<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc strict='yes'?>
<?rfc iprnotified='no'?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-templin-aerolink-57.txt" ipr="trust200902"
     obsoletes="rfc5320, rfc5558, rfc5720, rfc6179, rfc6706">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="AERO">Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)</title>

    <author fullname="Fred L. Templin" initials="F. L." role="editor"
            surname="Templin">
      <organization>Boeing Research &amp; Technology</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 3707</street>

          <city>Seattle</city>

          <region>WA</region>

          <code>98124</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>fltemplin@acm.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="17" month="June" year="2015"/>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
      using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO). Nodes attached to
      AERO links can exchange packets via trusted intermediate routers that
      provide forwarding services to reach off-link destinations and
      redirection services for route optimization. AERO provides an IPv6
      link-local address format known as the AERO address that supports
      operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol and links IPv6 ND
      to IP forwarding. Admission control, provisioning and mobility are
      supported by the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6),
      and route optimization is naturally supported through dynamic neighbor
      cache updates. Although DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND messaging are used in the
      control plane, both IPv4 and IPv6 are supported in the data plane. AERO
      is a widely-applicable tunneling solution using standard control
      messaging exchanges as described in this document.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
      using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO). The AERO link can
      be used for tunneling to neighboring nodes over either IPv6 or IPv4
      networks, i.e., AERO views the IPv6 and IPv4 networks as equivalent
      links for tunneling. Nodes attached to AERO links can exchange packets
      via trusted intermediate routers that provide forwarding services to
      reach off-link destinations and redirection services for route
      optimization that addresses the requirements outlined in <xref
      target="RFC5522"/>.</t>

      <t>AERO provides an IPv6 link-local address format known as the AERO
      address that supports operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND)
      <xref target="RFC4861"/> protocol and links IPv6 ND to IP forwarding.
      Admission control, provisioning and mobility are supported by the
      Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) <xref
      target="RFC3315"/>, and route optimization is naturally supported
      through dynamic neighbor cache updates. Although DHCPv6 and IPv6 ND
      messaging are used in the control plane, both IPv4 and IPv6 can be used
      in the data plane. AERO is a widely-applicable tunneling solution using
      standard control messaging exchanges as described in this document. The
      remainder of this document presents the AERO specification.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The terminology in the normative references applies; the following
      terms are defined within the scope of this document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="AERO link"><vspace/>a Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access
          (NBMA) tunnel virtual overlay configured over a node's attached IPv6
          and/or IPv4 networks. All nodes on the AERO link appear as
          single-hop neighbors from the perspective of the virtual
          overlay.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to an AERO
          link. Nodes typically have a single AERO interface; support for
          multiple AERO interfaces is also possible but out of scope for this
          document.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO address"><vspace/>an IPv6 link-local address
          constructed as specified in <xref target="aero-address"/> and
          assigned to a Client's AERO interface.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO node"><vspace/>a node that is connected to an AERO
          link and that participates in IPv6 ND and DHCPv6 messaging over the
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client (&quot;Client&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          issues DHCPv6 messages using the special IPv6 link-local address
          'fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff' to receive IP Prefix Delegations (PD)
          from one or more AERO Servers. Following PD, the Client assigns an
          AERO address to the AERO interface which it uses in IPv6 ND
          messaging to coordinate with other AERO nodes.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Server (&quot;Server&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          configures an AERO interface to provide default forwarding and
          DHCPv6 services for AERO Clients. The Server assigns an
          administratively provisioned IPv6 link-local unicast address to
          support the operation of DHCPv6 and the IPv6 ND protocol. An AERO
          Server can also act as an AERO Relay.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Relay (&quot;Relay&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          configures an AERO interface to relay IP packets between nodes on
          the same AERO link and/or forward IP packets between the AERO link
          and the native Internetwork. The Relay assigns an administratively
          provisioned IPv6 link-local unicast address to the AERO interface
          the same as for a Server. An AERO Relay can also act as an AERO
          Server.</t>

          <t
          hangText="AERO Forwarding Agent (&quot;Forwarding Agent&quot;)"><vspace/>a
          node that performs data plane forwarding services as a companion to
          an AERO Server.</t>

          <t hangText="ingress tunnel endpoint (ITE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that injects tunneled packets into an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="egress tunnel endpoint (ETE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that receives tunneled packets from an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying network"><vspace/>a connected IPv6 or IPv4
          network routing region over which the tunnel virtual overlay is
          configured. A typical example is an enterprise network.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying interface"><vspace/>an AERO node's interface
          point of attachment to an underlying network.</t>

          <t hangText="link-layer address"><vspace/>an IP address assigned to
          an AERO node's underlying interface. When UDP encapsulation is used,
          the UDP port number is also considered as part of the link-layer
          address. Link-layer addresses are used as the encapsulation header
          source and destination addresses.</t>

          <t hangText="network layer address"><vspace/>the source or
          destination address of the encapsulated IP packet.</t>

          <t hangText="end user network (EUN)"><vspace/>an internal virtual or
          external edge IP network that an AERO Client connects to the rest of
          the network via the AERO interface.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Service Prefix (ASP)"><vspace/>an IP prefix
          associated with the AERO link and from which AERO Client Prefixes
          (ACPs) are derived (for example, the IPv6 ACP 2001:db8:1:2::/64 is
          derived from the IPv6 ASP 2001:db8::/32).</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client Prefix (ACP)"><vspace/>a more-specific IP
          prefix taken from an ASP and delegated to a Client.</t>
        </list>Throughout the document, the simple terms "Client", "Server"
      and "Relay" refer to "AERO Client", "AERO Server" and "AERO Relay",
      respectively. Capitalization is used to distinguish these terms from
      DHCPv6 client/server/relay <xref target="RFC3315"/>.</t>

      <t>The terminology of <xref target="RFC4861"/> (including the names of
      node variables and protocol constants) applies to this document. Also
      throughout the document, the term "IP" is used to generically refer to
      either Internet Protocol version (i.e., IPv4 or IPv6).</t>

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.
      Lower case uses of these words are not to be interpreted as carrying
      RFC2119 significance.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="aerospec"
             title="Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)">
      <t>The following sections specify the operation of IP over Asymmetric
      Extended Route Optimization (AERO) links:</t>

      <section anchor="aerolink" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
        <t><figure anchor="chaining-fig" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
            <artwork><![CDATA[                           .-(::::::::)
                        .-(:::: IP ::::)-.
                       (:: Internetwork ::)
                        `-(::::::::::::)-'
                           `-(::::::)-' 
                                |
    +--------------+   +--------+-------+   +--------------+
    |AERO Server S1|   | AERO Relay R1  |   |AERO Server S2|
    |  Nbr: C1; R1 |   |   Nbr: S1; S2  |   |  Nbr: C2; R1 |
    |  default->R1 |   |(H1->S1; H2->S2)|   |  default->R1 |
    |    H1->C1    |   +--------+-------+   |    H2->C2    |
    +-------+------+            |           +------+-------+
            |                   |                  |
    X---+---+-------------------+------------------+---+---X
        |                  AERO Link                   |
  +-----+--------+                            +--------+-----+
  |AERO Client C1|                            |AERO Client C2|
  |    Nbr: S1   |                            |   Nbr: S2    |
  | default->S1  |                            | default->S2  |
  +--------------+                            +--------------+
        .-.                                         .-.
     ,-(  _)-.                                   ,-(  _)-.
  .-(_   IP  )-.                              .-(_   IP  )-.
 (__    EUN      )                           (__    EUN      )
    `-(______)-'                                `-(______)-'
         |                                           |
     +--------+                                  +--------+
     | Host H1|                                  | Host H2|
     +--------+                                  +--------+
]]></artwork>
          </figure><xref target="chaining-fig"/> presents the AERO link
        reference model. In this model:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Relay R1 acts as a default router for its associated Servers S1
            and S2, and connects the AERO link to the rest of the IP
            Internetwork</t>

            <t>Servers S1 and S2 associate with Relay R1 and also act as
            default routers for their associated Clients C1 and C2.</t>

            <t>Clients C1 and C2 associate with Servers S1 and S2,
            respectively and also act as default routers for their associated
            EUNs</t>

            <t>Hosts H1 and H2 attach to the EUNs served by Clients C1 and C2,
            respectively</t>
          </list>Each node maintains a neighbor cache and IP forwarding table.
        (For example, AERO Relay R1 in the diagram has neighbor cache entries
        for Servers S1 and S2 and IP forwarding table entries for ACPs H1 and
        H2.) In common operational practice, there may be many additional
        Relays, Servers and Clients. (Although not shown in the figure, AERO
        Forwarding Agents may also be provided for data plane forwarding
        offload services.)</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="node-types" title="AERO Link Node Types">
        <t>AERO Relays provide default forwarding services to AERO Servers.
        Relays forward packets between Servers connected to the same AERO link
        and also forward packets between the AERO link and the native IP
        Internetwork. Relays present the AERO link to the native Internetwork
        as a set of one or more AERO Service Prefixes (ASPs) and serve as a
        gateway between the AERO link and the Internetwork. AERO Relays
        maintain an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each AERO Server,
        and maintain an IP forwarding table entry for each AERO Client Prefix
        (ACP). AERO Relays can also be configured to act as AERO Servers.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers provide default forwarding services to AERO Clients.
        Each Server also peers with each Relay in a dynamic routing protocol
        instance to advertise its list of associated ACPs. Servers configure a
        DHCPv6 server function to facilitate Prefix Delegation (PD) exchanges
        with Clients. Each delegated prefix becomes an ACP taken from an ASP.
        Servers forward packets between AERO interface neighbors only, i.e.,
        and not between the AERO link and the native IP Internetwork. AERO
        Servers maintain an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each AERO
        Relay. They also maintain both a neighbor cache entry and an IP
        forwarding table entry for each of their associated Clients. AERO
        Servers can also be configured to act as AERO Relays.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients act as requesting routers to receive ACPs through
        DHCPv6 PD exchanges with AERO Servers over the AERO link and
        sub-delegate portions of their ACPs to EUN interfaces. (Each Client
        MAY associate with a single Server or with multiple Servers, e.g., for
        fault tolerance, load balancing, etc.) Each IPv6 Client receives at
        least a /64 IPv6 ACP, and may receive even shorter prefixes.
        Similarly, each IPv4 Client receives at least a /32 IPv4 ACP (i.e., a
        singleton IPv4 address), and may receive even shorter prefixes. AERO
        Clients maintain an AERO interface neighbor cache entry for each of
        their associated Servers as well as for each of their correspondent
        Clients.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients typically configure a TUN/TAP interface <xref
        target="TUNTAP"/> as a point-to-point linkage between the IP layer and
        the AERO interface. The IP layer therefore sees only the TUN/TAP
        interface, while the AERO interface provides an intermediate conduit
        between the TUN/TAP interface and the underlying interfaces. AERO
        Clients that act as hosts assign one or more IP addresses from their
        ACPs to the TUN/TAP interface, i.e., and not to the AERO
        interface.</t>

        <t>AERO Forwarding Agents provide data plane forwarding services as
        companions to AERO Servers. Note that while Servers are required to
        perform both control and data plane operations on their own behalf,
        they may optionally enlist the services of special-purpose Forwarding
        Agents to offload data plane traffic.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aero-address" title="AERO Addresses">
        <t>An AERO address is an IPv6 link-local address with an embedded ACP
        and assigned to a Client's AERO interface. The AERO address is formed
        as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::[ACP]</t>
          </list>For IPv6, the AERO address begins with the prefix fe80::/64
        and includes in its interface identifier the base prefix taken from
        the Client's IPv6 ACP. The base prefix is determined by masking the
        ACP with the prefix length. For example, if the AERO Client receives
        the IPv6 ACP:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>2001:db8:1000:2000::/56</t>
          </list>it constructs its AERO address as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000</t>
          </list>For IPv4, the AERO address is formed from the lower 64 bits
        of an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address <xref target="RFC4291"/> that includes
        the base prefix taken from the Client's IPv4 ACP. For example, if the
        AERO Client receives the IPv4 ACP:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>192.0.2.32/28</t>
          </list>it constructs its AERO address as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::FFFF:192.0.2.32</t>
          </list>The AERO address remains stable as the Client moves between
        topological locations, i.e., even if its link-layer addresses
        change.</t>

        <t>NOTE: In some cases, prospective neighbors may not have advanced
        knowledge of the Client's ACP length and may therefore send initial
        IPv6 ND messages with an AERO destination address that matches the ACP
        but does not correspond to the base prefix. In that case, the Client
        MUST accept the address as equivalent to the base address, but then
        use the base address as the source address of any IPv6 ND message
        replies. For example, if the Client receives the IPv6 ACP
        2001:db8:1000:2000::/56 then subsequently receives an IPv6 ND message
        with destination address fe80::2001:db8:1000:2001, it accepts the
        message but uses fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000 as the source address of any
        IPv6 ND replies.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="interface" title="AERO Interface Characteristics">
        <t>AERO interfaces use encapsulation (see <xref target="aeroencaps"/>)
        to exchange packets with neighbors attached to the AERO link. AERO
        interfaces maintain a neighbor cache, and AERO Clients and Servers use
        unicast IPv6 ND messaging. AERO interfaces use unicast Neighbor
        Solicitation (NS), Neighbor Advertisement (NA), Router Solicitation
        (RS) and Router Advertisement (RA) messages the same as for any IPv6
        link. AERO interfaces use two redirection message types -- the first
        known as a Predirect message and the second being the standard
        Redirect message (see <xref target="predirect"/>). AERO links further
        use link-local-only addressing; hence, AERO nodes ignore any Prefix
        Information Options (PIOs) they may receive in RA messages over an
        AERO interface.</t>

        <t>AERO interface ND messages include one or more Source/Target
        Link-Layer Address Options (S/TLLAOs) formatted as shown in <xref
        target="tllaov6"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="tllaov6"
            title="AERO Source/Target Link-Layer Address Option (S/TLLAO) Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Type = 2   |   Length = 3  |           Reserved            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Link ID    |    NDSCPs     |  DSCP #1  |Prf|  DSCP #2  |Prf|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  DSCP #3  |Prf|  DSCP #4  |Prf| ....
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        UDP Port Number        |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               +
     |                                                               |
     +                                                               +
     |                          IP Address                           |
     +                                                               +
     |                                                               |
     +                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In this format, Link ID is an integer value between 0 and 255
        corresponding to an underlying interface of the target node, NDSCPs
        encodes an integer value between 1 and 64 indicating the number of
        Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) octets that follow. Each
        DSCP octet is a 6-bit integer DSCP value followed by a 2-bit
        Preference ("Prf") value. Each DSCP value encodes an integer between 0
        and 63 associated with this Link ID, where the value 0 means "default"
        and other values are interpreted as specified in <xref
        target="RFC2474"/>. The 'Prf' qualifier for each DSCP value is set to
        the value 0 ("deprecated'), 1 ("low"), 2 ("medium"), or 3 ("high") to
        indicate a preference level for packet forwarding purposes. UDP Port
        Number and IP Address are set to the addresses used by the target node
        when it sends encapsulated packets over the underlying interface. When
        the encapsulation IP address family is IPv4, IP Address is formed as
        an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address <xref target="RFC4291"/>.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces may be configured over multiple underlying
        interfaces. For example, common mobile handheld devices have both
        wireless local area network ("WLAN") and cellular wireless links.
        These links are typically used "one at a time" with low-cost WLAN
        preferred and highly-available cellular wireless as a standby. In a
        more complex example, aircraft frequently have many wireless data link
        types (e.g. satellite-based, terrestrial, air-to-air directional,
        etc.) with diverse performance and cost properties.</t>

