Using Simulcast in SDP and RTP Sessions

Most of today's multiparty video conference solutions make use of centralized servers to reduce the bandwidth and CPU consumption in the endpoints. Those servers receive RTP streams from each participant and send some suitable set of possibly modified RTP streams to the rest of the participants, which usually have heterogeneous capabilities (screen size, CPU, bandwidth, codec, etc). One of the biggest issues is how to perform RTP stream adaptation to different participants' constraints with the minimum possible impact on both video quality and server performance. Simulcast is defined in this memo as the act of simultaneously sending multiple different encoded streams of the same media source, e.g. the same video source encoded with different video encoder types or image resolutions. This can be done in several ways and for different purposes. This document focuses on the case where it is desirable to provide a media source as multiple encoded streams over RTP towards an intermediary so that the intermediary can provide the wanted functionality by selecting which RTP stream(s) to forward to other participants in the session, and more specifically how the identification and grouping of the involved RTP streams are done. This document describes a few scenarios where it is motivated to use simulcast, and also defines the needed RTP/RTCP and SDP signaling for it.

This document makes use of the terminology defined in RTP Taxonomy, and RTP Topologies. In addition, the following terms are used: An RTP middle node, defined in (Section 3.6 to 3.9). A common short term for the terms "switching RTP mixer", "source projecting middlebox", and "video switching MCU" as discussed in . One encoded stream or dependent stream from a set of concurrently transmitted encoded streams and optional dependent streams, all sharing a common media source, as defined in . Decoding a dependent stream also requires the related (dependent and) encoded stream(s), but in the context of simulcast that is considered a property of the dependent stream constituting the simulcast stream. For example, HD and thumbnail video simulcast versions of a single media source sent concurrently as separate RTP Streams. Different formats of a simulcast stream serve the same purpose as alternative RTP payload types in non-simulcast SDP, to allow multiple alternative media formats for a given RTP stream. As for multiple RTP payload types on the m-line in offer/answer, any one of the negotiated alternative formats can be used in a single RTP stream at a given point in time, but not more than one (based on RTP timestamp). What format is used can change dynamically from one RTP packet to another. The identification value used to refer to individual simulcast streams, identical to the "rid-id" identification value for an RTP Constraint and the corresponding content of "RtpStreamId" RTCP SDES Item.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.

Many use cases of simulcast as described in this document relate to a multi-party communication session where one or more central nodes are used to adapt the view of the communication session towards individual participants, and facilitate the media transport between participants. Thus, these cases target the RTP Mixer type of topology. There are two principle approaches for an RTP Mixer to provide this adapted view of the communication session to each receiving participant: Transcoding (decoding and re-encoding) received RTP streams with characteristics adapted to each receiving participant. This often include mixing or composition of media sources from multiple participants into a mixed media source originated by the RTP Mixer. The main advantage of this approach is that it achieves close to optimal adaptation to individual receiving participants. The main disadvantages are that it can be very computationally expensive to the RTP Mixer and typically also degrades media Quality of Experience (QoE) such as end-to-end delay for the receiving participants. Switching a subset of all received RTP streams or sub-streams to each receiving participant, where the used subset is typically specific to each receiving participant. The main advantages of this approach are that it is computationally cheap to the RTP Mixer and it has very limited impact on media QoE. The main disadvantage is that it can be difficult to combine a subset of received RTP streams into a perfect fit to the resource situation of a receiving participant. The use of simulcast relates to the latter approach, where it is more important to reduce the load on the RTP Mixer and/or minimize QoE impact than to achieve an optimal adaptation of resource usage.

