<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc strict='yes'?>
<?rfc iprnotified='no'?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-26"
     ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="rfc5320, rfc5558, rfc5720, rfc6179, rfc6706">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="AERO">Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)</title>

    <author fullname="Fred L. Templin" initials="F. L." role="editor"
            surname="Templin">
      <organization>Boeing Research &amp; Technology</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 3707</street>

          <city>Seattle</city>

          <region>WA</region>

          <code>98124</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>fltemplin@acm.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="6" month="February" year="2020"/>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies the operation of IP over tunnel virtual links
      using Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO). AERO interfaces use
      an IPv6 link-local address format that supports operation of the IPv6
      Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol and links ND to IP forwarding. Prefix
      delegation/registration services are employed for network admission and
      to manage the routing system. Multilink operation, mobility management,
      quality of service (QoS) signaling and route optimization are naturally
      supported through dynamic neighbor cache updates. Standard IP
      multicasting services are also supported. AERO is a widely-applicable
      mobile internetworking service especially well-suited to aviation
      services, mobile Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and many other
      applications.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO) fulfills the
      requirements of Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) <xref
      target="RFC7333"/> and route optimization <xref target="RFC5522"/> for
      aeronautical networking and other network mobility use cases. AERO is
      based on a Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access (NBMA) virtual link model
      known as the AERO link. The AERO link is a virtual overlay configured
      over one or more underlying Internetworks, and nodes on the link can
      exchange IP packets via tunneling. Multilink operation allows for
      increased reliability, bandwidth optimization and traffic path
      diversity.</t>

      <t>The AERO service comprises Clients, Proxys, Servers and Gateways that
      are seen as AERO link neighbors. Each node's AERO interface uses an IPv6
      link-local address format (known as the AERO address) that supports
      operation of the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol <xref
      target="RFC4861"/> and links ND to IP forwarding. A node's AERO
      interface can be configured over multiple underlying interfaces, and may
      therefore may appear as a single interface with multiple link-layer
      addresses. Each link-layer address is subject to change due to mobility
      and/or QoS fluctuations, and link-layer address changes are signaled by
      ND messaging the same as for any IPv6 link.</t>

      <t>AERO links provide a cloud-based service where mobile nodes may use
      any Server acting as a Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) and fixed nodes may
      use any Gateway on the link for efficient communications. Fixed nodes
      forward packets destined to other AERO nodes to the nearest Gateway,
      which forwards them through the cloud. A mobile node's initial packets
      are forwarded through the MAP, while direct routing is supported through
      asymmetric extended route optimization while data packets are flowing.
      Both unicast and multicast communications are supported, and mobile
      nodes may efficiently move between locations while maintaining
      continuous communications with correspondents and without changing their
      IP Address.</t>

      <t>AERO Relays are interconnected in a secured private BGP overlay
      routing instance known as the "SPAN". The SPAN provides a hybrid
      routing/bridging service to join the underlying Internetworks of
      multiple disjoint administrative domains into a single unified AERO
      link. Each AERO link instance is characterized by the set of Mobility
      Service Prefixes (MSPs) common to all mobile nodes. The link extends to
      the point where a Gateway/MAP is on the optimal route from any
      correspondent node on the link, and provides a gateway between the
      underlying Internetwork and the SPAN. To the underlying Internetwork,
      the Gateway/MAP is the source of a route to its MSP, and hence uplink
      traffic to the mobile node is naturally routed to the nearest
      Gateway/MAP.</t>

      <t>AERO assumes the use of PIM Sparse Mode in support of multicast
      communication. In support of Source Specific Multicast (SSM) when a
      Mobile Node is the source, AERO route optimization ensures that a
      shortest-path multicast tree is established with provisions for mobility
      and multilink operation. In all other multicast scenarios there are no
      AERO dependencies.</t>

      <t>AERO was designed for aeronautical networking for both manned and
      unmanned aircraft, where the aircraft is treated as a mobile node that
      can connect an Internet of Things (IoT). AERO is also applicable to a
      wide variety of other use cases. For example, it can be used to
      coordinate the Virtual Private Network (VPN) links of mobile nodes
      (e.g., cellphones, tablets, laptop computers, etc.) that connect into a
      home enterprise network via public access networks using services such
      as OpenVPN <xref target="OVPN"/>. Other applicable use cases are also in
      scope.</t>

      <t>The following numbered sections present the AERO specification. The
      appendices at the end of the document are non-normative.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The terminology in the normative references applies; the following
      terms are defined within the scope of this document:</t>

      <t><list style="hanging">
          <t hangText="IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND)"><vspace/>an IPv6 control
          message service for coordinating neighbor relationships between
          nodes connected to a common link. AERO interfaces use the ND service
          specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="IPv6 Prefix Delegation (PD)"><vspace/>a networking
          service for delegating IPv6 prefixes to nodes on the link. The
          nominal PD service is DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC8415"/>, however
          alternate services (e.g., based on ND messaging) are also in scope
          <xref target="I-D.templin-v6ops-pdhost"/><xref
          target="I-D.templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt"/>. Most notably, a minimal
          form of PD known as "prefix registration" can be used if the Client
          knows its prefix in advance and can represent it in the IPv6 source
          address of an ND message.</t>

          <t hangText="Access Network (ANET)"><vspace/>a node's first-hop data
          link service network, e.g., a radio access network, cellular service
          provider network, corporate enterprise network, or the public
          Internet itself. For secured ANETs, link-layer security services
          such as IEEE 802.1X and physical-layer security prevent unauthorized
          access internally while border network-layer security services such
          as firewalls and proxies prevent unauthorized outside access.</t>

          <t hangText="ANET interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to a link
          in an ANET.</t>

          <t hangText="ANET address"><vspace/>an IP address assigned to a
          node's interface connection to an ANET.</t>

          <t hangText="Internetwork (INET)"><vspace/>a connected IP network
          topology with a coherent routing and addressing plan and that
          provides a transit backbone service for ANET end systems. INETs also
          provide an underlay service over which the AERO virtual link is
          configured. Example INETs include corporate enterprise networks,
          aviation networks, and the public Internet itself. When there is no
          administrative boundary between an ANET and the INET, the ANET and
          INET are one and the same.</t>

          <t hangText="INET Partition"><vspace/>frequently, INETs such as
          large corporate enterprise networks are sub-divided internally into
          separate isolated partitions. Each partition is fully connected
          internally but disconnected from other partitions, and there is no
          requirement that separate partitions maintain consistent Internet
          Protocol and/or addressing plans. (An INET partition is the same as
          a SPAN segment discussed below.)</t>

          <t hangText="INET interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to a link
          in an INET.</t>

          <t hangText="INET address"><vspace/>an IP address assigned to a
          node's interface connection to an INET.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO link"><vspace/>a Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access
          (NBMA) tunnel virtual overlay configured over one or more underlying
          INETs. Nodes on the AERO link appear as single-hop neighbors from
          the perspective of the virtual overlay even though they may be
          separated by many underlying INET hops. AERO links may be configured
          over multiple underlying SPAN segments (see below).</t>

          <t hangText="AERO interface"><vspace/>a node's attachment to an AERO
          link. Since the addresses assigned to an AERO interface are managed
          for uniqueness, AERO interfaces do not require Duplicate Address
          Detection (DAD) and therefore set the administrative variable
          'DupAddrDetectTransmits' to zero <xref target="RFC4862"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="underlying interface"><vspace/>an ANET or INET
          interface over which an AERO interface is configured.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO address"><vspace/>an IPv6 link-local address
          assigned to an AERO interface and constructed as specified in <xref
          target="aero-address"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="base AERO address"><vspace/>the lowest-numbered AERO
          address aggregated by the MNP (see <xref
          target="aero-address"/>).</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Service Prefix (MSP)"><vspace/>an IP prefix
          assigned to the AERO link and from which more-specific Mobile
          Network Prefixes (MNPs) are derived.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Network Prefix (MNP)"><vspace/>an IP prefix
          allocated from an MSP and delegated to an AERO Client or
          Gateway.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO node"><vspace/>a node that is connected to an AERO
          link, or that provides services to other nodes on an AERO link.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Client (&quot;Client&quot;)"><vspace/>an AERO node
          that connects to one or more ANETs and requests MNP PDs from AERO
          Servers. The Client assigns a Client AERO address to the AERO
          interface for use in ND exchanges with other AERO nodes and forwards
          packets to correspondents according to AERO interface neighbor cache
          state.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Server (&quot;Server&quot;)"><vspace/>an INET node
          that configures an AERO interface to provide default forwarding
          services and a Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) for AERO Clients. The
          Server assigns an administratively-provisioned AERO address to its
          AERO interface to support the operation of the ND/PD services, and
          advertises all of its associated MNPs via BGP peerings with
          Relays.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Gateway (&quot;Gateway&quot;)"><vspace/>an AERO
          Server that also provides forwarding services between nodes reached
          via the AERO link and correspondents on other links. AERO Gateways
          are provisioned with MNPs (i.e., the same as for an AERO Client) and
          run a dynamic routing protocol to discover any non-MNP IP routes. In
          both cases, the Gateway advertises the MSP(s) over INET interfaces,
          and distributes all of its associated MNPs and non-MNP IP routes via
          BGP peerings with Relays (i.e., the same as for an AERO Server).</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Relay (&quot;Relay&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          provides hybrid routing/bridging services (as well as a security
          trust anchor) for nodes on an AERO link. As a router, the Relay
          forwards packets using standard IP forwarding. As a bridge, the
          Relay forwards packets over the AERO link without decrementing the
          IPv6 Hop Limit. AERO Relays peer with Servers and other Relays to
          discover the full set of MNPs for the link as well as any non-MNPs
          that are reachable via Gateways.</t>

          <t hangText="AERO Proxy (&quot;Proxy&quot;)"><vspace/>a node that
          provides proxying services between Clients in an ANET and Servers in
          external INETs. The AERO Proxy is a conduit between the ANET and
          external INETs in the same manner as for common web proxies, and
          behaves in a similar fashion as for ND proxies <xref
          target="RFC4389"/>.</t>

          <t hangText="Spanning Partitioned AERO Networks (SPAN)"><vspace/>a
          means for bridging disjoint INET partitions as segments of a unified
          AERO link the same as for a bridged campus LAN. The SPAN is a
          mid-layer IPv6 encapsulation service in the AERO routing system that
          supports a unified AERO link view for all segments. Each segment in
          the SPAN is a distinct INET partition.</t>

          <t hangText="SPAN Service Prefix (SSP)"><vspace/>a global or unique
          local /96 IPv6 prefix assigned to the AERO link to support SPAN
          services.</t>

          <t hangText="SPAN Partition Prefix (SPP)"><vspace/>a sub-prefix of
          the SPAN Service Prefix uniquely assigned to a single SPAN
          segment.</t>

          <t hangText="SPAN Address"><vspace/>a global or unique local IPv6
          address taken from a SPAN Partition Prefix and constructed as
          specified in <xref target="span"/>. SPAN addresses are statelessly
          derived from AERO addresses, and vice-versa.</t>

          <t hangText="ingress tunnel endpoint (ITE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that injects encapsulated packets into an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="egress tunnel endpoint (ETE)"><vspace/>an AERO
          interface endpoint that receives encapsulated packets from an AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="link-layer address"><vspace/>an IP address used as an
          encapsulation header source or destination address from the
          perspective of the AERO interface. When an upper layer protocol
          (e.g., UDP) is used as part of the encapsulation, the port number is
          also considered as part of the link-layer address. From the
          perspective of the AERO interface, the link-layer address is either
          an INET address for intra-segment encapsulation or a SPAN address
          for inter-segment encapsulation.</t>

          <t hangText="network layer address"><vspace/>the source or
          destination address of an encapsulated IP packet presented to the
          AERO interface.</t>

          <t hangText="end user network (EUN)"><vspace/>an internal virtual or
          external edge IP network that an AERO Client or Gateway connects to
          the rest of the network via the AERO interface. The Client/Gateway
          sees each EUN as a "downstream" network, and sees the AERO interface
          as the point of attachment to the "upstream" network.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Node (MN)"><vspace/>an AERO Client and all of
          its downstream-attached networks that move together as a single
          unit, i.e., an end system that connects an Internet of Things.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobile Router (MR)"><vspace/>a MN's on-board router
          that forwards packets between any downstream-attached networks and
          the AERO link.</t>

          <t hangText="Mobility Anchor Point (MAP)"><vspace/>an AERO Server
          that is currently tracking and reporting the mobility events of its
          associated Mobile Node Clients.</t>

          <t hangText="Route Optimization Source (ROS)"><vspace/>the AERO node
          nearest the source that initiates route optimization. The ROS may be
          a Server or Proxy acting on behalf of the source Client.</t>

          <t hangText="Route Optimization responder (ROR)"><vspace/>the AERO
          node nearest the target destination that responds to route
          optimization requests. The ROR may be a Server acting as a MAP on
          behalf of a target MNP Client, or a Gateway for a non-MNP
          destination.</t>

          <t hangText="MAP List"><vspace/>a geographically and/or
          topologically referenced list of AERO addresses of all MAPs within
          the same AERO link. There is a single MAP list for the entire AERO
          link.</t>

          <t hangText="ROS List"><vspace/>a list of AERO/SPAN-to-INET address
          mappings of all ROSes within the same SPAN segment. There is a
          distinct ROS list for each segment.</t>

          <t hangText="Distributed Mobility Management (DMM)"><vspace/>a
          BGP-based overlay routing service coordinated by Servers and Relays
          that tracks all MAP-to-Client associations.</t>
        </list>Throughout the document, the simple terms "Client", "Server",
      "Relay", "Proxy" and "Gateway" refer to "AERO Client", "AERO Server",
      "AERO Relay", "AERO Proxy" and "AERO Gateway", respectively.
      Capitalization is used to distinguish these terms from other common
      Internetworking uses in which they appear without capitalization.</t>

      <t>The terminology of DHCPv6 <xref target="RFC8415"/> and IPv6 ND <xref
      target="RFC4861"/> (including the names of node variables, messages and
      protocol constants) is used throughout this document. The terms
      "All-Routers multicast", "All-Nodes multicast" and "Subnet-Router
      anycast" are defined in <xref target="RFC4291"/> (with Link-Local scope
      assumed). Also, the term "IP" is used to generically refer to either
      Internet Protocol version, i.e., IPv4 <xref target="RFC0791"/> or IPv6
      <xref target="RFC8200"/>.</t>

      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref target="RFC2119"/><xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
      they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="aerospec"
             title="Asymmetric Extended Route Optimization (AERO)">
      <t>The following sections specify the operation of IP over Asymmetric
      Extended Route Optimization (AERO) links:</t>

      <section anchor="aerolink" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
        <t><figure anchor="chaining-fig" title="AERO Link Reference Model">
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 
                       +----------------+
                       | AERO Relay R1  |
                       | Nbr: S1, S2, P1|
                       |(X1->S1; X2->S2)|
                       |      MSP M1    |
                       +-+---------+--+-+
    +--------------+     | Secured |  |     +--------------+
    |AERO Server S1|     | tunnels |  |     |AERO Server S2|
    |  Nbr: C1, R1 +-----+         |  +-----+  Nbr: C2, R1 |
    |  default->R1 |               |        |  default->R1 |
    |    X1->C1    |               |        |    X2->C2    |
    +-------+------+               |        +------+-------+
            |       AERO Link      |               |
    X===+===+===================+==)===============+===+===X
        |                       |  |                   |
  +-----+--------+     +--------+--+-----+    +--------+-----+
  |AERO Client C1|     |  AERO Proxy P1  |    |AERO Client C2|
  |    Nbr: S1   |     |(Proxy Nbr Cache)|    |   Nbr: S2    |
  | default->S1  |     +--------+--------+    | default->S2  |
  |    MNP X1    |              |             |    MNP X2    |
  +------+-------+     .--------+------.      +-----+--------+
         |           (- Proxyed Clients -)          |
        .-.            `---------------'           .-.
     ,-(  _)-.                                  ,-(  _)-.
  .-(_  IP   )-.   +-------+     +-------+    .-(_  IP   )-.
(__    EUN      )--|Host H1|     |Host H2|--(__    EUN      )
   `-(______)-'    +-------+     +-------+     `-(______)-'
]]></artwork>
          </figure><xref target="chaining-fig"/> presents the AERO link
        reference model. In this model:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>the AERO link is an overlay network service configured over one
            or more underlying INET partitions which may be managed by
            different administrative authorities and have incompatible
            protocols and/or addressing plans.</t>

            <t>AERO Relay R1 aggregates Mobility Service Prefix (MSP) M1,
            discovers Mobile Network Prefixes (MNPs) X* and advertises the MSP
            via BGP peerings over secured tunnels to Servers (S1, S2). Relays
            use the SPAN service to bridge disjoint segments of a partitioned
            AERO link.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers S1 and S2 configure secured tunnels with Relay R1
            and also act as Mobility Anchor Points (MAPs) and default routers
            for their associated Clients C1 and C2.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients C1 and C2 associate with Servers S1 and S2,
            respectively. They receive Mobile Network Prefix (MNP) delegations
            X1 and X2, and also act as default routers for their associated
            physical or internal virtual EUNs. Simple hosts H1 and H2 attach
            to the EUNs served by Clients C1 and C2, respectively.</t>

            <t>AERO Proxy P1 configures a secured tunnel with Relay R1 and
            provides proxy services for AERO Clients in secured enclaves that
            cannot associate directly with other AERO link neighbors.</t>
          </list>Each node on the AERO link maintains an AERO interface
        neighbor cache and an IP forwarding table the same as for any link.
        Although the figure shows a limited deployment, in common operational
        practice there will normally be many additional Relays, Servers,
        Clients and Proxys.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="node-types" title="AERO Node Types">
        <t>AERO Relays provide hybrid routing/bridging services (as well as a
        security trust anchor) for nodes on an AERO link. Relays use standard
        IPv6 routing to forward packets both within the same INET partitions
        and between disjoint INET partitions based on a mid-layer IPv6
        encapsulation known as the SPAN header. The inner IP layer experiences
        a virtual bridging service since the inner IP TTL/Hop Limit is not
        decremented during forwarding. Each Relay also peers with Servers and
        other Relays in a dynamic routing protocol instance to provide a
        Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) service for the list of active
        MNPs (see <xref target="scaling"/>). Relays present the AERO link as a
        set of one or more Mobility Service Prefixes (MSPs) but as link-layer
        devices need not connect directly to the AERO link themselves unless
        an administrative interface is desired. Relays configure secured
        tunnels with Servers, Proxys and other Relays; they further maintain
        IP forwarding table entries for each Mobile Network Prefix (MNP) and
        any other reachable non-MNP prefixes.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers provide default forwarding services and a Mobility
        Anchor Point (MAP) for AERO Client Mobile Nodes (MNs). Each Server
        also peers with Relays in a dynamic routing protocol instance to
        advertise its list of associated MNPs (see <xref target="scaling"/>).
        Servers facilitate PD exchanges with Clients, where each delegated
        prefix becomes an MNP taken from an MSP. Servers forward packets
        between AERO interface neighbors and track each Client's mobility
        profiles.</t>

        <t>AERO Clients register their MNPs through PD exchanges with AERO
        Servers over the AERO link, and distribute the MNPs to nodes on EUNs.
        A Client may also be co-resident on the same physical or virtual
        platform as a Server; in that case, the Client and Server behave as a
        single functional unit.</t>

        <t>AERO Proxys provide a conduit for ANET AERO Clients to associate
        with AERO Servers in external INETs. Client and Servers exchange
        control plane messages via the Proxy acting as a bridge between the
        ANET/INET boundary. The Proxy forwards data packets between Clients
        and the AERO link according to forwarding information in the neighbor
        cache. The Proxy function is specified in <xref
        target="aero-proxy"/>.</t>

        <t>AERO Gateways are Servers that provide forwarding services between
        the AERO interface and INET/EUN interfaces. Gateways are provisioned
        with MNPs the same as for an AERO Client, and also run a dynamic
        routing protocol to discover any non-MNP IP routes. The Gateway
        advertises the MSP(s) to INETs, and distributes all of its associated
        MNPs and non-MNP IP routes via BGP peerings with Relays.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays, Servers, Proxys and Gateways are critical
        infrastructure elements in fixed (i.e., non-mobile) INET deployments
        and hence have permanent and unchanging INET addresses. AERO Clients
        are MNs that connect via ANET interfaces, i.e., their ANET addresses
        may change when the Client moves to a new ANET connection.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="scaling" title="AERO Routing System">
        <t>The AERO routing system comprises a private instance of the Border
        Gateway Protocol (BGP) <xref target="RFC4271"/> that is coordinated
        between Relays and Servers and does not interact with either the
        public Internet BGP routing system or any underlying INET routing
        systems.</t>