        <t>If a Client's multiple underlying interfaces are used "one at a
        time" (i.e., all other interfaces are in standby mode while one
        interface is active), then Redirect, Predirect and unsolicited NA
        messages include only a single TLLAO with Link ID set to a constant
        value.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple active underlying interfaces, then from
        the perspective of IPv6 ND it would appear to have a single link-local
        address with multiple link-layer addresses. In that case, Redirect,
        Predirect and unsolicited NA messages MAY include multiple TLLAOs --
        each with a different Link ID that corresponds to a specific
        underlying interface of the Client.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerolinkinit" title="AERO Link Registration">
        <t>When an administrative authority first deploys a set of AERO Relays
        and Servers that comprise an AERO link, they also assign a unique
        domain name for the link, e.g., "linkupnetworks.example.com". Next, if
        administrative policy permits Clients within the domain to serve as
        correspondent nodes for Internet mobile nodes, the administrative
        authority adds a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) for each of the
        AERO link's ASPs to the Domain Name System (DNS) <xref
        target="RFC1035"/>. The FQDN is based on the suffix
        "aero.linkupnetworks.net" with a prefix formed from the
        wildcard-terminated reverse mapping of the ASP <xref
        target="RFC3596"/><xref target="RFC4592"/>, and resolves to a DNS PTR
        resource record. For example, for the ASP '2001:db8:1::/48' within the
        domain name "linkupnetworks.example.com", the DNS database
        contains:</t>

        <t>'*.1.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.aero.linkupnetworks.net. PTR
        linkupnetworks.example.com'</t>

        <t>This DNS registration advertises the AERO link's ASPs to
        prospective correspondent nodes.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroinit" title="AERO Interface Initialization">
        <section anchor="rinit" title="AERO Relay Behavior">
          <t>When a Relay enables an AERO interface, it first assigns an
          administratively provisioned link-local address fe80::ID to the
          interface. Each fe80::ID address MUST be unique among all AERO nodes
          on the link, and MUST NOT collide with any potential AERO addresses
          nor the special addresses fe80:: and fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff. (The
          fe80::ID addresses are typically taken from the available range
          fe80::/96, e.g., as fe80::1, fe80::2, fe80::3, etc.) The Relay then
          engages in a dynamic routing protocol session with all Servers on
          the link (see: <xref target="scaling"/>), and advertises its
          assigned ASP prefixes into the native IP Internetwork.</t>

          <t>Each Relay subsequently maintains an IP forwarding table entry
          for each Client-Server association, and maintains a neighbor cache
          entry for each Server on the link. Relays exchange NS/NA messages
          with AERO link neighbors the same as for any AERO node, however they
          typically do not perform explicit Neighbor Unreachability Detection
          (NUD) (see: <xref target="nud"/>) since the dynamic routing protocol
          already provides reachability confirmation.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sinit" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>When a Server enables an AERO interface, it assigns an
          administratively provisioned link-local address fe80::ID the same as
          for Relays. The Server further configures a DHCPv6 server function
          to facilitate DHCPv6 PD exchanges with AERO Clients. The Server
          maintains a neighbor cache entry for each Relay on the link, and
          manages per-Client neighbor cache entries and IP forwarding table
          entries based on control message exchanges. Each Server also engages
          in a dynamic routing protocol with each Relay on the link (see:
          <xref target="scaling"/>).</t>

          <t>When the Server receives an NS/RS message from a Client on the
          AERO interface it returns an NA/RA message but does not update the
          neighbor cache. The Server further provides a simple conduit between
          AERO interface neighbors. Therefore, packets enter the Server's AERO
          interface from the link layer and are forwarded back out the link
          layer without ever leaving the AERO interface and therefore without
          ever disturbing the network layer.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cinit" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>When a Client enables an AERO interface, it uses the special
          address fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff to obtain an ACP from an AERO
          Server via DHCPv6 PD. Next, it assigns the corresponding AERO
          address to the AERO interface and creates a neighbor cache entry for
          the Server, i.e., the PD exchange bootstraps autoconfiguration of a
          unique link-local address. The Client maintains a neighbor cache
          entry for each of its Servers and each of its active correspondent
          Clients. When the Client receives Redirect/Predirect messages on the
          AERO interface it updates or creates neighbor cache entries,
          including link-layer address information. Unsolicited NA messages
          update the cached link-layer addresses for correspondent Clients
          (e.g., following a link-layer address change due to node mobility)
          but do not create new neighbor cache entries. NS/NA messages used
          for NUD update timers in existing neighbor cache entires but do not
          update link-layer addresses nor create new neighbor cache
          entries.</t>

          <t>Finally, the Client need not maintain any IP forwarding table
          entries for its Servers or correspondent Clients. Instead, it can
          set a single "route-to-interface" default route in the IP forwarding
          table, and all forwarding decisions can be made within the AERO
          interface based on neighbor cache entries. (On systems in which
          adding a default route would violate security policy, the default
          route could instead be installed via a "synthesized RA", e.g., as
          discussed in <xref target="aeropd-client"/>.)</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="feinit" title="AERO Forwarding Agent Behavior">
          <t>When a Forwarding Agent enables an AERO interface, it assigns the
          same link-local address(es) as the companion AERO Server. The
          Forwarding Agent thereafter provides data plane forwarding services
          based solely on the forwarding information assigned to it by the
          companion AERO Server.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="scaling" title="AERO Link Routing System">
        <t>Relays require full topology knowledge of all ACP/Server
        associations for the ASP they service, while individual Servers at a
        minimum only need to know the ACPs for their current set of associated
        Clients. This is accomplished through the use of an internal instance
        of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) <xref target="RFC4271"/>
        coordinated between Servers and Relays. This internal BGP instance
        does not interact with the public Internet BGP instance; therefore,
        the AERO link is presented to the IP Internetwork as a small set of
        ASPs as opposed to the full set of individual ACPs.</t>

        <t>In a reference BGP arrangement, each AERO Server is configured as
        an Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) for a stub Autonomous System
        (AS) using an AS Number (ASN) that is unique within the BGP instance,
        and each Server further peers with each Relay but does not peer with
        other Servers. Similarly, Relays do not peer with each other, since
        they will reliably receive all updates from all Servers and will
        therefore have a consistent view of the AERO link ACP delegations.</t>

        <t>Each Server maintains a working set of associated ACPs, and
        dynamically announces new ACPs and withdraws departed ACPs in its BGP
        updates to Relays. Clients are expected to remain associated with
        their current Servers for extended timeframes, however Servers SHOULD
        selectively suppress BGP updates for impatient Clients that repeatedly
        associate and disassociate with them in order to dampen routing
        churn.</t>

        <t>Each Relay configures a black-hole route for each ASP it services.
        By black-holing the ASP, the Relay will maintain active forwarding
        table entries only for the ACPs that are currently active, and all
        other ACPs will result in destination unreachable failures due to the
        black hole route. In this way, the AERO system is incrementally
        deployable and can support small scale initial deployments followed by
        deployment of additional Clients, Servers and Relays without
        disturbing the already-deployed base.</t>

        <t>Scaling properties of the AERO routing system are therefore limited
        by the number of BGP routes that can be carried by Relays. Assuming
        O(10^6) as a reasonable maximum number of BGP routes, this means that
        O(10^6) Clients can be serviced by a single Relay. A means of
        increasing scaling would be to assign a different set of Relays for
        each set of ASPs. In that case, each Server still peers with each
        Relay, but the Server institutes route filters so that each set of
        Relays only receives BGP updates for the ASPs they aggregate. For
        example, if the ASP for the AERO link is 2001:db8::/32, a first set of
        Relays could service the ASP segment 2001:db8::/40, a second set of
        Relays could service the ASP segment 2001:db8:0100::/40, a third set
        could service 2001:db8:0200::/40, etc. To support this model, each
        Relay maintains a route for each other Relay that services a different
        ASP segment so that inter-Relay forward can be supported.</t>

        <t>Assuming up to O(10^3) sets of Relays, the system can then
        accommodate O(10^9) Clients with no additional overhead for Servers
        and Relays. In this way, each set of Relays services a specific set of
        ASPs that they advertise to the native routing system outside of the
        AERO link, and each Server configures ASP-specific routes that list
        the correct set of Relays as next hops.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroncache"
               title="AERO Interface Neighbor Cache Maintenace">
        <t>Each AERO interface maintains a conceptual neighbor cache that
        includes an entry for each neighbor it communicates with on the AERO
        link, the same as for any IPv6 interface <xref target="RFC4861"/>.
        AERO interface neighbor cache entires are said to be one of
        "permanent", "static" or "dynamic".</t>

        <t>Permanent neighbor cache entries are created through explicit
        administrative action; they have no timeout values and remain in place
        until explicitly deleted. AERO Relays maintain a permanent neighbor
        cache entry for each Server on the link, and AERO Servers maintain a
        permanent neighbor cache entry for each Relay. Each entry maintains
        the mapping between the neighbor's fe80::ID network-layer address and
        corresponding link-layer address.</t>

        <t>Static neighbor cache entries are created though DHCPv6 PD
        exchanges and remain in place for durations bounded by prefix
        lifetimes. AERO Servers maintain static neighbor cache entries for the
        ACPs of each of their associated Clients, and AERO Clients maintain a
        static neighbor cache entry for each of their associated Servers. When
        an AERO Server sends a DHCPv6 Reply message response to a Client's
        DHCPv6 Request, Rebind or Renew message, it creates or updates a
        static neighbor cache entry based on the AERO address corresponding to
        the Client's ACP as the network-layer address, the prefix lifetime as
        the neighbor cache entry lifetime, the Client's encapsulation IP
        address and UDP port number as the link-layer address and the prefix
        length as the length to apply to the AERO address. When an AERO Client
        receives a DHCPv6 Reply message from a Server, it creates or updates a
        static neighbor cache entry based on the Reply message link-local
        source address as the network-layer address, the prefix lifetime as
        the neighbor cache entry lifetime, and the encapsulation IP source
        address and UDP source port number as the link-layer address.</t>

        <t>Dynamic neighbor cache entries are created or updated based on
        receipt of an IPv6 ND message, and are garbage-collected if not used
        within a bounded timescale. AERO Clients maintain dynamic neighbor
        cache entries for each of their active correspondent Client ACPs with
        lifetimes based on IPv6 ND messaging constants. When an AERO Client
        receives a valid Predirect message it creates or updates a dynamic
        neighbor cache entry for the Predirect target network-layer and
        link-layer addresses plus prefix length. The node then sets an
        "AcceptTime" variable in the neighbor cache entry to ACCEPT_TIME
        seconds and uses this value to determine whether packets received from
        the correspondent can be accepted. When an AERO Client receives a
        valid Redirect message it creates or updates a dynamic neighbor cache
        entry for the Redirect target network-layer and link-layer addresses
        plus prefix length. The Client then sets a "ForwardTime" variable in
        the neighbor cache entry to FORWARD_TIME seconds and uses this value
        to determine whether packets can be sent directly to the
        correspondent. The Client also sets a "MaxRetry" variable to MAX_RETRY
        to limit the number of keepalives sent when a correspondent may have
        gone unreachable.</t>

        <t>For dynamic neighbor cache entries, when an AERO Client receives a
        valid NS message it (re)sets AcceptTime for the neighbor to
        ACCEPT_TIME. When an AERO Client receives a valid solicited NA
        message, it (re)sets ForwardTime for the neighbor to FORWARD_TIME and
        sets MaxRetry to MAX_RETRY. When an AERO Client receives a valid
        unsolicited NA message, it updates the correspondent's link-layer
        addresses but DOES NOT reset AcceptTime, ForwardTime or MaxRetry.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that FORWARD_TIME be set to the default constant
        value 30 seconds to match the default REACHABLE_TIME value specified
        for IPv6 ND <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that ACCEPT_TIME be set to the default constant
        value 40 seconds to allow a 10 second window so that the AERO
        redirection procedure can converge before AcceptTime decrements below
        FORWARD_TIME.</t>

        <t>It is RECOMMENDED that MAX_RETRY be set to 3 the same as described
        for IPv6 ND address resolution in Section 7.3.3 of <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>Different values for FORWARD_TIME, ACCEPT_TIME, and MAX_RETRY MAY
        be administratively set, if necessary, to better match the AERO link's
        performance characteristics; however, if different values are chosen,
        all nodes on the link MUST consistently configure the same values.
        Most importantly, ACCEPT_TIME SHOULD be set to a value that is
        sufficiently longer than FORWARD_TIME to allow the AERO redirection
        procedure to converge.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroalg" title="AERO Interface Sending Algorithm">
        <t>IP packets enter a node's AERO interface either from the network
        layer (i.e., from a local application or the IP forwarding system), or
        from the link layer (i.e., from the AERO tunnel virtual link). Packets
        that enter the AERO interface from the network layer are encapsulated
        and admitted into the AERO link, i.e., they are tunnelled to an AERO
        interface neighbor. Packets that enter the AERO interface from the
        link layer are either re-admitted into the AERO link or delivered to
        the network layer where they are subject to either local delivery or
        IP forwarding. Since each AERO node may have only partial information
        about neighbors on the link, AERO interfaces may forward packets with
        link-local destination addresses at a layer below the network layer.
        This means that AERO nodes act as both IP routers and sub-IP layer
        forwarding agents. AERO interface sending considerations for Clients,
        Servers and Relays are given below.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's AERO interface from the network
        layer, if the destination is covered by an ASP the Client searches for
        a dynamic neighbor cache entry with a non-zero ForwardTime and an AERO
        address that matches the packet's destination address. (The
        destination address may be either an address covered by the neighbor's
        ACP or the (link-local) AERO address itself.) If there is a match, the
        Client uses a link-layer address in the entry as the link-layer
        address for encapsulation then admits the packet into the AERO link.
        If there is no match, the Client instead uses the link-layer address
        of a neighboring Server as the link-layer address for
        encapsulation.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Server's AERO interface from the link
        layer, if the destination is covered by an ASP the Server searches for
        a neighbor cache entry with an AERO address that matches the packet's
        destination address. (The destination address may be either an address
        covered by the neighbor's ACP or the AERO address itself.) If there is
        a match, the Server uses a link-layer address in the entry as the
        link-layer address for encapsulation and re-admits the packet into the
        AERO link. If there is no match, the Server instead uses the
        link-layer address in a permanent neighbor cache entry for a Relay as
        the link-layer address for encapsulation.</t>

        <t>When an IP packet enters a Relay's AERO interface from the network
        layer, the Relay searches its IP forwarding table for an entry that is
        covered by an ASP and also matches the destination. If there is a
        match, the Relay uses the link-layer address in a permanent neighbor
        cache entry for a Server as the link-layer address for encapsulation
        and admits the packet into the AERO link. When an IP packet enters a
        Relay's AERO interface from the link-layer, if the destination is not
        a link-local address and does not match an ASP the Relay removes the
        packet from the AERO interface and uses IP forwarding to forward the
        packet to the Internetwork. If the destination address is a link-local
        address or a non-link-local address that matches an ASP, and there is
        a more-specific ACP entry in the IP forwarding table, the Relay uses
        the link-layer address in the corresponding neighbor cache entry as
        the link-layer address for encapsulation and re-admits the packet into
        the AERO link. When an IP packet enters a Relay's AERO interface from
        either the network layer or link-layer, and the packet's destination
        address matches an ASP but there is no more-specific ACP entry, the
        Relay drops the packet and returns an ICMP Destination Unreachable
        message (see: <xref target="aeroerr"/>).</t>

        <t>When an AERO Server receives a packet from a Relay via the AERO
        interface, the Server MUST NOT forward the packet back to the same or
        a different Relay.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Relay receives a packet from a Server via the AERO
        interface, the Relay MUST NOT forward the packet back to the same
        Server. When an AERO Relay receives a packet from a Server with a
        link-local or non-link-local address corresponding to an ASP segment
        aggregated by another Relay, the first Relay forwards the packet to
        the second Relay.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node re-admits a packet into the AERO link without
        involving the network layer, the node MUST NOT decrement the network
        layer TTL/Hop-count.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node forwards a data packet to the primary link-layer
        address of a Server, it may receive Redirect messages with an SLLAO
        that include the link-layer address of an AERO Forwarding Agent. The
        AERO node SHOULD record the link-layer address in the neighbor cache
        entry for the neighbor and send subsequent data packets via this
        address instead of the Server's primary address (see: <xref
        target="aeropd-agent"/>).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroencaps"
               title="AERO Interface Encapsulation and Re-encapsulation">
        <t>AERO interfaces encapsulate IP packets according to whether they
        are entering the AERO interface from the network layer or if they are
        being re-admitted into the same AERO link they arrived on. This latter
        form of encapsulation is known as "re-encapsulation".</t>