The media sources provided by a sending participant potentially need to reach several receiving participants that differ in terms of available resources. The receiver resources that typically differ include, but are not limited to: This includes codec type (such as SDP MIME type) and can include codec configuration options (e.g. SDP fmtp parameters). A couple of codec resources that differ only in codec configuration will be "different" if they are somehow not "compatible", like if they differ in video codec profile, or the transport packetization configuration. This relates to how the media source is sampled, in spatial as well as in temporal domain. For video streams, spatial sampling affects image resolution and temporal sampling affects video frame rate. For audio, spatial sampling relates to the number of audio channels and temporal sampling affects audio bandwidth. This may be used to suit different rendering capabilities or needs at the receiving endpoints, as well as a method to achieve different transport capabilities, bitrates and eventually QoE by controlling the amount of source data. This relates to the amount of bits spent per second to transmit the media source as an RTP stream, which typically also affects the Quality of Experience (QoE) for the receiving user. Letting the sending participant create a simulcast of a few differently configured RTP streams per media source can be a good tradeoff when using an RTP switch as middlebox, instead of sending a single RTP stream and using an RTP mixer to create individual transcodings to each receiving participant. This requires that the receiving participants can be categorized in terms of available resources and that the sending participant can choose a matching configuration for a single RTP stream per category and media source. For example, assume for simplicity a set of receiving participants that differ only in that some have support to receive Codec A, and the others have support to receive Codec B. Further assume that the sending participant can send both Codec A and B. It can then reach all receivers by creating two simulcasted RTP streams from each media source; one for Codec A and one for Codec B. In another simple example, a set of receiving participants differ only in screen resolution; some are able to display video with at most 360p resolution and some support 720p resolution. A sending participant can then reach all receivers with best possible resolution by creating a simulcast of RTP streams with 360p and 720p resolution for each sent video media source. In more elaborate cases, the receiving participants differ both in available sampling and bitrate, and maybe also codec, and it is up to the RTP switch to find a good trade-off in which simulcasted stream to choose for each intended receiver. It is also the responsibility of the RTP switch to negotiate a good fit of simulcast streams with the sending participant. The maximum number of simulcasted RTP streams that can be sent is mainly limited by the amount of processing and uplink network resources available to the sending participant.

The application logic that controls the communication session may include special handling of some media sources. It is for example commonly the case that the media from a sending participant is not sent back to itself. It is also common that a currently active speaker participant is shown in larger size or higher quality than other participants (the sampling or bitrate aspects of ). Not sending the active speaker media back to itself means there is some other participant's media that instead has to receive special handling towards the active speaker; typically the previous active speaker. This way, the previously active speaker is needed both in larger size (to current active speaker) and in small size (to the rest of the participants), which can be solved with a simulcast from the previously active speaker to the RTP switch.

The application logic that controls the communication session may allow receiving participants to apply preferences to the characteristics of the RTP stream they receive, for example in terms of the aspects listed in . Sending a simulcast of RTP streams is one way of accommodating receivers with conflicting or otherwise incompatible preferences.

The following requirements need to be met to support the use cases in previous sections: Editor's note: Consider adding an explicit requirement that the solution supports use of simulcast even when using multiple codecs and multiple redundant RTP streams per defined codec (or something similar), since this is really an existing requirement and should also fully motivate the use of RID as identification mechanism. Identification. It must be possible to identify a set of simulcasted RTP streams as originating from the same media source: In SDP signaling. On RTP/RTCP level. Transport usage. The solution must work when using: Legacy SDP with separate media transports per SDP media description. Bundled SDP media descriptions. Capability negotiation. It must be possible that: Sender can express capability of sending simulcast. Receiver can express capability of receiving simulcast. Sender can express maximum number of simulcast streams that can be provided. Receiver can express maximum number of simulcast streams that can be received. Sender can detail the characteristics of the simulcast streams that can be provided. Receiver can detail the characteristics of the simulcast streams that it prefers to receive. Distinguishing features. It must be possible to have different simulcast streams use different codec parameters, as can be expressed by SDP format values and RTP payload types. Compatibility. It must be possible to use simulcast in combination with other RTP mechanisms that generate additional RTP streams: RTP Retransmission. RTP Forward Error Correction. Related payload types such as audio Comfort Noise and/or DTMF. Interoperability. The solution must be possible to use in: Interworking with non-simulcast legacy clients using a single media source per media type. WebRTC environment with a single media source per SDP media description.