        <t>In a reference deployment, each Server is configured as an
        Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) for a stub Autonomous System
        (AS) using an AS Number (ASN) that is unique within the BGP instance,
        and each Server further uses eBGP to peer with one or more Relays but
        does not peer with other Servers. Each INET of a multi-segment AERO
        link must include one or more Relays, which peer with the Servers and
        Proxys within that INET. All Relays within the same INET are members
        of the same hub AS using a common ASN, and use iBGP to maintain a
        consistent view of all active MNPs currently in service. The Relays of
        different INETs peer with one another using eBGP.</t>

        <t>Relays advertise the AERO link's MSPs and any non-MNP routes to
        each of their Servers. This means that any aggregated non-MNPs
        (including "default") are advertised to all Servers. Each Relay
        configures a black-hole route for each of its MSPs. By black-holing
        the MSPs, the Relay will maintain forwarding table entries only for
        the MNPs that are currently active, and packets destined to all other
        MNPs will correctly incur Destination Unreachable messages due to the
        black-hole route. In this way, Servers have only partial topology
        knowledge (i.e., they know only about the MNPs of their directly
        associated Clients) and they forward all other packets to Relays which
        have full topology knowledge.</t>

        <t>Servers maintain a working set of associated MNPs, and dynamically
        announce new MNPs and withdraw departed MNPs in eBGP updates to
        Relays. Servers that are configured as Gateways also redistribute
        non-MNP routes learned from non-AERO interfaces via their eBGP Relay
        peerings.</t>

        <t>Clients are expected to remain associated with their current
        Servers for extended timeframes, however Servers SHOULD selectively
        suppress updates for impatient Clients that repeatedly associate and
        disassociate with them in order to dampen routing churn. Servers that
        are configured as Gateways advertise the MSPs via INET/EUN interfaces,
        and forward packets between INET/EUN interfaces and the AERO interface
        using standard IP forwarding.</t>

        <t>Scaling properties of the AERO routing system are limited by the
        number of BGP routes that can be carried by Relays. As of 2015, the
        global public Internet BGP routing system manages more than 500K
        routes with linear growth and no signs of router resource exhaustion
        <xref target="BGP"/>. More recent network emulation studies have also
        shown that a single Relay can accommodate at least 1M dynamically
        changing BGP routes even on a lightweight virtual machine, i.e., and
        without requiring high-end dedicated router hardware.</t>

        <t>Therefore, assuming each Relay can carry 1M or more routes, this
        means that at least 1M Clients can be serviced by a single set of
        Relays. A means of increasing scaling would be to assign a different
        set of Relays for each set of MSPs. In that case, each Server still
        peers with one or more Relays, but institutes route filters so that
        BGP updates are only sent to the specific set of Relays that aggregate
        the MSP. For example, if the MSP for the AERO link is 2001:db8::/32, a
        first set of Relays could service the MSP 2001:db8::/40, a second set
        of Relays could service 2001:db8:0100::/40, a third set could service
        2001:db8:0200::/40, etc.</t>

        <t>Assuming up to 1K sets of Relays, the AERO routing system can then
        accommodate 1B or more MNPs with no additional overhead (for example,
        it should be possible to service 1B /64 MNPs taken from a /34 MSP and
        even more for shorter prefixes). In this way, each set of Relays
        services a specific set of MSPs that they advertise to the native
        Internetwork routing system, and each Server configures MSP-specific
        routes that list the correct set of Relays as next hops. This
        arrangement also allows for natural incremental deployment, and can
        support small scale initial deployments followed by dynamic deployment
        of additional Clients, Servers and Relays without disturbing the
        already-deployed base.</t>

        <t>Server and Relays can use the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
        (BFD) protocol <xref target="RFC5880"/> to quickly detect link
        failures that don&rsquo;t result in interface state changes, BGP peer
        failures, and administrative state changes. BFD is important in
        environments where rapid response to failures is required for routing
        reconvergence and, hence, communications continuity.</t>

        <t>A full discussion of the BGP-based routing system used by AERO is
        found in <xref target="I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"/>. The system provides
        for Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) per the distributed mobility
        anchoring architecture <xref
        target="I-D.ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring"/>.</t>

        <section anchor="scaling-compat" title="IPv4 Compatibility Routing">
          <t>For IPv6 MNPs, the AERO routing system includes ordinary IPv6
          routes. For IPv4 MNPs, the AERO routing system includes IPv6 routes
          based on an IPv4-embedded IPv6 address format discussed in <xref
          target="span-compat"/>.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aero-address" title="AERO Addresses">
        <t>A Client's AERO address is an IPv6 link-local address with an
        interface identifier based on the Client's delegated MNP. Relay,
        Server and Proxy AERO addresses are assigned from the range fe80::/96
        and include an administratively-provisioned value in the lower 32
        bits.</t>

        <t>For IPv6, Client AERO addresses begin with the prefix fe80::/64 and
        include in the interface identifier (i.e., the lower 64 bits) a 64-bit
        prefix taken from one of the Client's IPv6 MNPs. For example, if the
        AERO Client receives the IPv6 MNP:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>2001:db8:1000:2000::/56</t>
          </list>it constructs its corresponding AERO addresses as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000</t>

            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:2001</t>

            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:2002</t>

            <t>... etc. ...</t>

            <t>fe80::2001:db8:1000:20ff</t>
          </list>For IPv4, Client AERO addresses are based on an IPv4-mapped
        IPv6 address <xref target="RFC4291"/> formed from an IPv4 MNP and with
        a prefix length of 96 plus the MNP prefix length. For example, for the
        IPv4 MNP 192.0.2.32/28 the IPv4-mapped IPv6 MNP is:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:192.0.2.16/124 (also written as
            0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:c000:0210/124)</t>
          </list>The Client then constructs its AERO addresses with the prefix
        fe80::/64 and with the lower 64 bits of the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address
        in the interface identifier as:</t>

        <t><list style="empty">
            <t>fe80::FFFF:192.0.2.16</t>

            <t>fe80::FFFF:192.0.2.17</t>

            <t>fe80::FFFF:192.0.2.18</t>

            <t>... etc. ...</t>

            <t>fe80:FFFF:192.0.2.31</t>
          </list>Relay, Server and Proxy AERO addresses are allocated from the
        range fe80::/96, and MUST be managed for uniqueness. The lower 32 bits
        of the AERO address includes a unique integer value between 1 and
        0xfffffffe (e.g., fe80::1, fe80::2, fe80::3, etc., fe80::ffff:fffe) as
        assigned by the administrative authority for the link. If the link
        spans multiple SPAN segments, the AERO addresses are assigned to each
        segment in 1x1 correspondence with SPAN addresses (see: <xref
        target="span"/>). The address fe80:: is the IPv6 link-local
        Subnet-Router anycast address, and the address fe80::ffff:ffff is
        reserved as the unspecified AERO address.</t>

        <t>The lowest-numbered AERO address from a Client's MNP delegation
        serves as the "base" AERO address (for example, for the MNP
        2001:db8:1000:2000::/56 the base AERO address is
        fe80::2001:db8:1000:2000). The Client then assigns the base AERO
        address to the AERO interface and uses it for the purpose of
        maintaining the neighbor cache entry. The Server likewise uses the
        AERO address as its index into the neighbor cache for this Client.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple AERO addresses (i.e., when there are
        multiple MNPs and/or MNPs with prefix lengths shorter than /64), the
        Client originates ND messages using the base AERO address as the
        source address and accepts and responds to ND messages destined to any
        of its AERO addresses as equivalent to the base AERO address. In this
        way, the Client maintains a single neighbor cache entry that may be
        indexed by multiple AERO addresses.</t>

        <t>The Client's Subnet-Router anycast address can be statelessly
        determined from its AERO address by simply transposing the AERO
        address into the upper N bits of the Anycast address followed by 128-N
        bits of zeroes. For example, for the AERO address fe80::2001:db8:1:2
        the Subnet-Router anycast address is 2001:db8:1:2::.</t>

        <t>AERO addresses for mobile node Clients embed a MNP as discussed
        above, while AERO addresses for non-MNP destinations are constructed
        in exactly the same way. A Client AERO address therefore encodes
        either an MNP if the prefix is reached via the SPAN or a non-MNP if
        the prefix is reached via a Gateway.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="span" title="Spanning Partitioned AERO Networks (SPAN)">
        <t>An AERO link configured over a single INET appears as a single
        unified link with a consistent underlying network addressing plan. In
        that case, all nodes on the link can exchange packets via simple INET
        encapsulation, since the underlying INET is connected. In common
        practice, however, an AERO link may be partitioned into multiple
        "segments", where each segment is a distinct INET potentially managed
        under a different administrative authority (e.g., as for worldwide
        aviation service providers such as ARINC, SITA, Inmarsat, etc.).
        Individual INETs may also themselves be partitioned internally, in
        which case each internal partition is seen as a separate segment.</t>

        <t>The addressing plan of each segment is consistent internally but
        will often bear no relation to the addressing plans of other segments.
        Each segment is also likely to be separated from others by network
        security devices (e.g., firewalls, proxies, packet filtering gateways,
        etc.), and in many cases disjoint segments may not even have any
        common physical link connections at all. Therefore, nodes can only be
        assured of exchanging packets directly with correspondents in the same
        segment, and not with those in other segments. The only means for
        joining the segments therefore is through inter-domain peerings
        between AERO Relays.</t>

        <t>The same as for traditional campus LANs, multiple AERO link
        segments can be joined into a single unified link via a virtual
        bridging service termed the "SPAN". The SPAN performs link-layer
        packet forwarding between segments (i.e., bridging) without
        decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit. The SPAN model is
        depicted in <xref target="the-span"/>:</t>

        <figure anchor="the-span" title="The SPAN">
          <artwork><![CDATA[              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
            .                                               .
            .              .-(::::::::)                     .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+            .
            .          (:::: Segment A :::)--|R|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .              .-(::::::::)            |        .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+   |        .
            .          (:::: Segment B :::)--|R|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .              .-(::::::::)            |        .
            .           .-(::::::::::::)-.   +-+   |        .
            .          (:::: Segment C :::)--|R|---+        .
            .           `-(::::::::::::)-'   +-+   |        .
            .              `-(::::::)-'            |        .
            .                                      |        .
            .                ..(etc)..             x        .
            .                                               .
            .                                               .
            .      <- AERO Link Bridged by the SPAN ->      .
              . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .  
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>To support the SPAN, AERO links require a reserved /64 IPv6 "SPAN
        Service Prefix (SSP)". Although any routable IPv6 prefix can be used,
        a Unique Local Address (ULA) prefix (e.g., fd00::/64) <xref
        target="RFC4389"/> is recommended since border routers are commonly
        configured to prevent packets with ULAs from being injected into the
        AERO link by an external IPv6 node and from leaking out of the AERO
        link to the outside world.</t>

        <t>Each segment in the SPAN assigns a unique sub-prefix of SSP::/96
        termed a "SPAN Partition Prefix (SPP)". For example, a first segment
        could assign fd00::1000/116, a second could assign fd00::2000/116, a
        third could assign fd00::3000/116, etc. The administrative authorities
        for each segment must therefore coordinate to assure
        mutually-exclusive SPP assignments, but internal provisioning of the
        SPP is an independent local consideration for each administrative
        authority.</t>

        <t>A "SPAN address" is an address taken from a SPP and assigned to a
        Relay, Server, Gateway or Proxy interface. SPAN addresses are formed
        by simply replacing the upper portion of an administratively-assigned
        AERO address with the SPP. For example, if the SPP is fd00::1000/116,
        the SPAN address formed from the AERO address fe80::1001 is simply
        fd00::1001.</t>

        <t>An "INET address" is an address of a node's interface connection to
        an INET. AERO/SPAN/INET address mappings are maintained as permanent
        neighbor cache entires as discussed in <xref
        target="aeroncache"/>.</t>

        <t>AERO Relays serve as bridges to join multiple segments into a
        unified AERO link over multiple diverse administrative domains. They
        support the bridging function by first establishing forwarding table
        entries for their SPPs either via standard BGP routing or static
        routes. For example, if three Relays ('A', 'B' and 'C') from different
        segments serviced the SPPs fd00::1000/116, fd00::2000/116 and
        fd00::3000/116 respectively, then the forwarding tables in each Relay
        are as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="A:">fd00::1000/116-&gt;local, fd00::2000/116-&gt;B,
            fd00::3000/116-&gt;C</t>

            <t hangText="B:">fd00::1000/116-&gt;A, fd00::2000/116-&gt;local,
            fd00::3000/116-&gt;C</t>

            <t hangText="C:">fd00::1000/116-&gt;A, fd00::2000/116-&gt;B,
            fd00::3000/116-&gt;local</t>
          </list>These forwarding table entries are permanent and never
        change, since they correspond to fixed infrastructure elements in
        their respective segments. This provides the basis for a link-layer
        forwarding service that cannot be disrupted by routing updates due to
        node mobility.</t>

        <t>With the SPPs in place in each Relay's forwarding table, control
        and data packets sent between AERO nodes in different segments can
        therefore be carried over the SPAN via encapsulation. For example,
        when a source AERO node in segment A forwards a packet with IPv6
        address 2001:db8:1:2::1 to a target AERO node in segment C with IPv6
        address 2001:db8:1000:2000::1, it first encapsulates the packet in a
        SPAN header with source SPAN address taken from fd00::1000/116 (e.g.,
        fd00::1001) and destination SPAN address taken from fd00::3000/116
        (e.g., fd00::3001). Next, it encapsulates the SPAN message in an INET
        header with source address set to its own INET address (e.g.,
        192.0.2.100) and destination set to the INET address of a Relay (e.g.,
        192.0.2.1).</t>

        <t>SPAN encapsulation is based on Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6
        <xref target="RFC2473"/>; the encapsulation format in the above
        example is shown in <xref target="span-encaps"> </xref>:<figure
            anchor="span-encaps" title="SPAN Encapsulation">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          INET Header          |
     |       src = 192.0.2.100       |
     |        dst = 192.0.2.1        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         SPAN Header           |
     |       src = fd00::1001        |
     |       dst = fd00::3001        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Inner IP Header        |
     |    src = 2001:db8:1:2::1      |
     |  dst = 2001:db8:1000:2000::1  |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+       
     |                               |
     ~                               ~
     ~      Inner Packet Body        ~
     ~                               ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In this format, the inner IP header and packet body are the
        original IP packet, the SPAN header is an IPv6 header prepared
        according to <xref target="RFC2473"/>, and the INET header is prepared
        according to <xref target="aeroencaps"/>. A packet is said to be
        "forwarded/sent into the SPAN" when it is encapsulated as described
        above then forwarded via a secured tunnel to a neighboring Relay.</t>

        <t>This gives rise to a routing system that contains both MNP routes
        that may change dynamically due to regional node mobility and SPAN
        routes that never change. The Relays can therefore provide link-layer
        bridging by sending packets into the SPAN instead of network-layer
        routing according to MNP routes. As a result, opportunities for packet
        loss due to node mobility between different segments are
        mitigated.</t>

        <t>With reference to <xref target="span-encaps"/>, for a Client's AERO
        address the SPAN address is simply set to the Subnet-Router anycast
        address. For non-link-local addresses, the destination SPAN address
        may not be known in advance for the first few packets of a flow sent
        via the SPAN. In that case, the SPAN destination address is set to the
        original packet's destination, and the SPAN routing system will direct
        the packet to the correct SPAN egress node. (In the above example, the
        SPAN destination address is simply 2001:db8:1000:2000::1.)</t>

        <section anchor="span-compat" title="SPAN Compatibility Addressing">
          <t>For IPv4 MNPs, Servers inject a "SPAN Compatibility Prefix (SCP)"
          that embeds the MNP into the BGP routing system. The SCP begins with
          the upper 64 bits of the SSP, followed by the constant string
          "0000:FFFF" followed by the IPv4 MNP. For example, if the SSP is
          fd00::/64 and the MNP is 192.0.2.0/24 then the SCP is
          fd00::FFFF:192.0.2.0/120.</t>

          <t>This allows for encapsulation of IPv4 packets in IPv6 headers
          with "SPAN Compatibility Addresses (SCAs)". In this example, the SCA
          corresponding to the SCP is simply fd00::FFFF:192.0.2.0, and can be
          used as the SPAN destination address for packets forwarded via the
          SPAN. This allows for forwarding of initial IPv4 packets over IPv6
          SPAN routes, followed by route optimization for direct
          communications.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="interface" title="AERO Interface Characteristics">
        <t>AERO interfaces are virtual interfaces configured over one or more
        underlying interfaces classified as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Native interfaces have global IP addresses that are reachable
            from any INET correspondent. All Server, Gateway and Relay
            interfaces are native interfaces, as are INET-facing interfaces of
            Proxys.</t>

            <t>NATed interfaces connect to a private network behind a Network
            Address Translator (NAT). The NAT does not participate in any AERO
            control message signaling, but the Server can issue control
            messages on behalf of the Client. Clients that are behind a NAT
            are required to send periodic keepalive messages to keep NAT state
            alive when there are no data packets flowing. If no other periodic
            messaging service is available, the Client can send RS messages to
            receive RA replies from its Server(s).</t>

            <t>VPNed interfaces use security encapsulation to a Virtual
            Private Network (VPN) server that also acts as an AERO Server. As
            with NATed links, the Server can issue control messages on behalf
            of the Client, but the Client need not send periodic keepalives in
            addition to those already used to maintain the VPN connection.</t>

            <t>Proxyed interfaces connect to an ANET that is separated from
            the open INET by an AERO Proxy. Unlike NATed and VPNed interfaces,
            the Proxy can actively issue control messages on behalf of the
            Client.</t>

            <t>Direct interfaces connect a Client directly to a neighbor
            without crossing any ANET/INET paths. An example is a
            line-of-sight link between a remote pilot and an unmanned
            aircraft.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>AERO interfaces use encapsulation (see: <xref
        target="aeroencaps"/>) to exchange packets with AERO link neighbors
        over Native, NATed or VPNed interfaces. AERO interfaces do not use
        encapsulation over Proxyed and Direct underlying interfaces.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces maintain a neighbor cache for tracking per-neighbor
        state the same as for any interface. AERO interfaces use ND messages
        including Router Solicitation (RS), Router Advertisement (RA),
        Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) for
        neighbor cache management.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces send ND messages with an Overlay Multilink Network
        Interface (OMNI) option formatted as specified in <xref
        target="I-D.templin-atn-aero-interface"/>. The OMNI option includes
        prefix registration information and "ifIndex-tuples" containing link
        quality information for the AERO interface's underlying
        interfaces.</t>

        <t>When encapsulation is used, AERO interface ND messages MAY also
        include an AERO Source/Target Link-Layer Address Option (S/TLLAO)
        formatted as shown in <xref target="llaov6"/>:</t>

        <t><figure anchor="llaov6"
            title="AERO Source/Target Link-Layer Address Option (S/TLLAO) Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      Type     |     Length    |   ifIndex[1]  |V| Reserved[1] |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                     Link Layer Address [1]                    ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         Port Number [1]       |   ifIndex[2]  |V| Reserved[2] |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                     Link Layer Address [2]                    ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         Port Number [2]       |                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               ~
     ~                                                               ~
     ~                              ...                              ~
     ~                                                               ~
     ~                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               |   ifIndex[N]  |V| Reserved[N] |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                     Link Layer Address [N]                    ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         Port Number [N]       |     Trailing zero padding     |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |               Trailing zero padding (if necessary)            |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In this format, Type and Length are set the same as specified for
        S/TLLAOs in <xref target="RFC4861"/>, with trailing zero padding
        octets added as necessary to produce an integral number of 8 octet
        blocks. The S/TLLAO includes N ifIndex-tuples in correspondence to
        ifIndex-tuples that appear in the OMNI option. Each ifIndex-tuple
        includes the folllowing information:<list style="symbols">
            <t>ifIndex[i] - the same value as in the corresponding
            ifIndex-tuple included in the OMNI option.</t>

            <t>V[i] - a bit that identifies the IP protocol version of the
            address found in the Link Layer Address [i] field. The bit is set
            to 0 for IPv4 or 1 for IPv6.</t>

            <t>Reserved[i] - MUST encode the value 0 on transmission, and
            ignored on reception.</t>

            <t>Link Layer Address [i] - the IPv4 or IPv6 address used as the
            encapsulation source address. The field is 4 bytes in length for
            IPv4 or 16 bytes in length for IPv6.</t>