        <t>The AERO interface encapsulates packets per the base tunneling
        specifications (e.g., <xref target="RFC2003"/>, <xref
        target="RFC2473"/>, <xref target="RFC2784"/>, <xref
        target="RFC4213"/>, <xref target="RFC4301"/>, <xref
        target="RFC5246"/>, etc.) except that it inserts a UDP header
        immediately following the IP encapsulation header. If there are no
        additional encapsulation headers (and no fragmentation,
        identification, checksum or signature is needed), the AERO interface
        next encapsulates the IPv4 or IPv6 packet immediately following the
        UDP header. In that case, the most significant four bits of the
        encapsulated packet encode the value '4' for IPv4 or '6' for IPv6.</t>

        <t>For all other encapsulations, the AERO interface MUST insert an
        AERO Header between the UDP header and the next encapsulation header
        as shown in <xref target="aero-shim"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="aero-shim" title="AERO Header">
            <artwork><![CDATA[        0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |Version|N|F|C|S|  Next Header  |Fragment Offset (13 bits)|Res|M|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                    Identification (32 bits)                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      Checksum (16 bits)       |  Signature (variable length)  :
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
          </figure><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Version">a 4-bit "Version" field. MUST be 0 for the
            purpose of this specification.</t>

            <t hangText="N">a 1-bit "Next Header" flag. MUST be 1 for the
            purpose of this specification to indicate that "Next Header" field
            is present. "Next Header" encodes the IP protocol number
            corresponding to the next header in the encapsulation immediately
            following the AERO header. For example, "Next Header" encodes the
            value '4' for IPv4, '17' for UDP, '41' for IPv6, '47' for GRE,
            '50' for ESP, '51' for AH, etc.</t>

            <t hangText="F">a 1-bit "Fragment Header" flag. Set to '1' if the
            "Fragment Offset", "Res", "M", and "Identification" fields are
            present and collectively referred to as the "AERO Fragment
            Header"; otherwise, set to '0'.</t>

            <t hangText="C">a 1-bit "Checksum" flag. Set to '1' if the
            "Checksum" field is present; otherwise, set to '0'. When present,
            the Checksum field contains a checksum of the IP/UDP/AERO
            encapsulation headers prior to the Checksum field.</t>

            <t hangText="S">a 1-bit "Signature" flag. Set to '1' if the
            "Signature" field is present; otherwise, set to '0'. When present,
            the Signature field contains a cryptographic signature of the
            encapsulated packet following the Signature field. The signature
            is applied prior to any fragmentation; hence' the Signature field
            only appears in the first fragment of a fragmented packet.</t>
          </list>(Note: <xref target="RFC6706"/> defines an experimental use
        in which the bits corresponding to (Version, N, F, C, S) are all zero,
        which can be unambiguously distinguished from the values permitted by
        this specification.)</t>

        <t>During encapsulation, the AERO interface copies the "TTL/Hop
        Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic Class" <xref target="RFC2983"/> and
        "Congestion Experienced" <xref target="RFC3168"/> values in the
        packet's IP header into the corresponding fields in the encapsulation
        IP header. (When IPv6 is used as the encapsulation protocol, the
        interface also sets the Flow Label value in the encapsulation header
        per <xref target="RFC6438"/>.) For packets undergoing
        re-encapsulation, the AERO interface instead copies the "TTL/Hop
        Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic Class", "Flow Label" and "Congestion
        Experienced" values in the original encapsulation IP header into the
        corresponding fields in the new encapsulation IP header, i.e., the
        values are transferred between encapsulation headers and *not* copied
        from the encapsulated packet's network-layer header.</t>

        <t>The AERO interface next sets the UDP source port to a constant
        value that it will use in each successive packet it sends, and sets
        the UDP length field to the length of the encapsulated packet plus 8
        bytes for the UDP header itself, plus the length of the AERO header.
        For packets sent via a Server, the AERO interface sets the UDP
        destination port to 8060, i.e., the IANA-registered port number for
        AERO. For packets sent to a correspondent Client, the AERO interface
        sets the UDP destination port to the port value stored in the neighbor
        cache entry for this correspondent. The AERO interface also sets the
        UDP checksum field to zero (see: <xref target="RFC6935"/><xref
        target="RFC6936"/>) unless an integrity check is required (see: <xref
        target="integrity"/>).</t>

        <t>The AERO interface next sets the IP protocol number in the
        encapsulation header to 17 (i.e., the IP protocol number for UDP).
        When IPv4 is used as the encapsulation protocol, the AERO interface
        sets the DF bit as discussed in <xref target="aeromtu"/>. The AERO
        interface finally sets the AERO header fields as described in <xref
        target="aero-shim"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerodecaps" title="AERO Interface Decapsulation">
        <t>AERO interfaces decapsulate packets destined either to the node
        itself or to a destination reached via an interface other than the
        AERO interface the packet was received on. When the AERO interface
        receives a UDP packet, it examines the first octet of the encapsulated
        packet.</t>

        <t>If the most significant four bits of the first octet encode the
        value '4' (i.e., the IP version number value for IPv4) or the value
        '6' (i.e., the IP version number value for IPv6), the AERO interface
        discards the encapsulation headers and accepts the encapsulated packet
        as an ordinary IPv6 or IPv4 data packet, respectively. If the most
        significant four bits encode the value '0', however, the AERO
        interface processes the packet according to the appropriate AERO
        Header fields as specified in <xref target="aero-shim"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroauth"
               title="AERO Interface Data Origin Authentication">
        <t>AERO nodes employ simple data origin authentication procedures for
        encapsulated packets they receive from other nodes on the AERO link.
        In particular:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Relays and Servers accept encapsulated packets with a
            link-layer source address that matches a permanent neighbor cache
            entry.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers accept authentic encapsulated DHCPv6 messages from
            Clients, and create or update a static neighbor cache entry for
            the source based on the specific message type.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers accept encapsulated packets if there is a neighbor
            cache entry with an AERO address that matches the packet's
            network-layer source address and with a link-layer address that
            matches the packet's link-layer source address.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients accept encapsulated packets if there is a static
            neighbor cache entry with a link-layer source address that matches
            the packet's link-layer source address.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients and Servers accept encapsulated packets if there
            is a dynamic neighbor cache entry with an AERO address that
            matches the packet's network-layer source address, with a
            link-layer address that matches the packet's link-layer source
            address, and with a non-zero AcceptTime.</t>
          </list>Note that this simple data origin authentication is effective
        in environments in which link-layer addresses cannot be spoofed. In
        other environments, each AERO message must include a signature that
        the recipient can use to authenticate the message origin.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromtu" title="AERO Interface MTU and Fragmentation">
        <t>The AERO interface is the node's point of attachment to the AERO
        link. AERO links over IP networks have a maximum link MTU of 64KB
        minus the encapsulation overhead (termed here "ENCAPS"), since the
        maximum packet size in the base IP specifications is 64KB <xref
        target="RFC0791"/><xref target="RFC2460"/> (while IPv6 jumbograms can
        be up to 4GB, they are considered optional for IPv6 nodes <xref
        target="RFC2675"/><xref target="RFC6434"/>).</t>

        <t>IPv6 specifies a minimum link MTU of 1280 bytes <xref
        target="RFC2460"/>. This is the minimum packet size the AERO interface
        MUST admit without returning an ICMP Packet Too Big (PTB) message.
        Although IPv4 specifies a smaller minimum link MTU of 68 bytes <xref
        target="RFC0791"/>, AERO interfaces also observe a 1280 byte minimum
        for IPv4. Additionally, the vast majority of links in the Internet
        configure an MTU of at least 1500 bytes. Original source hosts have
        therefore become conditioned to expect that IP packets up to 1500
        bytes in length will either be delivered to the final destination or a
        suitable PTB message returned. However, PTB messages may be lost in
        the network <xref target="RFC2923"/> resulting in failure of the IP
        Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) mechanisms <xref target="RFC1191"/><xref
        target="RFC1981"/>.</t>

        <t>For these reasons, the source AERO interface (i.e., the tunnel
        ingress)admit packets into the tunnel subject to their reasonable
        expectation that PMTUD will convey the correct information to the
        original source in the event that the packet is too large. In
        particular, if the original source is within the same well-managed
        administrative domain as the tunnel ingress, the ingress drops the
        packet and sends a PTB message back to the original source if the
        packet is too large to traverse the tunnel in one piece. Similarly, if
        the tunnel ingress is within the same well-managed administrative
        domain as the to the destination AERO interface (i.e., the tunnel
        egress), the ingress can cache MTU values reported in PTB messages
        received from a router on the path to the egress.</t>

        <t>In all other cases, AERO interfaces admit all packets up to 1500
        bytes in length even if some fragmentation is necessary, and admit
        larger packets without fragmentation in case they are able to traverse
        the tunnel in one piece. AERO interfaces are therefore considered to
        have an indefinite MTU, i.e., instead of clamping the MTU to a finite
        size.</t>

        <t>For AERO links over IPv4, the IP ID field is only 16 bits in
        length, meaning that fragmentation at high data rates could result in
        data corruption due to reassembly misassociations <xref
        target="RFC6864"/><xref target="RFC4963"/> (see: <xref
        target="integrity"/>). For AERO links over both IPv4 and IPv6, studies
        have also shown that IP fragments are dropped unconditionally over
        some network paths [I-D.taylor-v6ops-fragdrop]. For these reasons,
        when fragmentation is needed it is performed through insertion of an
        AERO fragment header (see: <xref target="aeroencaps"/>) and
        application of tunnel fragmentation as described in Section 3.1.7 of
        <xref target="RFC2764"/>. Since the AERO fragment header reduces the
        room available for packet data, but the original source has no way to
        control its insertion, the header length MUST be included in the
        ENCAPS length even for packets in which the header does not
        appear.</t>

        <t>The tunnel ingress therefore sends encapsulated packets to the
        tunnel egress according to the following algorithm:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>For IP packets that are no larger than (1280-ENCAPS) bytes, the
            tunnel ingress encapsulates the packet and admits it into the
            tunnel without fragmentation. For IPv4 AERO links, the tunnel
            ingress sets the Don't Fragment (DF) bit to 0 so that these
            packets will be delivered to the tunnel egress even if there is a
            restricting link in the path, i.e., unless lost due to congestion
            or routing errors.</t>

            <t>For IP packets that are larger than (1280-ENCAPS) bytes but no
            larger than 1500 bytes, the tunnel ingress encapsulates the packet
            and inserts an AERO fragment header. Next, the tunnel ingress uses
            the fragmentation algorithm in <xref target="RFC2460"/> to break
            the packet into two non-overlapping fragments where the first
            fragment (including ENCAPS) is no larger than 1024 bytes and the
            second is no larger than the first. Each fragment consists of
            identical UDP/IP encapsulation headers, followed by the AERO
            header followed by the fragment of the encapsulated packet itself.
            The tunnel ingress then admits both fragments into the tunnel, and
            for IPv4 sets the DF bit to 0 in the IP encapsulation header.
            These fragmented encapsulated packets will be delivered to the
            tunnel egress. When the tunnel egress receives the fragments, it
            reassembles them into a whole packet per the reassembly algorithm
            in <xref target="RFC2460"/>. The tunnel egress therefore MUST be
            capable of reassembling packets up to 1500+ENCAPS bytes in length;
            hence, it is RECOMMENDED that the tunnel egress be capable of
            reassembling at least 2KB.</t>

            <t>For IPv4 packets that are larger than 1500 bytes and with the
            DF bit set to 0, the tunnel ingress uses ordinary IPv4
            fragmentation to break the unencapsulated packet into a minimum
            number of non-overlapping fragments where the first fragment is no
            larger than 1024-ENCAPS and all other fragments are no larger than
            the first fragment. The tunnel ingress then encapsulates each
            fragment (and for IPv4 sets the DF bit to 0) then admits them into
            the tunnel. These fragments will be delivered to the final
            destination via the tunnel egress.</t>

            <t>For all other IP packets, if the packet is too large to enter
            the underlying interface following encapsulation, the tunnel
            ingress drops the packet and returns a network-layer (L3) PTB
            message to the original source with MTU set to the larger of 1500
            bytes or the underlying interface MTU minus ENCAPS. Otherwise, the
            tunnel ingress encapsulates the packet and admits it into the
            tunnel without fragmentation (and for IPv4 sets the DF bit to 1)
            and translates any link-layer (L2) PTB messages it may receive
            from the network into corresponding L3 PTB messages to send to the
            original source as specified in <xref target="aeroerr"/>. Since
            both L2 and L3 PTB messages may be either lost or contain
            insufficient information, however, it is RECOMMENDED that original
            sources that send unfragmentable IP packets larger than 1500 bytes
            use Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery (PLPMTUD) <xref
            target="RFC4821"/>.</t>
          </list>While sending packets according to the above algorithm, the
        tunnel ingress MAY also send 1500 byte or larger probe packets to
        determine whether they can reach the tunnel egress without
        fragmentation. If the probes succeed, the tunnel ingress can
        discontinue fragmentation and (for IPv4) set DF to 1. Since the path
        MTU within the tunnel may fluctuate due to routing changes, the tunnel
        ingress SHOULD continue to send additional probes subject to rate
        limiting and SHOULD process any L2 PTB messages as an indication that
        the path MTU may have decreased. If the path MTU within the tunnel
        becomes insufficient, the source MUST resume fragmentation.</t>

        <t>To construct a probe, the tunnel ingress prepares an NS message
        with a Nonce option plus trailing NULL padding octets added to the
        probe length without including the length of the padding in the IPv6
        Payload Length field, but with the length included in the
        encapsulating IP header. The tunnel ingress then encapsulates the
        padded NS message in the encapsulation headers (and for IPv4 sets DF
        to 1) then sends the message to the tunnel egress. If the tunnel
        egress returns a solicited NA message with a matching Nonce option,
        the tunnel ingress deems the probe successful. Note that in this
        process it is essential that probes follow equivalent paths to those
        used to convey actual data packets. This means that Equal Cost
        MultiPath (ECMP) and Link Aggregation Gateway (LAG) equipment in the
        path would need to ensure that probes and data packets follow the same
        path, which is outside the scope of this specification.</t>

        <section anchor="aerobignd"
                 title="Accommodating Large Control Messages">
          <t>Control messages (i.e., IPv6 ND, DHCPv6, etc.) MUST be
          accommodated even if some fragmentation is necessary. These packets
          are therefore accommodated through a modification of the second rule
          in the above algorithm as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>For control messages that are larger than (1280-ENCAPS)
              bytes, the tunnel ingress encapsulates the packet and inserts an
              AERO fragment header. Next, the tunnel ingress uses the
              fragmentation algorithm in <xref target="RFC2460"/> to break the
              packet into a minimum number of non-overlapping fragments where
              the first fragment (including ENCAPS) is no larger than 1024
              bytes and the remaining fragments are no larger than the first.
              The tunnel ingress then encapsulates each fragment (and for IPv4
              sets the DF bit to 0) then admits them into the tunnel.</t>
            </list>Control messages that exceed the 2KB minimum reassembly
          size rarely occur in the modern era, however the tunnel egress
          SHOULD be able to reassemble them if they do. This means that the
          tunnel egress SHOULD include a configuration knob allowing the
          operator to set a larger reassembly buffer size if large control
          messages become more common in the future.</t>