As an overview, the above requirements are met by signaling simulcast capability and configurations in SDP: An offer or answer can contain a number of simulcast streams, separate for send and receive directions. An offer or answer can contain multiple, alternative simulcast stream formats in the same fashion as multiple, alternative formats can be offered in a media description. A single media source per SDP media description is assumed, which is aligned with the concepts defined in and will specifically work in a WebRTC context, both with and without BUNDLE grouping. The codec configuration for a simulcast stream is expressed through use of separately specified RTP payload format constraints with an associated RTP-level identification mechanism to identify which RTP payload format constraints an RTP stream adheres to. This complements and effectively extends simulcast stream identification and configuration possibilities that could be provided by using only SDP formats as identifier. It is possible, but not required to use source-specific signaling with the proposed solution.

This section further details the overview above. First, formal syntax is provided, followed by the rest of the SDP attribute definition in . Relating Simulcast Streams provides the definition of the RTP/RTCP mechanisms used. The section is concluded with a number of examples.

This document defines a new SDP media-level "a=simulcast" attribute with the following ABNF syntax:

The "a=simulcast" attribute has a parameter in the form of one or two simulcast stream descriptions, each consisting of a direction ("send" or "recv"), followed by a list of one or more simulcast streams. The simulcast stream identification (SCID) MUST be have the form of an RTP stream identifier, as described by RTP Payload Format Constraints. In the list of simulcast streams, each SCID is separated by a semicolon (";"). Each simulcast stream can in turn be offered in one or more alternative formats, where each alternative SCID is separated by a comma (","). Each simulcast stream can also be specified as initially paused, indicated by prepending a "~" to the SCID. In case there are alternative SCID, pause can be specified individually for each SCID. The reason to allow separate initial pause states for each SCID is that pause capability can be specified individually for each RTP payload type referenced by an SCID. Since pause capability specified via the "a=rtcp-fb" attribute and SCID specified by "a=rid" can refer to common payload types, it is unfeasible to pause streams with SCID where any of the related RTP payload type(s) do not have pause capability. Examples:

Above are two examples of different "a=simulcast" lines. The first line is an example offer to send two simulcast streams and to receive two simulcast streams. The first simulcast stream in send direction can be sent in three different alternative formats (SCID 1, 2, 3), and the second simulcast stream in send direction can be sent in two different alternative formats (SCID 4, 5). Both of the second stream alternative formats in send direction are offered as initially paused. The first simulcast stream in receive direction has no alternative formats (SCID 6). The second simulcast stream in receive direction has two alternative formats (SCID 7, 8) that are both offered as initially paused. The second line is an example answer to the first line, accepting to send and receive the two offered simulcast streams, however send and receive directions are specified in opposite order compared to the first line, which lets the answer keep the same order of simulcast streams in the SDP as in the offer, for convenience, even though directionality is reversed. This example answer has removed all offered alternative formats for the first simulcast stream (keeping only SCID 1), but kept alternative formats for the second simulcast stream in receive direction (4, 5). The answer accepts to send two simulcast streams, without alternatives. The answer does not accept initial pause of any simulcast streams, in either direction. More examples can be found in .