            <t>Port Number [i] - the upper layer protocol port number used as
            the encapsulation source port, or 0 when no upper layer protocol
            encapsulation is used. The field is 2 bytes in length.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>If an S/TLLAO is included, the first S/TLLAO ifIndex-tuple MUST
        correspond to the first OMNI option ifIndex-tuple, and any additional
        S/TLLAO ifIndex-tuples MUST correspond to a proper subset of the
        remaining OMNI option ifIndex-tuples. Any S/TLLAO ifIndex-tuple having
        an ifIndex value that does not appear in an OMNI option ifindex-tuple
        is ignored. If the same ifIndex value appears in multiple
        ifIndex-tuples, the first tuple is processed and the remaining tuples
        are ignored. Any S/TLLAO ifIndex-tuples can therefore be viewed as
        inter-dependent extensions of their corresponidng OMNI option
        ifIndex-tuples, i.e., the OMNI option and S/TLLAO are companion
        options that are interpreted in conjunction with each other.</t>

        <t>A Client's AERO interface may be configured over multiple
        underlying interface connections. For example, common mobile handheld
        devices have both wireless local area network ("WLAN") and cellular
        wireless links. These links are typically used "one at a time" with
        low-cost WLAN preferred and highly-available cellular wireless as a
        standby. In a more complex example, aircraft frequently have many
        wireless data link types (e.g. satellite-based, cellular, terrestrial,
        air-to-air directional, etc.) with diverse performance and cost
        properties.</t>

        <t>If a Client's multiple underlying interfaces are used "one at a
        time" (i.e., all other interfaces are in standby mode while one
        interface is active), then ND message OMNI options include only a
        single ifIndex-tuple and set to a constant value. In that case, the
        Client would appear to have a single interface but with a dynamically
        changing link-layer address.</t>

        <t>If the Client has multiple active underlying interfaces, then from
        the perspective of ND it would appear to have multiple link-layer
        addresses. In that case, ND message OMNI options MAY include multiple
        ifIndex-tuples - each with a value that corresponds to a specific
        interface. The OMNI option MUST include a first ifIndex-tuple that
        corresponds to the interface over which the ND message is sent. Every
        ND message need not include all OMNI and/or S/TLLAO ifIndex-tuples;
        for any ifIndex-tuple not included, the neighbor considers the status
        as unchanged.</t>

        <t>Relay, Server and Proxy AERO interfaces may be configured over one
        or more secured tunnel interfaces. The AERO interface configures both
        an AERO address and its corresponding SPAN address, while the
        underlying secured tunnel interfaces are either unnumbered or
        configure the same SPAN address. The AERO interface encapsulates each
        IP packet in a SPAN header and presents the packet to the underlying
        secured tunnel interface. For Relays that do not configure an AERO
        interface, the secured tunnel interfaces themselves are exposed to the
        IP layer with each interface configuring the Relay's SPAN address.
        Routing protocols such as BGP therefore run directly over the Relay's
        secured tunnel interfaces. For nodes that configure an AERO interface,
        routing protocols such as BGP run over the AERO interface but do not
        employ SPAN encapsulation. Instead, the AERO interface presents the
        routing protocol messages directly to the underlying secured tunnels
        without applying encapsulation and while using the SPAN address as the
        source address. This distinction must be honored consistently
        according to each node's configuration so that the IP forwarding table
        will associate discovered IP routes with the correct interface.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroinit" title="AERO Interface Initialization">
        <t>AERO Servers, Proxys and Clients configure AERO interfaces as their
        point of attachment to the AERO link. AERO nodes assign the MSPs for
        the link to their AERO interfaces (i.e., as a "route-to-interface") to
        ensure that packets with destination addresses covered by an MNP not
        explicitly assigned to a non-AERO interface are directed to the AERO
        interface.</t>

        <t>AERO interface initialization procedures for Servers, Proxys,
        Clients and Relays are discussed in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="sinit" title="AERO Server/Gateway Behavior">
          <t>When a Server enables an AERO interface, it assigns AERO/SPAN
          addresses and configures permanent neighbor cache entries for
          neighbors in the same SPAN segment by consulting the ROS list for
          the segment. The Server also configures secured tunnels with one or
          more neighboring Relays and engages in a BGP routing protocol
          session with each Relay.</t>

          <t>The AERO interface provides a single interface abstraction to the
          IP layer, but internally comprises multiple secured tunnels as well
          as an NBMA nexus for sending encapsulated data packets to AERO
          interface neighbors. The Server further configures a service to
          facilitate ND/PD exchanges with AERO Clients and manages per-Client
          neighbor cache entries and IP forwarding table entries based on
          control message exchanges.</t>

          <t>Gateways are simply Servers that run a dynamic routing protocol
          between the AERO interface and INET/EUN interfaces (see: <xref
          target="scaling"/>). The Gateway provisions MNPs to networks on the
          INET/EUN interfaces (i.e., the same as a Client would do) and
          advertises the MSP(s) for the AERO link over the INET/EUN
          interfaces. The Gateway further provides an attachment point of the
          AERO link to the non-MNP-based global topology.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pinit" title="AERO Proxy Behavior">
          <t>When a Proxy enables an AERO interface, it assigns AERO/SPAN
          addresses and configures permanent neighbor cache entries the same
          as for Servers. The Proxy also configures secured tunnels with one
          or more neighboring Relays and maintains per-Client neighbor cache
          entries based on control message exchanges.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="cinit" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>When a Client enables an AERO interface, it sends an RS message
          with ND/PD parameters over an ANET interface to a Server in the MAP
          list, which returns an RA message with corresponding parameters.
          (The RS/RA messages may pass through a Proxy in the case of a
          Client's Proxyed interface.)</t>

          <t>After the initial ND/PD message exchange, the Client assigns AERO
          addresses to the AERO interface based on the delegated prefix(es).
          The Client can then register additional ANET interfaces with the
          Server by sending an RS message over each ANET interface.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rinit" title="AERO Relay Behavior">
          <t>AERO Relays need not connect directly to the AERO link, since
          they operate as link-layer forwarding devices instead of network
          layer routers. Configuration of AERO interfaces on Relays is
          therefore OPTIONAL, e.g., if an administrative interface is needed.
          Relays configure secured tunnels with Servers, Proxys and other
          Relays; they also configure AERO/SPAN addresses and permanent
          neighbor cache entries the same as Servers. Relays engage in a BGP
          routing protocol session with a subset of the Servers on the local
          SPAN segment, and with other Relays on the SPAN (see: <xref
          target="scaling"/>).</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroncache"
               title="AERO Interface Neighbor Cache Maintenance">
        <t>Each AERO interface maintains a conceptual neighbor cache that
        includes an entry for each neighbor it communicates with on the AERO
        link per <xref target="RFC4861"/>. AERO interface neighbor cache
        entries are said to be one of "permanent", "symmetric", "asymmetric"
        or "proxy".</t>

        <t>Permanent neighbor cache entries are created through explicit
        administrative action; they have no timeout values and remain in place
        until explicitly deleted. AERO Servers and Proxys maintain permanent
        neighbor cache entries for all other Servers and Proxys within the
        same SPAN segment. Each entry maintains the mapping between the
        neighbor's network-layer AERO address and corresponding INET address.
        The list of all permanent neighbor cache entries for the SPAN segment
        is maintained in the segment's ROS list.</t>

        <t>Symmetric neighbor cache entries are created and maintained through
        RS/RA exchanges as specified in <xref target="aeropd"/>, and remain in
        place for durations bounded by ND/PD lifetimes. AERO Servers maintain
        symmetric neighbor cache entries for each of their associated Clients,
        and AERO Clients maintain symmetric neighbor cache entries for each of
        their associated Servers. The list of all Servers on the AERO link is
        maintained in the link's MAP list.</t>

        <t>Asymmetric neighbor cache entries are created or updated based on
        route optimization messaging as specified in <xref
        target="predirect"/>, and are garbage-collected when keepalive timers
        expire. AERO route optimization sources (ROSs) maintain asymmetric
        neighbor cache entries for active targets with lifetimes based on ND
        messaging constants. Asymmetric neighbor cache entries are
        unidirectional since only the ROS and not the target (e.g., a Client's
        MAP) creates an entry.</t>

        <t>Proxy neighbor cache entries are created and maintained by AERO
        Proxys when they process Client/Server ND/PD exchanges, and remain in
        place for durations bounded by ND/PD lifetimes. AERO Proxys maintain
        proxy neighbor cache entries for each of their associated Clients.
        Proxy neighbor cache entries track the Client state and the address of
        the Client's associated Server.</t>

        <t>To the list of neighbor cache entry states in Section 7.3.2 of
        <xref target="RFC4861"/>, Proxy and Server AERO interfaces add an
        additional state DEPARTED that applies to symmetric and proxy neighbor
        cache entries for Clients that have recently departed. The interface
        sets a "DepartTime" variable for the neighbor cache entry to
        "DEPARTTIME" seconds. DepartTime is decremented unless a new ND
        message causes the state to return to REACHABLE. While a neighbor
        cache entry is in the DEPARTED state, packets destined to the target
        Client are forwarded to the Client's new location instead of being
        dropped. When DepartTime decrements to 0, the neighbor cache entry is
        deleted. It is RECOMMENDED that DEPARTTIME be set to the default
        constant value REACHABLETIME plus 10 seconds (40 seconds by default)
        to allow a window for packets in flight to be delivered while stale
        route optimization state may be present.</t>

        <t>When a target Server (acting as a MAP) receives a valid NS message
        used for route optimization, it searches for a symmetric neighbor
        cache entry for the target Client. The MAP then returns a solicited NA
        message without creating a neighbor cache entry for the ROS, but
        creates or updates a target Client "Report List" entry for the ROS and
        sets a "ReportTime" variable for the entry to REPORTTIME seconds. The
        MAP resets ReportTime when it receives a new authentic NS message, and
        otherwise decrements ReportTime while no NS messages have been
        received. It is RECOMMENDED that REPORTTIME be set to the default
        constant value REACHABLETIME plus 10 seconds (40 seconds by default)
        to allow a window for route optimization to converge before ReportTime
        decrements below REACHABLETIME.</t>

        <t>When the ROS receives a solicited NA message response to its NS
        message, it creates or updates an asymmetric neighbor cache entry for
        the target network-layer and link-layer addresses. The ROS then
        (re)sets ReachableTime for the neighbor cache entry to REACHABLETIME
        seconds and uses this value to determine whether packets can be
        forwarded directly to the target, i.e., instead of via a default
        route. The ROS otherwise decrements ReachableTime while no further
        solicited NA messages arrive. It is RECOMMENDED that REACHABLETIME be
        set to the default constant value 30 seconds as specified in <xref
        target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>The ROS also uses the value MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT to limit the number
        of NS keepalives sent when a correspondent may have gone unreachable,
        the value MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS to limit the number of RS messages
        sent without receiving an RA and the value MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT
        to limit the number of unsolicited NAs that can be sent based on a
        single event. It is RECOMMENDED that MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT,
        MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS and MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT be set to 3 the
        same as specified in <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>

        <t>Different values for DEPARTTIME, REPORTTIME, REACHABLETIME,
        MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT, MAX_RTR_SOLCITATIONS and
        MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT MAY be administratively set; however, if
        different values are chosen, all nodes on the link MUST consistently
        configure the same values. Most importantly, DEPARTTIME and REPORTTIME
        SHOULD be set to a value that is sufficiently longer than
        REACHABLETIME to avoid packet loss due to stale route optimization
        state.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroencaps"
               title="AERO Interface Encapsulation and Re-encapsulation">
        <t>Client AERO interfaces avoid encapsulation over Direct underlying
        interfaces and Proxyed underlying interfaces for which the first-hop
        access router is AERO-aware. Other AERO interfaces encapsulate packets
        according to whether they are entering the AERO interface from the
        network layer or if they are being re-admitted into the same AERO link
        they arrived on. This latter form of encapsulation is known as
        "re-encapsulation".</t>

        <t>For packets entering the AERO interface from the network layer, the
        AERO interface copies the "TTL/Hop Limit", "Type of Service/Traffic
        Class" <xref target="RFC2983"/>, "Flow Label"<xref target="RFC6438">
        </xref> (for IPv6) and "Congestion Experienced" <xref
        target="RFC3168"/> values in the packet's IP header into the
        corresponding fields in the encapsulation header(s).</t>

        <t>For packets undergoing re-encapsulation, the AERO interface instead
        copies these values from the original encapsulation header into the
        new encapsulation header, i.e., the values are transferred between
        encapsulation headers and *not* copied from the encapsulated packet's
        network-layer header. (Note especially that by copying the TTL/Hop
        Limit between encapsulation headers the value will eventually
        decrement to 0 if there is a (temporary) routing loop.) For IPv4
        encapsulation/re-encapsulation, the AERO interface sets the DF bit as
        discussed in <xref target="aeromtu"/>.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces configured over INET underlying interfaces
        encapsulate each packet in a SPAN header, then encapsulate the
        resulting SPAN packet in an INET header according to the next hop
        determined in the forwarding algorithm in <xref target="aeroalg"/>. If
        the next hop is reached via a secured tunnel, the AERO interface uses
        an INET encapsulation format specific to the secured tunnel type (see:
        <xref target="secure"/>). If the next hop is reached via an unsecured
        underlying interface, the AERO interface instead uses Generic UDP
        Encapsulation (GUE) <xref target="I-D.ietf-intarea-gue"/> or an
        alternate minimal encapsulation format <xref target="minimal"/>.</t>

        <t>When GUE encapsulation is used, the AERO interface next sets the
        UDP source port to a constant value that it will use in each
        successive packet it sends, and sets the UDP length field to the
        length of the SPAN packet plus 8 bytes for the UDP header itself plus
        the length of the GUE header (or 0 if GUE direct IP encapsulation is
        used). For packets sent to a Server or Relay, the AERO interface sets
        the UDP destination port to 8060, i.e., the IANA-registered port
        number for AERO. For packets sent to a Client, the AERO interface sets
        the UDP destination port to the port value stored in the neighbor
        cache entry for this Client. The AERO interface then either includes
        or omits the UDP checksum according to the GUE specification.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces observes the packet sizing and fragmentation
        considerations found in <xref target="aeromtu"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aerodecaps" title="AERO Interface Decapsulation">
        <t>AERO interfaces decapsulate packets destined either to the AERO
        node itself or to a destination reached via an interface other than
        the AERO interface the packet was received on. When the encapsulated
        packet arrives in multiple fragments, the AERO interface reassembles
        as discussed in <xref target="aeromtu"/>. Further decapsulation steps
        are performed according to the appropriate encapsulation format
        specification.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroauth"
               title="AERO Interface Data Origin Authentication">
        <t>AERO nodes employ simple data origin authentication procedures. In
        particular:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>AERO Relays, Servers and Proxys accept encapsulated data
            packets and control messages received from secured tunnels.</t>

            <t>AERO Servers and Proxys accept encapsulated data packets and NS
            messages used for Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) received
            from a source found in the ROS list.</t>

            <t>AERO Proxys and Clients accept packets that originate from
            within the same secured ANET.</t>

            <t>AERO Clients and Gateways accept packets from downstream
            network correspondents based on ingress filtering.</t>
          </list>AERO nodes silently drop any packets that do not satisfy the
        above data origin authentication procedures. Further security
        considerations are discussed <xref target="secure"/>.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroalg" title="AERO Interface Forwarding Algorithm">
        <t>IP packets enter a node's AERO interface either from the network
        layer (i.e., from a local application or the IP forwarding system) or
        from the link layer (i.e., from an AERO interface neighbor). All
        packets entering a node's AERO interface first undergo data origin
        authentication as discussed in <xref target="aeroauth"/>. Packets that
        satisfy data origin authentication are processed further, while all
        others are dropped silently.</t>

        <t>Packets that enter the AERO interface from the network layer are
        forwarded to an AERO interface neighbor. Packets that enter the AERO
        interface from the link layer are either re-admitted into the AERO
        link or forwarded to the network layer where they are subject to
        either local delivery or IP forwarding. In all cases, the AERO
        interface itself MUST NOT decrement the network layer TTL/Hop-count
        since its forwarding actions occur below the network layer.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces may have multiple underlying interfaces and/or
        neighbor cache entries for neighbors with multiple ifIndex-tuple
        registrations (see <xref target="interface"/>). The AERO interface
        uses each packet's DSCP value (and/or other traffic discriminators
        such as port number) to select an outgoing underlying interface based
        on the node's own QoS preferences, and also to select a destination
        link-layer address based on the neighbor's underlying interface with
        the highest preference. AERO implementations SHOULD allow for QoS
        preference values to be modified at runtime through network
        management.</t>

        <t>If multiple outgoing interfaces and/or neighbor interfaces have a
        preference of "high", the AERO node replicates the packet and sends
        one copy via each of the (outgoing / neighbor) interface pairs;
        otherwise, the node sends a single copy of the packet via an interface
        with the highest preference. AERO nodes keep track of which underlying
        interfaces are currently "reachable" or "unreachable", and only use
        "reachable" interfaces for forwarding purposes.</t>

        <t>The following sections discuss the AERO interface forwarding
        algorithms for Clients, Proxys, Servers and Relays. In the following
        discussion, a packet's destination address is said to "match" if it is
        the same as a cached address, or if it is covered by a cached prefix
        (which may be encoded in an AERO address).</t>

        <section anchor="cforw" title="Client Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's AERO interface from the
          network layer the Client searches for an asymmetric neighbor cache
          entry that matches the destination. If there is a match, the Client
          uses one or more "reachable" neighbor interfaces in the entry for
          packet forwarding. If there is no asymmetric neighbor cache entry,
          the Client instead forwards the packet toward a Server (the packet
          is intercepted by a Proxy if there is a Proxy on the path).</t>

          <t>When an IP packet enters a Client's AERO interface from the
          link-layer, if the destination matches one of the Client's MNPs or
          link-local addresses the Client decapsulates the packet (if
          necessary) and delivers it to the network layer. Otherwise, the
          Client drops the packet and MAY return a network-layer ICMP
          Destination Unreachable message subject to rate limiting (see: <xref
          target="aeroerr"/>).</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pforw" title="Proxy Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>For control messages originating from or destined to a Client,
          the Proxy intercepts the message and updates its proxy neighbor
          cache entry for the Client. The Proxy then forwards a (proxyed) copy
          of the control message. (For example, the Proxy forwards a proxied
          version of a Client's NS/RS message to the target neighbor, and
          forwards a proxied version of the NA/RA reply to the Client.)</t>

          <t>When the Proxy receives a data packet from a Client within the
          ANET, the Proxy searches for an asymmetric neighbor cache entry that
          matches the destination and forwards the packet as follows:<list
              style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches an asymmetric neighbor cache
              entry, the Proxy uses one or more "reachable" neighbor
              interfaces in the entry for packet forwarding via encapsulation.
              If the neighbor interface is in the same SPAN segment, the Proxy
              forwards the packet directly to the neighbor; otherwise, it
              forwards the packet to a Relay.</t>

              <t>else, the Proxy encapsulates and forwards the packet to a
              Relay while using the packet's destination address as the SPAN
              destination address. (If the destination is an AERO address, the
              Proxy instead uses the corresponding Subnet-Router anycast
              address for Client AERO addresses and the SPAN address for
              administratively-provisioned AERO addresses.).</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>When the Proxy receives an encapsulated data packet from an INET
          neighbor or from a secured tunnel, it accepts the packet only if
          data origin authentication succeeds and the SPAN destination address
          is its own address. If the packet is a SPAN fragment, the Proxy then
          adds the fragment to the reassembly buffer and returns if the
          reassembly is still incomplete. Otherwise, the Proxy reassembles the
          packet (if necessary) and continues processing.</t>

          <t>Next, the Proxy searches for a proxy neighbor cache entry that
          matches the destination. If there is a proxy neighbor cache entry in
          the REACHABLE state, the Proxy decapsulates and forwards the packet
          to the Client. If the neighbor cache entry is in the DEPARTED state,
          the Proxy instead re-encapsulates the packet and forwards it to a
          Relay. If there is no neighbor cache entry, the Proxy instead
          discards the packet.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="sforw" title="Server/Gateway Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>For control messages destined to a target Client's AERO address
          that are received from a secured tunnel, the Server (acting as a
          MAP) intercepts the message and sends an appropriate response on
          behalf of the Client. (For example, the Server sends an NA message
          reply in response to an NS message directed to one of its associated
          Clients.) If the Client's neighbor cache entry is in the DEPARTED
          state, however, the Server instead forwards the packet to the
          Client's new Server as discussed in <xref target="aeromob"/>.</t>

