<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">

<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>

<rfc category="info" docName="draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-04" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title>Roughtime</title>

    <author fullname="Aanchal Malhotra" initials="A." surname="Malhotra">
      <organization>Boston University</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>111 Cummington Mall</street>
          <city>Boston</city>
          <region></region>
          <code>02215</code>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>aanchal4@bu.edu</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Adam Langley" initials="A." surname="Langley">
      <organization>Google </organization>
      <address>
	<email>
	agl@google.com </email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Watson Ladd" initials="W." surname="Ladd">
      <organization> Cloudflare</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>101 Townsend St</street>
          <city>San Francisco</city>
          <region></region>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>watsonbladd@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

   <author fullname="Marcus Dansarie" initials="M." surname="Dansarie">
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street />
          <city />
          <region />
          <code />
          <country>Sweden</country>
        </postal>
        <email>marcus@dansarie.se</email>
        <uri>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-0263</uri>
      </address>
    </author>    
    <date year="2021" month="February" day="21"/>

    <area>General</area>

    <workgroup>Internet Engineering Task Force</workgroup>

    <keyword>roughtime</keyword>

    <keyword>time synchronization</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>
        This document specifies Roughtime - a protocol that aims to achieve
        rough time synchronization while detecting servers that provide
        inaccurate time and providing cryptographic proof of their malfeasance.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>
        Time synchronization is essential to Internet security as many security
        protocols and other applications require synchronization
        <xref target="RFC7384"/> <xref target="MCBG"/>. Unfortunately widely
        deployed protocols such as the Network Time Protocol (NTP)
        <xref target="RFC5905"/> lack essential security features, and even
        newer protocols like Network Time Security (NTS)
        <xref target="RFC8915"/> lack mechanisms to ensure that the servers
        behave correctly. Authenticating time servers prevents network
        adversaries from modifying time packets, but an authenticated time
        server still has full control over the contents of the time packet and
        may go rogue. The Roughtime protocol provides cryptographic proof of
        malfeasance, enabling clients to detect and prove to a third party a
        server's attempts to influence the time a client computes.
      </t>
      <texttable anchor="existing_approaches">
        <ttcol align='center'>Protocol</ttcol>
        <ttcol align='center'>Authenticated Server</ttcol>
        <ttcol align='center'>Server Malfeasance Evidence</ttcol>
        <c>NTP, Chronos</c> <c>N</c>   <c>N</c>
        <c>NTP-MD5</c>      <c>Y*</c>  <c>N</c>
        <c>NTP-Autokey</c>  <c>Y**</c> <c>N</c>
        <c>NTS</c>          <c>Y</c>   <c>N</c>
        <c>Roughtime</c>    <c>Y</c>   <c>Y</c>
        <postamble>Security Properties of current protocols</postamble>
      </texttable>
      <t>
        Y* For security issues with symmetric-key based NTP-MD5 authentication,
        please refer to <xref target="RFC8573">RFC 8573</xref>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Y** For security issues with Autokey Public Key Authentication, refer to
        <xref target="Autokey"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        <list style="symbols">
          <t>
            If a server's timestamps do not fit into the time context of other
            servers' responses, then a Roughtime client can cryptographically
            prove this misbehavior to third parties. This helps detect "bad"
            servers.
          </t>
          <t>
            A Roughtime client can roughly detect (with no absolute guarantee) a
            delay attack <xref target="DelayAttacks"/> but can not
            cryptographically prove this to a third party. However, the absence
            of proof of malfeasance should not be considered a proof of absence
            of malfeasance. So Roughtime should not be used as a witness that a
            server is overall "good".
          </t>
          <t>
            Note that delay attacks cannot be detected/stopped by any protocol.
            Delay attacks can not, however, undermine the security guarantees
            provided by Roughtime.
          </t>
          <t>
            Although delay attacks cannot be prevented, they can be limited to
            a predetermined upper bound. This can be done by defining a
            maximal tolerable Round Trip Time (RTT) value, MAX-RTT, that a