          <t>The tunnel ingress can send large control messages without
          fragmentation if there is assurance that large packets can traverse
          the tunnel without fragmentation. The tunnel ingress MAY send 1500
          byte or larger probe packets as specified above to determine a size
          for which fragmentation can be avoided.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="integrity" title="Integrity">
          <t>When fragmentation is needed, there must be assurance that
          reassembly can be safely conducted without incurring data
          corruption. Sources of corruption can include implementation errors,
          memory errors and misassociations of fragments from a first datagram
          with fragments of another datagram. The first two conditions
          (implementation and memory errors) are mitigated by modern systems
          and implementations that have demonstrated integrity through decades
          of operational practice. The third condition (reassembly
          misassociations) must be accounted for by AERO.</t>

          <t>The AERO fragmentation procedure described in the above
          algorithms reuses standard IPv6 fragmentation and reassembly code.
          Since the AERO fragment header includes a 32-bit ID field, there
          would need to be 2^32 packets alive in the network before a second
          packet with a duplicate ID enters the system with the (remote)
          possibility for a reassembly misassociation. For 1280 byte packets,
          and for a maximum network lifetime value of 60 seconds<xref
          target="RFC2460"/>, this means that the tunnel ingress would need to
          produce ~(7 *10^12) bits/sec in order for a duplication event to be
          possible. This exceeds the bandwidth of data link technologies of
          the modern era, but not necessarily so going forward into the
          future. Although wireless data links commonly used by AERO Clients
          support vastly lower data rates, the aggregate data rates between
          AERO Servers and Relays may be substantial. However, high speed data
          links in the network core are expected to configure larger MTUs,
          e.g., 4KB, 8KB or even larger such that unfragmented packets can be
          used. Hence, no integrity check is included to cover the AERO
          fragmentation and reassembly procedures.</t>

          <t>When the tunnel ingress sends an IPv4-encapsulated packet with
          the DF bit set to 0 in the above algorithms, there is a chance that
          the packet may be fragmented by an IPv4 router somewhere within the
          tunnel. Since the largest such packet is only 1280 bytes, however,
          it is very likely that the packet will traverse the tunnel without
          incurring a restricting link. Even when a link within the tunnel
          configures an MTU smaller than 1280 bytes, it is very likely that it
          does so due to limited performance characteristics <xref
          target="RFC3819"/>. This means that the tunnel would not be able to
          convey fragmented IPv4-encapsulated packets fast enough to produce
          reassembly misassociations, as discussed above. However, AERO must
          also account for the possibility of tunnel paths that include
          "poorly managed" IPv4 link MTUs due to misconfigurations.</t>

          <t>Since the IPv4 header includes only a 16-bit ID field, there
          would only need to be 2^16 packets alive in the network before a
          second packet with a duplicate ID enters the system. For 1280 byte
          packets, and for a maximum network lifetime value of 120
          seconds<xref target="RFC0791"/>, this means that the tunnel ingress
          would only need to produce ~(5 *10^6) bits/sec in order for a
          duplication event to be possible - a value that is well within range
          for many modern wired and wireless data link technologies.</t>

          <t>Therefore, if there is strong operational assurance that no IPv4
          links capable of supporting data rates of 5Mbps or more configure an
          MTU smaller than 1280 the tunnel ingress MAY omit an integrity check
          for the IPv4 fragmentation and reassembly procedures; otherwise, the
          tunnel ingress SHOULD include an integrity check. When an upper
          layer encapsulation (e.g., IPsec) already includes an integrity
          check, the tunnel ingress need not include an additional check.
          Otherwise, the tunnel ingress calculates the UDP checksum over the
          encapsulated packet and writes the value into the UDP encapsulation
          header, i.e., instead of writing the value 0. The tunnel egress will
          then verify the UDP checksum and discard the packet if the checksum
          is incorrect.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroerr" title="AERO Interface Error Handling">
        <t>When an AERO node admits encapsulated packets into the AERO
        interface, it may receive link-layer (L2) or network-layer (L3) error
        indications.</t>

        <t>An L2 error indication is an ICMP error message generated by a
        router on the path to the neighbor or by the neighbor itself. The
        message includes an IP header with the address of the node that
        generated the error as the source address and with the link-layer
        address of the AERO node as the destination address.</t>

        <t>The IP header is followed by an ICMP header that includes an error
        Type, Code and Checksum. For ICMPv6 <xref target="RFC4443"/>, the
        error Types include "Destination Unreachable", "Packet Too Big (PTB)",
        "Time Exceeded" and "Parameter Problem". For ICMPv4 <xref
        target="RFC0792"/>, the error Types include "Destination Unreachable",
        "Fragmentation Needed" (a Destination Unreachable Code that is
        analogous to the ICMPv6 PTB), "Time Exceeded" and "Parameter
        Problem".</t>

        <t>The ICMP header is followed by the leading portion of the packet
        that generated the error, also known as the "packet-in-error". For
        ICMPv6, <xref target="RFC4443"/> specifies that the packet-in-error
        includes: "As much of invoking packet as possible without the ICMPv6
        packet exceeding the minimum IPv6 MTU" (i.e., no more than 1280
        bytes). For ICMPv4, <xref target="RFC0792"/> specifies that the
        packet-in-error includes: "Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data
        Datagram", however <xref target="RFC1812"/> Section 4.3.2.3 updates
        this specification by stating: "the ICMP datagram SHOULD contain as
        much of the original datagram as possible without the length of the
        ICMP datagram exceeding 576 bytes".</t>

        <t>The L2 error message format is shown in <xref
        target="icmp2err"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp2err"
            title="AERO Interface L2 Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               ~
     |        L2 IP Header of        |
     |         error message         |
     ~                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         L2 ICMP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
     ~                               ~   P
     |   IP and other encapsulation  |   a
     | headers of original L3 packet |   c
     ~                               ~   k
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   e
     ~                               ~   t
     |        IP header of           |   
     |      original L3 packet       |   i
     ~                               ~   n
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   
     ~                               ~   e
     |    Upper layer headers and    |   r
     |    leading portion of body    |   r
     |   of the original L3 packet   |   o
     ~                               ~   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>The AERO node rules for processing these L2 error messages
        is as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When an AERO node receives an L2 Parameter Problem message, it
            processes the message the same as described as for ordinary ICMP
            errors in the normative references <xref target="RFC0792"/><xref
            target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent L2 IPv4 Time Exceeded
            messages, the IP ID field may be wrapping before earlier fragments
            have been processed. In that case, the node SHOULD begin including
            IPv4 integrity checks (see: <xref target="integrity"/>).</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its dynamic neighbor correspondents, the Client SHOULD
            test the path to the correspondent using Neighbor Unreachability
            Detection (NUD) (see <xref target="nud"/>). If NUD fails, the
            Client SHOULD set ForwardTime for the corresponding dynamic
            neighbor cache entry to 0 and allow future packets destined to the
            correspondent to flow through a Server.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its static neighbor Servers, the Client SHOULD test the
            path to the Server using NUD. If NUD fails, the Client SHOULD
            delete the neighbor cache entry and attempt to associate with a
            new Server.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server receives persistent L2 Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to tunneled packets that it sends
            to one of its static neighbor Clients, the Server SHOULD test the
            path to the Client using NUD. If NUD fails, the Server SHOULD
            cancel the DHCPv6 PD for the Client's ACP, withdraw its route for
            the ACP from the AERO routing system and delete the neighbor cache
            entry (see <xref target="nud"/> and <xref target="aeromob"/>).</t>

            <t>When an AERO Relay or Server receives an L2 Destination
            Unreachable message in response to a tunneled packet that it sends
            to one of its permanent neighbors, it discards the message since
            the routing system is likely in a temporary transitional state
            that will soon re-converge.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives an L2 PTB message, it translates the
            message into an L3 PTB message if possible (*) and forwards the
            message toward the original source as described below.</t>
          </list>To translate an L2 PTB message to an L3 PTB message, the AERO
        node first caches the MTU field value of the L2 ICMP header. The node
        next discards the L2 IP and ICMP headers, and also discards the
        encapsulation headers of the original L3 packet. Next the node
        encapsulates the included segment of the original L3 packet in an L3
        IP and ICMP header, and sets the ICMP header Type and Code values to
        appropriate values for the L3 IP protocol. In the process, the node
        writes the maximum of 1500 bytes and (L2 MTU - ENCAPS) into the MTU
        field of the L3 ICMP header.</t>

        <t>The node next writes the IP source address of the original L3
        packet as the destination address of the L3 PTB message and determines
        the next hop to the destination. If the next hop is reached via the
        AERO interface, the node uses the IPv6 address "::" or the IPv4
        address "0.0.0.0" as the IP source address of the L3 PTB message.
        Otherwise, the node uses one of its non link-local addresses as the
        source address of the L3 PTB message. The node finally calculates the
        ICMP checksum over the L3 PTB message and writes the Checksum in the
        corresponding field of the L3 ICMP header. The L3 PTB message
        therefore is formatted as follows:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp3err"
            title="AERO Interface L3 Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               ~
     |        L3 IP Header of        |
     |         error message         |
     ~                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         L3 ICMP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  ---
     ~                               ~   p
     |        IP header of           |   k
     |      original L3 packet       |   t
     ~                               ~ 
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   i  
     ~                               ~   n
     |    Upper layer headers and    |
     |    leading portion of body    |   e
     |   of the original L3 packet   |   r
     ~                               ~   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>After the node has prepared the L3 PTB message, it either
        forwards the message via a link outside of the AERO interface without
        encapsulation, or encapsulates and forwards the message to the next
        hop via the AERO interface.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Relay receives an L3 packet for which the destination
        address is covered by an ASP, if there is no more-specific routing
        information for the destination the Relay drops the packet and returns
        an L3 Destination Unreachable message. The Relay first writes the IP
        source address of the original L3 packet as the destination address of
        the L3 Destination Unreachable message and determines the next hop to
        the destination. If the next hop is reached via the AERO interface,
        the Relay uses the IPv6 address "::" or the IPv4 address "0.0.0.0" as
        the IP source address of the L3 Destination Unreachable message and
        forwards the message to the next hop within the AERO interface.
        Otherwise, the Relay uses one of its non link-local addresses as the
        source address of the L3 Destination Unreachable message and forwards
        the message via a link outside the AERO interface.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node receives any L3 error message via the AERO
        interface, it examines the destination address in the L3 IP header of
        the message. If the next hop toward the destination address of the
        error message is via the AERO interface, the node re-encapsulates and
        forwards the message to the next hop within the AERO interface.
        Otherwise, if the source address in the L3 IP header of the message is
        the IPv6 address "::" or the IPv4 address "0.0.0.0", the node writes
        one of its non link-local addresses as the source address of the L3
        message and recalculates the IP and/or ICMP checksums. The node
        finally forwards the message via a link outside of the AERO
        interface.</t>

        <t>(*) Note that in some instances the packet-in-error field of an L2
        PTB message may not include enough information for translation to an
        L3 PTB message. In that case, the AERO interface simply discards the
        L2 PTB message. It can therefore be said that translation of L2 PTB
        messages to L3 PTB messages can provide a useful optimization when
        possible, but is not critical for sources that correctly use
        PLPMTUD.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd"
               title="AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Address Configuration">
        <section anchor="aeropd-dhcp" title="AERO DHCPv6 Service Model">
          <t>Each AERO Server configures a DHCPv6 server function to
          facilitate PD requests from Clients. Each Server is provisioned with
          a database of ACP-to-Client ID mappings for all Clients enrolled in
          the AERO system, as well as any information necessary to
          authenticate each Client. The Client database is maintained by a
          central administrative authority for the AERO link and securely
          distributed to all Servers, e.g., via the Lightweight Directory
          Access Protocol (LDAP) <xref target="RFC4511"/> or a similar
          distributed database service.</t>

          <t>Therefore, no Server-to-Server DHCPv6 PD delegation state
          synchronization is necessary, and Clients can optionally hold
          separate delegations for the same ACP from multiple Servers. In this
          way, Clients can associate with multiple Servers, and can receive
          new delegations from new Servers before deprecating delegations
          received from existing Servers.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers exchange Client link-layer address
          information using an option format similar to the Client Link Layer
          Address Option (CLLAO) defined in <xref target="RFC6939"/>. Due to
          practical limitations of CLLAO, however, AERO interfaces instead use
          Vendor-Specific Information Options as described in the following
          sections.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-client" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>AERO Clients discover the link-layer addresses of AERO Servers
          via static configuration, or through an automated means such as DNS
          name resolution. In the absence of other information, the Client
          resolves the FQDN "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" where
          "linkupnetworks" is a constant text string and "[domainname]" is the
          connection-specific DNS suffix for the Client's underlying network
          connection (e.g., "example.com"). After discovering the link-layer
          addresses, the Client associates with one or more of the
          corresponding Servers.</t>

          <t>To associate with a Server, the Client acts as a requesting
          router to request an ACP through a two-message (i.e., Request/Reply)
          DHCPv6 PD exchange <xref target="RFC3315"/><xref target="RFC3633"/>.
          The Client's Request message includes fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff as
          the IPv6 source address, 'All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers' as the
          IPv6 destination address and the link-layer address of the Server as
          the link-layer destination address. The Request message also
          includes a Client Identifier option with a DHCP Unique Identifier
          (DUID) and an Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD)
          option. If the Client is pre-provisioned with an ACP associated with
          the AERO service, it MAY also include the ACP in the IA_PD to
          indicate its preference to the DHCPv6 server.</t>

          <t>The Client also SHOULD include an AERO Link-registration Request
          (ALREQ) option to register one or more links with the Server. The
          Server will include an AERO Link-registration Reply (ALREP) option
          in the corresponding DHCPv6 Reply message as specified in <xref
          target="aeropd-server"/>. (The Client MAY omit the ALREQ option, in
          which case the Server will still include an ALREP option in its
          Reply with "Link ID" set to 0, "DSCP" set to 0, and "Prf" set to
          3.)</t>

          <t>The format for the ALREQ option is shown in <xref
          target="alireq"/>:<figure anchor="alireq"
              title="AERO Link-registration Request (ALREQ) Option">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS       |         option-len (1)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                   enterprise-number = 45282                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  opt-code = OPTION_ALREQ (0)  |         option-len (2)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Link ID   |  DSCP #1  |Prf|  DSCP #2  |Prf|   ...
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t>In the above format, the Client sets 'option-code' to
          OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS, sets 'option-len (1)' to the length of the
          option following this field, sets 'enterprise-number' to 45282 (see:
          "IANA Considerations"), sets opt-code to the value 0
          ("OPTION_ALREQ") and sets 'option-len (2)' to the length of the
          remainder of the option. The Client includes appropriate 'Link ID,
          'DSCP' and 'Prf' values for the underlying interface over which the
          DHCPv6 PD Request will be issued the same as specified for an
          S/TLLAO <xref target="interface"/>. The Client MAY include multiple
          (DSCP, Prf) values with this Link ID, with the number of values
          indicated by option-len (2). The Server will register each value
          with the Link ID in the Client's neighbor cache entry. The Client
          finally includes any necessary authentication options to identify
          itself to the DHCPv6 server, and sends the encapsulated DHCPv6 PD
          Request via the underlying interface corresponding to Link ID. (Note
          that this implies that the Client must perform additional
          Renew/Reply DHCPv6 exchanges with the server following the initial
          Request/Reply using different underlying interfaces and their
          corresponding Link IDs if it wishes to register additional
          link-layer addresses and their associated DSCPs.)</t>

          <t>When the Client receives its ACP via a DHCPv6 Reply from the AERO
          Server, it creates a static neighbor cache entry with the Server's
          link-local address as the network-layer address and the Server's
          encapsulation address as the link-layer address. The Client then
          considers the link-layer address of the Server as the primary
          default encapsulation address for forwarding packets for which no
          more-specific forwarding information is available. The Client
          further caches any ASPs included in the ALREP option as ASPs to
          apply to the AERO link.</t>

          <t>Next, the Client autoconfigures an AERO address from the
          delegated ACP, assigns the AERO address to the AERO interface and
          sub-delegates the ACP to its attached EUNs and/or the Client's own
          internal virtual interfaces. The Client also assigns a default IP
          route to the AERO interface as a route-to-interface, i.e., with no
          explicit next-hop. The Client can then determine the correct next
          hops for packets submitted to the AERO interface by inspecting the
          neighbor cache.</t>

