rfc4510









Network Working Group                                   K. Zeilenga, Ed.
Request for Comments: 4510                           OpenLDAP Foundation
Obsoletes: 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255,                       June 2006
           2256, 2829, 2830, 3377, 3771
Category: Standards Track


             Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
                    Technical Specification Road Map

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

   The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet
   protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in
   accordance with X.500 data and service models.  This document
   provides a road map of the LDAP Technical Specification.

1.  The LDAP Technical Specification

   The technical specification detailing version 3 of the Lightweight
   Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), an Internet Protocol, consists of
   this document and the following documents:

      LDAP: The Protocol [RFC4511]
      LDAP: Directory Information Models [RFC4512]
      LDAP: Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms [RFC4513]
      LDAP: String Representation of Distinguished Names [RFC4514]
      LDAP: String Representation of Search Filters [RFC4515]
      LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator [RFC4516]
      LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules [RFC4517]
      LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation [RFC4518]
      LDAP: Schema for User Applications [RFC4519]







Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


   The terms "LDAP" and "LDAPv3" are commonly used to refer informally
   to the protocol specified by this technical specification.  The LDAP
   suite, as defined here, should be formally identified in other
   documents by a normative reference to this document.

   LDAP is an extensible protocol.  Extensions to LDAP may be specified
   in other documents.  Nomenclature denoting such combinations of
   LDAP-plus-extensions is not defined by this document but may be
   defined in some future document(s).  Extensions are expected to be
   truly optional.  Considerations for the LDAP extensions described in
   BCP 118, RFC 4521 [RFC4521] fully apply to this revision of the LDAP
   Technical Specification.

   IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) considerations for LDAP
   described in BCP 64, RFC 4520 [RFC4520] apply fully to this revision
   of the LDAP technical specification.

1.1.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].

2.  Relationship to X.500

   This technical specification defines LDAP in terms of [X.500] as an
   X.500 access mechanism.  An LDAP server MUST act in accordance with
   the X.500 (1993) series of International Telecommunication Union -
   Telecommunication Standardization (ITU-T) Recommendations when
   providing the service.  However, it is not required that an LDAP
   server make use of any X.500 protocols in providing this service.
   For example, LDAP can be mapped onto any other directory system so
   long as the X.500 data and service models [X.501][X.511], as used in
   LDAP, are not violated in the LDAP interface.

   This technical specification explicitly incorporates portions of
   X.500(93).  Later revisions of X.500 do not automatically apply to
   this technical specification.

3.  Relationship to Obsolete Specifications

   This technical specification, as defined in Section 1, obsoletes
   entirely the previously defined LDAP technical specification defined
   in RFC 3377 (and consisting of RFCs 2251-2256, 2829, 2830, 3771, and
   3377 itself).  The technical specification was significantly
   reorganized.





Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


   This document replaces RFC 3377 as well as Section 3.3 of RFC 2251.
   [RFC4512] replaces portions of RFC 2251, RFC 2252, and RFC 2256.
   [RFC4511] replaces the majority RFC 2251, portions of RFC 2252, and
   all of RFC 3771.  [RFC4513] replaces RFC 2829, RFC 2830, and portions
   of RFC 2251.  [RFC4517] replaces the majority of RFC 2252 and
   portions of RFC 2256.  [RFC4519] replaces the majority of RFC 2256.
   [RFC4514] replaces RFC 2253.  [RFC4515] replaces RFC 2254.  [RFC4516]
   replaces RFC 2255.

   [RFC4518] is new to this revision of the LDAP technical
   specification.

   Each document of this specification contains appendices summarizing
   changes to all sections of the specifications they replace.  Appendix
   A.1 of this document details changes made to RFC 3377.  Appendix A.2
   of this document details changes made to Section 3.3 of RFC 2251.

   Additionally, portions of this technical specification update and/or
   replace a number of other documents not listed above.  These
   relationships are discussed in the documents detailing these portions
   of this technical specification.

4.  Security Considerations

   LDAP security considerations are discussed in each document
   comprising the technical specification.

5.  Acknowledgements

   This document is based largely on RFC 3377 by J. Hodges and R.
   Morgan, a product of the LDAPBIS and LDAPEXT Working Groups.  The
   document also borrows from RFC 2251 by M. Wahl, T. Howes, and S.
   Kille, a product of the ASID Working Group.

   This document is a product of the IETF LDAPBIS Working Group.
















Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]     Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
                 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4511]     Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006.

   [RFC4512]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June
                 2006.

   [RFC4513]     Harrison, R., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security
                 Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006.

   [RFC4514]     Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished
                 Names", RFC 4514, June 2006.

   [RFC4515]     Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Search
                 Filters", RFC 4515, June 2006.

   [RFC4516]     Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator", RFC
                 4516, June 2006.

   [RFC4517]     Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RFC 4517, June
                 2006.

   [RFC4518]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Internationalized String Preparation", RFC
                 4518, June 2006.

   [RFC4519]     Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC
                 4519, June 2006.

   [RFC4520]     Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
                 (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006.

   [RFC4521]     Zeilenga, K., "Considerations for LDAP Extensions", BCP
                 118, RFC 4521, June 2006.





Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


   [X.500]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory -- Overview of concepts, models and
                 services", X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994).

   [X.501]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory -- Models", X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-
                 2:1994).

   [X.511]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory: Abstract Service Definition", X.511(1993)
                 (also ISO/IEC 9594-3:1993).





































Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


Appendix A.  Changes to Previous Documents

   This appendix outlines changes this document makes relative to the
   documents it replaces (in whole or in part).

A.1. Changes to RFC 3377

   This document is nearly a complete rewrite of RFC 3377 as much of the
   material of RFC 3377 is no longer applicable.  The changes include
   redefining the terms "LDAP" and "LDAPv3" to refer to this revision of
   the technical specification.

A.2. Changes to Section 3.3 of RFC 2251

   The section was modified slightly (the word "document" was replaced
   with "technical specification") to clarify that it applies to the
   entire LDAP technical specification.

Author's Address

   Kurt D. Zeilenga
   OpenLDAP Foundation

   EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org



























Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 4510                   LDAP: TS Road Map                   June 2006


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).







Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 7]



ERRATA