            Roughtime client is willing to accept. A Roughtime client can
            measure the RTT of every request-response handshake and compare it
            to MAX-RTT. If the RTT exceeds MAX-RTT, the corresponding server
            is assumed to be a falseticker. When this approach is used the
            maximal time error that can be caused by a delay attack is
            MAX-RTT/2. It should be noted that this approach assumes that the
            nature of the system is known to the client, including reasonable
            upper bounds on the RTT value.
          </t>
        </list>
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Requirements Language">
      <t>
        The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
        "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
        <xref target="RFC2119"></xref> <xref target="RFC8174"></xref> when, and
        only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Protocol Overview" anchor="protocol-overview">
      <t>
        Roughtime is a protocol for rough time synchronization that enables
        clients to provide cryptographic proof of server malfeasance. It does so
        by having responses from servers include a signature with a certificate
        rooted in a long-term public/private key pair over a value derived from
        a nonce provided by the client in its request. This provides
        cryptographic proof that the timestamp was issued after the server
        received the client's request. The derived value included in the
        server's response is the root of a Merkle tree which includes the hash
        of the client's nonce as the value of one of its leaf nodes. This
        enables the server to amortize the relatively costly signing operation
        over a number of client requests.
      </t>
      <t>
        Single server mode: At its most basic level, Roughtime is a one round
        protocol in which a completely fresh client requests the current time
        and the server sends a signed response. The response includes a
        timestamp and a radius used to indicate the server's certainty about the
        reported time. For example, a radius of 1,000,000 microseconds means the
        server is absolutely confident that the true time is within one second
        of the reported time.
      </t>
      <t>
        The server proves freshness of its response as follows: The client's
        request contains a nonce. The server incorporates the nonce into its
        signed response so that the client can verify the server's signatures
        covering the nonce issued by the client. Provided that the nonce has
        sufficient entropy, this proves that the signed response could only have
        been generated after the nonce.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="The Guarantee">
      <t>
        A Roughtime server guarantees that a response to a query sent
        at t_1, received at t_2, and with timestamp t_3 has been
        created between the transmission of the query and its
        reception. If t_3 is not within that interval, a server
        inconsistency may be detected and used to impeach the
        server. The propagation of such a guarantee and its use of
        type synchronization is discussed in <xref target="ntp-integration"/>. No delay attacker may affect this:
        they may only expand the interval between t_1 and t_2, or of
        course stop the measurement in the first place.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Message Format">
      <t>
        Roughtime messages are maps consisting of one or more (tag, value)
        pairs. They start with a header, which contains the number of pairs, the
        tags, and value offsets. The header is followed by a message values
        section which contains the values associated with the tags in the
        header. Messages MUST be formatted according to
        <xref target="fig-roughtime-message"/> as described in the following
        sections.
      </t>
      <t>
        Messages may be recursive, i.e. the value of a tag can itself be a
        Roughtime message.
      </t>
      <figure anchor="fig-roughtime-message" title="Roughtime Message Format">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Number of pairs (uint32)                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
.                                                               .
.                     N-1 offsets (uint32)                      .
.                                                               .
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
.                                                               .
.                        N tags (uint32)                        .
.                                                               .
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
.                                                               .
.                            Values                             .
.                                                               .
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+]]>
        </artwork>
      </figure>

