LCURLY = %x7B ; left curly brace "{" RCURLY = %x7D ; right curly brace "}" ; Any UTF-8 [UTF-8] encoded Unicode [Unicode] character UTF8 = UTF1 / UTFMB UTFMB = UTF2 / UTF3 / UTF4 UTF0 = %x80-BF UTF1 = %x00-7F UTF2 = %xC2-DF UTF0 UTF3 = %xE0 %xA0-BF UTF0 / %xE1-EC 2(UTF0) / %xED %x80-9F UTF0 / %xEE-EF 2(UTF0) UTF4 = %xF0 %x90-BF 2(UTF0) / %xF1-F3 3(UTF0) / %xF4 %x80-8F 2(UTF0) OCTET = %x00-FF ; Any octet (8-bit data unit) Object identifiers (OIDs) [X.680] are represented in LDAP using a dot-decimal format conforming to the ABNF: Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 5] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 numericoid = number 1*( DOT number ) Short names, also known as descriptors, are used as more readable aliases for object identifiers. Short names are case insensitive and conform to the ABNF: descr = keystring Where either an object identifier or a short name may be specified, the following production is used: oid = descr / numericoid While the form is generally preferred when the usage is restricted to short names referring to object identifiers which identify like kinds of objects (e.g., attribute type descriptions, matching rule descriptions, object class descriptions), the form should be used when the object identifiers may identify multiple kinds of objects or when an unambiguous short name (descriptor) is not available. Implementations SHOULD treat short names (descriptors) used in an ambiguous manner (as discussed above) as unrecognized. Short Names (descriptors) are discussed further in Section 6.2. 2. Model of Directory User Information As [X.501] states: The purpose of the Directory is to hold, and provide access to, information about objects of interest (objects) in some 'world'. An object can be anything which is identifiable (can be named). An object class is an identified family of objects, or conceivable objects, which share certain characteristics. Every object belongs to at least one class. An object class may be a subclass of other object classes, in which case the members of the former class, the subclass, are also considered to be members of the latter classes, the superclasses. There may be subclasses of subclasses, etc., to an arbitrary depth. A directory entry, a named collection of information, is the basic unit of information held in the Directory. There are multiple kinds of directory entries. An object entry represents a particular object. An alias entry Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 6] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 provides alternative naming. A subentry holds administrative and/or operational information. The set of entries representing the DIB are organized hierarchically in a tree structure known as the Directory Information Tree (DIT). Section 2.1 describes the Directory Information Tree Section 2.2 discusses the structure of entries. Section 2.3 discusses naming of entries. Section 2.4 discusses object classes. Section 2.5 discusses attribute descriptions. Section 2.6 discusses alias entries. 2.1. The Directory Information Tree As noted above, the DIB is composed of a set of entries organized hierarchically in a tree structure known as the Directory Information Tree (DIT). Specifically, a tree where vertices are the entries. The arcs between vertices define relations between entries. If an arc exists from X to Y, then the entry at X is the immediate superior of Y and Y is the immediate subordinate of X. An entry's superiors are the entry's immediate superior and its superiors. An entry's subordinates are all of its immediate subordinates and their subordinates. Similarly, the superior/subordinate relationship between object entries can be used to derive a relation between the objects they represent. DIT structure rules can be used to govern relationships between objects. Note: An entry's immediate superior is also known as the entry's parent and an entry's immediate subordinate is also known as the entry's child. Entries which have the same parent are known as siblings. 2.2. Structure of an Entry An entry consists of a set of attributes which hold information about the object which the entry represents. Some attributes represent user information and are called user attributes. Other attributes represent operational and/or administrative information and are called operational attributes. An attribute is an attribute description (a type and zero or more options) with one or more associated values. An attribute is often referred to by its attribute description. For example, the Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 7] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 'givenName' attribute is the attribute which consists of the attribute description 'givenName' (the 'givenName' attribute type [Schema] and zero options) and one or more associated values. The attribute type governs whether the attribute can have multiple values, the syntax and matching rules used to construct and compare values of that attribute, and other functions. Options indicate subtypes and other functions. Attribute values conform to the defined syntax of the attribute type. No two values of an attribute may be equivalent. Two values are considered equivalent if and only if they would match according to the equality matching rule of the attribute type or, if the attribute type is defined with no equality matching rule, two values are equivalent if and only if they are identical. (See 2.5.1 for other restrictions.) For example, a 'givenName' attribute can have more than one value, they must be Directory Strings, and they are case insensitive. A 'givenName' attribute cannot hold both "John" and "JOHN" as these are equivalent values per the equality matching rule of the attribute type. Additionally, no attribute is to have a value which is not equivalent to itself. For example, the 'givenName' attribute cannot have as a value a directory string which includes the REPLACEMENT CHARACTER (U+FFFD) code point as matching involving that directory string is Undefined per this attribute's equality matching rule. When an attribute is used for naming of the entry, one and only one value of the attribute is used in forming the Relative Distinguished Name. This value is known as a distinguished value. 