Simulcast capability is expressed through a new media level SDP attribute, "a=simulcast". The meaning of the attribute on SDP session level is undefined and MUST NOT be used. The meaning of including multiple "a=simulcast" lines in a single SDP media description is undefined and MUST NOT be used. For each desired direction (send/recv), the simulcast attribute defines a list of simulcast streams (separated by semicolons), each of which is a list of alternate simulcast stream formats (separated by commas). The different simulcast stream formats MUST be identified through the RTP payload format constraints RTP-level identification mechanism, here denoted SCID. Simulcast streams using undefined SCID MUST NOT be used as valid simulcast streams by an RTP stream receiver. There are separate and independent sets of parameters for simulcast in send and receive directions. When listing multiple directions, each direction MUST NOT occur more than once on the same line. Attribute parameters are grouped by direction and consist of a listing of SCID to be used. The direction for an SCID MUST be aligned with the direction specified for the corresponding RTP stream identifier on the "a=rid" line. The number of (non-alternative, see above) SCID in the list sets a limit to the number of supported simulcast streams in that direction. The order of the listed SCID in the "send" direction suggests a proposed order of preference, in decreasing order: the SCID listed first is the most preferred and subsequent streams have progressively lower preference. The order of the listed SCID in the "recv" direction expresses a preference which simulcast streams that are preferred, with the leftmost being most preferred. This can be of importance if the number of actually sent simulcast streams have to be reduced for some reason. SCID that have explicit dependencies to other SCID (even in the same media description) MAY be used. Alternative SCID MAY be specified as part of the attribute parameters by expressing each simulcast stream as a comma-separated list of alternative SCID. In this case, it is not possible to align what alternative SCID that are used between different simulcast streams, like requiring all simulcast streams to use SCID alternatives referring to the same codec format. The order of the SCID alternatives within a simulcast stream is significant; the SCID alternatives are listed from (left) most preferred to (right) least preferred. For the use of simulcast, this overrides the normal codec preference as expressed by format type ordering on the "m=" line, using regular SDP rules. This is to enable a separation of general codec preferences and simulcast stream configuration preferences. A simulcast stream can use a codec defined such that the same RTP SSRC can change RTP payload type multiple times during a session, possibly even on a per-packet basis. A typical example can be a speech codec that makes use of Comfort Noise and/or DTMF formats. In those cases, such "related" formats MUST NOT be defined as SCID and listed explicitly in the attribute parameters, since they are not strictly simulcast streams of the media source, but rather a specific way of generating the RTP stream of a single simulcast stream with varying RTP payload type. If RTP stream pause/resume is supported, any SCID MAY be prefixed by a "~" character to indicate that the corresponding simulcast stream is initially paused already from start of the RTP session. In this case, support for RTP stream pause/resume MUST also be included under the same "m=" line where "a=simulcast" is included. If the simulcast stream is specified as a list of alternative SCID, each of which can be individually prefixed by the paused indication. All RTP payload types related to such initially paused simulcast stream MUST be listed in the SDP as pause/resume capable as specified by , e.g. by using the "*" wildcard format for "a=rtcp-fb". An initially paused simulcast stream in "send" direction MUST be considered equivalent to an unsolicited locally paused stream, and be handled accordingly. Initially paused simulcast streams are resumed as described by the RTP pause/resume specification. An RTP stream receiver that wishes to resume an unsolicited locally paused stream needs to know the SSRC of that stream. The SSRC of an initially paused simulcast stream can be obtained from an RTP stream sender RTCP Sender Report (SR) including both the desired SSRC as "SSRC of sender", and the SCID value in an RtpStreamId RTCP SDES item. Including an initially paused simulcast stream in "recv" direction in an SDP towards an RTP sender, SHOULD cause the remote RTP sender to put the stream as unsolicited locally paused, unless there are other RTP stream receivers that do not mark the simulcast stream as initially paused. The reason to require an initially paused "recv" stream to be considered locally paused by the remote RTP sender, instead of making it equivalent to implicitly sending a pause request, is because the pausing RTP sender cannot know which receiving SSRC owns the restriction when TMMBR/TMMBN are used for pause/resume signaling since the RTP receiver's SSRC in send direction is sometimes not yet known. Use of the redundant audio data format could be seen as a form of simulcast for loss protection purposes, but is not considered conflicting with the mechanisms described in this memo and MAY therefore be used as any other format. In this case the "red" format, rather than the carried formats, SHOULD be the one to list as a simulcast stream on the "a=simulcast" line. The media formats and corresponding characteristics of simulcast streams SHOULD be chosen such that they are different, either as different SDP formats with differing "a=rtpmap" and/or "a=fmtp" lines, as differently defined RTP Constraints, or both. If this difference is not required, RTP duplication procedures SHOULD be considered instead of simulcast.

Note: The inclusion of "a=simulcast" or the use of simulcast does not change any of the interpretation or Offer/Answer procedures for other SDP attributes, like "a=fmtp" or "a=rid".

An offerer wanting to use simulcast SHALL include the "a=simulcast" attribute in the offer. An offerer listing a set of receive simulcast streams and/or alternative formats as SCID in the offer MUST be prepared to receive RTP streams for any of those simulcast streams and/or alternative formats from the answerer.