      <section title="Data Types" anchor="format">
        <section title="int32">
          <t>
            An int32 is a 32 bit signed integer. It is serialized in
            sign-magnitude representation with the sign bit in the most
            significant bit. It is serialized least significant byte first. The
            negative zero value (0x80000000) MUST NOT be used.
          </t>
        </section>
        <section title="uint32">
          <t>
            A uint32 is a 32 bit unsigned integer. It is serialized with the
            least significant byte first.
          </t>
        </section>

        <section title="uint64">
          <t>
            A uint64 is a 64 bit unsigned integer. It is serialized with the
            least significant byte first.
          </t>
        </section>

        <section title="Tag" anchor="tag">
          <t>
            Tags are used to identify values in Roughtime messages. A tag is a
            uint32 but may also be listed as a sequence of up to four ASCII
            characters <xref target="RFC0020"/>. ASCII strings shorter than four
            characters can be unambiguously converted to tags by padding them
            with zero bytes. For example, the ASCII string "NONC" would
            correspond to the tag 0x434e4f4e and "PAD" would correspond to
            0x00444150.
          </t>
        </section>

        <section title="Timestamp">
          <t>
            A timestamp is a uint64 interpreted in the following way. The most
            significant 3 bytes contain the integer part of a Modified Julian
            Date (MJD). The least significant 5 bytes is a count of the number
            of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) microseconds
            <xref target="ITU-R_TF.460-6"/> since midnight on that day.
          </t>
          <t>
            The MJD is the number of UTC days since 17 November 1858
            <xref target="ITU-R_TF.457-2"/>. It is useful to note that 1 January 1970 is
            40,587 days after 17 November 1858.
          </t>
          <t>
            Note that, unlike NTP, this representation does not use the full
            number of bits in the fractional part and that days with leap
            seconds will have more or fewer than the nominal 86,400,000,000
            microseconds.
          </t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="Header">
        <t>
          All Roughtime messages start with a header. The first four bytes of
          the header is the uint32 number of tags N, and hence of (tag, value)
          pairs. The following 4*(N-1) bytes are offsets, each a uint32. The
          last 4*N bytes in the header are tags.
        </t>
        <t>
          Offsets refer to the positions of the values in the message values
          section. All offsets MUST be multiples of four and placed in
          increasing order. The first post-header byte is at offset 0. The
          offset array is considered to have a not explicitly encoded value of 0
          as its zeroth entry. The value associated with the ith tag begins at
          offset[i] and ends at offset[i+1]-1, with the exception of the last
          value which ends at the end of the message. Values may have zero
          length.
        </t>
        <t>
          Tags MUST be listed in the same order as the offsets of
          their values.  A tag MUST NOT appear more than once in a
          header. Tags MUST also be sorted in ascending order by numeric value.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Protocol">
      <t>
        As described in <xref target="protocol-overview"/>, clients
        initiate time synchronization by sending requests containing
        a nonce to servers who send signed time responses in
        return. Roughtime packets can be sent between clients and
        servers either as UDP datagrams or via TCP streams. Servers
        SHOULD support the UDP transport mode, while TCP transport is
        OPTIONAL.
      </t>
      <t>
        A Roughtime packet MUST be formatted according to
        <xref target="fig-roughtime-packet-format" /> and as described here.
        The first field is a uint64 with the value 0x4d49544847554f52
        ("ROUGHTIM" in ASCII). The second field is a uint32 and contains the
        length of the third field. The third and last field contains a
        Roughtime message as specified in <xref target="format"/>.
      </t>
      <figure anchor="fig-roughtime-packet-format"
          title="Roughtime Packet Format">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  0x4d49544847554f52 (uint64)                  |
|                        ("ROUGHTIM")                           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Message length (uint32)                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
.                                                               .
.                      Roughtime message                        .
.                                                               .
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+]]>
        </artwork>
      </figure>
      <t>
        Roughtime request and response packets MUST be transmitted in a single
        datagram when the UDP transport mode is used. Setting the packet's don't
        fragment bit <xref target="RFC0791" /> is OPTIONAL in IPv4 networks.
      </t>
      <t>
        Multiple requests and responses can be exchanged over an established TCP
        connection. Clients MAY send multiple requests at once and servers MAY
        send responses out of order. The connection SHOULD be closed by the
        client when it has no more requests to send and has received all
        expected responses. Either side SHOULD close the connection in response
        to synchronization, format, implementation-defined timeouts, or other
        errors.
      </t>
      <t>
        All requests and responses MUST contain the VER tag. It contains a list
        of one or more uint32 version numbers. The version of Roughtime
        specified by this memo has version number 1.
      </t>
      <t>
        For testing drafts of this memo, a version number of 0x80000000 plus the
        draft number is used.
      </t>

      <section title="Requests">
        <t>
          A request MUST contain the tags NONC and VER.
        </t>
        <t>
          The value of the NONC tag is a 64 byte nonce. It SHOULD be generated
          in a manner indistinguishable from random. 
        </t>
        <t>
          In a request, the VER tag contains a list of versions. The VER tag
          MUST include at least one Roughtime version supported by the client.
          The client MUST ensure that the version numbers and tags included in
          the request are not incompatible with each other or the packet
          contents.
        </t>
        <t>
          Tags other than NONC and VER SHOULD be ignored by the server.
        </t>
        <t>
          The size of the request message SHOULD be at least 1024 bytes when
          the UDP transport mode is used. To attain this size the PAD tag
          SHOULD be added to the message. Its value SHOULD be all zeros.
          Responding to requests shorter than 1024 bytes is OPTIONAL and
          servers MUST NOT send responses larger than the requests they are
          replying to.
        </t>
      </section>