          <t>The Client subsequently renews its ACP delegation through each of
          its Servers by performing DHCPv6 Renew/Reply exchanges with the
          link-layer address of a Server as the link-layer destination address
          and the same options that were used in the initial PD request. Note
          that if the Client does not issue a DHCPv6 Renew before the
          delegation expires (e.g., if the Client has been out of touch with
          the Server for a considerable amount of time) it must re-initiate
          the DHCPv6 PD procedure. </t>

          <t>Since the Client's AERO address is obtained from the unique ACP
          delegation it receives, there is no need for Duplicate Address
          Detection (DAD) on AERO links. Other nodes maliciously attempting to
          hijack an authorized Client's AERO address will be denied access to
          the network by the DHCPv6 server due to an unacceptable link-layer
          address and/or security parameters (see: Security
          Considerations).</t>

          <section title="Autoconfiguration for Constrained Platforms">
            <t>On some platforms (e.g., popular cell phone operating systems),
            the act of assigning a default IPv6 route and/or assigning an
            address to an interface may not be permitted from a user
            application due to security policy. Typically, those platforms
            include a TUN/TAP interface that acts as a point-to-point conduit
            between user applications and the AERO interface. In that case,
            the Client can instead generate a "synthesized RA" message. The
            message conforms to <xref target="RFC4861"/> and is prepared as
            follows:</t>

            <t><list style="symbols">
                <t>the IPv6 source address is the Client's AERO address</t>

                <t>the IPv6 destination address is all-nodes multicast</t>

                <t>the Router Lifetime is set to a time that is no longer than
                the ACP DHCPv6 lifetime</t>

                <t>the message does not include a Source Link Layer Address
                Option (SLLAO)</t>

                <t>the message includes a Prefix Information Option (PIO) with
                a /64 prefix taken from the ACP as the prefix for
                autoconfiguration</t>
              </list>The Client then sends the synthesized RA message via the
            TUN/TAP interface, where the operating system kernel will
            interpret it as though it were generated by an actual router. The
            operating system will then install a default route and use
            StateLess Address AutoConfiguration (SLAAC) to configure an IPv6
            address on the TUN/TAP interface. Methods for similarly installing
            an IPv4 default route and IPv4 address on the TUN/TAP interface
            are based on synthesized DHCPv4 messages <xref
            target="RFC2131"/>.</t>
          </section>

          <section title="Client DHCPv6  Message Source Address">
            <t>In the initial DHCPv6 PD message exchanges, AERO Clients use
            the special IPv6 source address 'fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff' since
            their AERO addresses are not yet configured. After AERO address
            autoconfiguration, however, AERO Clients can either continue to
            use 'fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff' as the source address for further
            DHCPv6 messaging or begin using their AERO address as the source
            address.</t>
          </section>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-server" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>AERO Servers configure a DHCPv6 server function on their AERO
          links. AERO Servers arrange to add their encapsulation layer IP
          addresses (i.e., their link-layer addresses) to the DNS resource
          records for the FQDN "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" before entering
          service.</t>

          <t>When an AERO Server receives a prospective Client's DHCPv6 PD
          Request on its AERO interface, it first authenticates the message.
          If authentication succeeds, the Server determines the correct ACP to
          delegate to the Client by searching the Client database. In
          environments where spoofing is not considered a threat, the Server
          MAY use the Client's DUID as the identification value. Otherwise,
          the Server SHOULD use a signed certificate provided by the
          Client.</t>

          <t>When the Server delegates the ACP, it also creates an IP
          forwarding table entry so that the AERO routing system will
          propagate the ACP to all Relays that aggregate the corresponding ASP
          (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). Next, the Server prepares a DHCPv6
          Reply message to send to the Client while using fe80::ID as the IPv6
          source address, the link-local address taken from the Client's
          Request as the IPv6 destination address, the Server's link-layer
          address as the source link-layer address, and the Client's
          link-layer address as the destination link-layer address. The server
          also includes an IA_PD option with the delegated ACP. Since the
          Client may experience a fault that prevents it from issuing a DHCPv6
          Release before departing from the network, Servers should set a
          short prefix lifetime (e.g., 40 seconds) so that stale prefix
          delegation state can be flushed out of the network.</t>

          <t>The Server also includes an ALREP option that includes the UDP
          Port Number and IP Address values it observed when it received the
          ALREQ in the Client's original DHCPv6 message (if present) followed
          by the ASP(s) for the AERO link. The ALREP option is formatted as
          shown in <xref target="alrep"/>:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="alrep"
              title="AERO Link-registration Reply (ALREP) Option">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS       |         option-len (1)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                   enterprise-number = 45282                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  opt-code = OPTION_ALREP (1)  |         option-len (2)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |    Link ID    |    Reserved   |         UDP Port Number       |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     +                                                               +
     |                                                               |
     +                          IP Address                           +
     |                                                               |
     +                                                               +
     |                                                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     +              AERO Service Prefix (ASP) #1     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                               |  Prefix Len   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                                               |
     +              AERO Service Prefix (ASP) #2     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                                               |  Prefix Len   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                                                               ~
     ~                                                               ~

]]></artwork>
            </figure>In the ALREP, the Server sets 'option-code' to
          OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS, sets 'option-length (1)' to the length of the
          option, sets 'enterprise-number' to 45282 (see: "IANA
          Considerations"), sets opt-code to OPTION_ALREP (1), and sets
          'option-len (2)' to the length of the remainder of the option. Next,
          the Server sets 'Link ID' to the same value that appeared in the
          ALREQ, sets Reserved to 0 and sets 'UDP Port Number' and 'IP
          address' to the Client's link-layer address. The Server next
          includes one or more ASP with the IP prefix as it would appear in
          the interface identifier portion of the corresponding AERO address
          (see: <xref target="aero-address"/>), except that the low-order 8
          bits of the ASP field encode the prefix length instead of the
          low-order 8 bits of the prefix. The longest prefix that can
          therefore appear as an ASP is /56 for IPv6 or /24 for IPv4. (Note
          that if the Client did not include an ALREQ option in its DHCPv6
          message, the Server MUST still include an ALREP option in the
          corresponding reply with 'Link ID' set to 0.)</t>

          <t>When the Server admits the DHCPv6 Reply message into the AERO
          interface, it creates a static neighbor cache entry for the Client's
          AERO address with lifetime set to no more than the delegation
          lifetime and the Client's link-layer address as the link-layer
          address for the Link ID specified in the ALREQ. The Server then uses
          the Client link-layer address information in the ALREQ option as the
          link-layer address for encapsulation based on the (DSCP, Prf)
          information.</t>

          <t>After the initial DHCPv6 PD exchange, the AERO Server maintains
          the neighbor cache entry for the Client until the delegation
          lifetime expires. If the Client issues a Renew/Reply exchange, the
          Server extends the lifetime. If the Client issues a Release/Reply,
          or if the Client does not issue a Renew/Reply before the lifetime
          expires, the Server deletes the neighbor cache entry for the Client
          and withdraws the IP route from the AERO routing system.</t>

          <section title="Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA)">
            <t>AERO Clients and Servers are always on the same link (i.e., the
            AERO link) from the perspective of DHCPv6. However, in some
            implementations the DHCPv6 server and AERO interface driver may be
            located in separate modules. In that case, the Server's AERO
            interface driver module acts as a Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent
            (LDRA)<xref target="RFC6221"> </xref> to relay DHCPv6 messages to
            and from the DHCPv6 server module.</t>

            <t>When the LDRA receives a DHCPv6 message from a client, it
            prepares an ALREP option the same as described above then wraps
            the option in a Relay-Supplied DHCP Option option (RSOO) <xref
            target="RFC6422"/>. The LDRA then incorporates the option into the
            Relay-Forward message and forwards the message to the DHCPv6
            server.</t>

            <t>When the DHCPv6 server receives the Relay-Forward message, it
            caches the ALREP option and authenticates the encapsulated DHCPv6
            message. The DHCPv6 server subsequently ignores the ALREQ option
            itself, since the relay has already included the ALREP option.</t>

            <t>When the DHCPv6 server prepares a Reply message, it then
            includes the ALREP option in the body of the message along with
            any other options, then wraps the message in a Relay-Reply
            message. The DHCPv6 server then delivers the Relay-Reply message
            to the LDRA, which discards the Relay-Reply wrapper and delivers
            the DHCPv6 message to the Client.</t>
          </section>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-link-dereg"
                 title="Deleting Link Registrations">
          <t>After an AERO Client registers its Link IDs and their associated
          (DSCP,Prf) values with the AERO Server, the Client may wish to
          delete one or more Link registrations, e.g., if an underlying link
          becomes unavailable. To do so, the Client prepares a DHCPv6 Rebind
          message that includes an AERO Link-registration Delete (ALDEL)
          option and sends the Rebind message to the Server over any available
          underlying link. The ALDEL option is formatted as shown in <xref
          target="aldel"/>:</t>

          <t><figure anchor="aldel"
              title="AERO Link-registration Delete (ALDEL) Option">
              <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS       |         option-len (1)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                   enterprise-number = 45282                   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  opt-code = OPTION_ALDEL (2)  |         option-len (2)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |   Link ID #1  |  Link ID #2   |  Link ID #3   |    ...
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-

]]></artwork>
            </figure>In the ALDEL, the Client sets 'option-code' to
          OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS, sets 'option-length (1)' to the length of the
          option, sets 'enterprise-number' to 45282 (see: "IANA
          Considerations"), sets optcode to OPTION_ALDEL (2), and sets
          'option-len (2)' to the length of the remainder of the option. Next,
          the Server includes each 'Link ID' value that it wishes to
          delete.</t>

          <t>If the Client wishes to discontinue use of a Server and thereby
          delete all of its Link ID associations, it must use a DHCPv6
          Release/Reply exchange to delete the entire neighbor cache entry,
          i.e., instead of using a DHCPv6 Rebind/Reply exchange with one or
          more ALDEL options.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd-agent" title="AERO Forwarding Agent Behavior">
        <t>AERO Servers MAY associate with one or more companion AERO
        Forwarding Agents as platforms for offloading high-speed data plane
        traffic. When an AERO Server receives a Client's DHCPv6
        Request/Renew/Rebind/Release message, it services the message then
        forwards the corresponding Reply message to the Forwarding Agent. When
        the Forwarding Agent receives the Reply message, it creates, updates
        or deletes a neighbor cache entry with the Client's AERO address and
        link-layer information included in the Reply message. The Forwarding
        Agent then forwards the Reply message back to the AERO Server, which
        forwards the message to the Client. In this way, Forwarding Agent
        state is managed in conjunction with Server state, with the Client
        responsible for reliability. If the Client subsequently disappears
        without issuing a Release, the Server is responsible for purging stale
        state by sending synthesized Reply messages to the Forwarding
        Agent.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Server receives a data packet on an AERO interface
        with a network layer destination address for which it has distributed
        forwarding information to a Forwarding Agent, the Server returns a
        Redirect message to the source neighbor (subject to rate limiting)
        then forwards the data packet as usual. The Redirect message includes
        a TLLAO with the link-layer address of the Forwarding Engine.</t>

        <t>When the source neighbor receives the Redirect message, it SHOULD
        record the link-layer address in the TLLAO as the encapsulation
        addresses to use for sending subsequent data packets. However, the
        source MUST continue to use the primary link-layer address of the
        Server as the encapsulation address for sending control messages.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="predirect" title="AERO Intradomain Route Optimization">
        <t>When a source Client forwards packets to a prospective
        correspondent Client within the same AERO link domain (i.e., one for
        which the packet's destination address is covered by an ASP), the
        source Client initiates an intra-domain AERO route optimization
        procedure. It is important to note that this procedure is initiated by
        the Client; if the procedure were initiated by the Server, the Server
        would have no way of knowing whether the Client was actually able to
        contact the correspondent over the route-optimized path.</t>

        <t>The procedure is based on an exchange of IPv6 ND messages using a
        chain of AERO Servers and Relays as a trust basis. This procedure is
        in contrast to the Return Routability procedure required for route
        optimization to a correspondent Client located in the Internet as
        described in <xref target="aerointernet"/>. The following sections
        specify the AERO intradomain route optimization procedure.</t>

        <section anchor="avoidance-fig" title="Reference Operational Scenario">
          <t><xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/> depicts the AERO
          intradomain route optimization reference operational scenario, using
          IPv6 addressing as the example (while not shown, a corresponding
          example for IPv4 addressing can be easily constructed). The figure
          shows an AERO Relay ('R1'), two AERO Servers ('S1', 'S2'), two AERO
          Clients ('C1', 'C2') and two ordinary IPv6 hosts ('H1', 'H2'):</t>

          <figure anchor="no-onlink-prefix-fig"
                  title="AERO Reference Operational Scenario">
            <artwork><![CDATA[         +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+
         |   Server S1  |  |    Relay R1  |  |   Server S2  |
         +--------------+  +--------------+  +--------------+
             fe80::2            fe80::1           fe80::3
              L2(S1)             L2(R1)            L2(S2) 
                |                  |                 |
    X-----+-----+------------------+-----------------+----+----X
          |       AERO Link                               |
         L2(A)                                          L2(B)
  fe80::2001:db8:0:0                              fe80::2001:db8:1:0
  +--------------+                                 +--------------+
  |AERO Client C1|                                 |AERO Client C2|
  +--------------+                                 +--------------+
  2001:DB8:0::/48                                  2001:DB8:1::/48
          |                                                |
         .-.                                              .-.
      ,-(  _)-.   2001:db8:0::1      2001:db8:1::1     ,-(  _)-.
   .-(_  IP   )-.   +---------+      +---------+    .-(_  IP   )-.
 (__    EUN      )--| Host H1 |      | Host H2 |--(__    EUN      )
    `-(______)-'    +---------+      +---------+     `-(______)-'
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t>In <xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/>, Relay ('R1') assigns
          the address fe80::1 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(R1), Server ('S1') assigns the address fe80::2 with link-layer
          address L2(S1),and Server ('S2') assigns the address fe80::3 with
          link-layer address L2(S2). Servers ('S1') and ('S2') next arrange to
          add their link-layer addresses to a published list of valid Servers
          for the AERO link.</t>

          <t>AERO Client ('C1') receives the ACP 2001:db8:0::/48 in a DHCPv6
          PD exchange via AERO Server ('S1') then assigns the address
          fe80::2001:db8:0:0 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(C1). Client ('C1') configures a default route and neighbor cache
          entry via the AERO interface with next-hop address fe80::2 and
          link-layer address L2(S1), then sub-delegates the ACP to its
          attached EUNs. IPv6 host ('H1') connects to the EUN, and configures
          the address 2001:db8:0::1.</t>

          <t>AERO Client ('C2') receives the ACP 2001:db8:1::/48 in a DHCPv6
          PD exchange via AERO Server ('S2') then assigns the address
          fe80::2001:db8:1:0 to its AERO interface with link-layer address
          L2(C2). Client ('C2') configures a default route and neighbor cache
          entry via the AERO interface with next-hop address fe80::3 and
          link-layer address L2(S2), then sub-delegates the ACP to its
          attached EUNs. IPv6 host ('H1') connects to the EUN, and configures
          the address 2001:db8:1::1.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="conops" title="Concept of Operations">
          <t>Again, with reference to <xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/>,
          when source host ('H1') sends a packet to destination host ('H2'),
          the packet is first forwarded over the source host's attached EUN to
          Client ('C1'). Client ('C1') then forwards the packet via its AERO
          interface to Server ('S1') and also sends a Predirect message toward
          Client ('C2') via Server ('S1'). Server ('S1') then re-encapsulates
          and forwards both the packet and the Predirect message out the same
          AERO interface toward Client ('C2') via Relay ('R1').</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the packet and Predirect message, it
          consults its forwarding table to discover Server ('S2') as the next
          hop toward Client ('C2'). Relay ('R1') then forwards both the packet
          and the Predirect message to Server ('S2'), which then forwards them
          to Client ('C2').</t>

