<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
  <!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.3.15 -->

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
]>

<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>

<rfc ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-04" category="std">

  <front>
    <title abbrev="RPH Values for Emergency Services">Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks</title>

    <author initials="M." surname="Dolly" fullname="Martin Dolly">
      <organization>AT&amp;T</organization>
      <address>
        <email>md3135@att.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="Chris Wendt">
      <organization>Comcast</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Comcast Technology Center</street>
          <city>Philadelphia, PA  19103</city>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>chris-ietf@chriswendt.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2020" month="November" day="02"/>

    <area>ART</area>
    <workgroup>STIR</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>


<t>This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority Header (“rph”) claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim (“sph”) for protection of the “psap-callback” value as part of the “rph” PASSporT extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks for emergency call origination and callback.</t>



    </abstract>


  </front>

  <middle>


<section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">

<t>Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization <xref target="RFC8443"/> extended the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in <xref target="RFC8225"/> to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) “Resource-Priority” header field <xref target="RFC4412"/>. <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls"/> introduces the need and justification for the protection of both the SIP “Resource-Priority” and “Priority” header fields, used for categorizing the priority use of the call in the telephone network, specifically for emergency calls.</t>

<t>Compromise of the SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header fields could lead to misuse of network resources (i.e., during congestion scenarios), impacting the application services supported using the SIP “Resource-Priority” header field and the handling of Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks.</t>

<t><xref target="RFC8225"/> allows extensions by which an authority on the originating side verifying the authorization of a particular communication for the SIP “Resource-Priority” header field or the SIP “Priority” header field can use PASSPorT claims to cryptographically sign the information associated with either the SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header field and convey assertion of those values by the signing party authorization.  A signed SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header field will allow a receiving entity (including entities located in different network domains/boundaries) to verify the validity of assertions to act on the information with confidence that the information has not been spoofed or compromised.</t>

<t>This document adds new “auth” array key values for a Resource Priority Header (“rph”) claim defined in <xref target="RFC8443"/>, in support of Emergency Services Networks for emergency call origination and callback. This document additionally defines a new PASSporT claim, “sph”, including protection of the SIP Priority header for the indication of an emergency service call-back assigned the value “psap-callback” as defined in <xref target="RFC7090"/>.
The use of the newly defined claim and key values corresponding to the SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ and ‘Priority’ header fields for emergency services is introduced in <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls"/> but otherwise out-of-scope of this document.  In addition, the PASSPorT claims and values defined in this document are intended for use in environments where there are means to verify that the signer of the SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ and ‘Priority’ header fields is authoritative.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">

<t>The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="new-assertion-values-for-rph-claim" title="New Assertion Values for “rph” claim">

<t>This specification defines the ability to sign the SIP Resource-Priority Header field namespace for local emergency communications defined in <xref target="RFC7135"/> and represented by the string “esnet.x” where x is the priority-level allowed in the esnet namespace. As of the writing of this specification the priority-level is between 0 and 4, but may be extended by future specifications.</t>

<t>Similar to the values allowed by <xref target="RFC8443"/> for the “auth” JSON object key inside the “rph” claim, the string “esnet.x” with the appropriate value should be used when resource priority is required for local emergency communications corresponding and exactly matching the SIP Resource-Priority header string representing the namespace invoked in the call.</t>

<t>When using “esnet.x” as the “auth” assertion value in emergency service destined calls, the “orig” claim of the PASSporT MUST represent the calling party number that initiates the call to emergency services.  The “dest” claim MUST either be a country or region specific dial string (e.g., “911” for North America or “112” GSM defined string used in Europe and other countries) or “urn:service:sos” as defined in <xref target="RFC5031"/>, representing the emergency services destination of the call.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “rph” claim for SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ header field with an “esnet.1” assertion:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":“12155551212"},
    "dest":{"uri":["urn:service:sos"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.1"]}
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

<t>For emergency services callbacks, the “orig” claim of the “rph” PASSporT MUST represent the Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP) telephone number. The “dest” claim MUST be the telephone number representing the original calling party of the emergency service call that is being called back.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “rph” claim for SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ header field with a “esnet.0” assertion:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]}
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

<t>After the header and claims PASSporT objects have been constructed, their signature is generated normally per the guidance in <xref target="RFC8225"/> using the full form of PASSPorT.  The credentials (i.e., Certificate) used to create the signature must have authority over the namespace of the “rph” claim, and there is only one authority per claim. The authority MUST use its credentials associated with the specific service supported by the resource priority namespace in the claim. If r-values are added or dropped by the intermediaries along the path, the intermediaries must generate a new “rph” header and sign the claim with their own authority.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="the-sip-priority-header-sph-claim" title="The SIP Priority header “sph” claim">