      <section title="Responses">
        <t>
          A response MUST contain the tags CERT, INDX, NONC, PATH, SIG, SREP,
          and VER.
        </t>
        <t>
          The SIG tag is a signature over the SREP value using the
          public key contained in CERT, as explained below.
        </t>
        <t>
          The SREP tag contains a time response. Its value is a
          Roughtime message with the tags ROOT, MIDP, and RADI. The server MAY
          include any of the tags DUT1, DTAI and LEAP in the contents of the
          SREP tag.
        </t>
        <t>
          The NONC tag contains the nonce of the message being responded to.
        </t>
        <t>
          The ROOT tag contains a 32 byte value of a Merkle tree root as
          described in <xref target="merkle-tree"/>.
        </t>
        <t>
          The MIDP tag value is a timestamp of the moment of processing.
        </t>
        <t>
          The RADI tag value is a uint32 representing the server's estimate of
          the accuracy of MIDP in microseconds. Servers MUST ensure that the
          true time is within (MIDP-RADI, MIDP+RADI) at the time they compose
          the response message.
        </t>
        <t>
          The DUT1 tag value is an int32 indicating the predicted difference
          between UT1 and UTC (UT1 - UTC) in milliseconds as given by the
          International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS).
        </t>
        <t>
          The DTAI tag value is an int32 indicating the current difference between
          International Atomic Time (TAI) and UTC (TAI - UTC) in milliseconds as
          published in the International Bureau of Weights and Measures' (BIPM)
          Circular T.
        </t>
        <t>
          The LEAP tag contains zero or more int32 values, each representing
          a past or future leap second event. Positive values represent the
          addition of a second and negative values represent the removal of a
          second. The absolute value represents the MJD of the second after the
          leap second event, i.e., the first second with a new UTC - TAI
          difference. The leap second events MUST be sorted in reverse
          chronological order and the first item MUST be the last (past or
          future) leap second event that the server knows about. A LEAP tag with
          zero int32 values indicates that the server does not hold any updated
          leap second information.
        </t>
        <t>
          The SIG tag value is a 64 byte Ed25519 signature
          <xref target="RFC8032"/> over a signature context concatenated with
          the entire value of a DELE or SREP tag. Signatures of DELE tags MUST
          use the ASCII string "RoughTime v1 delegation signature--" and
          signatures of SREP tags MUST use the ASCII string "RoughTime v1
          response signature" as signature context. Both strings MUST include a
          terminating zero byte.
        </t>
        <t>
          The CERT tag contains a public-key certificate signed with the
          server's long-term key. Its value is a Roughtime message with the tags
          DELE and SIG, where SIG is a signature over the DELE value.
        </t>
        <t>
          The DELE tag contains a delegated public-key certificate used by the
          server to sign the SREP tag. Its value is a Roughtime message with the
          tags MINT, MAXT, and PUBK. The purpose of the DELE tag is to enable
          separation of a long-term public key from keys on devices exposed to
          the public Internet.
        </t>
        <t>
          The MINT tag is the minimum timestamp for which the key in PUBK is
          trusted to sign responses. MIDP MUST be more than or equal to MINT for
          a response to be considered valid.
        </t>
        <t>
          The MAXT tag is the maximum timestamp for which the key in PUBK is
          trusted to sign responses. MIDP MUST be less than or equal to MAXT for
          a response to be considered valid.
        </t>
        <t>
          The PUBK tag contains a temporary 32 byte Ed25519 public key which is
          used to sign the SREP tag.
        </t>
        <t>
          The INDX tag value is a uint32 determining the position of NONC in the
          Merkle tree used to generate the ROOT value as described in
          <xref target="merkle-tree"/>.
        </t>
        <t>
          The PATH tag value is a multiple of 32 bytes long and represents a
          path of 32 byte hash values in the Merkle tree used to generate the
          ROOT value as described in <xref target="merkle-tree"/>. In the case
          where a response is prepared for a single request and the Merkle tree
          contains only the root node, the size of PATH is zero.
        </t>
        <t>
          In a response, the VER tag MUST contain a single version number. It
          SHOULD be one of the version numbers supplied by the client in its
          request. The server MUST ensure that the version number corresponds
          with the rest of the packet contents.
        </t>
      </section>