          <t>When the Server receives an encapsulated data packet from an INET
          neighbor or from a secured tunnel, it accepts the packet only if
          data origin authentication succeeds. If the SPAN destination address
          is its own address, the Server reassembles if necessary and discards
          the SPAN header (if the reassembly is incomplete, the Server instead
          adds the fragment to the reassembly buffer and returns). The Server
          then continues processing as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches a symmetric neighbor cache entry
              in the REACHABLE state the Server prepares the packet for
              forwarding to the destination Client. If the current header is a
              SPAN header, the Server reassembles if necessary and discards
              the SPAN header. The Server then forwards the packet according
              to the cached link-layer information, while using SPAN
              encapsulation for the Client's Proxyed/Native interfaces, simple
              INET encapsulation for NATed/VPNed interfaces, or no
              encapsulation for Direct interfaces.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches a symmetric neighbor cache
              entry in the DEPARETED state the Server re-encapsulates the
              packet and forwards it using the SPAN address of the Client's
              new Server as the destination.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches an asymmetric neighbor cache
              entry, the Server uses one or more "reachable" neighbor
              interfaces in the entry for packet forwarding via the local INET
              if the neighbor is in the same SPAN segment or via a Relay
              otherwise.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination is an AERO address that is not
              assigned on the AERO interface the Server drops the packet.</t>

              <t>else, the Server (acting as a Gateway) releases the packet to
              the network layer for local delivery or IP forwarding. Based on
              the information in the forwarding table, the network layer may
              return the packet to the same AERO interface in which case
              further processing occurs as below. (Note that this arrangement
              accommodates common implementations in which the IP forwarding
              table is not accessible from within the AERO interface. If the
              AERO interface can directly access the IP forwarding table, the
              forwarding table lookup can instead be performed internally from
              within the AERO interface itself.)</t>
            </list>When the Server's AERO interface receives a data packet
          from the network layer or from a NATed/VPNed/Direct Client, it
          processes the packet according to the network-layer destination
          address as follows:<list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches a symmetric or asymmetric neighbor
              cache entry the Server processes the packet as above.</t>

              <t>else, the Server encapsulates the packet and forwards it to a
              Relay. For administratively-assigned AERO address destinations,
              the Server uses the SPAN address corresponding to the
              destination as the SPAN destination address. For Client AERO
              address destinations, the Server uses the Subnet-Router anycast
              address corresponding to the destination as the SPAN destination
              address. For all others, the Server uses the packet's
              destination IP address as the SPAN destination address.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rforw" title="Relay Forwarding Algorithm">
          <t>Relays forward packets over secured tunnels the same as any IP
          router. When the Relay receives an encapsulated packet via a secured
          tunnel, it removes the INET header and searches for a forwarding
          table entry that matches the destination address in the next header.
          The Relay then processes the packet as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the destination matches one of the Relay's own addresses,
              the Relay submits the packet for local delivery.</t>

              <t>else, if the destination matches a forwarding table entry the
              Relay forwards the packet via a secured tunnel to the next hop.
              If the destination matches an MSP without matching an MNP,
              however, the Relay instead drops the packet and returns an ICMP
              Destination Unreachable message subject to rate limiting (see:
              <xref target="aeroerr"/>).</t>

              <t>else, the Relay drops the packet and returns an ICMP
              Destination Unreachable as above.</t>
            </list>As for any IP router, the Relay decrements the TTL/Hop
          Limit when it forwards the packet. If the packet is encapsulated in
          a SPAN header, only the Hop Limit in the SPAN header is decremented,
          and not the TTL/Hop Limit in the inner packet header.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromtu" title="AERO Interface MTU and Fragmentation">
        <t>The AERO interface is the node's attachment to the AERO link. For
        AERO link neighbor underlying interface paths that do not require
        encapsulation, the AERO interface sends unencapsulated IP packets. For
        other paths, the AERO interface acts as a tunnel ingress when it sends
        packets to the neighbor and as a tunnel egress when it receives
        packets from the neighbor.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces configure an MTU the same as for any IP interface,
        however the MTU does not reflect the physical size of any links in the
        path but rather determines the maximum size for reassembly. AERO
        interfaces observe the packet sizing considerations for tunnels
        discussed in <xref target="I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"/> and as
        specified below.</t>

        <t>The Internet Protocol expects that IP packets will either be
        delivered to the destination or a suitable Packet Too Big (PTB)
        message returned to support the process known as IP Path MTU Discovery
        (PMTUD) <xref target="RFC1191"/><xref target="RFC8201"/>. However, PTB
        messages may be crafted for malicious purposes or lost in the network
        <xref target="RFC2923"/>. This can be especially problematic for
        tunnels, where a condition known as a PMTUD "black hole" can result.
        For these reasons, AERO interfaces employ operational procedures that
        avoid interactions with PMTUD, including the use of fragmentation when
        necessary.</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces observe three different types of fragmentation.
        Source fragmentation occurs when the AERO interface (acting as a
        tunnel ingress) fragments the encapsulated packet into multiple
        fragments before admitting each fragment into the tunnel. Network
        fragmentation occurs when an encapsulated packet admitted into the
        tunnel by the ingress is fragmented by an IPv4 router on the path to
        the egress. Finally, link-layer fragmentation (aka link adaptation)
        occurs at a layer below IP and is coordinated between underlying data
        link endpoints.</t>

        <t>IPv6 specifies a minimum link Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of
        1280 bytes <xref target="RFC8200"/>. Although IPv4 specifies a smaller
        minimum link MTU of 68 bytes <xref target="RFC0791"/>, AERO interfaces
        also observe the IPv6 minimum for IPv4 even if encapsulated packets
        may incur network fragmentation.</t>

        <t>IPv6 specifies a minimum Maximum Reassembly Unit (MRU) of 1500
        bytes <xref target="RFC8200"/>, while the minimum MRU for IPv4 is only
        576 bytes <xref target="RFC1122"/> (but, note that many standard IPv6
        over IPv4 tunnel types already assume a larger MRU than the IPv4
        minimum).</t>

        <t>AERO interfaces therefore configure an MTU that MUST NOT be smaller
        than 1280 bytes, MUST NOT be larger than the minimum MRU among all
        nodes on the AERO link minus the encapsulation overhead ("ENCAPS"),
        and SHOULD NOT be smaller than 1500 bytes. AERO interfaces also
        configure a Maximum Segment Unit (MSU) as the maximum-sized
        encapsulated packet that the ingress can inject into the tunnel
        without source fragmentation. The MSU value MUST NOT be larger than
        1280 bytes if there is no operational assurance that a larger size can
        traverse the link along all paths.</t>

        <t>The network layer proceeds as follows when it forwards an IP packet
        to the AERO interface. For each IPv4 packet that is larger than the
        AERO interface MTU and with DF set to 0, the network layer uses IPv4
        fragmentation to break the packet into a minimum number of
        non-overlapping fragments where the first fragment is no larger than
        the MTU and the remaining fragments are no larger than the first. For
        all other IP packets, if the packet is larger than the AERO interface
        MTU, the network layer drops the packet and returns a PTB message to
        the original source. Otherwise, the network layer admits each IP
        packet or fragment into the AERO interface.</t>

        <t>For each IP packet admitted into AERO interface, if the neighbor is
        reached via an underlying interface that does not require
        encapsulation the AERO interface proceeds according to the underlying
        interface MTU. If the packet is no larger than the underlying
        interface MTU, the AERO interface presents the packet to the
        underlying interface. Otherwise, for IPv4 packets with DF set to 0 the
        AERO interface uses IPv4 fragmentation to break the packet into
        fragments no larger than the underlying interface MTU. For other
        packets, the AERO interface either performs link adaptation or drops
        the packet and returns a PTB message to the original source. (If the
        original source corresponds to a local application, the PTB would
        appear to have originated from a router on the path when in fact it
        was locally generated from within the AERO interface.) In the same
        way, when a packet that has been admitted into the AERO link reaches a
        target neighbor but is too large to be delivered over the final-hop
        underlying interface, the target either performs link adaptation or
        drops the packet and returns a PTB. Link adaptation is preferred in
        both cases when possible to avoid packet loss.</t>

        <t>For underlying interfaces that require encapsulation, the AERO
        interface (acting as a tunnel ingress) instead encapsulates the packet
        and performs path MTU procedures according to the specific
        encapsulation format. For INET interfaces, the ingress encapsulates
        the packet in a SPAN header. If the SPAN packet is larger than the
        MSU, the ingress source fragments the SPAN packet into a minimum
        number of non-overlapping fragments where the first fragment is no
        larger than the MSU and the remaining fragments are no larger than the
        first. The ingress then encapsulates each SPAN packet/fragment in an
        INET header and admits them into the tunnel. For IPv4, the ingress
        sets the DF bit to 0 in the INET header in case any network
        fragmentation is necessary. The encapsulated packets will be delivered
        to the egress, which reassembles them into a whole packet if
        necessary.</t>

        <t>By fragmenting at the SPAN layer instead of lower layers, standard
        IPv6 fragmentation and reassembly <xref target="RFC8200"/> ensures
        that IPv4 issues such as data corruption due to reassembly
        misassociations will not occur <xref target="RFC6864"/><xref
        target="RFC4963"/>. The ingress sends each fragment with minimal delay
        (i.e., in a multi-fragment burst) so that individual fragments are
        unlikely to be diverted to different destinations due to routing
        fluctuations.</t>

        <t>Since the SPAN header and IPv6 fragment extension header reduces
        the room available for packet data, but the original source has no way
        to control its insertion, the ingress MUST include their lengths in
        ENCAPS even for packets in which the header is absent.</t>

        <section anchor="atnips" title="AERO MTU Requirements">
          <t>In light of the above considerations, AERO interfaces MUST
          configure an MTU of 9180 bytes (i.e., the same as specified in <xref
          target="RFC2492"/>). This means that the AERO interface MUST be
          capable of reassembling original IP packets up to 9180 bytes in
          length. When an IP packet is admitted into an AERO interface, the
          interface encapsulates the packet using SPAN encapsulation and
          fragments the encapsulated packet into fragments that are no larger
          than 1280 bytes. The fragments will be reassembled by the tunnel
          egress that services the final destination.</t>

          <t>The AERO interfaces of Clients behind Proxys MAY see underlying
          interfaces with MTUs smaller than 9180 (but no smaller than the IP
          minimum link MTU). If a Client's underlying interfaces configure a
          diversity of MTUs (e.g., 1280, 1500, 4KB, 8KB, etc.) then neighbors
          on the link would appear to have multiple MTUs. IPv6 Path MTU
          Discovery <xref target="RFC8201"/> accounts for this possibility
          since MTU discovery must be performed even between nodes that appear
          to be connected to the same link.</t>

          <t>Applications that cannot tolerate loss in the network due to MTU
          restrictions should restrict themselves to sending packets no larger
          than the IP minimum link MTU, i.e., even if the current path MTU
          would appear to support a larger size. This is due to the fact that
          routing changes could cause the path to traverse links with smaller
          MTUs at any given point in time.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroerr" title="AERO Interface Error Handling">
        <t>When an AERO node admits a packet into the AERO interface, it may
        receive link-layer or network-layer error indications.</t>

        <t>A link-layer error indication is an ICMP error message generated by
        a router in the INET on the path to the neighbor or by the neighbor
        itself. The message includes an IP header with the address of the node
        that generated the error as the source address and with the link-layer
        address of the AERO node as the destination address.</t>

        <t>The IP header is followed by an ICMP header that includes an error
        Type, Code and Checksum. Valid type values include "Destination
        Unreachable", "Time Exceeded" and "Parameter Problem" <xref
        target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>. (AERO interfaces ignore
        all link-layer IPv4 "Fragmentation Needed" and IPv6 "Packet Too Big"
        messages since they only emit packets that are guaranteed to be no
        larger than the IP minimum link MTU as discussed in <xref
        target="aeromtu"/>.)</t>

        <t>The ICMP header is followed by the leading portion of the packet
        that generated the error, also known as the "packet-in-error". For
        ICMPv6, <xref target="RFC4443"/> specifies that the packet-in-error
        includes: "As much of invoking packet as possible without the ICMPv6
        packet exceeding the minimum IPv6 MTU" (i.e., no more than 1280
        bytes). For ICMPv4, <xref target="RFC0792"/> specifies that the
        packet-in-error includes: "Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data
        Datagram", however <xref target="RFC1812"/> Section 4.3.2.3 updates
        this specification by stating: "the ICMP datagram SHOULD contain as
        much of the original datagram as possible without the length of the
        ICMP datagram exceeding 576 bytes".</t>

        <t>The link-layer error message format is shown in <xref
        target="icmp2err"/> (where, "L2" and "L3" refer to link-layer and
        network-layer, respectively):</t>

        <t><figure anchor="icmp2err"
            title="AERO Interface Link-Layer Error Message Format">
            <artwork><![CDATA[     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ~                               ~
     |        L2 IP Header of        |
     |         error message         |
     ~                               ~
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |         L2 ICMP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
     ~                               ~   P
     |   IP and other encapsulation  |   a
     | headers of original L3 packet |   c
     ~                               ~   k
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   e
     ~                               ~   t
     |        IP header of           |   
     |      original L3 packet       |   i
     ~                               ~   n
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   
     ~                               ~   e
     |    Upper layer headers and    |   r
     |    leading portion of body    |   r
     |   of the original L3 packet   |   o
     ~                               ~   r
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ---
]]></artwork>
          </figure>The AERO node rules for processing these link-layer error
        messages are as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When an AERO node receives a link-layer Parameter Problem
            message, it processes the message the same as described as for
            ordinary ICMP errors in the normative references <xref
            target="RFC0792"/><xref target="RFC4443"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link-layer Time Exceeded
            messages, the IP ID field may be wrapping before earlier fragments
            awaiting reassembly have been processed. In that case, the node
            should begin including integrity checks and/or institute rate
            limits for subsequent packets.</t>

            <t>When an AERO node receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its asymmetric neighbor correspondents, the node
            should process the message as an indication that a path may be
            failing, and optionally initiate NUD over that path. If it
            receives Destination Unreachable messages over multiple paths, the
            node should allow future packets destined to the correspondent to
            flow through a default route and re-initiate route
            optimization.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Client receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its symmetric neighbor Servers, the Client should
            mark the path as unusable and use another path. If it receives
            Destination Unreachable messages on many or all paths, the Client
            should associate with a new Server and release its association
            with the old Server as specified in <xref target="newsrv"/>.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server receives persistent link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to encapsulated packets that it
            sends to one of its symmetric neighbor Clients, the Server should
            mark the underlying path as unusable and use another underlying
            path.</t>

            <t>When an AERO Server or Proxy receives link-layer Destination
            Unreachable messages in response to an encapsulated packet that it
            sends to one of its permanent neighbors, it treats the messages as
            an indication that the path to the neighbor may be failing.
            However, the dynamic routing protocol should soon reconverge and
            correct the temporary outage.</t>
          </list>When an AERO Relay receives a packet for which the
        network-layer destination address is covered by an MSP, if there is no
        more-specific routing information for the destination the Relay drops
        the packet and returns a network-layer Destination Unreachable message
        subject to rate limiting. The Relay writes the network-layer source
        address of the original packet as the destination address and uses one
        of its non link-local addresses as the source address of the
        message.</t>

        <t>When an AERO node receives an encapsulated packet for which the
        reassembly buffer it too small, it drops the packet and returns a
        network-layer Packet Too Big (PTB) message. The node first writes the
        MRU value into the PTB message MTU field, writes the network-layer
        source address of the original packet as the destination address and
        writes one of its non link-local addresses as the source address.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeropd"
               title="AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Autoconfiguration">
        <t>AERO Router Discovery, Prefix Delegation and Autoconfiguration are
        coordinated as discussed in the following Sections.</t>

        <section anchor="aeropd-dhcp" title="AERO ND/PD Service Model">
          <t>Each AERO Server on the link configures a PD service to
          facilitate Client requests. Each Server is provisioned with a
          database of MNP-to-Client ID mappings for all Clients enrolled in
          the AERO service, as well as any information necessary to
          authenticate each Client. The Client database is maintained by a
          central administrative authority for the AERO link and securely
          distributed to all Servers, e.g., via the Lightweight Directory
          Access Protocol (LDAP) <xref target="RFC4511"/>, via static
          configuration, etc. Clients receive the same service regardless of
          the Servers they select.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers use ND messages to maintain neighbor
          cache entries. AERO Servers configure their AERO interfaces as
          advertising interfaces, and therefore send unicast RA messages with
          a short Router Lifetime value (e.g., REACHABLETIME seconds) in
          response to a Client's RS message. Thereafter, Clients send
          additional RS messages to keep Server state alive.</t>

          <t>AERO Clients and Servers include PD parameters in RS/RA messages
          (see <xref target="I-D.templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt"/> for ND/PD
          alternatives). The unified ND/PD messages are exchanged between
          Client and Server according to the prefix management schedule
          required by the PD service. If the Client knows its MNP in advance,
          it can instead employ prefix registration by including its AERO
          address as the source address of an RS message and with an OMNI
          option with valid prefix registration information for the MNP. If
          the Server (and Proxy) accept the Client's MNP assertion, they
          inject the prefix into the routing system and establish the
          necessary neighbor cache state.</t>

          <t>The following sections specify the Client and Server
          behavior.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-client" title="AERO Client Behavior">
          <t>AERO Clients discover the addresses of Servers in a similar
          manner as described in <xref target="RFC5214"/>. Discovery methods
          include static configuration (e.g., from a flat-file map of Server
          addresses and locations), or through an automated means such as
          Domain Name System (DNS) name resolution <xref target="RFC1035"/>.
          Alternatively, the Client can discover Server addresses through a
          layer 2 data link login exchange, or through a unicast RA response
          to a multicast/anycast RS as described below. In the absence of
          other information, the Client can resolve the DNS Fully-Qualified
          Domain Name (FQDN) "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" where
          "linkupnetworks" is a constant text string and "[domainname]" is a
          DNS suffix for the AERO link (e.g., "example.com").</t>

          <t>To associate with a Server, the Client acts as a requesting
          router to request MNPs. The Client prepares an RS message with PD
          parameters and includes a Nonce and Timestamp option if the Client
          needs to correlate RA replies. If the Client already knows the
          Server's AERO address, it includes the AERO address as the
          network-layer destination address; otherwise, it includes the
          link-scoped All-Routers multicast (ff02::2) or Subnet-Router anycast
          (fe80::) address as the network-layer destination. If the Client
          already knows its own AERO address, it uses the AERO address as the
          network-layer source address; otherwise, it uses the unspecified
          AERO address (fe80::ffff:ffff) as the network-layer source
          address.</t>

          <t>The Client next includes an OMNI option in the RS message to
          register its link-layer information with the Server. The Client sets
          the OMNI option prefix registration information according to the
          MNP, and includes a first ifIndex-tuple corresponding to the
          underlying interface over which the Client will send the RS message.
          The Client MAY include additional ifIndex-tuples specific to other
          underlying interfaces. The Client MAY also include an SLLAO with a
          single link-layer address corresponding to the first OMNI option
          ifIndex-tuple. The Client sets a "primary" flag in the OMNI option
          if it wishes to enable proxy keepalives on this underlying
          interface.</t>

          <t>The Client then sends the RS message (either directly via Direct
          interfaces, via INET encapsulation for NATed interfaces, via a VPN
          for VPNed interfaces, via a Proxy for proxyed interfaces or via a
          Relay for native interfaces) and waits for an RA message reply (see
          <xref target="aeropd-server"/>). The Client retries up to
          MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS times until an RA is received. If the Client
          receives no RAs, or if it receives an RA with Router Lifetime set to
          0, the Client SHOULD abandon this Server and try another Server.
          Otherwise, the Client processes the PD information found in the RA
          message.</t>

          <t>Next, the Client creates a symmetric neighbor cache entry with
          the Server's AERO address as the network-layer address and the
          Server's encapsulation and/or link-layer addresses as the link-layer
          address. The Client records the RA Router Lifetime field value in
          the neighbor cache entry as the time for which the Server has
          committed to maintaining the MNP in the routing system, and caches
          the other RA configuration information including Cur Hop Limit, M
          and O flags, Reachable Time and Retrans Timer. The Client then
          autoconfigures AERO addresses for each of the delegated MNPs and
          assigns them to the AERO interface. The Client also caches any MSPs
          included in Route Information Options (RIOs) <xref
          target="RFC4191"/> as MSPs to associate with the AERO link, and
          assigns the MTU value in the MTU option to the underlying
          interface.</t>