An answerer that does not understand the concept of simulcast will also not know the attribute and will remove it in the SDP answer, as defined in existing SDP Offer/Answer procedures. An answerer that does understand the attribute and that wants to support simulcast in an indicated direction SHALL reverse directionality of the unidirectional direction parameters; "send" becomes "recv" and vice versa, and include it in the answer. An answerer that receives an offer with simulcast containing an "a=simulcast" attribute listing alternative SCID MAY keep all the alternative SCID in the answer, but it MAY also choose to remove any non-desirable alternative SCID in the answer. The answerer MUST NOT add any alternative SCID that were not present in the offer. The answerer MUST be prepared to receive any of the receive direction SCID alternatives, and MAY send any of the send direction alternatives that are kept in the answer. An answerer that receives an offer with simulcast that lists a number of simulcast streams, MAY reduce the number of simulcast streams in the answer, but MUST NOT add simulcast streams. An answerer that receives an offer without RTP stream pause/resume capability MUST NOT mark any simulcast streams as initially paused in the answer. An RTP stream pause/resume capable answerer that receives an offer with RTP stream pause/resume capability MAY mark any SCID that refer to pause/resume capable formats as initially paused in the answer. An answerer that receives indication in an offer of an SCID being initially paused , SHOULD mark that SCID as initially paused also in the answer, regardless of direction, unless it has good reason for the SCID not being initially paused. One such reason could for example be that the answerer would otherwise initially not receive any media of that type at all.

An offerer that receives an answer without "a=simulcast" MUST NOT use simulcast towards the answerer. An offerer that receives an answer with "a=simulcast" without any SCID in a specified direction MUST NOT use simulcast in that direction. An offerer that receives an answer where some SCID alternatives are kept MUST be prepared to receive any of the kept send direction SCID alternatives, and MAY send any of the kept receive direction SCID alternatives. An offerer that receives an answer where some of the SCID are removed MAY release the corresponding resources (codec, transport, etc) in its receive direction and MUST NOT send any RTP packets corresponding to the removed SCID. An offerer that offered some of its SCID as initially paused and that receives an answer that does not indicate RTP stream pause/resume capability, MUST NOT initially pause any simulcast streams. An offerer with RTP stream pause/resume capability that receives an answer where some SCID are marked as initially paused, SHOULD initially pause those RTP streams regardless if they were marked as initially paused also in the offer, unless it has good reason for those RTP streams not being initially paused. One such reason could for example be that the answerer would otherwise initially not receive any media of that type at all.

Offers and answers inside an existing session follow the rules for initial session negotiation, with the additional restriction that any SCID marked as initially paused in such offer or answer MUST already be paused, thus a new offer/answer MUST NOT replace use of RTP stream pause/resume in the session. Session modification restrictions in section 6.5 of "a=rid" also apply.

When used as a declarative media description, "a=simulcast" line "recv" direction formats indicate the configured end point's required capability to recognize and receive a specified set of RTP streams as simulcast streams. In the same fashion, "a=simulcast" line "send" direction requests the end point to send a specified set of RTP streams as simulcast streams. If multiple alternative simulcast formats are listed, it means that the configured end point MUST be prepared to receive any of the "recv" formats, and MAY send any of the "send" formats for that simulcast stream, which is aligned with the semantics of listing multiple formats on the "m=" line. It may not be beneficial for declarative use to be limited to a single media source per "m=" line, as elaborated further in .

Simulcast RTP streams MUST be related on RTP level through RID, as specified in the SDP "a=simulcast" attribute parameters. This is sufficient as long as there is only a single media source per SDP media description. When using BUNDLE, where multiple SDP media descriptions jointly specify a single RTP session, the SDES MID identification mechanism in BUNDLE allows relating RTP streams back to individual media descriptions, after which the above described RID relations can be used. Use of the RTP header extension for both MID and RID identifications can be important to ensure rapid initial reception, required to correctly interpret and process the RTP streams. Implementers of this specification MUST support RTCP source description (SDES) item and SHOULD support RTP header extension method to signal RID on RTP level. RTP streams MUST only use a single alternative SCID at a time (based on RTP timestamps), but MAY change format on a per-RTP packet basis. This corresponds to the existing (non-simulcast) SDP offer/answer case when multiple formats are included on the "m=" line in the SDP answer.