2.3. Naming of Entries 2.3.1. Relative Distinguished Names Each entry is named relative to its immediate superior. This relative name, known as its Relative Distinguished Name (RDN) [X.501], is composed of an unordered set of one or more attribute value assertions (AVA) consisting of an attribute description with zero options and an attribute value. These AVAs are chosen to match attribute values (each a distinguished value) of the entry. An entry's relative distinguished name must be unique among all immediate subordinates of the entry's immediate superior (i.e., all Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 8] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 siblings). The following are examples of string representations of RDNs [LDAPDN]: UID=12345 OU=Engineering CN=Kurt Zeilenga+L=Redwood Shores The last is an example of a multi-valued RDN. That is, an RDN composed of multiple AVAs. 2.3.2. Distinguished Names An entry's fully qualified name, known as its Distinguished Name (DN) [X.501], is the concatenation of its RDN and its immediate superior's DN. A Distinguished Name unambiguously refers to an entry in the tree. The following are examples of string representations of DNs [LDAPDN]: UID=nobody@example.com,DC=example,DC=com CN=John Smith,OU=Sales,O=ACME Limited,L=Moab,ST=Utah,C=US 2.3.3. Alias Names An alias, or alias name, is "an name for an object, provided by the use of alias entries" [X.501]. Alias entries are described in Section 2.6. 2.4. Object Classes An object class is "an identified family of objects (or conceivable objects) which share certain characteristics" [X.501]. As defined in [X.501]: Object classes are used in the Directory for a number of purposes: - describing and categorising objects and the entries that correspond to these objects; - where appropriate, controlling the operation of the Directory; - regulating, in conjunction with DIT structure rule specifications, the position of entries in the DIT; Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 9] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 - regulating, in conjunction with DIT content rule specifications, the attributes that are contained in entries; - identifying classes of entry that are to be associated with a particular policy by the appropriate administrative authority. An object class (a subclass) may be derived from an object class (its direct superclass) which is itself derived from an even more generic object class. For structural object classes, this process stops at the most generic object class, 'top' (defined in Section 2.4.1). An ordered set of superclasses up to the most superior object class of an object class is its superclass chain. An object class may be derived from two or more direct superclasses (superclasses not part of the same superclass chain). This feature of subclassing is termed multiple inheritance. Each object class identifies the set of attributes required to be present in entries belonging to the class and the set of attributes allowed to be present in entries belonging to the class. As an entry of a class must meet the requirements of each class it belongs to, it can be said that an object class inherits the sets of allowed and required attributes from its superclasses. A subclass can identify an attribute allowed by its superclass as being required. If an attribute is a member of both sets, it is required to be present. Each object class is defined to be one of three kinds of object classes: Abstract, Structural, or Auxiliary. Each object class is identified by an object identifier (OID) and, optionally, one or more short names (descriptors). 2.4.1. Abstract Object Classes An abstract object class, as the name implies, provides a base of characteristics from which other object classes can be defined to inherit from. An entry cannot belong to an abstract object class unless it belongs to a structural or auxiliary class which inherits from that abstract class. Abstract object classes can not derive from structural nor auxiliary object classes. All structural object classes derive (directly or indirectly) from the 'top' abstract object class. Auxiliary object classes do not necessarily derive from 'top'. Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 10] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 The following is the object class definition (see Section 4.1.1) for the 'top' object class: ( 2.5.6.0 NAME 'top' ABSTRACT MUST objectClass ) All entries belong to the 'top' abstract object class. 2.4.2. Structural Object Classes As stated in [X.501]: An object class defined for use in the structural specification of the DIT is termed a structural object class. Structural object classes are used in the definition of the structure of the names of the objects for compliant entries. An object or alias entry is characterised by precisely one structural object class superclass chain which has a single structural object class as the most subordinate object class. This structural object class is referred to as the structural object class of the entry. Structural object classes are related to associated entries: - an entry conforming to a structural object class shall represent the real-world object constrained by the object class; - DIT structure rules only refer to structural object classes; the structural object class of an entry is used to specify the position of the entry in the DIT; - the structural object class of an entry is used, along with an associated DIT content rule, to control the content of an entry. The structural object class of an entry shall not be changed. Each structural object class is a (direct or indirect) subclass of the 'top' abstract object class. Structural object classes cannot subclass auxiliary object classes. Each entry is said to belong to its structural object class as well as all classes in its structural object class's superclass chain. Zeilenga LDAP Models [Page 11] INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-14 21 February 2005 2.4.3. Auxiliary Object Classes Auxiliary object classes are used to augment the characteristics of entries. They are commonly used to augment the sets of attributes required and allowed to be present in an entry. They can be used to describe entries or classes of entries. Auxiliary object classes cannot subclass structural object classes. An entry can belong to any subset of the set of auxiliary object classes allowed by the DIT content rule associated with the structural object class of the entry. If no DIT content rule is associated with the structural object class of the entry, the entry cannot belong to any auxiliary object class. The set of auxiliary object classes which an entry belongs to can change over time. 2.5. Attribute Descriptions An attribute description is composed of an attribute type (see Section 2.5.1) and a set of zero or more attribute options (see Section 2.5.2). An attribute description is represented by the ABNF: attributedescription = attributetype options attributetype = oid options = *( SEMI option ) option = 1*keychar where identifies the attribute type and each