<t>As defined in <xref target="RFC7090"/> the SIP Priority header may be set to the value “psap-callback” for emergency services callback calls.  Because some SIP networks may act on this value and provide priority or other special routing based on this value, it is important to protect and validate the authoritative use associated with it.</t>

<t>Therefore, we define a new claim key as part of the “rph” PASSporT, “sph”.  This is an optional claim that MUST only be used only with an “auth” claim with an “esnet.x” value indicating an authorized emergency callback call and corresponding to a SIP Priority header with the value “psap-callback”.</t>

<t>The value of the “sph” claim key should only be “psap-callback” which MUST match the SIP Priority header field value for authorized emergency services callbacks. If the value is anything other than “psap-callback”, the PASSporT validation MUST be considered a failure case.</t>

<t>Note: Because the intended use of this specification is only for emergency services, there is also an explicit assumption that the signer of the “rph” PASSporT can authoritatively represent both the content of the Resource Priority Header and Priority Header information associated specifically with a emergency services callback case where both could exist. This document is not intended to be a general mechanism for protecting SIP Priority Header fields, this could be accomplished as part of future work with a new PASSporT extension or new claim added to either an existing PASSporT or PASSporT extension usage.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “sph” claim for SIP ‘Priority’ header field with the value “psap-callback”:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]},
    "sph":"psap-callback"
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

</section>
<section anchor="order-of-claim-keys" title="Order of Claim Keys">

<t>The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of <xref target="RFC8225"/> Section 9; the claim keys MUST appear in lexicographic order. Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order,</t>

<t><list style="symbols">
  <t>dest</t>
  <t>iat</t>
  <t>orig</t>
  <t>rph</t>
  <t>sph</t>
</list></t>

</section>
<section anchor="compact-form-of-passport" title="Compact Form of PASSporT">

<t>The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this document or recommended for ‘rph’ PASSporTs.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">

<t>The authors would like to thank Brian Rosen, Terry Reese, and Jon Peterson for helpful suggestions, comments, and corrections.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="iana-considerations" title="IANA Considerations">

<section anchor="json-web-token-claims" title="JSON Web Token claims">

<t>This specification requests that the IANA add one new claim to the JSON Web Token Claims registry as defined in <xref target="RFC7519"/>.</t>

<t>Claim Name: “sph”</t>

<t>Claim Description: SIP Priority header field</t>

<t>Change Controller: IESG</t>

<t>Specification Document(s): [RFCThis]</t>

</section>
</section>
<section anchor="security-considerations" title="Security Considerations">

<t>The security considerations discussed in <xref target="RFC8224"/>, Section 12, are applicable here.</t>

</section>


  </middle>

  <back>

    <references title='Normative References'>





<reference anchor="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls">
<front>
<title>Non-Interactive Emergency Calls</title>

<author initials='B' surname='Rosen' fullname='Brian Rosen'>
    <organization />
</author>

<date month='March' day='9' year='2020' />

<abstract><t>Emergency calls from citizens to authorities, and call back of such emergency calls by authorities to citizens need assurances that headers intended to get appropriate priority from the networks they traverse, and in some cases, appropriate routing.  Protection of the SIP Resource Priority Header and the SIP Priority header is needed for such calls.  This document describes the environment for placing emergency calls and call backs which motivate the need and use of the mechanisms described in other documents</t></abstract>