      <section title="The Merkle Tree" anchor="merkle-tree">
        <t>
          A Merkle tree is a binary tree where the value of each non-leaf node
          is a hash value derived from its two children. The root of the tree is
          thus dependent on all leaf nodes.
        </t>
        <t>
          In Roughtime, each leaf node in the Merkle tree represents the nonce
          of one request that a response message is sent in reply to. Leaf nodes
          are indexed left to right, beginning with zero.
        </t>
        <t>
          The values of all nodes are calculated from the leaf nodes and up
          towards the root node using the first 32 bytes of the output of the
          SHA-512 hash algorithm <xref target="SHS"/>. For leaf nodes, the
          byte 0x00 is prepended to the nonce before applying the hash function.
          For all other nodes, the byte 0x01 is concatenated with first the left
          and then the right child node value before applying the hash function.
        </t>
        <t>
          The value of the Merkle tree's root node is included in the ROOT tag
          of the response.
        </t>
        <t>
          The index of a request's nonce node is included in the INDX tag of the
          response.
        </t>
        <t>
          The values of all sibling nodes in the path between a request's nonce
          node and the root node is stored in the PATH tag so that the client
          can reconstruct and validate the value in the ROOT tag using its
          nonce.
        </t>

        <section title="Root Value Validity Check Algorithm"
            anchor="root-check">
          <t>
            One starts by computing the hash of the NONC value from the request,
            with 0x00 prepended. Then one walks from the least significant bit
            of INDX to the most significant bit, and also walks towards the end
            of PATH.
          </t>
          <t>
            If PATH ends then the remaining bits of the INDX MUST be all zero.
            This indicates the termination of the walk, and the current value
            MUST equal ROOT if the response is valid.
          </t>
          <t>
            If the current bit is 0, one hashes 0x01, the current hash, and the
            value from PATH to derive the next current value.
          </t>
          <t>
            If the current bit is 1 one hashes 0x01, the value from PATH, and
            the current hash to derive the next current value.
          </t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section title="Validity of Response">
        <t>
          A client MUST check the following properties when it receives a
          response. We assume the long-term server public key is known to the
          client through other means.

          <list style="symbols">
            <t>
              The signature in CERT was made with the long-term key of the
              server.
            </t>
            <t>
              The DELE timestamps and the MIDP value are consistent.
            </t>
            <t>
              The INDX and PATH values prove NONC was included in the Merkle
              tree with value ROOT using the algorithm in
              <xref target="root-check"/>.
            </t>
            <t>
              The signature of SREP in SIG validates with the public key in
              DELE.
            </t>
          </list>

          A response that passes these checks is said to be valid. Validity of a
          response does not prove the time is correct, but merely that the
          server signed it, and thus guarantees that it began to compute the
          signature at a time in the interval (MIDP-RADI, MIDP+RADI).
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title = "Integration into NTP" anchor="ntp-integration">
      <t>
        We assume that there is a bound PHI on the frequency error in
        the clock on the machine. Given a measurement taken at a local
        time t1, we know the true time is in [ t1-delta-sigma,
        t1-delta+sigma ]. After d seconds have elapsed we know the true
        time is within [ t1-delta-sigma-d*PHI, t1-delta+sigma+d*PHI]. A
        simple and effective way to mix with NTP or PTP discipline of
        the clock is to trim the observed intervals in NTP to fit
        entirely within this window or reject measurements that fall
        to far outside. This assumes time has not been stepped.  If
        the NTP process decides to step the time, it MUST use
        Roughtime to ensure the new truetime estimate that will be
        stepped to is consistent with the true time.</t>

        <t>Should this window become too large, another Roughtime
        measurement is called for. The definition of "too large" is
        implementation defined.</t>

        <t>Implementations MAY use other, more sophisticated means of
        adjusting the clock respecting Roughtime information.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Grease">
      <t>
        Servers MAY send back a fraction of responses that are syntactically
        invalid or contain invalid signatures as well as incorrect times.
        Clients MUST properly reject such responses. Servers MUST NOT send back
        responses with incorrect times and valid signatures. Either signature
        MAY be invalid for this application.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Roughtime Servers">
      <t>
        The below list contains a list of servers with their public keys in
        Base64 format. These servers may implement older versions of this
        specification.
        <figure>
          <artwork>
address:       roughtime.cloudflare.com
port:          2002
long-term key: gD63hSj3ScS+wuOeGrubXlq35N1c5Lby/S+T7MNTjxo=

address:       roughtime.int08h.com
port:          2002
long-term key: AW5uAoTSTDfG5NfY1bTh08GUnOqlRb+HVhbJ3ODJvsE=

address:       roughtime.sandbox.google.com
port:          2002
long-term key: etPaaIxcBMY1oUeGpwvPMCJMwlRVNxv51KK/tktoJTQ=

