<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
  <!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.3.15 -->

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
]>

<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>

<rfc ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-05" category="std">

  <front>
    <title abbrev="RPH Values for Emergency Services">Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks</title>

    <author initials="M." surname="Dolly" fullname="Martin Dolly">
      <organization>AT&amp;T</organization>
      <address>
        <email>md3135@att.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="Chris Wendt">
      <organization>Comcast</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Comcast Technology Center</street>
          <city>Philadelphia, PA  19103</city>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>chris-ietf@chriswendt.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2021" month="January" day="25"/>

    <area>ART</area>
    <workgroup>STIR</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>


<t>This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority Header (“rph”) claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim (“sph”) for protection of the “psap-callback” value as part of the “rph” PASSporT extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks for emergency call origination and callback.</t>



    </abstract>


  </front>

  <middle>


<section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">

<t>Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization <xref target="RFC8443"/> extended the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in <xref target="RFC8225"/> to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) “Resource-Priority” header field <xref target="RFC4412"/>. <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls"/> introduces the need and justification for the protection of both the SIP “Resource-Priority” and “Priority” header fields, used for categorizing the priority use of the call in the telephone network, specifically for emergency calls.</t>

<t>Compromise of the SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header fields could lead to misuse of network resources (i.e., during congestion scenarios), impacting the application services supported using the SIP “Resource-Priority” header field and the handling of Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks.</t>

<t><xref target="RFC8225"/> allows extensions by which an authority on the originating side verifying the authorization of a particular communication for the SIP “Resource-Priority” header field or the SIP “Priority” header field can use PASSPorT claims to cryptographically sign the information associated with either the SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header field and convey assertion of those values by the signing party authorization.  A signed SIP “Resource-Priority” or “Priority” header field will allow a receiving entity (including entities located in different network domains/boundaries) to verify the validity of assertions to act on the information with confidence that the information has not been spoofed or compromised.</t>

<t>This document adds new “auth” array key values for a Resource Priority Header (“rph”) claim defined in <xref target="RFC8443"/>, in support of Emergency Services Networks for emergency call origination and callback. This document additionally defines a new PASSporT claim, “sph”, including protection of the SIP Priority header for the indication of an emergency service call-back assigned the value “psap-callback” as defined in <xref target="RFC7090"/>.
The use of the newly defined claim and key values corresponding to the SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ and ‘Priority’ header fields for emergency services is introduced in <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls"/> but otherwise out-of-scope of this document.  In addition, the PASSPorT claims and values defined in this document are intended for use in environments where there are means to verify that the signer of the SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ and ‘Priority’ header fields is authoritative.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">

<t>The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="new-assertion-values-for-rph-claim" title="New Assertion Values for “rph” claim">

<t>This specification defines the ability to sign the SIP Resource-Priority Header field namespace for local emergency communications defined in <xref target="RFC7135"/> and represented by the string “esnet.x” where x is the priority-level allowed in the esnet namespace. As of the writing of this specification the priority-level is between 0 and 4, but may be extended by future specifications.</t>

<t>Similar to the values allowed by <xref target="RFC8443"/> for the “auth” JSON object key inside the “rph” claim, the string “esnet.x” with the appropriate value should be used when resource priority is required for local emergency communications corresponding and exactly matching the SIP Resource-Priority header string representing the namespace invoked in the call.</t>

<t>When using “esnet.x” as the “auth” assertion value in emergency service destined calls, the “orig” claim of the PASSporT MUST represent the calling party number that initiates the call to emergency services.  The “dest” claim MUST either be a country or region specific dial string (e.g., “911” for North America or “112” GSM defined string used in Europe and other countries) or “urn:service:sos” as defined in <xref target="RFC5031"/>, representing the emergency services destination of the call.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “rph” claim for SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ header field with an “esnet.1” assertion:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":“12155551212"},
    "dest":{"uri":["urn:service:sos"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.1"]}
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

<t>For emergency services callbacks, the “orig” claim of the “rph” PASSporT MUST represent the Public Saftey Answering Point (PSAP) telephone number. The “dest” claim MUST be the telephone number representing the original calling party of the emergency service call that is being called back.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “rph” claim for SIP ‘Resource-Priority’ header field with a “esnet.0” assertion:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]}
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

<t>After the header and claims PASSporT objects have been constructed, their signature is generated normally per the guidance in <xref target="RFC8225"/> using the full form of PASSPorT.  The credentials (i.e., Certificate) used to create the signature must have authority over the namespace of the “rph” claim, and there is only one authority per claim. The authority MUST use its credentials associated with the specific service supported by the resource priority namespace in the claim. If r-values are added or dropped by the intermediaries along the path, the intermediaries must generate a new “rph” header and sign the claim with their own authority.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="the-sip-priority-header-sph-claim" title="The SIP Priority header “sph” claim">