</front>

<seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft' value='draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00' />
<format type='TXT'
        target='http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00.txt' />
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC4412" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412'>
<front>
<title>Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Polk' fullname='J. Polk'><organization /></author>
<date year='2006' month='February' />
<abstract><t>This document defines two new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) header fields for communicating resource priority, namely, &quot;Resource-Priority&quot; and &quot;Accept-Resource-Priority&quot;.  The &quot;Resource-Priority&quot; header field can influence the behavior of SIP user agents (such as telephone gateways and IP telephones) and SIP proxies.  It does not directly influence the forwarding behavior of IP routers.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4412'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC4412'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC5031" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5031'>
<front>
<title>A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<date year='2008' month='January' />
<abstract><t>The content of many communication services depends on the context, such as the user's location.  We describe a 'service' URN that allows well-known context-dependent services that can be resolved in a distributed manner to be identified.  Examples include emergency services, directory assistance, and call-before-you-dig hot lines.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='5031'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC5031'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7090" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7090'>
<front>
<title>Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Callback</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<author initials='H.' surname='Tschofenig' fullname='H. Tschofenig'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Holmberg' fullname='C. Holmberg'><organization /></author>
<author initials='M.' surname='Patel' fullname='M. Patel'><organization /></author>
<date year='2014' month='April' />
<abstract><t>After an emergency call is completed (terminated either prematurely by the emergency caller or normally by the call taker), the call taker may feel the need for further communication.  For example, the call may have been dropped by accident without the call taker having sufficient information about the current state of an accident victim. A call taker may trigger a callback to the emergency caller using the contact information provided with the initial emergency call.  This callback could, under certain circumstances, be treated like any other call and, as a consequence, it may get blocked by authorization policies or may get forwarded to an answering machine.</t><t>The IETF emergency services architecture specification already offers a solution approach for allowing Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks to bypass authorization policies in order to reach the caller without unnecessary delays.  Unfortunately, the specified mechanism only supports limited scenarios.  This document discusses shortcomings of the current mechanisms and illustrates additional scenarios where better-than-normal call treatment behavior would be desirable.  We describe a solution based on a new header field value for the SIP Priority header field, called &quot;psap-callback&quot;, to mark PSAP callbacks.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7090'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7090'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7135" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7135'>
<front>
<title>Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications</title>
<author initials='J.' surname='Polk' fullname='J. Polk'><organization /></author>
<date year='2014' month='May' />
<abstract><t>This document creates the new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource Priority header field namespace 'esnet' and registers this namespace with IANA.  The new header field namespace allows for local emergency session establishment to a public safety answering point (PSAP), between PSAPs, and between a PSAP and first responders and their organizations.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7135'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7135'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8224" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8224'>
<front>
<title>Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
<author initials='J.' surname='Peterson' fullname='J. Peterson'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Jennings' fullname='C. Jennings'><organization /></author>
<author initials='E.' surname='Rescorla' fullname='E. Rescorla'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Wendt' fullname='C. Wendt'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='February' />
<abstract><t>The baseline security mechanisms in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) are inadequate for cryptographically assuring the identity of the end users that originate SIP requests, especially in an interdomain context.  This document defines a mechanism for securely identifying originators of SIP requests.  It does so by defining a SIP header field for conveying a signature used for validating the identity and for conveying a reference to the credentials of the signer.</t><t>This document obsoletes RFC 4474.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8224'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8224'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8225" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8225'>
<front>
<title>PASSporT: Personal Assertion Token</title>
<author initials='C.' surname='Wendt' fullname='C. Wendt'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Peterson' fullname='J. Peterson'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='February' />
<abstract><t>This document defines a method for creating and validating a token that cryptographically verifies an originating identity or, more generally, a URI or telephone number representing the originator of personal communications.  The Personal Assertion Token, PASSporT, is cryptographically signed to protect the integrity of the identity of the originator and to verify the assertion of the identity information at the destination.  The cryptographic signature is defined with the intention that it can confidently verify the originating persona even when the signature is sent to the destination party over an insecure channel.  PASSporT is particularly useful for many personal-communications applications over IP networks and other multi-hop interconnection scenarios where the originating and destination parties may not have a direct trusted relationship.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8225'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8225'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7519" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519'>
<front>
<title>JSON Web Token (JWT)</title>
<author initials='M.' surname='Jones' fullname='M. Jones'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Bradley' fullname='J. Bradley'><organization /></author>
<author initials='N.' surname='Sakimura' fullname='N. Sakimura'><organization /></author>
<date year='2015' month='May' />
<abstract><t>JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties.  The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7519'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7519'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8443" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443'>
<front>
<title>Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization</title>
<author initials='R.' surname='Singh' fullname='R. Singh'><organization /></author>
<author initials='M.' surname='Dolly' fullname='M. Dolly'><organization /></author>
<author initials='S.' surname='Das' fullname='S. Das'><organization /></author>
<author initials='A.' surname='Nguyen' fullname='A. Nguyen'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='August' />
<abstract><t>This document extends the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in RFC 8225 to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority' header field, which is used for communications resource prioritization.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8443'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8443'/>
</reference>




    </references>

    <references title='Informative References'>





<reference  anchor="RFC2119" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119'>
<front>
<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
<author initials='S.' surname='Bradner' fullname='S. Bradner'><organization /></author>
<date year='1997' month='March' />
<abstract><t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='BCP' value='14'/>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2119'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC2119'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8174" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174'>
<front>
<title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
<author initials='B.' surname='Leiba' fullname='B. Leiba'><organization /></author>
<date year='2017' month='May' />
<abstract><t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='BCP' value='14'/>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8174'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8174'/>
</reference>




    </references>



  </back>

<!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>