address:       roughtime.se
port:          2002
long-term key: S3AzfZJ5CjSdkJ21ZJGbxqdYP/SoE8fXKY0+aicsehI=
          </artwork>
        </figure>
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>
         Thomas Peterson corrected multiple nits. Peter L&ouml;thberg
         (Lothberg), Tal Mizrahi, Ragnar Sundblad, Kristof Teichel,
         and the other members of the NTP working group contributed
         comments and suggestions.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <section title="Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry">
        <t>
          IANA is requested to allocate the following entry in the
          <xref target="RFC6335">Service Name and Transport Protocol
          Port Number Registry</xref>:
          <list>
            <t>Service Name: Roughtime</t>
            <t>Transport Protocol: tcp,udp</t>
            <t>Assignee: IESG &lt;iesg@ietf.org&gt;</t>
            <t>Contact: IETF Chair &lt;chair@ietf.org&gt;</t>
            <t>Description: Roughtime time synchronization</t>
            <t>Reference: [[this memo]]</t>
            <t>Port Number: [[TBD1]], selected by IANA from the User Port
              range</t>
          </list>
        </t>
      </section>
      <section title="Roughtime Version Registry">
        <t> IANA is requested to create a new registry entitled
        &quot; Roughtime Version Registry &quot; Entries shall have the following fields:
        <list>
          <t> Version ID (REQUIRED): a 32-bit unsigned integer </t>
          <t> Version name (REQUIRED): A short text string naming the version being identified. </t>
          <t> Reference (REQUIRED): A reference to a relevant specification document. </t>
        </list>
          The policy for allocation of new entries SHOULD be: IETF Review.
        </t>
        <t>
          The initial contents of this registry shall be as follows:
        </t>
        <texttable>
          <ttcol>Version ID</ttcol>
          <ttcol>Version name</ttcol>
          <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>

          <c>0x0</c>
          <c>Reserved</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x1</c>
          <c>Roughtime version 1</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x2-0x7fffffff</c>
          <c>Unassigned</c>
          <c></c>

          <c>0x80000000-0xffffffff</c>
          <c>Reserved for Private or Experimental use</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>
        </texttable>
      </section>

      <section title="Roughtime Tag Registry">
        <t>
          IANA is requested to create a new registry entitled
          &quot;Roughtime Tag Registry&quot;. Entries SHALL have
          the following fields:
          <list>
            <t>
              Tag (REQUIRED): A 32-bit unsigned integer in hexadecimal format.
            </t>
            <t>
              ASCII Representation (OPTIONAL): The ASCII representation of the
              tag in accordance with <xref target="tag"/> of this memo, if
              applicable.
            </t>
            <t>
              Reference (REQUIRED): A reference to a relevant specification
              document.
            </t>
          </list>
          The policy for allocation of new entries in this registry
          SHOULD be: Specification Required.
        </t>
        <t>
          The initial contents of this registry SHALL be as follows:
        </t>
        <texttable>
          <ttcol>Tag</ttcol>
          <ttcol>ASCII Representation</ttcol>
          <ttcol>Reference</ttcol>

          <c>0x00444150</c>
          <c>PAD</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x00474953</c>
          <c>SIG</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x00524556</c>
          <c>VER</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x31545544</c>
          <c>DUT1</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x434e4f4e</c>
          <c>NONC</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x454c4544</c>
          <c>DELE</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x48544150</c>
          <c>PATH</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x49415444</c>
          <c>DTAI</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x49444152</c>
          <c>RADI</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x4b425550</c>
          <c>PUBK</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x5041454c</c>
          <c>LEAP</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x5044494d</c>
          <c>MIDP</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x50455253</c>
          <c>SREP</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x544e494d</c>
          <c>MINT</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x544f4f52</c>
          <c>ROOT</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x54524543</c>
          <c>CERT</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x5458414d</c>
          <c>MAXT</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>