          <t>The Client then registers additional underlying interfaces with
          the Server by sending RS messages via each additional interface. The
          RS messages include the same parameters as for the initial RS/RA
          exchange, but with destination address set to the Server's AERO
          address and with the initial OMNI option ifIndex-tuple corresponding
          to the underlying interface. The Client sets a "primary" flag in the
          OMNI option if it wishes to enable proxy keepalives on this
          underlying interface.</t>

          <t>Following autoconfiguration, the Client sub-delegates the MNPs to
          its attached EUNs and/or the Client's own internal virtual
          interfaces as described in <xref target="I-D.templin-v6ops-pdhost"/>
          to support the Client's downstream attached "Internet of Things
          (IoT)". The Client subsequently sends additional RS messages over
          each underlying interface before the Router Lifetime received for
          that interface expires.</t>

          <t>After the Client registers its underlying interfaces, it may wish
          to change one or more registrations, e.g., if an interface changes
          address or becomes unavailable, if QoS preferences change, etc. To
          do so, the Client prepares an RS message to send over any available
          underlying interface. The RS includes an OMNI option with prefix
          registration information specific to its MNP, with a first
          ifIndex-tuple specific to the selected underlying interface, and
          with any additional ifIndex-tuples specific to other underlying
          interfaces. The Client includes fresh ifIndex-tuple values to update
          the Server's neighbor cache entry. When the Client receives the
          Server's RA response, it has assurance that the Server has been
          updated with the new information.</t>

          <t>If the Client wishes to discontinue use of a Server it issues an
          RS message over any underlying interface with an OMNI option with a
          prefix release indication. When the Server processes the message, it
          releases the MNP, sets the symmetric neighbor cache entry state for
          the Client to DEPARTED and returns an RA reply with Router Lifetime
          set to 0. After a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds), the Server
          withdraws the MNP from the routing system.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="aeropd-server" title="AERO Server Behavior">
          <t>AERO Servers act as IP routers and support a PD service for
          Clients. Servers arrange to add their AERO addresses to a static map
          of Server addresses for the link and/or the DNS resource records for
          the FQDN "linkupnetworks.[domainname]" before entering service.
          Server addresses should be geographically and/or topologically
          referenced, and made available for discovery by Clients on the AERO
          link.</t>

          <t>When a Server receives a prospective Client's RS message on its
          AERO interface, it SHOULD return an immediate RA reply with Router
          Lifetime set to 0 if it is currently too busy or otherwise unable to
          service the Client. Otherwise, the Server authenticates the RS
          message and processes the PD parameters. The Server first determines
          the correct MNPs to delegate to the Client by searching the Client
          database. When the Server delegates the MNPs, it also creates a
          forwarding table entry for each MNP so that the MNPs are propagated
          into the routing system (see: <xref target="scaling"/>). For IPv6,
          the Server creates an IPv6 forwarding table entry for each MNP. For
          IPv4, the Server creates an IPv6 forwarding table entry with the
          SPAN Compatibility Prefix (SCP) corresponding to the IPv4
          address.</t>

          <t>The Server next creates a symmetric neighbor cache entry for the
          Client using the base AERO address as the network-layer address and
          with lifetime set to no more than the smallest PD lifetime. Next,
          the Server updates the neighbor cache entry by recording the
          information in each ifIndex-tuple in the RS OMNI option. The Server
          also records the actual SPAN/INET addresses in the neighbor cache
          entry. If an SLLAO was present, the Server also compares the SLLAO
          address information for the first ifIndex-tuple with the SPAN/INET
          information to determine if there is a NAT on the path.</t>

          <t>Next, the Server prepares an RA message using its AERO address as
          the network-layer source address and the network-layer source
          address of the RS message as the network-layer destination address.
          The Server sets the Router Lifetime to the time for which it will
          maintain the symmetric neighbor cache entry, and sets Cur Hop Limit,
          M and O flags, Reachable Time and Retrans Timer to values
          appropriate for the AERO link. The Server includes the delegated
          MNPs, any other PD parameters and an OMNI option with an
          ifIndex-tuple with ifIndex set to 0. The Server then includes one or
          more RIOs that encode the MSPs for the AERO link, plus an MTU option
          (see <xref target="aeromtu"/>). The Server finally forwards the
          message to the Client using SPAN/INET, INET, or NULL encapsulation
          as necessary.</t>

          <t>After the initial RS/RA exchange, the Server maintains a
          ReachableTime timer for the Client's symmetric neighbor cache entry
          set to expire after Router Lifetime seconds. If the Client (or
          Proxy) issues additional RS messages, the Server sends an RA
          response and resets ReachableTime. If the Server receives an ND
          message with PD release indication it sets the Client's symmetric
          neighbor cache entry to the DEPARTED state and withdraws the MNP
          from the routing system after a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds). If
          ReachableTime expires before a new RS is received, the Server
          deletes the neighbor cache entry and withdraws the MNP without
          delay.</t>

          <t>The Server processes any ND/PD messages pertaining to the Client
          and returns an NA/RA reply in response to solicitations. The Server
          may also issue unsolicited RA messages, e.g., with PD reconfigure
          parameters to cause the Client to renegotiate its PDs, with Router
          Lifetime set to 0 if it can no longer service this Client, etc.
          Finally, If the symmetric neighbor cache entry is in the DEPARTED
          state, the Server deletes the entry after DepartTime expires.</t>

          <t>Note: Clients SHOULD notify former Servers of their departures,
          but Servers are responsible for expiring neighbor cache entries and
          withdrawing routes even if no departure notification is received
          (e.g., if the Client leaves the network unexpectedly). Servers
          SHOULD therefore set Router Lifetime to REACHABLETIME seconds in
          solicited RA messages to minimize persistent stale cache information
          in the absence of Client departure notifications. A short Router
          Lifetime also ensures that proactive Client/Server RS/RA messaging
          will keep any NAT state alive (see above).</t>

          <t>Note: All Servers on an AERO link MUST advertise consistent
          values in the RA Cur Hop Limit, M and O flags, Reachable Time and
          Retrans Timer fields the same as for any link, since unpredictable
          behavior could result if different Servers on the same link
          advertised different values.</t>

          <section title="Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA)">
            <t>When DHCPv6 is used as the ND/PD service back end, AERO Clients
            and Servers are always on the same link (i.e., the AERO link) from
            the perspective of DHCPv6. However, in some implementations the
            DHCPv6 server and ND function may be located in separate modules.
            In that case, the Server's AERO interface module can act as a
            Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA)<xref target="RFC6221">
            </xref> to relay PD messages to and from the DHCPv6 server
            module.</t>

            <t>When the LDRA receives an authentic RS message, it extracts the
            PD message parameters and uses them to construct an
            IPv6/UDP/DHCPv6 message. It sets the IPv6 source address to the
            source address of the RS message, sets the IPv6 destination
            address to 'All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers' and sets the UDP
            fields to values that will be understood by the DHCPv6 server.</t>

            <t>The LDRA then wraps the message in a DHCPv6 'Relay-Forward'
            message header and includes an 'Interface-Id' option that includes
            enough information to allow the LDRA to forward the resulting
            Reply message back to the Client (e.g., the Client's link-layer
            addresses, a security association identifier, etc.). The LDRA also
            wraps the OMNI option and SLLAO into the Interface-Id option, then
            forwards the message to the DHCPv6 server.</t>

            <t>When the DHCPv6 server prepares a Reply message, it wraps the
            message in a 'Relay-Reply' message and echoes the Interface-Id
            option. The DHCPv6 server then delivers the Relay-Reply message to
            the LDRA, which discards the Relay-Reply wrapper and IPv6/UDP
            headers, then uses the DHCPv6 message to construct an RA response
            to the Client. The Server uses the information in the Interface-Id
            option to prepare the RA message and to cache the link-layer
            addresses taken from the OMNI option and SLLAO echoed in the
            Interface-Id option.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aero-proxy" title="The AERO Proxy">
        <t>Clients may connect to ANETs that require a perimeter security
        gateway to enable communications to Servers in outside INETs. In that
        case, the ANET can employ an AERO Proxy. The Proxy is located at the
        ANET/INET border and listens for RS messages originating from or RA
        messages destined to ANET Clients. The Proxy acts on these control
        messages as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>when the Proxy receives an RS message from a new ANET Client,
            it first authenticates the message then examines the network-layer
            destination address. If the destination address is a Server's AERO
            address, the Proxy proceeds to the next step. Otherwise, if the
            destination is All-Routers multicast or Subnet-Router anycast, the
            Proxy selects a "nearby" Server that is likely to be a good
            candidate to serve the Client and replaces the destination address
            with the Server's AERO address. Next, the Proxy creates a proxy
            neighbor cache entry and caches the Client and Server link-layer
            addresses along with the OMNI option information and any other
            identifying information including Transaction IDs, Client
            Identifiers, Nonce values, etc. The Proxy then replaces the SLLAO
            in the RS message (if present) with a new SLLAO with a single
            ifIndex-tuple matching the first ifIndex-tuple in the OMNI option
            and with the Link Layer Address and Port Number fields set to the
            Proxy's SPAN address. The Proxy finally encapsulates the (proxyed)
            RS message in a SPAN header with destination set to the Server's
            SPAN address then forwards the message into the SPAN.</t>

            <t>when the Server receives the RS, it authenticates the message
            then creates or updates a symmetric neighbor cache entry for the
            Client with the Proxy's SPAN address as the link-layer address.
            The Server then sends an RA message back to the Proxy via the
            SPAN.</t>

            <t>when the Proxy receives the RA, it authenticates the message
            and matches it with the proxy neighbor cache entry created by the
            RS. The Proxy then caches the PD route information as a mapping
            from the Client's MNPs to the Client's ANET address, caches the
            Server's advertised Router Lifetime and sets the neighbor cache
            entry state to REACHABLE. The Proxy then replaces the RA SLLAO
            with an SLLAO with its own ANET address, sets the P bit in the RA
            flags field, sets the OMNI option "primary" flag according to the
            cached value from the RS, optionally rewrites the Router Lifetime
            and forwards the (proxyed) message to the Client. If the RA
            included an MTU option, the Proxy rewrites the MTU value (if
            necessary) to the minimum of the received MTU value and the MTU of
            the underlying ANET interface.</t>
          </list>After the initial RS/RA exchange, the Proxy forwards any
        Client data packets for which there is no matching asymmetric neighbor
        cache entry to a Relay via the SPAN. The Proxy instead forwards any
        Client data destined to an asymmetric neighbor cache target directly
        to the target according to the link-layer information - the process of
        establishing asymmetric neighbor cache entries is specified in <xref
        target="predirect"/>.</t>

        <t>While the Client is still attached to the ANET, the Proxy sends NS,
        RS and/or unsolicited NA messages to update the Server's symmetric
        neighbor cache entries on behalf of the Client and/or to convey QoS
        updates. If the "primary" flag was set, the Proxy performs periodic
        RS/RA exchanges on the Client's behalf according to the cached Server
        lifetime. This allows for higher-frequency Proxy-initiated RS/RA
        messaging over well-connected INET infrastructure supplemented by
        lower-frequency Client-initiated RS/RA messaging over constrained ANET
        data links.</t>

        <t>If the Server ceases to send solicited advertisements, the Proxy
        deletes the neighbor cache entry and sends unsolicited RAs on the ANET
        interface with destination set to All-Nodes multicast (ff02::1) and
        with Router Lifetime set to zero to inform Clients that the Server has
        failed. Although the Proxy engages in ND exchanges on behalf of the
        Client, the Client can also send ND messages on its own behalf, e.g.,
        if it is in a better position than the Proxy to convey QoS changes,
        etc. For this reason, the Proxy marks any Client-originated
        solicitation messages (e.g. by inserting a Nonce option) so that it
        can return the solicited advertisement to the Client instead of
        processsing it locally.</t>

        <t>If the Client becomes unreachable, the Proxy sets the neighbor
        cache entry state to DEPARTED and retains the entry for DEPARTTIME
        seconds. While the state is DEPARTED, the Proxy forwards any packets
        destined to the Client to a Relay. The Relay in turn forwards the
        packets to the Client's current Server. When DepartTime expires, the
        Proxy deletes the neighbor cache entry and discards any further
        packets destined to this (now forgotten) Client.</t>

        <t>When a neighbor cache entry transitions to DEPARTED, some of the
        fragments of a multiple fragment packet may have already arrived at
        the Proxy while others are en route to the Client's new location,
        however no special attention in the reassembly algorithm is necessary
        when re-routed packets are simply treated as loss. Since the fragments
        of a multiple-fragment packet are sent in minimal inter-packet delay
        bursts, such occasions will be rare.</t>

        <t>In some ANETs that employ a Proxy, the Client's MNP can be injected
        into the ANET routing system. In that case, the Client can send data
        messages without encapsulation so that the ANET native routing system
        transports the unencapsulated packets to the Proxy. This can be very
        beneficial, e.g., if the Client connects to the ANET via low-end data
        links such as some aviation wireless links.</t>

        <t>If the first-hop ANET access router is AERO-aware, the Client can
        avoid encapsulation for both its control and data messages. When the
        Client connects to the link, it can send an unencapsulated RS message
        with source address set to its AERO address and with destination
        address set to the AERO address of the Client's selected Server or to
        All-Routers multicast or Subnet-Router anycast. The Client includes an
        OMNI option formatted as specified in <xref
        target="I-D.templin-atn-aero-interface"/>.</t>

        <t>The Client then sends the unencapsulated RS message, which will be
        intercepted by the AERO-Aware access router. The access router then
        encapsulates the RS message in an ANET header with its own address as
        the source address and the address of a Proxy as the destination
        address. The access router further remembers the address of the Proxy
        so that it can encapsulate future data packets from the Client via the
        same Proxy. If the access router needs to change to a new Proxy, it
        simply sends another RS message toward the Server via the new Proxy on
        behalf of the Client.</t>

        <t>In some cases, the access router and Proxy may be one and the same
        node. In that case, the node would be located on the same physical
        link as the Client, but its message exchanges with the Server would
        need to pass through a security gateway at the ANET/INET border. The
        method for deploying access routers and Proxys (i.e. as a single node
        or multiple nodes) is an ANET-local administrative consideration.</t>

        <section anchor="pulse"
                 title="Detecting and Responding to Server Failures">
          <t>In environments where fast recovery from Server failure is
          required, Proxys SHOULD use proactive Neighbor Unreachability
          Detection (NUD) to track Server reachability in a similar fashion as
          for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) <xref
          target="RFC5880"/>. Proxys can then quickly detect and react to
          failures so that cached information is re-established through
          alternate paths. The NUD control messaging is carried only over
          well-connected ground domain networks (i.e., and not low-end
          aeronautical radio links) and can therefore be tuned for rapid
          response.</t>

          <t>Proxys perform proactive NUD with Servers for which there are
          currently active ANET Clients by sending continuous NS messages in
          rapid succession, e.g., one message per second. The Proxy sends the
          NS message via the SPAN with the Proxy's AERO address as the source
          and the AERO address of the Server as the destination. When the
          Proxy is also sending RS messages to the Server on behalf of ANET
          Clients, the resulting RA responses can be considered as equivalent
          hints of forward progress. This means that the Proxy need not also
          send a periodic NS if it has already sent an RS within the same
          period. If the Server fails (i.e., if the Proxy ceases to receive
          advertisements), the Proxy can quickly inform Clients by sending
          multicast RA messages on the ANET interface.</t>

          <t>The Proxy sends RA messages on the ANET interface with source
          address set to the Server's address, destination address set to
          All-Nodes multicast, and Router Lifetime set to 0. The Proxy SHOULD
          send MAX_FINAL_RTR_ADVERTISEMENTS RA messages separated by small
          delays <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Any Clients on the ANET that had
          been using the failed Server will receive the RA messages and
          associate with a new Server.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="predirect" title="AERO Route Optimization">
        <t>While data packets are flowing between a source and target node,
        route optimization SHOULD be used. Route optimization is initiated by
        the first eligible Route Optimization Source (ROS) closest to the
        source as follows:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>For Clients on VPNed, NATed and Direct interfaces, the Server
            is the ROS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on Proxyed interfaces, the Proxy is the ROS.</t>

            <t>For Clients on native interfaces, the Client itself is the
            ROS.</t>

            <t>For correspondent nodes on INET/EUN interfaces serviced by a
            Gateway, the Gateway is the ROS.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The route optimization procedure is conducted between the ROS and
        the target Server/Gateway acting as a Route Optimization Responder
        (ROR) in the same manner as for IPv6 ND Address Resolution and using
        the same NS/NA messaging. The target may either be a MNP Client
        serviced by a Server, or a non-MNP correspondent reachable via a
        Gateway.</t>

        <t>The procedures are specified in the following sections.</t>

        <section anchor="sendns" title="Route Optimization Initiation">
          <t>While data packets are flowing from the source node toward a
          target node, the ROS performs address resolution by sending an NS
          message to receive a solicited NA message from the ROR.</t>

          <t>When the ROS sends an NS, it includes the AERO address of the ROS
          as the source address (e.g., fe80::1) and the AERO address
          corresponding to the data packet's destination address as the
          destination address (e.g., if the destination address is
          2001:db8:1:2::1 then the corresponding AERO address is
          fe80::2001:db8:1:2). The NS message includes an OMNI option with a
          single ifIndex-tuple with ifIndex set to 0, and an SLLAO with the
          SPAN address of the ROS. The message also includes a Nonce and
          Timestamp option if the ROS needs to correlate NA replies.</t>

          <t>The ROS then encapsulates the NS message in a SPAN header with
          source set to its own SPAN address and destination set to the data
          packet's destination address, then sends the message into the SPAN
          without decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relayns" title="Relaying the NS">
          <t>When the Relay receives the NS message from the ROS, it discards
          the INET header and determines that the ROR is the next hop by
          consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the SPAN header
          destination address. The Relay then forwards the SPAN message toward
          the ROR the same as for any IPv6 router. The final-hop Relay in the
          SPAN will deliver the message via a secured tunnel to the ROR.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="nsna" title="Processing the NS and Sending the NA">
          <t>When the ROR receives the NS message, it examines the AERO
          destination address to determine whether it has a neighbor cache
          entry and/or route that matches the target. If there is no match,
          the ROR drops the NS message. Otherwise, the ROR continues
          processing as follows:</t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>if the target belongs to an MNP Client neighbor in the
              DEPARTED state the ROR changes the NS message SPAN destination
              address to the SPAN address of the Client's new Server, forwards
              the message into the SPAN and returns from processing.</t>

              <t>If the target belongs to an MNP Client neighbor in the
              REACHABLE state, the ROR instead adds the AERO source address to
              the target Client's Report List with time set to ReportTime.</t>

              <t>If the target belongs to a non-MNP route, the ROR continues
              processing without adding an entry to the Report List.</t>
            </list>The ROR then prepares a solicited NA message to send back
          to the ROS but does not create a neighbor cache entry. The ROR sets
          the NA source address to the destination AERO address of the NS, and
          includes the Nonce value received in the NS plus the current
          Timestamp.</t>

          <t>If the target belongs to an MNP Client, the ROR then includes an
          OMNI option with prefix registration length set to the length of the
          MNP; otherwise, set to the maximum of the non-MNP prefix length and
          64. (Note that a /64 limit is imposed to avoid causing the ROS to
          set short prefixes (e.g., "default") that would match destinations
          for which the routing system includes more-specific prefixes.)</t>

          <t>The ROR next includes a first ifIndex-tuple in the OMNI option
          with ifIndex set to 0. If the target belongs to an MNP Client, the
          ROR next includes additional ifIndex-tuples in the OMNI option for
          each of the target Client's underlying interfaces with current
          information for each interface</t>

          <t>The ROR then includes a TLLAO option with ifIndex-tuples in
          one-to-one correspondence with the tuples that appear in the OMNI
          option. For NATed, VPNed and Direct interfaces, the link layer
          addresses are the SPAN address of the ROR. For Proxyed interfaces,
          the link-layer addresses are the SPAN addresses of the Proxy's INET
          interfaces. For native interfaces, the link-layer addresses are the
          SPAN addesses of the Client's native interfaces.</t>

