<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-03" ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="EST Alternative Challenge Attributes">Alternative Challenge Password Attributes for Enrollment over Secure Transport</title>
    <author initials="M." surname="Pritikin" fullname="Max Pritikin">
      <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>510 McCarthy Drive</street>
          <city>Milpitas</city>
          <region>CA</region>
          <code>95035</code>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>pritikin@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Wallace" fullname="Carl Wallace">
      <organization>Red Hound Software, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>carl@redhoundsoftware.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date/>
    <area>Security</area>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <keyword>Enrollment over Secure Transport</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines a set of new Certificate Signing Request attributes for use with the Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST) protocol.  These attributes provide disambiguation of the existing overloaded uses for the PKCS #9 challengePassword attribute. Uses include the original certificate revocation password, common authentication password uses, and EST-defined linking of transport security identity. 
</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction" anchor="intro">
      <t>PKCS #9 <xref target="RFC2985"/> defined a challengePassword attribute that has been overloaded by modern protocol usage with the appropriate interpretation being provided by context rather than OID definition. PKCS #9 defines the challengePassword attribute as “a password by which an entity may request certificate revocation”. The parsing and embedding of this attribute within Certificate Signing Requests is well supported by common PKI tool sets, but many work-flows leverage this supported field as a One-Time Password for authentication. For example this is codified in many SCEP implementations as indicated by <xref target="I-D.gutmann-scep"/>. Continuing this trend, Enrollment over Secure Transport <xref target="RFC7030"/> defines an additional semantic for the challengePassword attribute in Section 3.5, in order to provide a linking of the Certificate Signing Request to the secure transport. </t>
      <t>Where the context of the protocol operation fully defined the proper semantic, and when only one use was required at a time, the overloading of this field did not cause difficulties. Implementation experience with EST has shown this to be a limitation though. There are plausible use cases where it is valuable to use either of the existing methods separately or in concert. For example an EST server might require the client to authenticate itself using the existing client X.509 certificate, the user’s username and password and to include a One-Time Password within the Certificate Signing Request all while maintaining identity linking to bind the CSR to the secure transport. The overloading of a single attribute type should not be the limiting factor for administrators attempting to meet their security requirements.</t>
      <t>This document defines the otpChallenge attribute for use when a one-time password (OTP) value within the CSR is a requirement.  The revocationChallenge attribute is defined to allow disambiguated usage of the original challenge password attribute semantics for certificate revocation. The estIdentityLinking attribute is defined to reference existing EST challenge password semantics with no potential for confusion with legacy challenge password practices.
</t>  
<t>The attributes defined in this specification supplement existing EST mechanisms and is not intended to displace current usage of any existing EST authentication mechanisms. Conveying the authentication value itself as an attribute may be preferable to using an HTTP or TLS password or other TLS authentication mechanism in environments where the certificate request processing component is removed from the HTTP/TLS termination point, for example, when a web application firewall is used.
</t>
    </section>
    <section title="Terminology" anchor="terms">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
        this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section title="Alternative Challenge Password Attributes" anchor="attributes">
      <t>The following sections describe three alternative challenge password attributes for use with EST <xref target="RFC7030"/>. Appendix A provides an ASN.1 module containing the new definitions.</t>
      <t>Each attribute described below is defined as a DirectoryString, which features several possible encoding options. Attribute values generated in accordance this document SHOULD use the PrintableString encoding whenever possible. If internationalization issues make this impossible, the UTF8String alternative SHOULD be used.  Attribute processing systems MUST be able to recognize and process the PrintableString and UTF8String string types in DirectoryString values. Support for other string types is OPTIONAL.</t>
    <section title="OTP Challenge Attribute" anchor="sfattribute">
    <t>The otpChallenge attribute is defined as a DirectoryString with an upper bound of 255. This is consistent with the challengePassword attribute as originally defined in PKCS#9. The otpChallenge attribute is identified by the id-otpChallenge object identifier.  This facilitates reuse of existing challengePassword code by associating the new object identifiers with the existing parsing and generation code.  This attribute provides a means of conveying a one-time password value as part of a CSR request. Generation, verification, storage, etc. of the values is not addressed by this specification.
</t>  
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
   ub-otpChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
   id-otpChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
       id-smime TBD1
   }   
   otpChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
       WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-otpChallenge}
       EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
       SINGLE VALUE TRUE
       ID id-otpChallenge
   }   
           ]]></artwork>
      </figure>    
    </section>
    <section title="PKCS #9 Challenge Password Attribute" anchor="p9attribute">
    <t>The original PKCS#9 challengePassword field has been overloaded and the common use is unclear. The revocationChallenge attribute defined here provides an unambiguous method of indicating the original PKCS#9 intent for this attribute type. The revocation Challenge attribute is identified by the id-revocationChallenge object identifier.  <xref target="RFC2985"/> discusses the original semantics for the PKCS #9 challenge password attribute.</t>  
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
   ub-revocationChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
   id-revocationChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
       id-smime TBD2
   }   
   revocationChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
       WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-revocationChallenge}
       EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
       SINGLE VALUE TRUE
       ID id-revocationChallenge
   }   
           ]]></artwork>
      </figure>    
    </section>
    <section title="EST Identity Linking Attribute" anchor="estattribute">
    <t>EST defines a mechanism for associating identity information from an authenticated TLS session with proof-of-possession information in a certificate request. The mechanism was labeled using the pkcs-9-at-challengePassword identifier from <xref target="RFC2985"/>. To avoid any confusion with the semantics described in <xref target="RFC2985"/> or any other specifications that similarly defined use of the PKCS #9 challenge password attribute for their own purposes, a new object identifier is defined here and associated with the semantics described in section 3.5 of <xref target="RFC7030"/>.</t>  
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
   ub-est-identity-linking INTEGER ::= 255
   id-estIdentityLinking OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
       id-smime TBD3
   }   
   estIdentityLinking ATTRIBUTE ::= {
       WITH SYNTAX DirectoryString {ub-est-identity-linking}
       EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseExactMatch
       SINGLE VALUE TRUE
       ID id-estIdentityLinking
   }   
           ]]></artwork>
      </figure>    
    </section>
    </section>
    <section title="Indicating Support for the Alternative Challenge Password Attributes" anchor="support">
    <t>The EST server MAY indicate any or all of these in the /csrattrs. The EST client SHOULD include the indicated attributes in the subsequent CSR. The EST server can of course refuse enrollment requests that are not encoded according to the CA's policy.</t> <t>Note that the “estIdentityLinking" attribute is a disambiguated alternative to the overloading of the “challengePassword” in section 3.5 of <xref target="RFC7030"/>, therefore any EST server that requests “estIdentityLinking” MUST check the <xref target="RFC7030"/> “challengePassword” as specified in <xref target="RFC7030"/> as well as the “estIdentityLinking” requested in order to support legacy EST clients. EST clients that include the “estIdentityLinking” attribute SHOULD NOT also include the “challengePassword” attribute.</t>  
    </section>
    <section title="Security Considerations" anchor="security">
        <t>In addition to the security considerations expressed in the EST specification <xref target="RFC7030"/>, additional security considerations may be associated with the mechanism used to generate and verify the otpChallenge value. Where a one-time password is used, the security considerations expressed in the HOTP <xref target="RFC4226"/> or TOTP <xref target="RFC6238"/> specifications may be relevant. Similarly, the security considerations from <xref target="RFC2985"/> that apply to the challenge attribute are relevant as well.</t>
    </section>
    <section title="IANA Considerations" anchor="iana">
    <t>Section 3 defines an OID (id-otpChallenge) that should be assigned in the S/MIME arc maintained by IANA as described in section 3.5 of <xref target="RFC7107"/>.</t>
    <t>Appendix A defines an OID (EST-Alt-Challenge-Module) that should be assigned in the PKIX arc maintained by IANA as described in section 3.3 of <xref target="RFC7299"/>.</t>
    <figure>
    <artwork><![CDATA[
            Value     Description                        Reference
            --------  ---------------------------------  ---------
            TBD1      id-otpChallenge                    [RFC7107]
            TBD2      id-revocationChallenge             [RFC7107]
            TBD3      id-estIdentityLinking              [RFC7107]
            TBD4      EST-Alt-Challenge-Module           [RFC7299]
            ]]></artwork>
    </figure>    
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5272.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5280.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5912.xml"?>
    </references>
    <references title="Informative References">
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2985.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4226.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6238.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7030.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7107.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7299.xml"?>
	<?rfc include="reference.I-D.draft-gutmann-scep-01.xml"?>
    </references>
    <section title="ASN.1 Module" anchor="asn1">
      <t>The following ASN.1 module includes the definitions to support usage of the attributes defined in this specification. Modules from <xref target="RFC5912"/> are imported (original standards-track source for the imported structures is <xref target="RFC5280"/> and <xref target="RFC5272"/>.</t>
      <figure>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
EST-Alt-Challenge-Module { 
   id-pkix TBD4 
}

DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
IMPORTS

DirectoryString{}
FROM PKIX1Explicit-2009 {
   iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
   mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-pkix1-explicit-02(51) 
}
	  
ATTRIBUTE
FROM PKIX-CommonTypes-2009 {
   iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
   mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-pkixCommon-02(57)
};   

ub-otpChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
id-otpChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
   iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) 
   smime(16) aa(2) TBD
}   
otpChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
   TYPE DirectoryString {ub-otpChallenge}
   COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
   IDENTIFIED BY id-otpChallenge
}   
ub-revocationChallenge INTEGER ::= 255
id-revocationChallenge OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
   iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) 
   smime(16) aa(2) TBD2
}   
revocationChallenge ATTRIBUTE ::= {
   TYPE DirectoryString {ub-revocationChallenge}
   COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
   IDENTIFIED BY id-revocationChallenge
}  
ub-est-identity-linking INTEGER ::= 255
id-estIdentityLinking OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 
   iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) 
   smime(16) aa(2) TBD3
}   
estIdentityLinking ATTRIBUTE ::= {
   TYPE DirectoryString {ub-est-identity-linking}
   COUNTS MIN 1 MAX 1
   IDENTIFIED BY id-estIdentityLinking
}    
END   
           ]]></artwork>
      </figure>
    </section>
    <section title="Acknowledgements" anchor="acknowledgements">
      <t>Thanks to Phil Scheffler, Geoff Beier, Mike Jenkins and Deb Cooley for their feedback.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