          <t>After Client ('C2') receives the Predirect message, it process
          the message and returns a Redirect message toward Client ('C1') via
          Server ('S2'). During the process, Client ('C2') also creates or
          updates a dynamic neighbor cache entry for Client ('C1').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S2') receives the Redirect message, it
          re-encapsulates the message and forwards it on to Relay ('R1'),
          which forwards the message on to Server ('S1') which forwards the
          message on to Client ('C1'). After Client ('C1') receives the
          Redirect message, it processes the message and creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry for Client ('C2').</t>

          <t>Following the above Predirect/Redirect message exchange,
          forwarding of packets from Client ('C1') to Client ('C2') without
          involving any intermediate nodes is enabled. The mechanisms that
          support this exchange are specified in the following sections.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmsg" title="Message Format">
          <t>AERO Redirect/Predirect messages use the same format as for
          ICMPv6 Redirect messages depicted in Section 4.5 of <xref
          target="RFC4861"/>, but also include a new "Prefix Length" field
          taken from the low-order 8 bits of the Redirect message Reserved
          field. For IPv6, valid values for the Prefix Length field are 0
          through 64; for IPv4, valid values are 0 through 32. The
          Redirect/Predirect messages are formatted as shown in <xref
          target="aero-redirect"/>:</t>

          <figure anchor="aero-redirect"
                  title="AERO Redirect/Predirect Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Type (=137)  |  Code (=0/1)  |          Checksum             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Reserved                    | Prefix Length |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +                       Target Address                          +
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +                     Destination Address                       +
      |                                                               |
      +                                                               +
      |                                                               |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Options ...
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
]]></artwork>
          </figure>

          <t/>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sending_pre" title="Sending Predirects">
          <t>When a Client forwards a packet with a source address from one of
          its ACPs toward a destination address covered by an ASP (i.e.,
          toward another AERO Client connected to the same AERO link), the
          source Client MAY send a Predirect message forward toward the
          destination Client via the Server.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C1')
          forwards a packet toward Client ('C2'), it MAY also send a Predirect
          message forward toward Client ('C2'), subject to rate limiting (see
          Section 8.2 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>). Client ('C1') prepares the
          Predirect message as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the link-layer source address is set to 'L2(C1)' (i.e., the
              link-layer address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the link-layer destination address is set to 'L2(S1)' (i.e.,
              the link-layer address of Server ('S1')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer source address is set to fe80::2001:db8:0:0
              (i.e., the AERO address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer destination address is set to
              fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address of Client
              ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the Type is set to 137.</t>

              <t>the Code is set to 1 to indicate "Predirect".</t>

              <t>the Prefix Length is set to the length of the prefix to be
              assigned to the Target Address.</t>

              <t>the Target Address is set to fe80::2001:db8:0:0 (i.e., the
              AERO address of Client ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the Destination Address is set to the source address of the
              originating packet that triggered the Predirection event. (If
              the originating packet is an IPv4 packet, the address is
              constructed in IPv4-compatible IPv6 address format).</t>

              <t>the message includes one or more TLLAOs with Link ID and
              DSCPs set to appropriate values for Client ('C1')'s underlying
              interfaces, and with UDP Port Number and IP Address set to
              0'.</t>

              <t>the message SHOULD include a Timestamp option and a Nonce
              option.</t>

              <t>the message includes a Redirected Header Option (RHO) that
              contains the originating packet truncated if necessary to ensure
              that at least the network-layer header is included but the size
              of the message does not exceed 1280 bytes.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Note that the act of sending Predirect messages is cited as
          "MAY", since Client ('C1') may have advanced knowledge that the
          direct path to Client ('C2') would be unusable or otherwise
          undesirable. If the direct path later becomes unusable after the
          initial route optimization, Client ('C1') simply allows packets to
          again flow through Server ('S1').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relaying_pre"
                 title="Re-encapsulating and Relaying Predirects">
          <t>When Server ('S1') receives a Predirect message from Client
          ('C1'), it first verifies that the TLLAOs in the Predirect are a
          proper subset of the Link IDs in Client ('C1')'s neighbor cache
          entry. If the Client's TLLAOs are not acceptable, Server ('S1')
          discards the message. Otherwise, Server ('S1') validates the message
          according to the ICMPv6 Redirect message validation rules in Section
          8.1 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, except that the Predirect has
          Code=1. Server ('S1') also verifies that Client ('C1') is authorized
          to use the Prefix Length in the Predirect when applied to the AERO
          address in the network-layer source address by searching for the
          AERO address in the neighbor cache. If validation fails, Server
          ('S1') discards the Predirect; otherwise, it copies the correct UDP
          Port numbers and IP Addresses for Client ('C1')'s links into the
          (previously empty) TLLAOs.</t>

          <t>Server ('S1') then examines the network-layer destination address
          of the Predirect to determine the next hop toward Client ('C2') by
          searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. Since Client
          ('C2') is not one of its neighbors, Server ('S1') re-encapsulates
          the Predirect and relays it via Relay ('R1') by changing the
          link-layer source address of the message to 'L2(S1)' and changing
          the link-layer destination address to 'L2(R1)'. Server ('S1')
          finally forwards the re-encapsulated message to Relay ('R1') without
          decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the Predirect message from Server
          ('S1') it determines that Server ('S2') is the next hop toward
          Client ('C2') by consulting its forwarding table. Relay ('R1') then
          re-encapsulates the Predirect while changing the link-layer source
          address to 'L2(R1)' and changing the link-layer destination address
          to 'L2(S2)'. Relay ('R1') then relays the Predirect via Server
          ('S2').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S2') receives the Predirect message from Relay
          ('R1') it determines that Client ('C2') is a neighbor by consulting
          its neighbor cache. Server ('S2') then re-encapsulates the Predirect
          while changing the link-layer source address to 'L2(S2)' and
          changing the link-layer destination address to 'L2(C2)'. Server
          ('S2') then forwards the message to Client ('C2').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="processing_pre"
                 title="Processing Predirects and Sending Redirects">
          <t>When Client ('C2') receives the Predirect message, it accepts the
          Predirect only if the message has a link-layer source address of one
          of its Servers (e.g., L2(S2)). Client ('C2') further accepts the
          message only if it is willing to serve as a redirection target.
          Next, Client ('C2') validates the message according to the ICMPv6
          Redirect message validation rules in Section 8.1 of <xref
          target="RFC4861"/>, except that it accepts the message even though
          Code=1 and even though the network-layer source address is not that
          of it's current first-hop router.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C2')
          receives a valid Predirect message, it either creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry that stores the Target Address of the
          message as the network-layer address of Client ('C1') , stores the
          link-layer addresses found in the TLLAOs as the link-layer addresses
          of Client ('C1') and stores the Prefix Length as the length to be
          applied to the network-layer address for forwarding purposes. Client
          ('C2') then sets AcceptTime for the neighbor cache entry to
          ACCEPT_TIME.</t>

          <t>After processing the message, Client ('C2') prepares a Redirect
          message response as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the link-layer source address is set to 'L2(C2)' (i.e., the
              link-layer address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the link-layer destination address is set to 'L2(S2)' (i.e.,
              the link-layer address of Server ('S2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer source address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0
              (i.e., the AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer destination address is set to
              fe80::2001:db8:0:0 (i.e., the AERO address of Client
              ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the Type is set to 137.</t>

              <t>the Code is set to 0 to indicate "Redirect".</t>

              <t>the Prefix Length is set to the length of the prefix to be
              applied to the Target Address.</t>

              <t>the Target Address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the
              AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the Destination Address is set to the destination address of
              the originating packet that triggered the Redirection event. (If
              the originating packet is an IPv4 packet, the address is
              constructed in IPv4-compatible IPv6 address format).</t>

              <t>the message includes one or more TLLAOs with Link ID and
              DSCPs set to appropriate values for Client ('C2')'s underlying
              interfaces, and with UDP Port Number and IP Address set to
              '0'.</t>

              <t>the message SHOULD include a Timestamp option and MUST echo
              the Nonce option received in the Predirect (i.e., if a Nonce
              option is included).</t>

              <t>the message includes as much of the RHO copied from the
              corresponding AERO Predirect message as possible such that at
              least the network-layer header is included but the size of the
              message does not exceed 1280 bytes.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>After Client ('C2') prepares the Redirect message, it sends the
          message to Server ('S2').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relaying_re"
                 title="Re-encapsulating and Relaying Redirects">
          <t>When Server ('S2') receives a Redirect message from Client
          ('C2'), it first verifies that the TLLAOs in the Redirect are a
          proper subset of the Link IDs in Client ('C2')'s neighbor cache
          entry. If the Client's TLLAOs are not acceptable, Server ('S2')
          discards the message. Otherwise, Server ('S2') validates the message
          according to the ICMPv6 Redirect message validation rules in Section
          8.1 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Server ('S2') also verifies that
          Client ('C2') is authorized to use the Prefix Length in the Redirect
          when applied to the AERO address in the network-layer source address
          by searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. If
          validation fails, Server ('S2') discards the Predirect; otherwise,
          it copies the correct UDP Port numbers and IP Addresses for Client
          ('C2')'s links into the (previously empty) TLLAOs.</t>

          <t>Server ('S2') then examines the network-layer destination address
          of the Predirect to determine the next hop toward Client ('C2') by
          searching for the AERO address in the neighbor cache. Since Client
          ('C2') is not a neighbor, Server ('S2') re-encapsulates the
          Predirect and relays it via Relay ('R1') by changing the link-layer
          source address of the message to 'L2(S2)' and changing the
          link-layer destination address to 'L2(R1)'. Server ('S2') finally
          forwards the re-encapsulated message to Relay ('R1') without
          decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>

          <t>When Relay ('R1') receives the Predirect message from Server
          ('S2') it determines that Server ('S1') is the next hop toward
          Client ('C1') by consulting its forwarding table. Relay ('R1') then
          re-encapsulates the Predirect while changing the link-layer source
          address to 'L2(R1)' and changing the link-layer destination address
          to 'L2(S1)'. Relay ('R1') then relays the Predirect via Server
          ('S1').</t>

          <t>When Server ('S1') receives the Predirect message from Relay
          ('R1') it determines that Client ('C1') is a neighbor by consulting
          its neighbor cache. Server ('S1') then re-encapsulates the Predirect
          while changing the link-layer source address to 'L2(S1)' and
          changing the link-layer destination address to 'L2(C1)'. Server
          ('S1') then forwards the message to Client ('C1').</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="processing_re" title="Processing Redirects">
          <t>When Client ('C1') receives the Redirect message, it accepts the
          message only if it has a link-layer source address of one of its
          Servers (e.g., ''L2(S1)'). Next, Client ('C1') validates the message
          according to the ICMPv6 Redirect message validation rules in Section
          8.1 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, except that it accepts the message
          even though the network-layer source address is not that of it's
          current first-hop router. Following validation, Client ('C1') then
          processes the message as follows.</t>

          <t>In the reference operational scenario, when Client ('C1')
          receives the Redirect message, it either creates or updates a
          dynamic neighbor cache entry that stores the Target Address of the
          message as the network-layer address of Client ('C2'), stores the
          link-layer addresses found in the TLLAOs as the link-layer addresses
          of Client ('C2') and stores the Prefix Length as the length to be
          applied to the network-layer address for forwarding purposes. Client
          ('C1') then sets ForwardTime for the neighbor cache entry to
          FORWARD_TIME.</t>

          <t>Now, Client ('C1') has a neighbor cache entry with a valid
          ForwardTime value, while Client ('C2') has a neighbor cache entry
          with a valid AcceptTime value. Thereafter, Client ('C1') may forward
          ordinary network-layer data packets directly to Client ('C2')
          without involving any intermediate nodes, and Client ('C2') can
          verify that the packets came from an acceptable source. (In order
          for Client ('C2') to forward packets to Client ('C1'), a
          corresponding Predirect/Redirect message exchange is required in the
          reverse direction; hence, the mechanism is asymmetric.)</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="server_re" title="Server-Oriented Redirection">
          <t>In some environments, the Server nearest the target Client may
          need to serve as the redirection target, e.g., if direct
          Client-to-Client communications are not possible. In that case, the
          Server prepares the Redirect message the same as if it were the
          destination Client (see: <xref target="processing_pre"/>), except
          that it writes its own link-layer address in the TLLAO option. The
          Server must then maintain a dynamic neighbor cache entry for the
          redirected source Client.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nud" title="Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD)">
        <t>AERO nodes perform Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) by
        sending unicast NS messages to elicit solicited NA messages from
        neighbors the same as described in <xref target="RFC4861"/>. NUD is
        performed either reactively in response to persistent L2 errors (see
        <xref target="aeroerr"/>) or proactively to refresh existing neighbor
        cache entries.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node sends an NS/NA message, it MUST use its
        link-local address as the IPv6 source address and the link-local
        address of the neighbor as the IPv6 destination address. When an AERO
        node receives an NS message or a solicited NA message, it accepts the
        message if it has a neighbor cache entry for the neighbor; otherwise,
        it ignores the message.</t>

        <t>When a source Client is redirected to a target Client it SHOULD
        proactively test the direct path by sending an initial NS message to
        elicit a solicited NA response. While testing the path, the source
        Client can optionally continue sending packets via the Server,
        maintain a small queue of packets until target reachability is
        confirmed, or (optimistically) allow packets to flow directly to the
        target. The source Client SHOULD thereafter continue to proactively
        test the direct path to the target Client (see Section 7.3 of <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>) periodically in order to keep dynamic neighbor
        cache entries alive.</t>

        <t>In particular, while the source Client is actively sending packets
        to the target Client it SHOULD also send NS messages separated by
        RETRANS_TIMER milliseconds in order to receive solicited NA messages.
        If the source Client is unable to elicit a solicited NA response from
        the target Client after MAX_RETRY attempts, it SHOULD set ForwardTime
        to 0 and resume sending packets via one of its Servers. Otherwise, the
        source Client considers the path usable and SHOULD thereafter process
        any link-layer errors as a hint that the direct path to the target
        Client has either failed or has become intermittent.</t>

        <t>When a target Client receives an NS message from a source Client,
        it resets AcceptTime to ACCEPT_TIME if a neighbor cache entry exists;
        otherwise, it discards the NS message. If ForwardTime is non-zero, the
        target Client then sends a solicited NA message to the link-layer
        address of the source Client; otherwise, it sends the solicited NA
        message to the link-layer address of one of its Servers.</t>

        <t>When a source Client receives a solicited NA message from a target
        Client, it resets ForwardTime to FORWARD_TIME if a neighbor cache
        entry exists; otherwise, it discards the NA message.</t>

        <t>When ForwardTime for a dynamic neighbor cache entry expires, the
        source Client resumes sending any subsequent packets via a Server and
        may (eventually) attempt to re-initiate the AERO redirection process.
        When AcceptTime for a dynamic neighbor cache entry expires, the target
        Client discards any subsequent packets received directly from the
        source Client. When both ForwardTime and AcceptTime for a dynamic
        neighbor cache entry expire, the Client deletes the neighbor cache
        entry.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromob" title="Mobility Management">
        <section anchor="llchange"
                 title="Announcing Link-Layer Address Changes">
          <t>When a Client needs to change its link-layer address, e.g., due
          to a mobility event, it performs an immediate DHCPv6 Rebind/Reply
          exchange via each of its Servers using the new link-layer address as
          the source address and with an ALREQ that includes the correct Link
          ID and DSCP values. If authentication succeeds, the Server then
          update its neighbor cache and sends a DHCPv6 Reply. Note that if the
          Client does not issue a DHCPv6 Rebind before the prefix delegation
          lifetime expires (e.g., if the Client has been out of touch with the
          Server for a considerable amount of time), the Server's Reply will
          report NoBinding and the Client must re-initiate the DHCPv6 PD
          procedure.</t>