          <t>The ROR finally encapsulates the NA message in a SPAN header with
          source set to its own SPAN address and destination set to the source
          SPAN address of the NS message, then forwards the message into the
          SPAN without decrementing the network-layer TTL/Hop Limit field.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="relayna" title="Relaying the NA">
          <t>When the Relay receives the NA message from the ROR, it discards
          the INET header and determines that the ROS is the next hop by
          consulting its standard IPv6 forwarding table for the SPAN header
          destination address. The Relay then forwards the SPAN-encapsulated
          NA message toward the ROS the same as for any IPv6 router. The
          final-hop Relay in the SPAN will deliver the message via a secured
          tunnel to the ROS.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="procna" title="Processing the NA">
          <t>When the ROS receives the solicited NA message, it caches the
          source SPAN address then discards the INET and SPAN headers. The ROS
          next verifies the Nonce and Timestamp values (if present), then
          creates an asymmetric neighbor cache entry for the ROR and caches
          all information found in the solicited NA OMNI and TLLAO options.
          The ROS finally sets the asymmetric neighbor cache entry lifetime to
          REACHABLETIME seconds.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="postro" title="Route Optimization Maintenance">
          <t>Following route optimization, the ROS forwards future data
          packets destined to the target via the addresses found in the cached
          link-layer information. The route optimization is shared by all
          sources that send packets to the target via the ROS, i.e., and not
          just the source on behalf of which the route optimization was
          initiated.</t>

          <t>While new data packets destined to the target are flowing through
          the ROS, it sends additional NS messages to the ROR before
          ReachableTime expires to receive a fresh solicited NA message the
          same as described in the previous sections (route optimization
          refreshment strategies are an implementation matter, with a
          non-normative example given in <xref target="rorefresh"/>). The ROS
          uses the cached SPAN address of the ROR as the NS SPAN destination
          address, and sends up to MAX_UNICAST_SOLICIT NS messages separated
          by 1 second until an NA is received. If no NA is received, the ROS
          assumes that the current ROR has become unreachable and deletes the
          neighbor cache entry. Subsequent data packets will trigger a new
          route optimization per <xref target="sendns"/> to discover a new ROR
          while initial data packets travel over a suboptimal route.</t>

          <t>If an NA is received, the ROS then updates the asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry to refresh ReachableTime, while (for MNP
          destinations) the ROR adds or updates the ROS address to the target
          Client's Report List and with time set to ReportTime. While no data
          packets are flowing, the ROS instead allows ReachableTime for the
          asymmetric neighbor cache entry to expire. When ReachableTime
          expires, the ROS deletes the asymmetric neighbor cache entry. Any
          future data packets flowing through the ROS will again trigger a new
          route optimization.</t>

          <t>The ROS may also receive unsolicited NA messages from the ROR at
          any time (see: <xref target="aeromob"/>). If there is an asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry for the target, the ROS updates the link-layer
          information but does not update ReachableTime since the receipt of
          an unsolicited NA does not confirm that the forward path is still
          working. If there is no asymmetric neighbor cache entry, the ROS
          simply discards the unsolicited NA.</t>

          <t>In this arrangement, the ROS holds an asymmetric neighbor cache
          entry for the ROR, but the ROR does not hold an asymmetric neighbor
          cache entry for the ROS. The route optimization neighbor
          relationship is therefore asymmetric and unidirectional. If the
          target node also has packets to send back to the source node, then a
          separate route optimization procedure is performed in the reverse
          direction. But, there is no requirement that the forward and reverse
          paths be symmetric.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="nud" title="Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD)">
        <t>AERO nodes perform Neighbor Unreachability Detection (NUD) per
        <xref target="RFC4861"/>. NUD is performed either reactively in
        response to persistent link-layer errors (see <xref
        target="aeroerr"/>) or proactively to confirm reachability. The NUD
        algorithm is based on periodic authentic NS/NA message exchanges. The
        algorithm may further be seeded by ND hints of forward progress, but
        care must be taken to avoid inferring reachability based on spoofed
        information. For example, authentic RS/RA exchanges may be considered
        as acceptable hints of forward progress, while spurious data packets
        should not be.</t>

        <t>When an ROR directs an ROS to a neighbor with one or more target
        link-layer addresses, the ROS can proactively test each direct path by
        sending an initial NS message to elicit a solicited NA response. While
        testing the paths, the ROS can optionally continue sending packets via
        the SPAN, maintain a small queue of packets until target reachability
        is confirmed, or (optimistically) allow packets to flow via the direct
        paths. In any case, the ROS should only consider the neighbor
        unreachable if NUD fails over multiple target link-layer address
        paths.</t>

        <t>When a ROS sends an NS message used for NUD, it uses its AERO
        addresses as the IPv6 source address and the AERO address
        corresponding to a target link-layer address as the destination. For
        each target link-layer address, the source node encapsulates the NS
        message in SPAN/INET headers with its own SPAN address as the source
        and the SPAN address of the target as the destination, If the target
        is located within the same SPAN segment, the source sets the INET
        address of the target as the destination; otherwise, it sets the INET
        address of a Relay as the destination. The source then forwards the
        message into the SPAN.</t>

        <t>Paths that pass NUD tests are marked as "reachable", while those
        that do not are marked as "unreachable". These markings inform the
        AERO interface forwarding algorithm specified in <xref
        target="aeroalg"/>.</t>

        <t>Proxys can perform NUD to verify Server reachability on behalf of
        their proxyed Clients to reduce Client-initated control messaging
        overhead.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeromob"
               title="Mobility Management and Quality of Service (QoS)">
        <t>AERO is a Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) service. Each
        Server is responsible for only a subset of the Clients on the AERO
        link, as opposed to a Centralized Mobility Management (CMM) service
        where there is a single network mobility collective entity for all
        Clients. Clients coordinate with their associated Servers via RS/RA
        exchanges to maintain the DMM profile, and the AERO routing system
        tracks all current Client/Server peering relationships.</t>

        <t>Servers provide a Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) for their dependent
        Clients. Clients are responsible for maintaining neighbor
        relationships with their Servers through periodic RS/RA exchanges,
        which also serves to confirm neighbor reachability. When a Client's
        underlying interface address and/or QoS information changes, the
        Client is responsible for updating the Server with this new
        information. Note that for Proxyed interfaces, however, the Proxy can
        perform the RS/RA exchanges on the Client's behalf.</t>

        <t>Mobility management considerations are specified in the following
        sections.</t>

        <section anchor="mobman" title="Mobility Update Messaging">
          <t>Servers acting as MAPs accommodate Client mobility and/or QoS
          change events by sending unsolicited NA messages to each ROS in the
          target Client's Report List. When a MAP sends an unsolicited NA
          message, it sets the IPv6 source address to the Client's AERO
          address and sets the IPv6 destination address to All-Nodes
          multicast. The MAP also includes an OMNI option with prefix
          registration information, with a first ifIndex-tuple with ifIndex
          set to 0, and with additional ifIndex-tuples for the target Client's
          remaining interfaces. The MAP then includes a TLLAO with
          corresponding ifIndex-tuples, with the link layer address of the
          first tuple set to the MAP's SPAN address and with link layer
          addresses of the remaining tuples set to the corresponding target
          SPAN addresses. The MAP finally encapsulates the message in a SPAN
          header with source set to its own SPAN address and destination set
          to the SPAN address of the ROS, then sends the message to a Relay
          which in turn forwards it to the ROS.</t>

          <t>As discussed in Section 7.2.6 of <xref target="RFC4861"/>, the
          transmission and reception of unsolicited NA messages is unreliable
          but provides a useful optimization. In well-connected Internetworks
          with robust data links unsolicited NA messages will be delivered
          with high probability, but in any case the MAP can optionally send
          up to MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT unsolicited NAs to each ROS to
          increase the likelihood that at least one will be received.</t>

          <t>When the ROS receives an unsolicited NA message, it ignores the
          message if there is no existing neighbor cache entry for the Client.
          Otherwise, it uses the included OMNI option and TLLAO information to
          update the neighbor cache entry, but does not reset ReachableTime
          since the receipt of an unsolicited NA message from the target
          Server does not provide confirmation that any forward paths to the
          target Client are working.</t>

          <t>If unsolicited NA messages are lost, the ROS may be left with
          stale address and/or QoS information for the Client for up to
          REACHABLETIME seconds. During this time, the ROS can continue
          sending packets according to its stale neighbor cache information.
          When ReachableTime is close to expiring, the ROS will re-initiate
          route optimization and receive fresh state information.</t>

          <t>In addition to sending unsolicited NA messages to the current set
          of ROSs for the Client, the MAP also sends unsolicited NAs to the
          former link-layer address for any ifIndex-tuple for which the
          link-layer address has changed. The NA messages update Proxys or
          Servers that cannot easily detect (e.g., without active probing)
          when a formerly-active Client has departed.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="llchange"
                 title="Announcing Link-Layer Address and/or QoS Preference Changes">
          <t>When a Client needs to change its ANET addresses and/or QoS
          preferences (e.g., due to a mobility event), either the Client or
          its Proxys send RS messages to the Server via the SPAN with an OMNI
          option and SLLAO that include an ifIndex-tuple with the new link
          quality and address information.</t>

          <t>Up to MAX_RTR_SOLICITATION RS messages MAY be sent in parallel
          with sending actual data packets in case one or more RAs are lost.
          If all RAs are lost, the Client SHOULD re-associate with a new
          Server.</t>

          <t>When the Server receives the Client's changes, it sends
          unsolicited NA messages to all nodes in the Report List the same as
          described in the previous section.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newlink" title="Bringing New Links Into Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to bring new underlying interfaces into
          service (e.g., when it activates a new data link), it sends an RS
          message to the Server via the underlying interface with an OMNI
          option with appropriate link quality values and with an SLLAO (if
          necessary) with link-layer address information for the new
          link..</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="rmlink" title="Removing Existing Links from Service">
          <t>When a Client needs to remove existing underlying interfaces from
          service (e.g., when it de-activates an existing data link), it sends
          an RS message to its Server with an OMNI option with appropriate
          link quality values.</t>

          <t>If the Client needs to send RS messages over an underlying
          interface other than the one being removed from service, it MUST
          include an ifIndex-tuple for the sending interface as the first
          tuple and include additional ifIndex-tuples with appropriate link
          quality values for any underlying interfaces being removed from
          service.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="newsrv" title="Moving to a New Server">
          <t>When a Client associates with a new Server, it performs the
          Client procedures specified in <xref target="aeropd-client"/>. The
          Client also includes a notification identifier in the RS message
          OMNI option per <xref target="I-D.templin-atn-aero-interface"/> if
          it wants the new Server to notify the old Server.</t>

          <t>When the new Server receives the Client's RS message, it responds
          by returning an RA as specified in <xref target="aeropd-server"/>.
          If the Client's RS includes a notification identifier, the new
          Server also prepares an RS or unsolicited NA message to send to the
          old Server. The RS/NA message includes the Client's AERO address as
          the source address, the old Server's AERO address as the destination
          address, and an OMNI option and S/TLLAO with an ifIndex-tuple with
          ifIndex set to 0. The OMNI option includes a prefix release
          indication, and the S/TLLAO includes the SPAN address of the new
          Server. For RS messages, the new Server retries up to
          MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS attempts until an RA is received. (Note that
          the Client can alternatively send RS/NA messages with a release
          indication to the old Server on its own behalf, however, this
          additional Client messaging may be undesirable in some environments.
          Note also that the choice of using RS or unsolicited NA is based on
          the need for a reliable acknowledgement; in environments where
          Router Lifetimes can be expected to be short, sending up to
          MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENT unsolicited NAs may be sufficient.)</t>

          <t>When the old Server processes the RS/NA, it changes the symmetric
          neighbor cache entry state to DEPARTED, sets the link-layer address
          of the Client to the address found in the S/TLLAO, and sets
          DepartTime to DEPARTTIME seconds. For RS messages, the old Server
          then returns an immediate RA message with Router Lifetime set to 0.
          After a short delay (e.g., 2 seconds) the old Server withdraws the
          Client's MNP from the routing system. After DepartTime expires, the
          old Server deletes the symmetric neighbor cache entry.</t>

          <t>The old Server also sends unsolicited NA messages to all ROSs in
          the Client's Report List with an OMNI option with prefix release
          indication, with a single ifIndex-tuple with ifIndex set to 0 and
          with the SPAN address of the new Server in a companion TLLAO. When
          the ROS receives the NA, it caches the address of the new Server in
          the existing asymmetric neighbor cache entry and marks the entry as
          STALE. Subsequent data packets will then flow according to any
          existing cached link-layer information and trigger a new NS/NA
          exchange via the new Server.</t>

          <t>Clients SHOULD NOT move rapidly between Servers in order to avoid
          causing excessive oscillations in the AERO routing system. Examples
          of when a Client might wish to change to a different Server include
          a Server that has gone unreachable, topological movements of
          significant distance, movement to a new geographic region, movement
          to a new SPAN segment, etc.</t>

          <t>When a Client moves to a new Server, some of the fragments of a
          multiple fragment packet may have already arrived at the old Server
          while others are en route to the new Server, however no special
          attention in the reassembly algorithm is necessary when re-routed
          fragments are simply treated as loss. Since the fragments of a
          multiple-fragment packet are sent in a minimal inter-packet delay
          burst, such occasions will be rare.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="mcast" title="Multicast">
        <t>The AERO Client provides an IGMP (IPv4) <xref target="RFC2236"/> or
        MLD (IPv6) <xref target="RFC3810"/> proxy service for its EUNs and/or
        hosted applications <xref target="RFC4605"/>. The Client forwards
        IGMP/MLD messages over any of its underlying interfaces for which
        group membership is required. The IGMP/MLD messages may be further
        forwarded by a first-hop ANET access router acting as an
        IGMP/MLD-snooping switch <xref target="RFC4541"/>, then ultimately
        delivered to an AERO Proxy/Server acting as a Protocol Independent
        Multicast - Sparse-Mode (PIM-SM, or simply "PIM") Designated Router
        (DR) <xref target="RFC7761"/>. AERO Gateways also act as PIM routers
        (i.e., the same as AERO Proxys/Servers) on behalf of nodes on INET/EUN
        networks. The behaviors identified in the following sections
        correspond to Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) and Any-Source Multicast
        (ASM) operational modes.</t>

        <section anchor="pim-ssm" title="Source-Specific Multicast (SSM)">
          <t>When an ROS (i.e., an AERO Proxy/Server/Gateway) "X" acting as
          PIM router receives a Join/Prune message from a node on its
          downstream interfaces containing one or more ((S)ource, (G)roup)
          pairs, it updates its Multicast Routing Information Base (MRIB)
          accordingly. For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's
          non-AERO interfaces, X then forwards the (S, G) Join/Prune to any
          PIM routers on those interfaces per <xref target="RFC7761"/>.</t>

          <t>For each S belonging to a prefix reachable via X's AERO
          interface, X originates a separate copy of the Join/Prune for each
          (S,G) in the message using its own AERO address as the source
          address and ALL-PIM-ROUTERS as the destination address. X then
          encapsulates each message in a SPAN header with source address set
          to the SPAN address of X and destination address set to S then
          forwards the message into the SPAN. The SPAN in turn forwards the
          message to AERO Server/Gateway "Y" that services S. At the same
          time, if the message was a Join, X sends a route-optimization NS
          message toward each S the same as discussed in <xref
          target="predirect"/>. The resulting NAs will return the AERO address
          for the prefix that matches S as the network-layer source address
          and TLLAOs with the SPAN addresses corresponding to any
          ifIndex-tuples that are currently servicing S.</t>

          <t>When Y processes the Join/Prune message, if S located behind any
          Native, Direct, VPNed or NATed interfaces Y acts as a PIM router and
          updates its MRIB to list X as the next hop in the reverse path. If S
          is located behind any Proxys "Z"*, Y also forwards the message to
          each Z* over the SPAN while continuing to use the AERO address of X
          as the source address. Each Z* then updates its MRIB accordingly and
          maintains the AERO address of X as the next hop in the reverse path.
          Since the Relays in the SPAN do not examine network layer control
          messages, this means that the (reverse) multicast tree path is
          simply from each Z* (and/or Y) to X with no other multicast-aware
          routers in the path. If any Z* (and/or Y) is located on the same
          SPAN segment as X, the multicast data traffic sent to X directly
          using SPAN/INET encapsulation instead of via a Relay.</t>

          <t>Following the initial Join/Prune and NS/NA messaging, X maintains
          an asymmetric neighbor cache entry for each S the same as if X was
          sending unicast data traffic to S. In particular, X performs
          additional NS/NA exchanges to keep the neighbor cache entry alive
          for up to t_periodic seconds <xref target="RFC7761"/>. If no new
          Joins are received within t_periodic seconds, X allows the neighbor
          cache entry to expire. Finally, if X receives any additional
          Join/Prune messages for (S,G) it forwards the messages to each Y and
          Z* in the neighbor cache entry over the SPAN.</t>

          <t>At some later time, Client C that holds an MNP for source S may
          depart from a first Proxy Z1 and/or connect via a new Proxy Z2. In
          that case, Y sends an unsolicited NA message to X the same as
          specified for unicast mobility in <xref target="aeromob"/>. When X
          receives the unsolicited NA message, it updates its asymmetric
          neighbor cache entry for the AERO address for source S and sends new
          Join messages to any new Proxys Z2. There is no requirement to send
          any Prune messages to old Proxys Z1 since source S will no longer
          source any multicast data traffic via Z1. Instead, the multicast
          state for (S,G) in Proxy Z1 will soon time out since no new Joins
          will arrive.</t>

          <t>After some later time, C may move to a new Server Y2 and depart
          from old Sever Y1. In that case, Y1 sends Join messages for any of
          C's active (S,G) groups to Y2 while including its own AERO address
          as the source address. This causes Y2 to include Y1 in the multicast
          forwarding tree during the interim time that Y1's symmetric neighbor
          cache entry for C is in the DEPARTED state. At the same time, Y1
          sends an unsolicited NA message to X with an OMNI option and TLLAO
          with ifIndex-tuple set to 0 and a release indication to cause X to
          release its asymmetric neighbor cache entry. X then sends a new Join
          message to S via the SPAN and re-initiates route optimization the
          same as if it were receiving a fresh Join message from a node on a
          downstream link.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="pim-asm" title="Any-Source Multicast (ASM)">
          <t>When an ROS X acting as a PIM router receives a Join/Prune from a
          node on its downstream interfaces containing one or more (*,G)
          pairs, it updates its Multicast Routing Information Base (MRIB)
          accordingly. X then forwards a copy of the message to the Rendezvous
          Point (RP) R for each G over the SPAN. X uses its own AERO address
          as the source address and ALL-PIM-ROUTERS as the destination
          address, then encapsulates each message in a SPAN header with source
          address set to the SPAN address of X and destination address set to
          R, then sends the message into the SPAN. At the same time, if the
          message was a Join X initiates NS/NA route optimization the same as
          for the SSM case discussed in <xref target="pim-ssm"/>.</t>

          <t>For each source S that sends multicast traffic to group G via R,
          the Proxy/Server Z* for the Client that aggregates S encapsulates
          the packets in PIM Register messages and forwards them to R via the
          SPAN. R may then elect to send a PIM Join to Z* over the SPAN. This
          will result in an (S,G) tree rooted at Z* with R as the next hop so
          that R will begin to receive two copies of the packet; one native
          copy from the (S, G) tree and a second copy from the pre-existing
          (*, G) tree that still uses PIM Register encapsulation. R can then
          issue a PIM Register-stop message to suppress the
          Register-encapsulated stream. At some later time, if C moves to a
          new Proxy/Server Z*, it resumes sending packets via PIM Register
          encapsulation via the new Z*.</t>

          <t>At the same time, as multicast listeners discover individual S's
          for a given G, they can initiate an (S,G) Join for each S under the
          same procedures discussed in <xref target="pim-ssm"/>. Once the
          (S,G) tree is established, the listeners can send (S, G) Prune
          messages to R so that multicast packets for group G sourced by S
          will only be delivered via the (S, G) tree and not from the (*, G)
          tree rooted at R. All mobility considerations discussed for SSM
          apply.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="bidir-pim" title="Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM)">
          <t>Bi-Directional PIM (BIDIR-PIM) <xref target="RFC5015"/> provides
          an alternate approach to ASM that treats the Rendezvous Point (RP)
          as a Designated Forwarder (DF). Further considerations for BIDIR-PIM
          are out of scope.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="multiaero"
               title="Operation over Multiple AERO Links (VLANs)">
        <t>An AERO Client can connect to multiple AERO links the same as for
        any data link service. In that case, the Client maintains a distinct
        AERO interface for each link, e.g., 'aero0' for the first link,
        'aero1' for the second, 'aero2' for the third, etc. Each AERO link
        would include its own distinct set of Relays, Servers and Proxys,
        thereby providing redundancy in case of failures.</t>