These examples describe a client to video conference service, using a centralized media topology with an RTP mixer.

| |<---->| B | +---+ | | +---+ | Mixer | +---+ | | +---+ | F |<---->| |<---->| J | +---+ +-----------+ +---+]]>

Alice is calling in to the mixer with a simulcast-enabled client capable of a single media source per media type. The client can send a simulcast of 2 video resolutions and frame rates: HD 1280x720p 30fps and thumbnail 320x180p 15fps. This is defined below using the "imageattr". In this example, only the "pt" RID parameter is used, effectively achieving a 1:1 mapping between RID and media formats (RTP payload types), to describe simulcast stream formats. Alice's Offer:

The only thing in the SDP that indicates simulcast capability is the line in the video media description containing the "simulcast" attribute. The included "a=fmtp" and "a=imageattr" parameters indicates that sent simulcast streams can differ in video resolution. The Answer from the server indicates that it too is simulcast capable. Should it not have been simulcast capable, the "a=simulcast" line would not have been present and communication would have started with the media negotiated in the SDP.

Since the server is the simulcast media receiver, it reverses the direction of the "simulcast" and "rid" attribute parameters.

Fred is calling in to the same conference as in the example above with a two-camera, two-display system, thus capable of handling two separate media sources in each direction, where each media source is simulcast-enabled in the send direction. Fred's client is restricted to a single media source per media description. The first two simulcast streams for the first media source use different codecs, H264-SVC and H264. These two simulcast streams also have a temporal dependency. Two different video codecs, VP8 and H264, are offered as alternatives for the third simulcast stream for the first media source. Only the highest fidelity simulcast stream are sent from start, the lower fidelity streams being initially paused. The second media source is offered with three different simulcast streams. All video streams of this second media source are loss protected by RTP retransmission. Also here, all but the highest fidelity simulcast stream are initially paused. Fred's client is also using BUNDLE to send all RTP streams from all media descriptions in the same RTP session on a single media transport. Although using many different simulcast streams in this example, the use of RID as simulcast stream identification enables use of a low number of RTP payload types. Note that the use of both BUNDLE and RID recommends using the RTP header extension for carrying these RTP stream identification fields, which is consequently also included in the SDP. Note also that for RID, the corresponding SDES attribute is named RtpStreamId.

Note: Empty lines in the SDP above are added only for readability and would not be present in an actual SDP.

Simulcast is in this memo defined as the act of sending multiple alternative encoded streams of the same underlying media source. When transmitting multiple independent streams that originate from the same source, it could potentially be done in several different ways using RTP. A general discussion on considerations for use of the different RTP multiplexing alternatives can be found in Guidelines for Multiplexing in RTP. Discussion and clarification on how to handle multiple streams in an RTP session can be found in . The network aspects that are relevant for simulcast are: When using simulcast it might be of interest to prioritize a particular simulcast stream, rather than applying equal treatment to all streams. For example, lower bit-rate streams may be prioritized over higher bit-rate streams to minimize congestion or packet losses in the low bit-rate streams. Thus, there is a benefit to use a simulcast solution with good QoS support. Using multiple RTP sessions incurs more cost for NAT/FW traversal unless they can re-use the same transport flow, which can be achieved by Multiplexing Negotiation Using SDP Port Numbers.

Use of multiple simulcast streams can require a significant amount of network resources. If the amount of available network resources varies during an RTP session such that it does not match what is negotiated in SDP, the bitrate used by the different simulcast streams may have to be reduced dynamically. What simulcast streams to prioritize when allocating available bitrate among the simulcast streams in such adaptation SHOULD be taken from the simulcast stream order on the "a=simulcast" line. Simulcast streams that have pause/resume capability and that would be given such low bitrate by the adaptation process that they are considered not really useful can be temporarily paused until the limiting condition clears.