<t>As defined in <xref target="RFC7090"/> the SIP Priority header may be set to the value “psap-callback” for emergency services callback calls.  Because some SIP networks may act on this value and provide priority or other special routing based on this value, it is important to protect and validate the authoritative use associated with it.</t>

<t>Therefore, we define a new claim key as part of the “rph” PASSporT, “sph”.  This is an optional claim that MUST only be used only with an “auth” claim with an “esnet.x” value indicating an authorized emergency callback call and corresponding to a SIP Priority header with the value “psap-callback”.</t>

<t>The value of the “sph” claim key should only be “psap-callback” which MUST match the SIP Priority header field value for authorized emergency services callbacks. If the value is anything other than “psap-callback”, the PASSporT validation MUST be considered a failure case.</t>

<t>Note: Because the intended use of this specification is only for emergency services, there is also an explicit assumption that the signer of the “rph” PASSporT can authoritatively represent both the content of the Resource Priority Header and Priority Header information associated specifically with a emergency services callback case where both could exist. This document is not intended to be a general mechanism for protecting SIP Priority Header fields, this could be accomplished as part of future work with a new PASSporT extension or new claim added to either an existing PASSporT or PASSporT extension usage.</t>

<t>The following is an example of an “sph” claim for SIP ‘Priority’ header field with the value “psap-callback”:</t>

<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
  {
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1443208345,
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]},
    "sph":"psap-callback"
  }
]]></artwork></figure>

</section>
<section anchor="order-of-claim-keys" title="Order of Claim Keys">

<t>The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of <xref target="RFC8225"/> Section 9; the claim keys MUST appear in lexicographic order. Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order,</t>

<t><list style="symbols">
  <t>dest</t>
  <t>iat</t>
  <t>orig</t>
  <t>rph</t>
  <t>sph</t>
</list></t>

</section>
<section anchor="compact-form-of-passport" title="Compact Form of PASSporT">

<t>The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this document or recommended for ‘rph’ PASSporTs.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">

<t>The authors would like to thank Brian Rosen, Terry Reese, and Jon Peterson for helpful suggestions, comments, and corrections.</t>

</section>
<section anchor="iana-considerations" title="IANA Considerations">

<section anchor="json-web-token-claims" title="JSON Web Token claims">

<t>This specification requests that the IANA add one new claim to the JSON Web Token Claims registry as defined in <xref target="RFC7519"/>.</t>

<t>Claim Name: “sph”</t>

<t>Claim Description: SIP Priority header field</t>

<t>Change Controller: IESG</t>

<t>Specification Document(s): [RFCThis]</t>

</section>
</section>
<section anchor="security-considerations" title="Security Considerations">

<t>The security considerations discussed in <xref target="RFC8224"/>, Section 12, are applicable here.</t>