          <c>0x58444e49</c>
          <c>INDX</c>
          <c>[[this memo]]</c>
        </texttable>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>
        Since the only supported signature scheme, Ed25519, is not quantum
        resistant, the Roughtime version described in this memo will not survive
        the advent of quantum computers.
      </t>
      <t>
        Maintaining a list of trusted servers and adjudicating violations of the
        rules by servers is not discussed in this document and is essential for
        security. Roughtime clients MUST update their view of which servers are
        trustworthy in order to benefit from the detection of misbehavior.
      </t>
      <t>
        Validating timestamps made on different dates requires knowledge of leap
        seconds in order to calculate time intervals correctly.
      </t>
      <t>
        Servers carry out a significant amount of computation in response to
        clients, and thus may experience vulnerability to denial of service
        attacks.
      </t>
      <t>
        This protocol does not provide any confidentiality, and given the nature
        of timestamps such impact is minor.
      </t>
      <t>
        The compromise of a PUBK's private
        key, even past MAXT, is a problem as the private key can be used to sign
        invalid times that are in the range MINT to MAXT, and thus violate the
        good behavior guarantee of the server.
      </t>
      <t>
        Servers MUST NOT send response packets larger than the request packets
        sent by clients, in order to prevent amplification attacks.
      </t>
    </section>

    <section title="Privacy Considerations">
      <t>
        This protocol is designed to obscure all client identifiers. Servers
        necessarily have persistent long-term identities essential to enforcing
        correct behavior.
      </t>
      <t>
        Generating nonces in a nonrandom manner can cause leaks of private data or
        enable tracking of clients as they move between networks.
      </t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <reference anchor="ITU-R_TF.457-2">
        <front>
          <title>
            Use of the Modified Julian Date by the Standard-Frequency
            and Time-Signal Services
          </title>
          <author>
            <organization>
              ITU-R
            </organization>
          </author>
          <date year="1997" month="October"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="ITU-R Recommendation" value="TF.457-2"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor = "SHS">
        <front>
          <title>Secure Hash Standard</title>
          <author>
            <organization>
              National Institute of Standards and Technology
            </organization>
          </author>
          <date year="2015" month="August"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4"/>
        <seriesInfo name="FIPS" value="180-4"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="ITU-R_TF.460-6">
        <front>
          <title>
            Standard-Frequency and Time-Signal Emissions
          </title>
          <author>
            <organization>
              ITU-R
            </organization>
          </author>
          <date year="2002" month="February"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="ITU-R Recommendation" value="TF.460-6"/>
      </reference>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0020.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4648.xml"?>
      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6335.xml'?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8032.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8259.xml"?>
    </references>
    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0768.xml"?>
      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.0791.xml'?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0793.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5905.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7384.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8573.xml"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8915.xml"?>

      <reference anchor="Autokey"
          target="https://zero-entropy.de/autokey_analysis.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Analysis of the NTP Autokey Procedures</title>
          <author initials="S." surname="Rottger">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2012"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="DelayAttacks"
          target="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6336612">
        <front>
          <title>
            A Game Theoretic Analysis of Delay Attacks Against Time
            Synchronization Protocols
          </title>
          <author initials="T." surname="Mizrahi" fullname="Tal Mizrahi">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2012"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1109/ISPCS.2012.6336612"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="MCBG" target="https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1020">
        <front>
          <title>Attacking the Network Time Protocol</title>
          <author initials="A." surname="Malhotra" fullname="A. Malhotra">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="I." surname="Cohen" fullname="I. Cohen">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="E." surname="Brakke" fullname="E. Brakke">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="S." surname="Goldberg" fullname="S. Goldberg">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2015"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>

    <section title="Terms and Abbreviations">
      <t>
        <list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="ASCII ">American Standard Code for Information
              Interchange</t>
          <t hangText="IANA  ">Internet Assigned Numbers Authority</t>
          <t hangText="JSON  "><xref target="RFC8259">JavaScript Object
              Notation</xref></t>
          <t hangText="MJD   ">Modified Julian Date</t>
          <t hangText="NTP   "><xref target="RFC5905">Network Time Protocol
              </xref></t>
          <t hangText="NTS   "><xref target="RFC8915">
              Network Time Security</xref></t>
          <t hangText="TAI   "><xref target="ITU-R_TF.460-6">International
              Atomic Time (Temps Atomique International)</xref></t>
          <t hangText="TCP   "><xref target="RFC0793">Transmission Control
              Protocol</xref></t>
          <t hangText="UDP   "><xref target="RFC0768">User Datagram Protocol
              </xref></t>
          <t hangText="UT    "><xref target="ITU-R_TF.460-6">Universal Time
              </xref></t>
          <t hangText="UTC   "><xref target="ITU-R_TF.460-6">Coordinated
              Universal Time</xref></t>
        </list>
      </t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