          <t>Next, the Client sends unsolicited NA messages to each of its
          correspondent Client neighbors using the same procedures as
          specified in Section 7.2.6 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, except that
          it sends the messages as unicast to each neighbor via a Server
          instead of multicast. In this process, the Client should send no
          more than MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT messages separated by no less
          than RETRANS_TIMER seconds to each neighbor.</t>

          <t>With reference to <xref target="no-onlink-prefix-fig"/>, when
          Client ('C2') needs to change its link-layer address it sends
          unicast unsolicited NA messages to Client ('C1') via Server ('S2')
          as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>the link-layer source address is set to 'L2(C2)' (i.e., the
              link-layer address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the link-layer destination address is set to 'L2(S2)' (i.e.,
              the link-layer address of Server ('S2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer source address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0
              (i.e., the AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the network-layer destination address is set to
              fe80::2001:db8:0:0 (i.e., the AERO address of Client
              ('C1')).</t>

              <t>the Type is set to 136.</t>

              <t>the Code is set to 0.</t>

              <t>the Solicited flag is set to 0.</t>

              <t>the Override flag is set to 1.</t>

              <t>the Target Address is set to fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the
              AERO address of Client ('C2')).</t>

              <t>the message includes one or more TLLAOs with Link ID and
              DSCPs set to appropriate values for Client ('C2')'s underlying
              interfaces, and with UDP Port Number and IP Address set to
              '0'.</t>

              <t>the message SHOULD include a Timestamp option.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>When Server ('S1') receives the NA message, it relays the message
          in the same way as described for relaying Redirect messages in <xref
          target="relaying_re"/>. In particular, Server ('S1') copies the
          correct UDP port numbers and IP addresses into the TLLAOs, changes
          the link-layer source address to its own address, changes the
          link-layer destination address to the address of Relay ('R1'), then
          forwards the NA message via the relaying chain the same as for a
          Redirect.</t>

          <t>When Client ('C1') receives the NA message, it accepts the
          message only if it already has a neighbor cache entry for Client
          ('C2') then updates the link-layer addresses for Client ('C2') based
          on the addresses in the TLLAOs. Next, Client ('C1') SHOULD initiate
          the NUD procedures specified in <xref target="nud"/> to provide
          Client ('C2') with an indication that the link-layer source address
          has been updated, and to refresh ('C2')'s AcceptTime and ('C1')'s
          ForwardTime timers.</t>

          <t>If Client ('C2') receives an NS message from Client ('C1')
          indicating that an unsolicited NA has updated its neighbor cache,
          Client ('C2') need not send additional unsolicited NAs. If Client
          ('C2')'s unsolicited NA messages are somehow lost, however, Client
          ('C1') will soon learn of the mobility event via NUD.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newlink" title="Bringing New Links Into Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to bring a new underlying interface into
          service (e.g., when it activates a new data link), it performs an
          immediate Rebind/Reply exchange via each of its Servers using the
          new link-layer address as the source address and with an ALREQ that
          includes the new Link ID and DSCP values. If authentication
          succeeds, the Server then updates its neighbor cache and sends a
          DHCPv6 Reply. The Client MAY then send unsolicited NA messages to
          each of its correspondent Clients to inform them of the new
          link-layer address as described in <xref target="llchange"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmlink" title="Removing Existing Links from Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to remove an existing underlying interface
          from service (e.g., when it de-activates an existing data link), it
          performs an immediate Rebind/Reply exchange via each of its Servers
          over any available link with an ALDEL that includes the deprecated
          Link ID. If authentication succeeds, the Server then updates its
          neighbor cache and sends a DHCPv6 Reply. The Client SHOULD then send
          unsolicited NA messages to each of its correspondent Clients to
          inform them of the deprecated link-layer address as described in
          <xref target="llchange"/>.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newsrv" title="Moving to a New Server">
          <t>When a Client associates with a new Server, it performs the
          Client procedures specified in <xref target="aeropd-client"/>.</t>

          <t>When a Client disassociates with an existing Server, it sends a
          DHCPv6 Release message via a new Server to the unicast link-local
          network layer address of the old Server. The new Server then writes
          its own link-layer address in the DHCPv6 Release message IP source
          address and forwards the message to the old Server.</t>

          <t>When the old Server receives the DHCPv6 Release, it first
          authenticates the message. The Server then resets the Client's
          neighbor cache entry lifetime to 5 seconds, rewrites the link-layer
          address in the neighbor cache entry to the address of the new
          Server, then returns a DHCPv6 Reply message to the Client via the
          old Server. When the lifetime expires, the old Server withdraws the
          IP route from the AERO routing system and deletes the neighbor cache
          entry for the Client. The Client can then use the Reply message to
          verify that the termination signal has been processed, and can
          delete both the default route and the neighbor cache entry for the
          old Server. (Note that since Release/Reply messages may be lost in
          the network the Client MUST retry until it gets Reply indicating
          that the Release was successful.)</t>

          <t>Clients SHOULD NOT move rapidly between Servers in order to avoid
          causing excessive oscillations in the AERO routing system. Such
          oscillations could result in intermittent reachability for the
          Client itself, while causing little harm to the network. Examples of
          when a Client might wish to change to a different Server include a
          Server that has gone unreachable, topological movements of
          significant distance, etc.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="proxy" title="Proxy AERO">
        <t>Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) <xref target="RFC5213"/><xref
        target="RFC5844"/><xref target="RFC5949"/> presents a localized
        mobility management scheme for use within an access network domain. It
        is typically used in WiFi and cellular wireless access networks, and
        allows Mobile Nodes (MNs) to receive and retain an IP address that
        remains stable within the access network domain without needing to
        implement any special mobility protocols. In the PMIPv6 architecture,
        access network devices known as Mobility Access Gateways (MAGs)
        provide MNs with an access link abstraction and receive prefixes for
        the MNs from a Local Mobility Anchor (LMA).</t>

        <t>In a proxy AERO domain, a proxy AERO Client (acting as a MAG) can
        similarly provide proxy services for MNs that do not participate in
        AERO messaging. The proxy Client presents an access link abstraction
        to MNs, and performs DHCPv6 PD exchanges over the AERO interface with
        an AERO Server (acting as an LMA) to receive ACPs for address
        provisioning of new MNs that come onto an access link. This scheme
        assumes that proxy Clients act as fixed (non-mobile) infrastructure
        elements under the same administrative trust basis as for Relays and
        Servers.</t>

        <t>When an MN comes onto an access link within a proxy AERO domain for
        the first time, the proxy Client authenticates the MN and obtains a
        unique identifier that it can use as a DHCPv6 DUID then issues a
        DHCPv6 PD Request to its Server. When the Server delegates an ACP, the
        proxy Client creates an AERO address for the MN and assigns the ACP to
        the MN's access link. The proxy Client then configures itself as a
        default router for the MN and provides address autoconfiguration
        services (e.g., SLAAC, DHCPv6, DHCPv4, etc.) for provisioning MN
        addresses from the ACP over the access link. Since the proxy Client
        may serve many such MNs simultaneously, it may receive multiple ACP
        prefix delegations and configure multiple AERO addresses, i.e., one
        for each MN.</t>

        <t>When two MNs are associated with the same proxy Client, the Client
        can forward traffic between the MNs without involving a Server since
        it configures the AERO addresses of both MNs and therefore also has
        the necessary routing information. When two MNs are associated with
        different proxy Clients, the source MN's Client can initiate standard
        AERO route optimization to discover a direct path to the target MN's
        Client through the exchange of Predirect/Redirect messages.</t>

        <t>When an MN in a proxy AERO domain leaves an access link provided by
        an old proxy Client, the MN issues an access link-specific "leave"
        message that informs the old Client of the link-layer address of a new
        Client on the planned new access link. This is known as a "predictive
        handover". When an MN comes onto an access link provided by a new
        proxy Client, the MN issues an access link-specific "join" message
        that informs the new Client of the link-layer address of the old
        Client on the actual old access link. This is known as a "reactive
        handover".</t>

        <t>Upon receiving a predictive handover indication, the old proxy
        Client sends a DHCPv6 PD Request message directly to the new Client
        and queues any arriving data packets addressed to the departed MN. The
        Request message includes the MN's ID as the DUID, the ACP in an IA_PD
        option, the old Client's address as the link-layer source address and
        the new Client's address as the link-layer destination address. When
        the new Client receives the Request message, it changes the link-layer
        source address to its own address, changes the link-layer destination
        address to the address of its Server, and forwards the message to the
        Server. At the same time, the new Client creates access link state for
        the ACP in anticipation of the MN's arrival (while queuing any data
        packets until the MN arrives), creates a neighbor cache entry for the
        old Client with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME, then sends a Redirect
        message back to the old Client. When the old Client receives the
        Redirect message, it creates a neighbor cache entry for the new Client
        with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, then forwards any queued data
        packets to the new Client. At the same time, the old Client sends a
        DHCPv6 PD Release message to its Server. Finally, the old Client sends
        unsolicited NA messages to any of the ACP's correspondents with a
        TLLAO containing the link-layer address of the new Client. This
        follows the procedure specified in <xref target="llchange"/>, except
        that it is the old Client and not the Server that supplies the
        link-layer address.</t>

        <t>Upon receiving a reactive handover indication, the new proxy Client
        creates access link state for the MN's ACP, sends a DHCPv6 PD Request
        message to its Server, and sends a DHCPv6 PD Release message directly
        to the old Client. The Release message includes the MN's ID as the
        DUID, the ACP in an IA_PD option, the new Client's address as the
        link-layer source address and the old Client's address as the
        link-layer destination address. When the old Client receives the
        Release message, it changes the link-layer source address to its own
        address, changes the link-layer destination address to the address of
        its Server, and forwards the message to the Server. At the same time,
        the old Client sends a Predirect message back to the new Client and
        queues any arriving data packets addressed to the departed MN. When
        the new Client receives the Predirect, it creates a neighbor cache
        entry for the old Client with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME, then
        sends a Redirect message back to the old Client. When the old Client
        receives the Redirect message, it creates a neighbor cache entry for
        the new Client with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, then forwards any
        queued data packets to the new Client. Finally, the old Client sends
        unsolicited NA messages to correspondents the same as for the
        predictive case.</t>

        <t>When a Server processes a DHCPv6 Request message, it creates a
        neighbor cache entry for this ACP if none currently exists. If a
        neighbor cache entry already exists, however, the Server changes the
        link-layer address to the address of the new proxy Client (this
        satisfies the case of both the old Client and new Client using the
        same Server).</t>

        <t>When a Server processes a DHCPv6 Release message, it resets the
        neighbor cache entry lifetime for this ACP to 5 seconds if the cached
        link-layer address matches the old proxy Client's address. Otherwise,
        the Server ignores the Release message (this satisfies the case of
        both the old Client and new Client using the same Server).</t>

        <t>When a correspondent Client receives an unsolicited NA message, it
        changes the link-layer address for the ACP's neighbor cache entry to
        the address of the new proxy Client. The correspondent Client then
        issues a Predirect/Redirect exchange to establish a new neighbor cache
        entry in the new Client.</t>

        <t>From an architectural perspective, in addition to the use of DHCPv6
        PD and IPv6 ND signaling the AERO approach differs from PMIPv6 in its
        use of the NBMA virtual link model instead of point-to-point tunnels.
        This provides a more agile interface for Client/Server and
        Client/Client coordinations, and also facilitates simple route
        optimization. The AERO routing system is also arranged in such a
        fashion that Clients get the same service from any Server they happen
        to associate with. This provides a natural fault tolerance and load
        balancing capability such as desired for distributed mobility
        management.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="securitygw"
               title="Extending AERO Links Through Security Gateways">
        <t>When an enterprise mobile device moves from a campus LAN connection
        to a public Internet link, it must re-enter the enterprise via a
        security gateway that has both a physical interface connection to the
        Internet and a physical interface connection to the enterprise
        internetwork. This most often entails the establishment of a Virtual
        Private Network (VPN) link over the public Internet from the mobile
        device to the security gateway. During this process, the mobile device
        supplies the security gateway with its public Internet address as the
        link-layer address for the VPN. The mobile device then acts as an AERO
        Client to negotiate with the security gateway to obtain its ACP.</t>

        <t>In order to satisfy this need, the security gateway also operates
        as an AERO Server with support for AERO Client proxying. In
        particular, when a mobile device (i.e., the Client) connects via the
        security gateway (i.e., the Server), the Server provides the Client
        with an ACP in a DHCPv6 PD exchange the same as if it were attached to
        an enterprise campus access link. The Server then replaces the
        Client's link-layer source address with the Server's enterprise-facing
        link-layer address in all AERO messages the Client sends toward
        neighbors on the AERO link. The AERO messages are then delivered to
        other devices on the AERO link as if they were originated by the
        security gateway instead of by the AERO Client. In the reverse
        direction, the AERO messages sourced by devices within the enterprise
        network can be forwarded to the security gateway, which then replaces
        the link-layer destination address with the Client's link-layer
        address and replaces the link-layer source address with its own
        (Internet-facing) link-layer address.</t>

        <t>After receiving the ACP, the Client can send IP packets that use an
        address taken from the ACP as the network layer source address, the
        Client's link-layer address as the link-layer source address, and the
        Server's Internet-facing link-layer address as the link-layer
        destination address. The Server will then rewrite the link-layer
        source address with the Server's own enterprise-facing link-layer
        address and rewrite the link-layer destination address with the target
        AERO node's link-layer address, and the packets will enter the
        enterprise network as though they were sourced from a device located
        within the enterprise. In the reverse direction, when a packet sourced
        by a node within the enterprise network uses a destination address
        from the Client's ACP, the packet will be delivered to the security
        gateway which then rewrites the link-layer destination address to the
        Client's link-layer address and rewrites the link-layer source address
        to the Server's Internet-facing link-layer address. The Server then
        delivers the packet across the VPN to the AERO Client. In this way,
        the AERO virtual link is essentially extended *through* the security
        gateway to the point at which the VPN link and AERO link are
        effectively grafted together by the link-layer address rewriting
        performed by the security gateway. All AERO messaging services
        (including route optimization and mobility signaling) are therefore
        extended to the Client.</t>

        <t>In order to support this virtual link grafting, the security
        gateway (acting as an AERO Server) must keep static neighbor cache
        entries for all of its associated Clients located on the public
        Internet. The neighbor cache entry is keyed by the AERO Client's AERO
        address the same as if the Client were located within the enterprise
        internetwork. The neighbor cache is then managed in all ways as though
        the Client were an ordinary AERO Client. This includes the AERO IPv6
        ND messaging signaling for Route Optimization and Neighbor
        Unreachability Detection.</t>

        <t>Note that the main difference between a security gateway acting as
        an AERO Server and an enterprise-internal AERO Server is that the
        security gateway has at least one enterprise-internal physical
        interface and at least one public Internet physical interface.
        Conversely, the enterprise-internal AERO Server has only
        enterprise-internal physical interfaces. For this reason security
        gateway proxying is needed to ensure that the public Internet
        link-layer addressing space is kept separate from the
        enterprise-internal link-layer addressing space. This is afforded
        through a natural extension of the security association caching
        already performed for each VPN client by the security gateway.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerointernet"
               title="Extending IPv6 AERO Links to the Internet">
        <t>When an IPv6 host ('H1') with an address from an ACP owned by AERO
        Client ('C1') sends packets to a correspondent IPv6 host ('H2'), the
        packets eventually arrive at the IPv6 router that owns ('H2')s prefix.
        This IPv6 router may or may not be an AERO Client ('C2') either within
        the same home network as ('C1') or in a different home network.</t>

        <t>If Client ('C1') is currently located outside the boundaries of its
        home network, it will connect back into the home network via a
        security gateway acting as an AERO Server. The packets sent by ('H1')
        via ('C1') will then be forwarded through the security gateway then
        through the home network and finally to ('C2') where they will be
        delivered to ('H2'). This could lead to sub-optimal performance when
        ('C2') could instead be reached via a more direct route without
        involving the security gateway.</t>