The chosen approach has a limitation that relates to the use of a single RTP session for all simulcast formats of a media source, which comes from sending all simulcast streams related to a media source under the same SDP media description. It is not possible to use different simulcast streams on different media transports, limiting the possibilities to apply different QoS to different simulcast streams. When using unicast, QoS mechanisms based on individual packet marking are feasible, since they do not require separation of simulcast streams into different RTP sessions to apply different QoS. It is also not possible to separate different simulcast streams into different multicast groups to allow a multicast receiver to pick the stream it wants, rather than receive all of them. In this case, the only reasonable implementation is to use different RTP sessions for each multicast group so that reporting and other RTCP functions operate as intended.

This document requests to register a new media-level SDP attribute, "simulcast", in the "att-field (media level only)" registry within the SDP parameters registry, according to the procedures of and . IETF, contacted via mmusic@ietf.org, or a successor address designated by IESG simulcast Simulcast stream description No See of RFC XXXX. Signals simulcast capability for a set of RTP streams NORMAL Note to RFC Editor: Please replace "RFC XXXX" with the assigned number of this RFC.

The simulcast capability, configuration attributes, and parameters are vulnerable to attacks in signaling. A false inclusion of the "a=simulcast" attribute may result in simultaneous transmission of multiple RTP streams that would otherwise not be generated. The impact is limited by the media description joint bandwidth, shared by all simulcast streams irrespective of their number. There may however be a large number of unwanted RTP streams that will impact the share of bandwidth allocated for the originally wanted RTP stream. A hostile removal of the "a=simulcast" attribute will result in simulcast not being used. Neither of the above will likely have any major consequences and can be mitigated by signaling that is at least integrity and source authenticated to prevent an attacker to change it. Security considerations related to the use of RID is covered in and . There are no additional security concerns related to their use in this specification.

Morgan Lindqvist and Fredrik Jansson, both from Ericsson, have contributed with important material to the first versions of this document. Robert Hansen and Cullen Jennings, from Cisco, Peter Thatcher, from Google, and Adam Roach, from Mozilla, contributed significantly to subsequent versions.

NOTE TO RFC EDITOR: Please remove this section prior to publication.

Aligned with recent changes in draft-ietf-mmusic-rid and draft-ietf-avtext-rid. Modified the SDP offer/answer section to follow the generally accepted structure, also adding a brief text on modifying the session that is aligned with draft-ietf-mmusic-rid. Improved text around simulcast stream identification (as opposed to the simulcast stream itself) to consistently use the acronym SCID and defined that in the Terminology section. Changed references for RTP-level pause/resume and VP8 payload format that are now published as RFC. Improved IANA registration text. Removed unused reference to draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme. Editorial improvements and corrections.

Changed to only use RID identification, as was consensus during IETF 94. ABNF improvements. Clarified offer-answer rules for initially paused streams. Changed references for RTP topologies and RTP taxonomy documents that are now published as RFC. Added reference to the new RID draft in AVTEXT. Re-structured section 6 to provide an easy reference by the updated IANA section. Added a sub-section 7.1 with a discussion of bitrate adaptation. Editorial improvements.

Removed text on multicast / broadcast from use cases, since it is not supported by the solution. Removed explicit references to unified plan draft. Added possibility to initiate simulcast streams in paused mode. Enabled an offerer to offer multiple stream identification (pt or rid) methods and have the answerer choose which to use. Added a preference indication also in send direction offers. Added a section on limitations of the current proposal, including identification method specific limitations.

Relying on the new RID solution for codec constraints and configuration identification. This has resulted in changes in syntax to identify if pt or RID is used to describe the simulcast stream. Renamed simulcast version and simulcast version alternative to simulcast stream and simulcast format respectively, and improved definitions for them. Clarification that it is possible to switch between simulcast version alternatives, but that only a single one be used at any point in time. Changed the definition so that ordering of simulcast formats for a specific simulcast stream do have a preference order.

No changes. Only preventing expiry.

Added this appendix.