Designating 6LBR for IID Assignment

IPv6 addresses in SLAAC are formed by concatenating a network prefix, acquired from Router Advertisement (RA) messages, with a locally generated IID , . Since the best method for generating IIDs depends on the nature of networks, none of the proposed mechanisms, is considered a default mechanism. Using neighbour discovery (ND), the uniqueness of newly generated IID is verified . 6LBR performs DAD, and replies with a status. A failed DAD would require the initiating 6LN (6LoWPAN node) to regenerate an IID and wait for another DAD cycle, until the 6LN successfully registers a unique address . A locally generated IID can be derived either from an embedded IEEE identifier , or randomly (based on a few variables) . Since MAC reuse is unfortunately far more common than usually assumed , IIDs derived from MAC address are likely to cause more than the expected number of DAD failures. As soon as the 6LN generates an IID, it sends the NS (Neighbor Solicitation) message to 6LR (LLN Router). Then 6LR proceeds to send an ICMPv6 based DAR (Duplicate Address Request) message to 6LBR. An LN sends out a NS after checking its local cache for duplication; before proceeding with DAR, the 6LR also protects against address duplication within a locally maintained Neighbor Cache Entry (NCE) . Use cases including huge numbers of nodes and vast scale networks are discussed in , . The use of arbitrary IIDs can resolve privacy concerns for a participating node, but a simple NS intended to be targeted to a small group of nodes can pollute all the wireless bandwidth . Multicast NS and NA are much more frequent in large scale radio environment with mobile devices . Since the IIDs may be sporadically changed for privacy, the probability increases that a duplicate IIDs would result in DAD failure and repeated DAD cycles. This document describes optimizations to 6LoWPAN ND which enable 6LBR to grant a unique IID for failed DAD, to undergo concurrent DAD and to return an IID to 6LN in a space-efficient manner.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in . This document uses terminology from , , , and . SLLAO: Stateless Link-Local Address Option RID: Random IDentifier PRF: Pseudo Random Function IID: Interface IDentifier This document also uses the following terms: EARO: Extended Address Registration Option EDAR: Extended Duplicate Address Request EDAC: Extended Duplicate Address Confirmation LSB: Least Significant Bit

MAC driven IIDs reduce or eliminate the need for DAD, but in practice such IID generation is discouraged (, ), as common privacy concerns still persist, for instance: o Network activity correlation, o Location tracking, o Address scanning, and o Device-specific vulnerability exploitation. Moreover, multiple approaches are proposed to suit different network constraints. Considering the scalability of a network and enabling 6LBR to suggest an IID, this draft proposes another method for IID generation that supports periodically changing IIDs.

If DAD fails, the 6LBR will use public values for Prefix, Interface Index, and Network ID; the remaining two variables (DAD Counter, Randomized Private Key) are local values. Neighbor solicitation using link-local address cannot be avoided, but only the newly generated IID needs to be forwarded to the LN.

| | | [ARO + SLLAO] | | | | | 2. | | ---------- EDAR --------> | | | | 3. | | <--------- EDAC --------- | | | | 4. | <-- NA with Address Reg --- | | | [EARO with Status] | |]]> The approach in this draft is reactive rather than proactive; 6LBR only replies with a locally generated IID when DAD fails.

The Prefix is the same throughout each LoWPAN network. This draft uses that feature to reduce the size of the DAR:

The fields are similar to DAR in except: Type: 159 (TBD) Cycle: 4 out of 8 reserved bits to identify the DAD cycle between given 6LR and 6LBR. The reference is used later by 6LR to extract IID suggested by 6LBR. Unlike the DAR, the Registered IID (64 bit) is returned instead of Registered Address (128 bit). EDAC reduces the space needed for returning the EUI-64:

The fields are similar to DAC in except: Type: 160 (TBD) Cycle: 4 out of 8 reserved bits identify the DAD cycle between the 6LR and 6LBR. The reference is used later by 6LR to extract the IID suggested by 6LBR. In case of a failed DAD, a 6LBR-generated IID is aggregated using XOR with EUI-64; otherwise the same EUI-64 occupies the 64 bits.

ARO and EARO can ONLY be initiated by host and 6LR, respectively. expects the reply of a host initiated ARO from 6LR with the same ARO except for changing the status bit to indicate the duplication detection. EARO is introduced in this document; 6LR can send out this option if it receives EDAC instead of DAC from 6LBR.

The fields are similar to ARO in except: Type: 36 (TBD) EUI-64/XOR Aggregation: a 64 bit IID generated by 6LBR is XOR'ed with EUI-64.

In , 6LN is expected to generate an IID; so 6LR only acts on the first unique IID claim and silently discards any later claims for the same IID. In contrast, this document enables 6LBR to assign a unique IID in case of a duplicate IID claim by 6LR. For this purpose, a "Cycle" field is introduced to enable concurrency that will be helpful for large-scale networks . See and for the format of the Cycle field.

Each iteration of DAR and DAC carries the entire 128 bit Registered Address during the DAD routine, even though the network Prefix is the same throughout each LoWPAN. This document enables eliding the network prefix part of the Registered Address as well in EDAC and EARO using simple XOR aggregation. The aggregated 64 bit field carries EUI-64 and suggested IID. See and for the format of the EUI-64/XOR Aggregation. Under the proposed arrangement, 6LBR would only aggregate values, 6LN would only extract values and 6LR would do both. At 6LR before sending EDAR to 6LBR: o 6LR would use the 4 out of 8 Reserved "Cycle" bits of EDAR to keep track of multiple DAD cycles. These iterations are recorded at 6LR and that information is used to extract IID/EUI-64 from EDAC to be forwarded to the appropriate 6LN. At 6LBR before sending to 6LR: o If Status = 0 (Success), then 6LBR returns EDAC using all the values as received from EDAR. o If Status = 1 (Duplicate), then 6LBR generates IID and XORs it with EUI-64 to return in the EDAC to 6LR. At 6LR before sending to 6LN: o If Status = 0 (Success) then keep the claimed address of 6LN as Destination Address for ARO to 6LN. o If Status = 1 (Duplicate), then match the "Cycle" bits of EDAC to extract (using XOR) the EUI-64 address and use the extracted address as the Destination Address for EARO to 6LN. Finally, at 6LN: o If Status = 0 (Success), 6LN starts using the address that it claimed. o If Status = 1 (Duplicate) then 6LN XORs the received EUI-64 address with its claimed EUI-64, which results in the newly generated IID sent by 6LBR.

The document requires two new ICMPv6 type numbers under the subregistry 'ICMPv6 "type" Numbers': o Extended Duplicate Address Request (159) o Extended Duplicate Address Confirmation (160) This document requires a new ND option type under the subregistry "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Option Formats": o Extended Address Registration Option (36)

One new value is required for the "Address Registration Option Status Values" sub-registry under the "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Option Formats":

TBD