        <t>The Relays, Servers and Proxys on each AERO link can assign AERO
        and SPAN addresses that use the same or different numberings from
        those on other links. Since the links are mutually independent there
        is no requirement for avoiding inter-link address duplication, e.g.,
        the same AERO address such as fe80::1000 could be used to number
        distinct nodes that connect to different AERO links.</t>

        <t>Each AERO link could utilize the same or different ANET
        connections. The links can be distinguished at the link-layer via
        Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) tagging (e.g., IEEE 802.1Q) and/or
        through assignment of distinct sets of MSPs on each link. This gives
        rise to the opportunity for supporting multiple redundant networked
        paths, where each VLAN is distinguished by a different label (e.g.,
        colors such as Red, Green, Blue, etc.). In particular, the Client can
        tag its RS messages with the appropriate label to cause the network to
        select the desired VLAN.</t>

        <t>Clients that connect to multiple AERO interfaces can select the
        outgoing interface appropriate for a given Red/Blue/Green/etc. traffic
        profile while (in the reverse direction) correspondent nodes must have
        some way of steering their packets destined to a target via the
        correct AERO link.</t>

        <t>In a first alternative, if each AERO link services different MSPs,
        then the Client can receive a distinct MNP from each of the links. IP
        routing will therefore assure that the correct Red/Green/Blue/etc.
        network is used for both outbound and inbound traffic. This can be
        accomplished using existing technologies and approaches, and without
        requiring any special supporting code in correspondent nodes or
        Relays.</t>

        <t>In a second alternative, if each AERO link services the same MSP(s)
        then each link could assign a distinct "AERO Link Anycast" address
        that is configured by all Relays on the link. Correspondent nodes then
        include a "type 4" routing header with the Anycast address for the
        AERO link as the IPv6 destination and with the address of the target
        encoded as the "next segment" in the routing header <xref
        target="RFC8402"/><xref
        target="I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header"/>. Standard IP routing
        will then direct the packet to the nearest Relay for the correct AERO
        link, which will replace the destination address with the target
        address then forward the packet to the target.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="dnsconsider" title="DNS Considerations">
        <t>AERO Client MNs and INET correspondent nodes consult the Domain
        Name System (DNS) the same as for any Internetworking node. When
        correspondent nodes and Client MNs use different IP protocol versions
        (e.g., IPv4 correspondents and IPv6 MNs), the INET DNS must maintain A
        records for IPv4 address mappings to MNs which must then be populated
        in Gateway NAT64 mapping caches. In that way, an IPv4 correspondent
        node can send packets to the IPv4 address mapping of the target MN,
        and the Gateway will translate the IPv4 header and destination address
        into an IPv6 header and IPv6 destination address of the MN.</t>

        <t>When an AERO Client registers with an AERO Server, the Server can
        return the address(es) of DNS servers in RDNSS options <xref
        target="RFC6106"/>. The DNS server provides the IP addresses of other
        MNs and correspondent nodes in AAAA records for IPv6 or A records for
        IPv4.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="trans" title="Transition Considerations">
        <t>The SPAN ensures that dissimilar INET partitions can be joined into
        a single unified AERO link, even though the partitions themselves may
        have differing protocol versions and/or incompatible addressing plans.
        However, a commonality can be achieved by incrementally distributing
        globally routable (i.e., native) IP prefixes to eventually reach all
        nodes (both mobile and fixed) in all SPAN segments. This can be
        accomplished by incrementally deploying AERO Gateways on each INET
        partition, with each Gateway distributing its MNPs and/or discovering
        non-MNP prefixes on its INET links.</t>

        <t>This gives rise to the opportunity to eventually distribute native
        IP addresses to all nodes, and to present a unified AERO link view
        (bridged by the SPAN) even if the INET partitions remain in their
        current protocol and addressing plans. In that way, the AERO link can
        serve the dual purpose of providing a mobility service and a
        transition service. Or, if an INET partition is transitioned to a
        native IP protocol version and addressing scheme that is compatible
        with the AERO link MNP-based addressing scheme, the partition and AERO
        link can be joined by Gateways.</t>

        <t>Gateways that connect INETs/EUNs with dissimilar IP protocol
        versions must employ a network address and protocol translation
        function such as NAT64<xref target="RFC6146"> </xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Detecting and Reacting to Server and Relay Failures">
        <t>In environments where rapid failure recovery is required, Servers
        and Relays SHOULD use Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) <xref
        target="RFC5880"/>. Nodes that use BFD can quickly detect and react to
        failures so that cached information is re-established through
        alternate nodes. BFD control messaging is carried only over
        well-connected ground domain networks (i.e., and not low-end radio
        links) and can therefore be tuned for rapid response.</t>

        <t>Servers and Relays maintain BFD sessions in parallel with their BGP
        peerings. If a Server or Relay fails, BGP peers will quickly
        re-establish routes through alternate paths the same as for common BGP
        deployments. Similarly, Proxys maintain BFD sessions with their
        associated Relays even though they do not establish BGP peerings with
        them.</t>

        <t>Proxys SHOULD use proactive NUD for Servers for which there are
        currently active ANET Clients in a manner that parallels BFD, i.e., by
        sending unicast NS messages in rapid succession to receive solicited
        NA messages. When the Proxy is also sending RS messages on behalf of
        ANET Clients, the RS/RA messaging can be considered as equivalent
        hints of forward progress. This means that the Proxy need not also
        send a periodic NS if it has already sent an RS within the same
        period. If a Server fails, the Proxy will cease to receive
        advertisements and can quickly inform Clients of the outage by sending
        multicast RA messages on the ANET interface.</t>

        <t>The Proxy sends multicast RA messages with source address set to
        the Server's address, destination address set to All-Nodes multicast,
        and Router Lifetime set to 0. The Proxy SHOULD send
        MAX_FINAL_RTR_ADVERTISEMENTS RA messages separated by small delays
        <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Any Clients on the ANET interface that have
        been using the (now defunct) Server will receive the RA messages and
        associate with a new Server.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="implement" title="Implementation Status">
      <t>An AERO implementation based on OpenVPN (https://openvpn.net/) was
      announced on the v6ops mailing list on January 10, 2018 and an initial
      public release of the AERO proof-of-concept source code was announced on
      the intarea mailing list on August 21, 2015.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>The IANA has assigned a 4-octet Private Enterprise Number "45282" for
      AERO in the "enterprise-numbers" registry.</t>

      <t>The IANA has assigned the UDP port number "8060" for an earlier
      experimental version of AERO <xref target="RFC6706"/>. This document
      obsoletes <xref target="RFC6706"/> and claims the UDP port number "8060"
      for all future use.</t>

      <t>No further IANA actions are required.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="secure" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>AERO Relays configure secured tunnels with AERO Servers and Proxys
      within their local SPAN segments. Applicable secured tunnel alternatives
      include IPsec <xref target="RFC4301"/>, TLS/SSL <xref
      target="RFC8446"/>, DTLS <xref target="RFC6347"/>, etc. The AERO Relays
      of all SPAN segments in turn configure secured tunnels for their
      neighboring AERO Relays across the SPAN. Therefore, packets that
      traverse the SPAN between any pair of AERO link neighbors are already
      secured.</t>

      <t>AERO Servers, Gateways and Proxys targeted by a route optimization
      may also receive packets directly from the INET partitions instead of
      via the SPAN. For INET partitions that apply effective ingress filtering
      to defeat source address spoofing, the simple data origin authentication
      procedures in <xref target="aeroauth"/> can be applied. This implies
      that the ROS list must be maintained consistently by all route
      optimization targets within the same INET partition, and that the ROS
      list must be securely managed by the partition administrative
      authority.</t>

      <t>For INET partitions that cannot apply effective ingress filtering,
      the two options for securing communications include 1) disable route
      optimization so that all traffic is conveyed over secured tunnels via
      the SPAN, or 2) enable on-demand secure tunnel creation between INET
      partition neighbors. Option 1) would result in longer routes than
      necessary and traffic concentration on critical infrastructure elements.
      Option 2) could be coordinated by establishing a secured tunnel
      on-demand instead of performing an NS/NA exchange in the route
      optimization procedures. Procedures for establishing on-demand secured
      tunnels are out of scope.</t>

      <t>AERO Clients that connect to secured enclaves need not apply security
      to their ND messages, since the messages will be intercepted by a
      perimeter Proxy that applies security on its outward-facing interface.
      AERO Clients located outside of secured enclaves SHOULD use symmetric
      network and/or transport layer security services, but when there are
      many prospective neighbors with dynamically changing connectivity an
      asymmetric security service such as SEND may be needed (see: <xref
      target="SEND"/>).</t>

      <t>Application endpoints SHOULD use application-layer security services
      such as TLS/SSL, DTLS or SSH <xref target="RFC4251"/> to assure the same
      level of protection as for critical secured Internet services. AERO
      Clients that require host-based VPN services SHOULD use symmetric
      network and/or transport layer security services such as IPsec, TLS/SSL,
      DTLS, etc. AERO Proxys and Servers can also provide a network-based VPN
      service on behalf of the Client, e.g., if the Client is located within a
      secured enclave and cannot establish a VPN on its own behalf.</t>

      <t>AERO Servers and Relays present targets for traffic amplification
      Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. This concern is no different than for
      widely-deployed VPN security gateways in the Internet, where attackers
      could send spoofed packets to the gateways at high data rates. This can
      be mitigated by connecting Servers and Relays over dedicated links with
      no connections to the Internet and/or when connections to the Internet
      are only permitted through well-managed firewalls. Traffic amplification
      DoS attacks can also target an AERO Client's low data rate links. This
      is a concern not only for Clients located on the open Internet but also
      for Clients in secured enclaves. AERO Servers and Proxys can institute
      rate limits that protect Clients from receiving packet floods that could
      DoS low data rate links.</t>

      <t>AERO Gateways must implement ingress filtering to avoid a spoofing
      attack in which spurious SPAN messages are injected into an AERO link
      from an outside attacker. AERO Clients MUST ensure that their
      connectivity is not used by unauthorized nodes on their EUNs to gain
      access to a protected network, i.e., AERO Clients that act as routers
      MUST NOT provide routing services for unauthorized nodes. (This concern
      is no different than for ordinary hosts that receive an IP address
      delegation but then "share" the address with other nodes via some form
      of Internet connection sharing such as tethering.)</t>

      <t>The MAP list and ROS lists MUST be well-managed and secured from
      unauthorized tampering, even though the list contains only public
      information. The MAP list can be conveyed to the Client in a similar
      fashion as in <xref target="RFC5214"/> (e.g., through layer 2 data link
      login messaging, secure upload of a static file, DNS lookups, etc.). The
      ROS list can be conveyed to Servers and Proxys through administrative
      action, secured file distribution, etc.</t>

      <t>Although public domain and commercial SEND implementations exist,
      concerns regarding the strength of the cryptographic hash algorithm have
      been documented <xref target="RFC6273"/> <xref target="RFC4982"/>.</t>

      <t>Security considerations for accepting link-layer ICMP messages and
      reflected packets are discussed throughout the document.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>Discussions in the IETF, aviation standards communities and private
      exchanges helped shape some of the concepts in this work. Individuals
      who contributed insights include Mikael Abrahamsson, Mark Andrews, Fred
      Baker, Bob Braden, Stewart Bryant, Brian Carpenter, Wojciech Dec, Ralph
      Droms, Adrian Farrel, Nick Green, Sri Gundavelli, Brian Haberman,
      Bernhard Haindl, Joel Halpern, Tom Herbert, Sascha Hlusiak, Lee Howard,
      Andre Kostur, Hubert Kuenig, Ted Lemon, Andy Malis, Satoru Matsushima,
      Tomek Mrugalski, Madhu Niraula, Alexandru Petrescu, Behcet Saikaya,
      Michal Skorepa, Joe Touch, Bernie Volz, Ryuji Wakikawa, Tony Whyman,
      Lloyd Wood and James Woodyatt. Members of the IESG also provided
      valuable input during their review process that greatly improved the
      document. Special thanks go to Stewart Bryant, Joel Halpern and Brian
      Haberman for their shepherding guidance during the publication of the
      AERO first edition.</t>

      <t>This work has further been encouraged and supported by Boeing
      colleagues including Kyle Bae, M. Wayne Benson, Dave Bernhardt, Cam
      Brodie, John Bush, Balaguruna Chidambaram, Irene Chin, Bruce Cornish,
      Claudiu Danilov, Don Dillenburg, Joe Dudkowski, Wen Fang, Samad
      Farooqui, Anthony Gregory, Jeff Holland, Seth Jahne, Brian Jaury, Greg
      Kimberly, Ed King, Madhuri Madhava Badgandi, Laurel Matthew, Gene
      MacLean III, Rob Muszkiewicz, Sean O'Sullivan, Vijay Rajagopalan, Greg
      Saccone, Rod Santiago, Kent Shuey, Brian Skeen, Mike Slane, Carrie
      Spiker, Katie Tran, Brendan Williams, Amelia Wilson, Julie Wulff, Yueli
      Yang, Eric Yeh and other members of the Boeing mobility, networking and
      autonomy teams. Kyle Bae, Wayne Benson, Katie Tran and Eric Yeh are
      especially acknowledged for implementing the AERO functions as
      extensions to the public domain OpenVPN distribution.</t>

      <t>Earlier works on NBMA tunneling approaches are found in <xref
      target="RFC2529"/><xref target="RFC5214"/><xref target="RFC5569"/>.</t>

      <t>Many of the constructs presented in this second edition of AERO are
      based on the author's earlier works, including:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) <xref
          target="RFC6179"/><xref target="I-D.templin-ironbis"/></t>

          <t>Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) <xref target="RFC5558"/><xref
          target="I-D.templin-intarea-vet"/></t>

          <t>The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) <xref
          target="RFC5320"/><xref target="I-D.templin-intarea-seal"/></t>

          <t>AERO, First Edition <xref target="RFC6706"/></t>
        </list>Note that these works cite numerous earlier efforts that are
      not also cited here due to space limitations. The authors of those
      earlier works are acknowledged for their insights.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the NASA Safe Autonomous Systems Operation
      (SASO) program under NASA contract number NNA16BD84C.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the FAA as per the SE2025 contract number
      DTFAWA-15-D-00030.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Commercial Airplanes (BCA)
      Internet of Things (IoT) and autonomy programs.</t>

      <t>This work is aligned with the Boeing Information Technology (BIT)
      MobileNet program.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0791"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.0792"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8200"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2474"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3972"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4861"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4862"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2473"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8415"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3971"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-atn-aero-interface"?>

      <?rfc ?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2003"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4213"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6347"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7333"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2529"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5214"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4301"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5569"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3810"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4605"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4541"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4607"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7761"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2236"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5880"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6438"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6706"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4963"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6864"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6146"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8402"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5522"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8446"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2923"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3819"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4443"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1812"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2492"?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc ?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1191"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8201"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6273"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4982"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6179"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5320"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5558"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6106"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2784"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2890"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8086"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4251"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2983"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3168"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2764"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6221"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7269"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4511"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5015"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.1122"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4389"?>

      <reference anchor="OVPN">
        <front>
          <title>http://openvpn.net</title>

          <author fullname="OpenVPN" initials="O" surname="OpenVPN">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="BGP">
        <front>
          <title>BGP in 2015, http://potaroo.net</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston">
            <organization/>
          </author>

          <date month="January" year="2016"/>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-ironbis"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-seal"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-vet"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-gue-extensions"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-gue"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-intarea-grefrag"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-intarea-tunnels"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.templin-v6ops-pdhost"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header"?>

      <?rfc ?>
    </references>

    <section anchor="minimal" title="AERO Alternate Encapsulations">
      <t>When GUE encapsulation is not needed, AERO can use common
      encapsulations such as IP-in-IP <xref target="RFC2003"/><xref
      target="RFC2473"/><xref target="RFC4213"/>, Generic Routing
      Encapsulation (GRE) <xref target="RFC2784"/><xref target="RFC2890"/> and
      others. The encapsulation is therefore only differentiated from non-AERO
      tunnels through the application of AERO control messaging and not
      through, e.g., a well-known UDP port number.</t>

      <t>As for GUE encapsulation, alternate AERO encapsulation formats may
      require encapsulation layer fragmentation. For simple IP-in-IP
      encapsulation, an IPv6 fragment header is inserted directly between the
      inner and outer IP headers when needed, i.e., even if the outer header
      is IPv4. The IPv6 Fragment Header is identified to the outer IP layer by
      its IP protocol number, and the Next Header field in the IPv6 Fragment
      Header identifies the inner IP header version. For GRE encapsulation, a
      GRE fragment header is inserted within the GRE header <xref
      target="I-D.templin-intarea-grefrag"/>.</t>

      <t><xref target="encaps"/> shows the AERO IP-in-IP encapsulation format
      before any fragmentation is applied:</t>

      <figure anchor="encaps"
              title="Minimal Encapsulation Format using IP-in-IP">
        <artwork><![CDATA[
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Outer IPv4 Header     |      |    Outer IPv6 Header      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |IPv6 Frag Header (optional)|      |IPv6 Frag Header (optional)|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      Inner IP Header      |      |       Inner IP Header     |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                           |      |                           |
     ~                           ~      ~                           ~
     ~    Inner Packet Body      ~      ~     Inner Packet Body     ~
     ~                           ~      ~                           ~
     |                           |      |                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

     Minimal Encapsulation in IPv4      Minimal Encapsulation in IPv6

]]></artwork>
      </figure>

      <t><xref target="gre-encaps"/> shows the AERO GRE encapsulation format
      before any fragmentation is applied:</t>

      <t><figure anchor="gre-encaps" title="Minimal Encapsulation Using GRE">
          <artwork><![CDATA[
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Outer IP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |          GRE Header           |
     | (with checksum, key, etc..)   |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | GRE Fragment Header (optional)|
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |        Inner IP Header        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                               |
     ~                               ~
     ~      Inner Packet Body        ~
     ~                               ~
     |                               |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>

      <t>Alternate encapsulation may be preferred in environments where GUE
      encapsulation would add unnecessary overhead. For example, certain
      low-bandwidth wireless data links may benefit from a reduced
      encapsulation overhead.</t>

      <t>GUE encapsulation can traverse network paths that are inaccessible to
      non-UDP encapsulations, e.g., for crossing Network Address Translators
      (NATs). More and more, network middleboxes are also being configured to
      discard packets that include anything other than a well-known IP
      protocol such as UDP and TCP. It may therefore be necessary to determine
      the potential for middlebox filtering before enabling alternate
      encapsulation in a given environment.</t>

      <t>In addition to IP-in-IP, GRE and GUE, AERO can also use security
      encapsulations such as IPsec, TLS/SSL, DTLS, etc. In that case, AERO
      control messaging and route determination occur before security
      encapsulation is applied for outgoing packets and after security
      decapsulation is applied for incoming packets.</t>

      <t>AERO is especially well suited for use with VPN system encapsulations
      such as OpenVPN <xref target="OVPN"/>.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="misc" title="Non-Normative Considerations">
      <t>AERO can be applied to a multitude of Internetworking scenarios, with
      each having its own adaptations. The following considerations are
      provided as non-normative guidance:</t>

      <section anchor="rorefresh"
               title="Implementation Strategies for Route Optimization">
        <t>Route optimization as discussed in <xref target="predirect"/>
        results in the route optimization source (ROS) creating an asymmetric
        neighbor cache entry for the target neighbor. The neighbor cache entry
        is maintained for at most REACHABLETIME seconds and then deleted
        unless updated. In order to refresh the neighbor cache entry lifetime
        before the ReachableTime timer expires, the specification requires
        implementations to issue a new NS/NA exchange to reset ReachableTime
        to REACHABLETIME seconds while data packets are still flowing.
        However, the decision of when to initiate a new NS/NA exchange and to
        perpetuate the process is left as an implementation detail.</t>

        <t>One possible strategy may be to monitor the neighbor cache entry
        watching for data packets for (REACHABLETIME - 5) seconds. If any data
        packets have been sent to the neighbor within this timeframe, then
        send an NS to receive a new NA. If no data packets have been sent,
        wait for 5 additional seconds and send an immediate NS if any data
        packets are sent within this "expiration pending" 5 second window. If
        no additional data packets are sent within the 5 second window, delete
        the neighbor cache entry.</t>

        <t>The monitoring of the neighbor data packet traffic therefore
        becomes an asymmetric ongoing process during the neighbor cache entry
        lifetime. If the neighbor cache entry expires, future data packets
        will trigger a new NS/NA exchange while the packets themselves are
        delivered over a longer path until route optimization state is
        re-established.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="imcplicit" title="Implicit Mobility Management">
        <t>AERO interface neighbors MAY provide a configuration option that
        allows them to perform implicit mobility management in which no ND
        messaging is used. In that case, the Client only transmits packets
        over a single interface at a time, and the neighbor always observes
        packets arriving from the Client from the same link-layer source
        address.</t>