        <t>Consider the case when host ('H1') has the IPv6 address
        2001:db8:1::1, and Client ('C1') has the ACP 2001:db8:1::/64 with
        underlying IPv6 Internet address of 2001:db8:1000::1. Also, host
        ('H2') has the IPv6 address 2001:db8:2::1, and Client ('C2') has the
        ACP 2001:db8:2::/64 with underlying IPv6 address of 2001:db8:2000::1.
        Client ('C1') can determine whether 'C2' is indeed also an AERO Client
        willing to serve as a route optimization correspondent by resolving
        the AAAA records for the DNS FQDN that matches ('H2')s prefix,
        i.e.:<vspace
        blankLines="1"/>'0.0.0.0.2.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.aero.linkupnetworks.net'</t>

        <t>If ('C2') is indeed a candidate correspondent, the FQDN lookup will
        return a PTR resource record that contains the domain name for the
        AERO link that manages ('C2')s ASP. Client ('C1') can then attempt
        route optimization using an approach similar to the Return Routability
        procedure specified for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) <xref target="RFC6275"/>.
        In order to support this process, both Clients MUST intercept and
        decapsulate packets that have a subnet router anycast address
        corresponding to any of the /64 prefixes covered by their respective
        ACPs.</t>

        <t>To initiate the process, Client ('C1') creates a specially-crafted
        encapsulated AERO Predirect message that will be routed through its
        home network then through ('C2')s home network and finally to ('C2')
        itself. Client ('C1') prepares the initial message in the exchange as
        follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header source address is set to
            2001:db8:1:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C1')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header destination address is set to
            2001:db8:2:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C2')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header is followed by a UDP header with
            source and destination port set to 8060</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header source address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header destination address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:2:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C2'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated AERO Predirect message includes all of the
            securing information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Home Test Init"
            message (format TBD)</t>
          </list>Client ('C1') then further encapsulates the message in the
        encapsulating headers necessary to convey the packet to the security
        gateway (e.g., through IPsec encapsulation) so that the message now
        appears "double-encapsulated". ('C1') then sends the message to the
        security gateway, which re-encapsulates and forwards it over the home
        network from where it will eventually reach ('C2').</t>

        <t>At the same time, ('C1') creates and sends a second encapsulated
        AERO Predirect message that will be routed through the IPv6 Internet
        without involving the security gateway. Client ('C1') prepares the
        message as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header source address is set to
            2001:db8:1000:1 (i.e., the Internet IPv6 address of ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header destination address is set to
            2001:db8:2:: (i.e., the IPv6 subnet router anycast address for
            ('C2')s ACP)</t>

            <t>The encapsulating IPv6 header is followed by a UDP header with
            source and destination port set to 8060</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header source address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:1:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C1'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated IPv6 header destination address is set to
            fe80::2001:db8:2:0 (i.e., the AERO address for ('C2'))</t>

            <t>The encapsulated AERO Predirect message includes all of the
            securing information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Care-of Test
            Init" message (format TBD)</t>
          </list>('C2') will receive both Predirect messages through its home
        network then return a corresponding Redirect for each of the Predirect
        messages with the source and destination addresses in the inner and
        outer headers reversed. The first message includes all of the securing
        information that would occur in a MIPv6 "Home Test" message, while the
        second message includes all of the securing information that would
        occur in a MIPv6 "Care-of Test" message (formats TBD).</t>

        <t>When ('C1') receives the Redirect messages, it performs the
        necessary security procedures per the MIPv6 specification. It then
        prepares an encapsulated NS message that includes the same source and
        destination addresses as for the "Care-of Test Init" Predirect
        message, and includes all of the securing information that would occur
        in a MIPv6 "Binding Update" message (format TBD) and sends the message
        to ('C2').</t>

        <t>When ('C2') receives the NS message, if the securing information is
        correct it creates or updates a neighbor cache entry for ('C1') with
        fe80::2001:db8:1:0 as the network-layer address, 2001:db8:1000::1 as
        the link-layer address and with AcceptTime set to ACCEPT_TIME. ('C2')
        then sends an encapsulated NA message back to ('C1') that includes the
        same source and destination addresses as for the "Care-of Test"
        Redirect message, and includes all of the securing information that
        would occur in a MIPv6 "Binding Acknowledgement" message (format TBD)
        and sends the message to ('C1').</t>

        <t>When ('C1') receives the NA message, it creates or updates a
        neighbor cache entry for ('C2') with fe80::2001:db8:2:0 as the
        network-layer address and 2001:db8:2:: as the link-layer address and
        with ForwardTime set to FORWARD_TIME, thus completing the route
        optimization in the forward direction.</t>

        <t>('C1') subsequently forwards encapsulated packets with outer source
        address 2001:db8:1000::1, with outer destination address 2001:db8:2::,
        with inner source address taken from the 2001:db8:1::, and with inner
        destination address taken from 2001:db8:2:: due to the fact that it
        has a securely-established neighbor cache entry with non-zero
        ForwardTime. ('C2') subsequently accepts any such encapsulated packets
        due to the fact that it has a securely-established neighbor cache
        entry with non-zero AcceptTime.</t>

        <t>In order to keep neighbor cache entries alive, ('C1') periodically
        sends additional NS messages to ('C2') and receives any NA responses.
        If ('C1') moves to a different point of attachment after the initial
        route optimization, it sends a new secured NS message to ('C2') as
        above to update ('C2')s neighbor cache.</t>

        <t>If ('C2') has packets to send to ('C1'), it performs a
        corresponding route optimization in the opposite direction following
        the same procedures described above. In the process, the
        already-established unidirectional neighbor cache entries within
        ('C1') and ('C2') are updated to include the now-bidirectional
        information. In particular, the AcceptTime and ForwardTime variables
        for both neighbor cache entries are updated to non-zero values, and
        the link-layer address for ('C1')s neighbor cache entry for ('C2') is
        reset to 2001:db8:2000::1.</t>

        <t>Note that two AERO Clients can use full security protocol messaging
        instead of Return Routability, e.g., if strong authentication and/or
        confidentiality are desired. In that case, security protocol key
        exchanges such as specified for MOBIKE <xref target="RFC4555"/> would
        be used to establish security associations and neighbor cache entries
        between the AERO clients. Thereafter, AERO NS/NA messaging can be used
        to maintain neighbor cache entries, test reachability, and to announce
        mobility events. If reachability testing fails, e.g., if both Clients
        move at roughly the same time, the Clients can tear down the security
        association and neighbor cache entries and again allow packets to flow
        through their home network.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="version"
               title="Encapsulation Protocol Version Considerations">
        <t>A source Client may connect only to an IPvX underlying network,
        while the target Client connects only to an IPvY underlying network.
        In that case, the target and source Clients have no means for reaching
        each other directly (since they connect to underlying networks of
        different IP protocol versions) and so must ignore any redirection
        messages and continue to send packets via the Server.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="mcast" title="Multicast Considerations">
        <t>When the underlying network does not support multicast, AERO nodes
        map IPv6 link-scoped multicast addresses (including
        'All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers') to the link-layer address of a
        Server.</t>

        <t>When the underlying network supports multicast, AERO nodes use the
        multicast address mapping specification found in <xref
        target="RFC2529"/> for IPv4 underlying networks and use a direct
        multicast mapping for IPv6 underlying networks. (In the latter case,
        "direct multicast mapping" means that if the IPv6 multicast
        destination address of the encapsulated packet is "M", then the IPv6
        multicast destination address of the encapsulating header is also
        "M".)</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nodhcp"
               title="Operation on AERO Links Without DHCPv6 Services">
        <t>When Servers on the AERO link do not provide DHCPv6 services,
        operation can still be accommodated through administrative
        configuration of ACPs on AERO Clients. In that case, administrative
        configurations of AERO interface neighbor cache entries on both the
        Server and Client are also necessary. However, this may interfere with
        the ability for Clients to dynamically change to new Servers, and can
        expose the AERO link to misconfigurations unless the administrative
        configurations are carefully coordinated.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="serverless" title="Operation on Server-less AERO Links">
        <t>In some AERO link scenarios, there may be no Servers on the link
        and/or no need for Clients to use a Server as an intermediary trust
        anchor. In that case, each Client acts as a Server unto itself to
        establish neighbor cache entries by performing direct Client-to-Client
        IPv6 ND message exchanges, and some other form of trust basis must be
        applied so that each Client can verify that the prospective neighbor
        is authorized to use its claimed ACP.</t>

        <t>When there is no Server on the link, Clients must arrange to
        receive ACPs and publish them via a secure alternate prefix delegation
        authority through some means outside the scope of this document.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="static-tunnel" title="Manually-Configured AERO Tunnels">
        <t>In addition to the dynamic neighbor discovery procedures for AERO
        link neighbors described above, AERO encapsulation can be applied to
        manually-configured tunnels. In that case, the tunnel endpoints use an
        administratively-assigned link-local address and exchange NS/NA
        messages the same as for dynamically-established tunnels.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="intra-route" title="Intradomain Routing">
        <t>After a tunnel neighbor relationship has been established,
        neighbors can use a traditional dynamic routing protocol over the
        tunnel to exchange routing information without having to inject the
        routes into the AERO routing system.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="implement" title="Implementation Status">
      <t>User-level and kernel-level AERO implementations have been developed
      and are undergoing internal testing within Boeing.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="next" title="Next Steps">
      <t>A new Generic UDP Encapsulation (GUE) format has been specified in
      <xref target="I-D.herbert-gue-fragmentation"/> <xref
      target="I-D.ietf-nvo3-gue"/>. The GUE encapsulation format will
      eventually supplant the native AERO UDP encapsulation format.</t>

      <t>Future versions of the spec will explore the subject of DSCP marking
      in more detail.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>The IANA has assigned a 4-octet Private Enterprise Number "45282" for
      AERO in the "enterprise-numbers" registry.</t>

      <t>The IANA has assigned the UDP port number "8060" for an earlier
      experimental version of AERO <xref target="RFC6706"/>. This document
      obsoletes <xref target="RFC6706"/> and claims the UDP port number "8060"
      for all future use.</t>

      <t>No further IANA actions are required.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="secure" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>AERO link security considerations are the same as for standard IPv6
      Neighbor Discovery <xref target="RFC4861"/> except that AERO improves on
      some aspects. In particular, AERO uses a trust basis between Clients and
      Servers, where the Clients only engage in the AERO mechanism when it is
      facilitated by a trust anchor. Unless there is some other means of
      authenticating the Client's identity (e.g., link-layer security), AERO
      nodes SHOULD also use DHCPv6 securing services (e.g., DHCPv6
      authentication, Secure DHCPv6 <xref target="I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6"/>,
      etc.) for Client authentication and network admission control. In
      particular, Clients SHOULD include authenticating information on each
      Request/Rebind/Release message they send, but omit authenticating
      information on Renew messages. Renew messages are exempt due to the fact
      that the Renew must already be checked for having a correct link-layer
      address and does not update any link-layer addresses. Therefore, asking
      the Server to also authenticate the Renew message would be unnecessary
      and could result in excessive processing overhead.</t>

      <t>AERO Redirect, Predirect and unsolicited NA messages SHOULD include a
      Timestamp option (see Section 5.3 of <xref target="RFC3971"/>) that
      other AERO nodes can use to verify the message time of origin. AERO
      Predirect, NS and RS messages SHOULD include a Nonce option (see Section
      5.3 of <xref target="RFC3971"/>) that recipients echo back in
      corresponding responses.</t>

      <t>AERO links must be protected against link-layer address spoofing
      attacks in which an attacker on the link pretends to be a trusted
      neighbor. Links that provide link-layer securing mechanisms (e.g., IEEE
      802.1X WLANs) and links that provide physical security (e.g., enterprise
      network wired LANs) provide a first line of defense that is often
      sufficient. In other instances, additional securing mechanisms such as
      Secure Neighbor Discovery (SeND) <xref target="RFC3971"/>, IPsec <xref
      target="RFC4301"/> or TLS <xref target="RFC5246"/> may be necessary.</t>

      <t>AERO Clients MUST ensure that their connectivity is not used by
      unauthorized nodes on their EUNs to gain access to a protected network,
      i.e., AERO Clients that act as routers MUST NOT provide routing services
      for unauthorized nodes. (This concern is no different than for ordinary
      hosts that receive an IP address delegation but then "share" the address
      with unauthorized nodes via a NAT function.)</t>

      <t>On some AERO links, establishment and maintenance of a direct path
      between neighbors requires secured coordination such as through the
      Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) protocol <xref target="RFC5996"/> to
      establish a security association.</t>

      <t>An AERO Client's link-layer address could be rewritten by a
      link-layer switching element on the path from the Client to the Server
      and not detected by the DHCPv6 security mechanism. However, such a
      condition would only be a matter of concern on unmanaged/unsecured links
      where the link-layer switching elements themselves present a
      man-in-the-middle attack threat. For this reason, IP security MUST be
      used when AERO is employed over unmanaged/unsecured links.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>Discussions both on IETF lists and in private exchanges helped shape
      some of the concepts in this work. Individuals who contributed insights
      include Mikael Abrahamsson, Mark Andrews, Fred Baker, Stewart Bryant,
      Brian Carpenter, Wojciech Dec, Ralph Droms, Adrian Farrel, Sri
      Gundavelli, Brian Haberman, Joel Halpern, Tom Herbert, Sascha Hlusiak,
      Lee Howard, Andre Kostur, Ted Lemon, Andy Malis, Satoru Matsushima,
      Tomek Mrugalski, Alexandru Petrescu, Behcet Saikaya, Joe Touch, Bernie
      Volz, Ryuji Wakikawa and Lloyd Wood. Members of the IESG also provided
      valuable input during their review process that greatly improved the
      document. Special thanks go to Stewart Bryant, Joel Halpern and Brian
      Haberman for their shepherding guidance.</t>

      <t>This work has further been encouraged and supported by Boeing
      colleagues including Dave Bernhardt, Cam Brodie, Balaguruna Chidambaram,
      Bruce Cornish, Claudiu Danilov, Wen Fang, Anthony Gregory, Jeff Holland,
      Ed King, Gen MacLean, Rob Muszkiewicz, Sean O'Sullivan, Kent Shuey,
      Brian Skeen, Mike Slane, Brendan Williams, Julie Wulff, Yueli Yang, and
      other members of the BR&amp;T and BIT mobile networking teams.</t>

      <t>Earlier works on NBMA tunneling approaches are found in <xref
      target="RFC2529"/><xref target="RFC5214"/><xref target="RFC5569"/>.</t>

      <t>Many of the constructs presented in this second edition of AERO are
      based on the author's earlier works, including:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) <xref
          target="RFC6179"/><xref target="I-D.templin-ironbis"/></t>

          <t>Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) <xref target="RFC5558"/><xref
          target="I-D.templin-intarea-vet"/></t>

          <t>The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) <xref
          target="RFC5320"/><xref target="I-D.templin-intarea-seal"/></t>

          <t>AERO, First Edition <xref target="RFC6706"/></t>
        </list>Note that these works cite numerous earlier efforts that are
      not also cited here due to space limitations. The authors of those
      earlier works are acknowledged for their insights.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0768"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0791"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0792"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2003"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2460"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2473"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2474"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4861"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4862"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6434"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3633"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3315"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3971"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2675"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1930"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2529"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5214"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4301"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5569"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6204"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6980"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0879"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4821"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6691"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6935"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6936"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6438"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6706"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4963"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6864"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7078"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5996"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6939"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5522"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4994"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5494"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5246"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6355"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2923"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3819"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1812"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2131"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5844"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6275"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4555"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1981"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4592"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3596"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6179"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5320"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5558"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5720"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2784"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5949"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6241"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2983"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3168"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2764"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6221"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6422"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4511"?>

      <reference anchor="TUNTAP">
        <front>
          <title>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TUN/TAP</title>

          <author fullname="Wikipedia" initials="W" surname="Wikipedia">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2014"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-ironbis"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-seal"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-vet"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.herbert-gue-fragmentation"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-nvo3-gue"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.vandevelde-idr-remote-next-hop"?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