</section>


  </middle>

  <back>

    <references title='Normative References'>





<reference  anchor="RFC4412" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412'>
<front>
<title>Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Polk' fullname='J. Polk'><organization /></author>
<date year='2006' month='February' />
<abstract><t>This document defines two new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) header fields for communicating resource priority, namely, &quot;Resource-Priority&quot; and &quot;Accept-Resource-Priority&quot;.  The &quot;Resource-Priority&quot; header field can influence the behavior of SIP user agents (such as telephone gateways and IP telephones) and SIP proxies.  It does not directly influence the forwarding behavior of IP routers.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='4412'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC4412'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC5031" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5031'>
<front>
<title>A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<date year='2008' month='January' />
<abstract><t>The content of many communication services depends on the context, such as the user's location.  We describe a 'service' URN that allows well-known context-dependent services that can be resolved in a distributed manner to be identified.  Examples include emergency services, directory assistance, and call-before-you-dig hot lines.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='5031'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC5031'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7090" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7090'>
<front>
<title>Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Callback</title>
<author initials='H.' surname='Schulzrinne' fullname='H. Schulzrinne'><organization /></author>
<author initials='H.' surname='Tschofenig' fullname='H. Tschofenig'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Holmberg' fullname='C. Holmberg'><organization /></author>
<author initials='M.' surname='Patel' fullname='M. Patel'><organization /></author>
<date year='2014' month='April' />
<abstract><t>After an emergency call is completed (terminated either prematurely by the emergency caller or normally by the call taker), the call taker may feel the need for further communication.  For example, the call may have been dropped by accident without the call taker having sufficient information about the current state of an accident victim. A call taker may trigger a callback to the emergency caller using the contact information provided with the initial emergency call.  This callback could, under certain circumstances, be treated like any other call and, as a consequence, it may get blocked by authorization policies or may get forwarded to an answering machine.</t><t>The IETF emergency services architecture specification already offers a solution approach for allowing Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks to bypass authorization policies in order to reach the caller without unnecessary delays.  Unfortunately, the specified mechanism only supports limited scenarios.  This document discusses shortcomings of the current mechanisms and illustrates additional scenarios where better-than-normal call treatment behavior would be desirable.  We describe a solution based on a new header field value for the SIP Priority header field, called &quot;psap-callback&quot;, to mark PSAP callbacks.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7090'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7090'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7135" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7135'>
<front>
<title>Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications</title>
<author initials='J.' surname='Polk' fullname='J. Polk'><organization /></author>
<date year='2014' month='May' />
<abstract><t>This document creates the new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource Priority header field namespace 'esnet' and registers this namespace with IANA.  The new header field namespace allows for local emergency session establishment to a public safety answering point (PSAP), between PSAPs, and between a PSAP and first responders and their organizations.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7135'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7135'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8224" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8224'>
<front>
<title>Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
<author initials='J.' surname='Peterson' fullname='J. Peterson'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Jennings' fullname='C. Jennings'><organization /></author>
<author initials='E.' surname='Rescorla' fullname='E. Rescorla'><organization /></author>
<author initials='C.' surname='Wendt' fullname='C. Wendt'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='February' />
<abstract><t>The baseline security mechanisms in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) are inadequate for cryptographically assuring the identity of the end users that originate SIP requests, especially in an interdomain context.  This document defines a mechanism for securely identifying originators of SIP requests.  It does so by defining a SIP header field for conveying a signature used for validating the identity and for conveying a reference to the credentials of the signer.</t><t>This document obsoletes RFC 4474.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8224'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8224'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8225" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8225'>
<front>
<title>PASSporT: Personal Assertion Token</title>
<author initials='C.' surname='Wendt' fullname='C. Wendt'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Peterson' fullname='J. Peterson'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='February' />
<abstract><t>This document defines a method for creating and validating a token that cryptographically verifies an originating identity or, more generally, a URI or telephone number representing the originator of personal communications.  The Personal Assertion Token, PASSporT, is cryptographically signed to protect the integrity of the identity of the originator and to verify the assertion of the identity information at the destination.  The cryptographic signature is defined with the intention that it can confidently verify the originating persona even when the signature is sent to the destination party over an insecure channel.  PASSporT is particularly useful for many personal-communications applications over IP networks and other multi-hop interconnection scenarios where the originating and destination parties may not have a direct trusted relationship.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8225'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8225'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC7519" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519'>
<front>
<title>JSON Web Token (JWT)</title>
<author initials='M.' surname='Jones' fullname='M. Jones'><organization /></author>
<author initials='J.' surname='Bradley' fullname='J. Bradley'><organization /></author>
<author initials='N.' surname='Sakimura' fullname='N. Sakimura'><organization /></author>
<date year='2015' month='May' />
<abstract><t>JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties.  The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='7519'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC7519'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8443" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443'>
<front>
<title>Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization</title>
<author initials='R.' surname='Singh' fullname='R. Singh'><organization /></author>
<author initials='M.' surname='Dolly' fullname='M. Dolly'><organization /></author>
<author initials='S.' surname='Das' fullname='S. Das'><organization /></author>
<author initials='A.' surname='Nguyen' fullname='A. Nguyen'><organization /></author>
<date year='2018' month='August' />
<abstract><t>This document extends the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in RFC 8225 to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority' header field, which is used for communications resource prioritization.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8443'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8443'/>
</reference>




    </references>

    <references title='Informative References'>





<reference anchor="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls">
<front>
<title>Non-Interactive Emergency Calls</title>

<author initials='B' surname='Rosen' fullname='Brian Rosen'>
    <organization />
</author>

<date month='March' day='9' year='2020' />

<abstract><t>Emergency calls from citizens to authorities, and call back of such emergency calls by authorities to citizens need assurances that headers intended to get appropriate priority from the networks they traverse, and in some cases, appropriate routing.  Protection of the SIP Resource Priority Header and the SIP Priority header is needed for such calls.  This document describes the environment for placing emergency calls and call backs which motivate the need and use of the mechanisms described in other documents</t></abstract>

</front>

<seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft' value='draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00' />
<format type='TXT'
        target='http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00.txt' />
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC2119" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119'>
<front>
<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
<author initials='S.' surname='Bradner' fullname='S. Bradner'><organization /></author>
<date year='1997' month='March' />
<abstract><t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='BCP' value='14'/>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2119'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC2119'/>
</reference>



<reference  anchor="RFC8174" target='https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174'>
<front>
<title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
<author initials='B.' surname='Leiba' fullname='B. Leiba'><organization /></author>
<date year='2017' month='May' />
<abstract><t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='BCP' value='14'/>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='8174'/>
<seriesInfo name='DOI' value='10.17487/RFC8174'/>
</reference>




    </references>



  </back>

<!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>