        <t>If the Client's underlying interface address changes (either due to
        a readdressing of the original interface or switching to a new
        interface) the neighbor immediately updates the neighbor cache entry
        for the Client and begins accepting and sending packets according to
        the Client's new address. This implicit mobility method applies to use
        cases such as cellphones with both WiFi and Cellular interfaces where
        only one of the interfaces is active at a given time, and the Client
        automatically switches over to the backup interface if the primary
        interface fails.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="direct" title="Direct Underlying Interfaces">
        <t>When a Client's AERO interface is configured over a Direct
        interface, the neighbor at the other end of the Direct link can
        receive packets without any encapsulation. In that case, the Client
        sends packets over the Direct link according to QoS preferences. If
        the Direct interface has the highest QoS preference, then the Client's
        IP packets are transmitted directly to the peer without going through
        an ANET/INET. If other interfaces have higher QoS preferences, then
        the Client's IP packets are transmitted via a different interface,
        which may result in the inclusion of Proxys, Servers and Relays in the
        communications path. Direct interfaces must be tested periodically for
        reachability, e.g., via NUD.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="crazyclient"
               title="AERO Clients on the Open Internetwork">
        <t>AERO Clients that connect to the open Internetwork via either a
        native or NATed interface can establish a VPN to securely connect to a
        Server. Alternatively, the Client can exchange ND messages directly
        with other AERO nodes on the same SPAN segment using INET
        encapsulation only and without joining the SPAN. In that case,
        however, the Client must apply asymmetric security for ND messages to
        ensure routing and neighbor cache integrity (see: <xref
        target="secure"/>).</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="hostonly" title="Operation on AERO Links with /64 ASPs">
        <t>IPv6 AERO links typically have MSPs that aggregate many candidate
        MNPs of length /64 or shorter. However, in some cases it may be
        desirable to use AERO over links that have only a /64 MSP. This can be
        accommodated by treating all Clients on the AERO link as simple hosts
        that receive /128 prefix delegations.</t>

        <t>In that case, the Client sends an RS message to the Server the same
        as for ordinary AERO links. The Server responds with an RA message
        that includes one or more /128 prefixes (i.e., singleton addresses)
        that include the /64 MSP prefix along with an interface identifier
        portion to be assigned to the Client. The Client and Server then
        configure their AERO addresses based on the interface identifier
        portions of the /128s (i.e., the lower 64 bits) and not based on the
        /64 prefix (i.e., the upper 64 bits).</t>

        <t>For example, if the MSP for the host-only IPv6 AERO link is
        2001:db8:1000:2000::/64, each Client will receive one or more /128
        IPv6 prefix delegations such as 2001:db8:1000:2000::1/128,
        2001:db8:1000:2000::2/128, etc. When the Client receives the prefix
        delegations, it assigns the AERO addresses fe80::1, fe80::2, etc. to
        the AERO interface, and assigns the global IPv6 addresses (i.e., the
        /128s) to either the AERO interface or an internal virtual interface
        such as a loopback. In this arrangement, the Client conducts route
        optimization in the same sense as discussed in <xref
        target="predirect"/>.</t>

        <t>This specification has applicability for nodes that act as a Client
        on an "upstream" AERO link, but also act as a Server on "downstream"
        AERO links. More specifically, if the node acts as a Client to receive
        a /64 prefix from the upstream AERO link it can then act as a Server
        to provision /128s to Clients on downstream AERO links.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="SEND"
               title="AERO Adaptations for SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND)">
        <t>SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) <xref target="RFC3971"/> and
        Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGAs) <xref target="RFC3972"/>
        were designed to secure IPv6 ND messaging in environments where
        symmetric network and/or transport-layer security services are
        impractical (see: <xref target="secure"/>). AERO nodes that use
        SEND/CGA employ the following adaptations.</t>

        <t>When a source AERO node prepares a SEND-protected ND message, it
        uses a link-local CGA as the IPv6 source address and writes the prefix
        embedded in its AERO address (i.e., instead of fe80::/64) in the CGA
        parameters Subnet Prefix field. When the neighbor receives the ND
        message, it first verifies the message checksum and SEND/CGA
        parameters while using the link-local prefix fe80::/64 (i.e., instead
        of the value in the Subnet Prefix field) to match against the IPv6
        source address of the ND message.</t>

        <t>The neighbor then derives the AERO address of the source by using
        the value in the Subnet Prefix field as the interface identifier of an
        AERO address. For example, if the Subnet Prefix field contains
        2001:db8:1:2, the neighbor constructs the AERO address as
        fe80::2001:db8:1:2. The neighbor then caches the AERO address in the
        neighbor cache entry it creates for the source, and uses the AERO
        address as the IPv6 destination address of any ND message replies.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="aeroarch"
               title="AERO Critical Infrastructure Considerations">
        <t>AERO Relays can be either Commercial off-the Shelf (COTS) standard
        IP routers or virtual machines in the cloud. Relays must be
        provisioned, supported and managed by the INET administrative
        authority, and connected to the Relays of other INETs via inter-domain
        peerings. Cost for purchasing, configuring and managing Relays is
        nominal even for very large AERO links.</t>

        <t>AERO Servers can be standard dedicated server platforms, but most
        often will be deployed as virtual machines in the cloud. The only
        requirements for Servers are that they can run the AERO user-level
        code and have at least one network interface connection to the INET.
        As with Relays, Servers must be provisioned, supported and managed by
        the INET administrative authority. Cost for purchasing, configuring
        and managing Servers is nominal especially for virtual Servers hosted
        in the cloud.</t>

        <t>AERO Proxys are most often standard dedicated server platforms with
        one network interface connected to the ANET and a second interface
        connected to an INET. As with Servers, the only requirements are that
        they can run the AERO user-level code and have at least one interface
        connection to the INET. Proxys must be provisioned, supported and
        managed by the ANET administrative authority. Cost for purchasing,
        configuring and managing Proxys is nominal, and borne by the ANET
        administrative authority.</t>

        <t>AERO Gateways can be any dedicated server or COTS router platform
        connected to INETs and/or EUNs. The Gateway joins the SPAN and engages
        in eBGP peering with one or more Relays as a stub AS. The Gateway then
        injects its MNPs and/or non-MNP prefixes into the BGP routing system,
        and provisions the prefixes to its downstream-attached networks. The
        Gateway can perform ROS and MAP services the same as for any Server,
        and can route between the MNP and non-MNP address spaces.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="servefail" title="AERO Server Failure Implications">
        <t>AERO Servers may appear as a single point of failure in the
        architecture, but such is not the case since all Servers on the link
        provide identical services and loss of a Server does not imply
        immediate and/or comprehensive communication failures. Although
        Clients typically associate with a single Server at a time, Server
        failure is quickly detected and conveyed by Bidirectional Forward
        Detection (BFD) and/or proactive NUD allowing Clients to migrate to
        new Servers.</t>

        <t>If a Server fails, ongoing packet forwarding to Clients will
        continue by virtue of the asymmetric neighbor cache entries that have
        already been established in route optimization sources (ROSs). If a
        Client also experiences mobility events at roughly the same time the
        Server fails, unsolicited NA messages may be lost but proxy neighbor
        cache entries in the DEPARTED state will ensure that packet forwarding
        to the Client's new locations will continue for up to DEPARTTIME
        seconds.</t>

        <t>If a Client is left without a Server for an extended timeframe
        (e.g., greater than REACHABLETIIME seconds) then existing asymmetric
        neighbor cache entries will eventually expire and both ongoing and new
        communications will fail. The original source will continue to
        retransmit until the Client has established a new Server relationship,
        after which time continuous communications will resume.</t>

        <t>Therefore, providing many Servers on the link with high
        availability profiles provides resilience against loss of individual
        Servers and assurance that Clients can establish new Server
        relationships quickly in event of a Server failure.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="clisrv" title="AERO Client / Server Architecture">
        <t>The AERO architectural model is client / server in the control
        plane, with route optimization in the data plane. The same as for
        common Internet services, the AERO Client discovers the addresses of
        AERO Servers and selects one Server to connect to. The AERO service is
        analogous to common Internet services such as google.com, yahoo.com,
        cnn.com, etc. However, there is only one AERO service for the link and
        all Servers provide identical services.</t>

        <t>Common Internet services provide differing strategies for
        advertising server addresses to clients. The strategy is conveyed
        through the DNS resource records returned in response to name
        resolution queries. As of January 2020 Internet-based 'nslookup'
        services were used to determine the following:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "google.com", the DNS
            always returns one A record (i.e., an IPv4 address) and one AAAA
            record (i.e., an IPv6 address). The client receives the same
            addresses each time it resolves the domainname via the same DNS
            resolver, but may receive different addresses when it resolves the
            domainname via different DNS resolvers. But, in each case, exactly
            one A and one AAAA record are returned.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "ietf.org", the DNS
            always returns one A record and one AAAA record with the same
            addresses regardless of which DNS resolver is used.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "yahoo.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 4 A records and 4 AAAA records. Each time
            the client resolves the domainname via the same DNS resolver, the
            same list of addresses are returned but in randomized order (i.e.,
            consistent with a DNS round-robin strategy). But, interestingly,
            the same addresses are returned (albeit in randomized order) when
            the domainname is resolved via different DNS resolvers.</t>

            <t>When a client resolves the domainname "amazon.com", the DNS
            always returns a list of 3 A records and no AAAA records. As with
            "yahoo.com", the same three A records are returned from any
            worldwide Internet connection point in randomized order.</t>
          </list>The above example strategies show differing approaches to
        Internet resilience and service distribution offered by major Internet
        services. The Google approach exposes only a single IPv4 and a single
        IPv6 address to clients. Clients can then select whichever IP protocol
        version offers the best response, but will always use the same IP
        address according to the current Internet connection point. This means
        that the IP address offered by the network must lead to a
        highly-available server and/or service distribution point. In other
        words, resilience is predicated on high availability within the
        network and with no client-initiated failovers expected (i.e., it is
        all-or-nothing from the client's perspective). However, Google does
        provide for worldwide distributed service distribution by virtue of
        the fact that each Internet connection point responds with a different
        IPv6 and IPv4 address. The IETF approach is like google
        (all-or-nothing from the client's perspective), but provides only a
        single IPv4 or IPv6 address on a worldwide basis. This means that the
        addresses must be made highly-available at the network level with no
        client failover possibility, and if there is any worldwide service
        distribution it would need to be conducted by a network element that
        is reached via the IP address acting as a service distribution
        point.</t>

        <t>In contrast to the Google and IETF philosophies, Yahoo and Amazon
        both provide clients with a (short) list of IP addresses with Yahoo
        providing both IP protocol versions and Amazon as IPv4-only. The order
        of the list is randomized with each name service query response, with
        the effect of round-robin load balancing for service distribution.
        With a short list of addresses, there is still expectation that the
        network will implement high availability for each address but in case
        any single address fails the client can switch over to using a
        different address. The balance then becomes one of function in the
        network vs function in the end system.</t>

        <t>The same implications observed for common highly-available services
        in the Internet apply also to the AERO client/server architecture.
        When an AERO Client connects to one or more ANETs, it discovers one or
        more AERO Server addresses through the mechanisms discussed in earlier
        sections. Each Server address presumably leads to a fault-tolerant
        clustering arrangement such as supported by Linux-HA, Extended Virtual
        Synchrony or Paxos. Such an arrangement has precedence in common
        Internet service deployments in lightweight virtual machines without
        requiring expensive hardware deployment. Similarly, common Internet
        service deployments set service IP addresses on service distribution
        points that may relay requests to many different servers.</t>

        <t>For AERO, the expectation is that a combination of the Google/IETF
        and Yahoo/Amazon philosophies would be employed. The AERO Client
        connects to different ANET access points and can receive 1-2 Server
        AERO addresses at each point. It then selects one AERO Server address,
        and engages in RS/RA exchanges with the same Server from all ANET
        connections. The Client remains with this Server unless or until the
        Server fails, in which case it can switch over to an alternate Server.
        The Client can likewise switch over to a different Server at any time
        if there is some reason for it to do so. So, the AERO expectation is
        for a balance of function in the network and end system, with fault
        tolerance and resilience at both levels.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="changes" title="Change Log">
      <t>&lt;&lt; RFC Editor - remove prior to publication &gt;&gt;</t>

      <t>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-25 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-26:<list style="symbols">
          <t>MTU and RA configuration information updated.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-24 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-25:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Added concept of "primary" to allow for proxyed RS/RA over only
          selected underlying interfaces.</t>

          <t>General Cleanup.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-23 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-24:<list style="symbols">
          <t>OMNI interface spec now a normative reference.</t>

          <t>Use REACHABLETIME as the nominal Router Lifetime to return in
          RAs.</t>

          <t>General cleanup.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-22 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-23:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Choice of using either RS/RA or unsolicited NA for old Server
          notification.</t>

          <t>General cleanup.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-21 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-22:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Tightened up text on Proxy.</t>

          <t>Removed unnecessarily restrictive texts.</t>

          <t>General cleanup.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-20 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-21:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Clarified relationship between OMNI and S/TLLAO
          ifIndex-tuples.</t>

          <t>Important text in Section 13.15.3 on Servers timing out Clients
          that have gone silent without sending a departure notification.</t>

          <t>New text on RS/RA as "hints of forward progress" for proactive
          NUD.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-19 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-20:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Included new route optimization source and destination addressing
          strategy. Now, route optimization maintenance uses the address of
          the existing Server instead of the data packet destination address
          so that less pressure is placed on the BGP routing system
          convergence time and Server constancy is supported.</t>

          <t>Included new method for releasing from old MSE without requiring
          Client messaging.</t>

          <t>Included references to new OMNI interface spec (including the
          OMNI option).</t>

          <t>New appendix on AERO Client/Server architecture.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-18 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-19:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Changed Proxy/Server keepalives to use "proactive NUD" in a
          manner tha paralles BFD</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-17 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-18:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Discuss how AERO option is used in relation to S/TLLAOs</t>

          <t>New text on Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)</t>

          <t>Cleaned up usage (and non-usage) of unsolicited NAs</t>

          <t>New appendix on Server failures</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-15 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-17:<list style="symbols">
          <t>S/TLLAO now includes multiple link-layer addresses within a
          single option instead of requiring multiple options</t>

          <t>New unsolicited NA message to inform the old link that a Client
          has moved to a new link</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-14 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-15:<list style="symbols">
          <t>MTU and fragmentation</t>

          <t>New details in movement to new Server</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-13 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-14:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Security based on secured tunnels, ingress filtering, MAP list
          and ROS list</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-12 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-13:<list style="symbols">
          <t>New paragraph in Section 3.6 on AERO interface layering over
          secured tunnels</t>

          <t>Removed extraneous text in Section 3.7</t>

          <t>Added new detail to the forwarding algorithm in Section 3.9</t>

          <t>Clarified use of fragmentation</t>

          <t>Route optimization now supported for both MNP and non-MNP-based
          prefixes</t>

          <t>Relays are now seen as link-layer elements in the
          architecture.</t>

          <t>Built out multicast section in detail.</t>

          <t>New Appendix on implementation considerations for route
          optimization.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-11 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-12:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Introduced Gateways as a new AERO element for connecting
          Correspondent Nodes on INET links</t>

          <t>Introduced terms "Access Network (ANET)" and "Internetwork
          (INET)"</t>

          <t>Changed "ASP" to "MSP", and "ACP" to "MNP"</t>

          <t>New figure on the relation of Segments to the SPAN and AERO
          link</t>

          <t>New "S" bit in S/TLLAO to indicate the "Source" S/TLLAO as
          opposed to additional S/TLLAOs</t>

          <t>Changed Interface ID for Servers from 255 to 0xffff</t>

          <t>Significant updates to Route Optimization, NUD, and Mobility
          Management</t>

          <t>New Section on Multicast</t>

          <t>New Section on AERO Clients in the open Internetwork</t>

          <t>New Section on Operation over multiple AERO links (VLANs over the
          SPAN)</t>

          <t>New Sections on DNS considerations and Transition
          considerations</t>

          <t/>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-10 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-11:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Added The SPAN</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-09 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-10:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Orphaned packets in flight (e.g., when a neighbor cache entry is
          in the DEPARTED state) are now forwarded at the link layer instead
          of at the network layer. Forwarding at the network layer can result
          in routing loops and/or excessive delays of forwarded packets while
          the routing system is still reconverging.</t>

          <t>Update route optimization to clarify the unsecured nature of the
          first NS used for route discovery</t>

          <t>Many cleanups and clarifications on ND messaging parameters</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-08 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-09:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Changed PRL to "MAP list"</t>

          <t>For neighbor cache entries, changed "static" to "symmetric", and
          "dynamic" to "asymmetric"</t>

          <t>Specified Proxy RS/RA exchanges with Servers on behalf of
          Clients</t>

          <t>Added discussion of unsolicited NAs in Section 3.16, and included
          forward reference to Section 3.18</t>

          <t>Added discussion of AERO Clients used as critical infrastructure
          elements to connect fixed networks.</t>

          <t>Added network-based VPN under security considerations</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-07 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-08:<list style="symbols">
          <t>New section on AERO-Aware Access Router</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-06 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-07:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Added "R" bit for release of PDs. Now have a full RS/RA service
          that can do PD without requiring DHCPv6 messaging over-the-air</t>

          <t>Clarifications on solicited vs unsolicited NAs</t>

          <t>Clarified use of MAX_NEIGHBOR_ADVERTISEMENTS for the purpose of
          increase reliability</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-05 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-06:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Major re-work and simplification of Route Optimization
          function</t>

          <t>Added Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) and Mobility Anchor
          Point (MAP) terminology</t>

          <t>New section on "AERO Critical Infrastructure Element
          Considerations" demonstrating low overall cost for the service</t>

          <t>minor text revisions and deletions</t>

          <t>removed extraneous appendices</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-04 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-05:<list style="symbols">
          <t>New Appendix E on S/TLLAO Extensions for special-purpose links.
          Discussed ATN/IPS as example.</t>

          <t>New sentence in introduction to declare appendices as
          non-normative.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-03 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-04:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Added definitions for Potential Router List (PRL) and secure
          enclave</t>

          <t>Included text on mapping transport layer port numbers to network
          layer DSCP values</t>

          <t>Added reference to DTLS and DMM Distributed Mobility Anchoring
          working group document</t>

          <t>Reworked Security Considerations</t>

          <t>Updated references.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-02 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-03:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Added new section on SEND.</t>

          <t>Clarifications on "AERO Address" section.</t>

          <t>Updated references and added new reference for RFC8086.</t>

          <t>Security considerations updates.</t>

          <t>General text clarifications and cleanup.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-01 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-02:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Note on encapsulation avoidance in Section 4.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-00 to
      draft-templin-intrea-6706bis-01:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Remove DHCPv6 Server Release procedures that leveraged the old
          way Relays used to &ldquo;route&rdquo; between Server link-local
          addresses</t>

          <t>Remove all text relating to Relays needing to do any
          AERO-specific operations</t>

          <t>Proxy sends RS and receives RA from Server using SEND. Use CGAs
          as source addresses, and destination address of RA reply is to the
          AERO address corresponding to the Client&rsquo;s ACP.</t>

          <t>Proxy uses SEND to protect RS and authenticate RA (Client does
          not use SEND, but rather relies on subnetwork security. When the
          Proxy receives an RS from the Client, it creates a new RS using its
          own addresses as the source and uses SEND with CGAs to send a new RS
          to the Server.</t>

          <t>Emphasize distributed mobility management</t>

          <t>AERO address-based RS injection of ACP into underlying routing
          system.</t>
        </list>Changes from draft-templin-aerolink-82 to
      draft-templin-intarea-6706bis-00:<list style="symbols">
          <t>Document use of NUD (NS/NA) for reliable link-layer address
          updates as an alternative to unreliable unsolicited NA. Consistent
          with Section 7.2.6 of RFC4861.</t>

          <t>Server adds additional layer of encapsulation between outer and
          inner headers of NS/NA messages for transmission through Relays that
          act as vanilla IPv6 routers. The messages include the AERO Server
          Subnet Router Anycast address as the source and the Subnet Router
          Anycast address corresponding to the Client's ACP as the
          destination.</t>

          <t>Clients use Subnet Router Anycast address as the encapsulation
          source address when the access network does not provide a
          topologically-fixed address.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
